logo
Countries refusing to take back illegal migrants could be stripped of visas

Countries refusing to take back illegal migrants could be stripped of visas

Telegraph17-06-2025

Countries refusing to take back migrants who arrive illegally in the UK could be stripped of visas under new plans being scrutinised by Sir Keir Starmer.
The Prime Minister said he was looking at taking a more 'transactional' approach to returns agreements and how to treat nations that refuse to sign one with the UK.
Sir Keir brought up the idea with fellow world leaders at the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Canada, as he pressed European counterparts to do more to tackle the small boats crisis.
The number of people arriving in the UK on small boats across the Channel so far this year is around 40 per cent higher than it was last year.
The crossings have piled pressure on the Government to go further to tackle the problem, with concern seen to be contributing to the surging popularity of Nigel Farage's Reform UK.
The UK has returns agreements with countries including Albania, India, Pakistan, Vietnam, Iraq, Nigeria, Bangladesh, Georgia, Somalia, Serbia, and Algeria. Each is different – but broadly, they include a commitment to take back citizens who have no right to stay in the UK, such as failed asylum seekers and foreign criminals.
Speaking to reporters at the summit, Sir Keir said he had raised the idea of linking returns agreements to visas in a round table discussion on Monday.
He said he had 'made clear that we are looking at issues like a smarter use of our visas', saying that included 'looking at whether we should tie our visas to the work that the countries we're dealing with are doing on preventative measures and on returns agreements '.
The Prime Minister said: 'We are looking at what we can do on returns agreements. We have done a number of bilateral returns agreements.
'So the question is, again, whether it is possible to go a bit beyond that, including looking at this question of visas now and whether we can't be a bit smarter with the use of our visas in relation to countries that don't have a returns agreement with us'.
Asked whether that meant countries that refused to sign returns agreements being stripped of visas, he said: 'Yeah – it would be much more sort of transactional, if you like.
'Now we're looking into it, but certainly I think there are areas like that that we should look more closely at.'
Sir Keir also had discussions with the leaders of France, Italy and Germany about where they could cooperate more deeply to tackle the small boats crisis.
His talks with Emmanuel Macron, the French president, included discussing 'innovative ways' to tackle the flow of boats, according to a Downing Street spokesman.
There is a UK-France summit next month, at which it seems likely that a new package of measures could be announced to counter the crisis.
The Downing Street readout of the Starmer-Macron bilateral meeting made mention of the 'deteriorating situation in the Channel', an apparent reference to the high number of crossings this year.
Asked whether that amounted to an admission of failure on small boats in his first months in office, Sir Keir said: 'Look, there's a serious situation in relation to the Channel crossings and, as I've said on a number of occasions, nobody should be making that crossing. It is a serious challenge that requires serious responses to it.'
Sir Keir said his conversations with Giorgia Meloni, the Italian prime minister, focused on what could be done 'upstream' – an area in which Ms Meloni has had 'some success in reducing her own numbers', the Prime Minister added.
He also talked to Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, attending his first G7 summit, about the problem of how some of the boats used for crossings often are moved through Germany.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man Utd chief gives major update on £2billion new stadium and reveals why ‘Wembley of the North' plan might NOT happen
Man Utd chief gives major update on £2billion new stadium and reveals why ‘Wembley of the North' plan might NOT happen

The Sun

time32 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Man Utd chief gives major update on £2billion new stadium and reveals why ‘Wembley of the North' plan might NOT happen

MANCHESTER UNITED chief Omar Berrada has given the clearest indication yet that the club will only build a new stadium if it receives financial backing from the government. Earlier this year minority United owner and billionaire Sir Jim Ratcliffe unveiled ambitious new plans for a £2bn stadium which would hold 100,000 fans and be built next to the current Old Trafford. 6 6 Sir Jim said plans to regenerate the area around the stadium with 17,000 homes, shops, restaurants and hotels, would boost the UK economy by £7.3bn. But the plans could only go ahead if the surrounding area was developed using taxpayers' money. In a recent interview with Red Issue fanzine, Berada said: 'We still see the stadium as the catalyst for the wider regeneration project. "So we do need the government to commit to developing the area around the stadium for it to make sense. 'Without it it doesn't make sense for us to build the stadium as a standalone. "We believe that it could be a catalyst for one of the biggest, if not the biggest regeneration projects that this area of the country has ever seen. 'And it'll bring benefits for the wider community in terms of home, jobs, health, and all that, that can yield an enormous amount of positive impact. "Hopefully the government will support it and put the funds behind it.' Concept images of the ground have teased a huge wraparound scoreboard, along with a three-storey museum and canal-side restaurants as part of a vast fan village. If the plans do go ahead United will be able to continue playing at Old Trafford during the construction process, before demolishing the historic ground once they move into their new home. Man Utd reveal first pics of redeveloped 100,000-capacity Old Trafford in 'biggest regeneration scheme ever seen' During the announcement of the ambitious project, Ratcliffe said: "Our current stadium has served us brilliantly for the past 115 years, but it has fallen behind the best arenas in world sport. "By building next to the existing site, we will be able to preserve the essence of Old Trafford, while creating a truly state-of-the-art stadium that transforms the fan experience, only footsteps from our historic home." 6 6 6 6

Kneecap's Glastonbury set will not be broadcast live, BBC confirms
Kneecap's Glastonbury set will not be broadcast live, BBC confirms

The Guardian

time35 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Kneecap's Glastonbury set will not be broadcast live, BBC confirms

Kneecap's Glastonbury set will not be broadcast live, the BBC has confirmed. The rap trio said the corporation had contacted them to say their performance would be available online on iPlayer from Saturday evening. The group were due to perform on the West Holts stage at 4pm on Saturday, despite criticism from the UK prime minister, Keir Starmer, who said they should be banned from the festival after the band member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, known as Mo Chara, was charged with a terrorism offence. The 27-year-old is accused of displaying a flag representing Hezbollah, a proscribed organisation, at a gig in November last year, a charge he denies. The BBC said the band's set would not be streamed live, 'but we look to make an on-demand version available'. A BBC spokesperson said: 'As the broadcast partner, the BBC is bringing audiences extensive music coverage from Glastonbury, with artists booked by the festival organisers. 'Whilst the BBC doesn't ban artists, our plans ensure that our programming meets our editorial guidelines. 'We don't always livestream every act from the main stages and look to make an on-demand version of Kneecap's performance available on our digital platforms, alongside more than 90 other sets.'

EU ‘cannot linger at the margins' of Gaza conflict, says former top diplomat
EU ‘cannot linger at the margins' of Gaza conflict, says former top diplomat

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

EU ‘cannot linger at the margins' of Gaza conflict, says former top diplomat

The EU must come up with a more assertive response to the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza and the violations of international law, the bloc's former chief diplomat has said. In a strongly worded article, Josep Borrell said the EU had a 'duty' to intervene and must come up with its own concerted plan to end the war instead of relying on the US. 'Europe can no longer afford to linger at the margins,' he said in the article that was co-authored with Kalypso Nicolaïdis, an occasional adviser to the EU and professorial chair in international affairs at the Florence school of transnational governance at the European University Institute. 'The EU needs a concerted plan. 'Not only is Europe's own security at stake, but more important, European history imposes a duty on Europeans to intervene in response to Israel's violations of international law,' they say, adding: 'Europeans cannot stay the hapless fools in this tragic story, dishing out cash with their eyes closed.' Their intervention in Foreign Affairs magazine comes as EU member states continue to struggle to unite on action. Last week Borrell's successor, Kaja Kallas, said it was 'very clear' that Israel had breached its human rights commitments in Gaza but said the 'concrete question' was what action the member states could agree on. Her remarks were made after a review of the EU-Israel association agreement, a trade and cooperation pact, was triggered last month by 17 member states in protest at Israel's blockade of humanitarian aid to Gaza. Last month Borrell launched a blistering attack on Israel accusing it of 'carrying out the largest ethnic-cleansing operation since the end of the second world war'. The authors say there are ways and lessons from the past to guide EU member states who want to take action without having to get buy-in from countries reluctant to do so, for historical reasons, including Germany, Hungary and Austria. They suggest a number of actions, from using the EU's financial leverage, to suspending Israel's presence in EU programmes such as the Erasmus+ student exchange. They also suggest EU member states could explore using article 20 of the EU's treaty to 'allow for at least nine member states to come together to utilise certain foreign policy tools not related to defence'. 'Because such an action has never been taken before, those states would have to explore what [it] … would concretely allow them to do,' the article said. Borrell and Nicolaidïs argue that the disunity in the EU has reduced what should be a powerful mediating voice in the Middle East into a bit player. 'Some EU leaders cautiously backed the international criminal court's investigations, while others, such as Austria and Germany, have declined to implement its arrest warrants against Israeli officials,' they say. 'And because EU member states, beginning with Germany and Hungary, could not agree on whether to revisit the union's trade policy with Israel, the EU continues to be Israel's largest trading partner. 'As a result, the EU, as a bloc, has been largely relegated to the sidelines, divided internally and overshadowed in ceasefire diplomacy by the United States and regional actors such as Egypt and Qatar. Shouldn't the EU also have acted as a mediator?'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store