UN Expert Urges Saudi Arabia To Halt Imminent Execution Of 26 Egyptian Nationals For Drug-Related Offences
The Government of Saudi Arabia must immediately halt the reportedly imminent execution of 26 Egyptian nationals sentenced to death for drug-related offences, in violation of international law, an UN expert said today.
'The Government's claim that applying the death penalty for offences such as smuggling, receiving and distributing narcotic substances under the Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances Act complies with international law is incompatible with its legal obligations under International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,' said Morris Tidball-Binz, the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions.
'The right not to be arbitrarily deprived of life is a fundamental tenet of international law, from which no derogation is permitted,' Tidball-Binz said.
The 26 Egyptian nationals, currently held on death row in Tabouk prison, have reportedly been informed that their executions will take place shortly after the Eid al-Adha holidays. This follows the execution of two other Egyptians from the same group, carried out on 24 and 25 May respectively, without prior notification to their families.
UN experts previously raised these cases with the Government of Saudi Arabia in a formal communication, to which the Government responded.
'The death penalty for drug-related offences fails to meet the threshold of the 'most serious crimes, and lacks conclusive evidence of serving as an effective deterrent,' the expert said.
According to court documents reviewed by the expert, some of the Egyptian prisoners were denied legal representation, while others were convicted based on self-incriminating statements which they later retracted in court, claiming that they were made under coercion.
'The right to effective legal representation must be ensured at all stages of criminal proceedings – during interrogations, preliminary hearings, trial, and appeal – and constitutes an effective safeguard against torture and other forms of ill-treatment,' the expert said. 'Violations of fair trial guarantees leading to the imposition of the death penalty render such sentences arbitrary and unlawful,' he added.
Since the beginning of 2025, Saudi Arabia has reportedly executed 141 individuals, approximately 68 of whom were foreign nationals. The vast majority were reportedly executed for non-lethal drug offences, in clear violation of international law.
Imposing death sentences and carrying out executions for such offences significantly increases the number of people worldwide subjected to punishments fundamentally incompatible with human rights norms, and amounting to arbitrary deprivation of life.
'I urgently call on the Government of Saudi Arabia to halt the planned executions of the 26 Egyptian nationals, to abolish the death penalty for drug-related offences, and to ensure that its drug control policies fully comply with its international human rights obligations, notably the right to life,' the expert said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
an hour ago
- Newsroom
Human rights body hooked by phishing scam
New Zealand's peak human rights body has overhauled its financial systems after falling for a cyber scam and paying an employee's salary into a fraudulent account. Payroll errors at the Human Rights Commission, which also overpaid its commissioners after incorrectly calculating their KiwiSaver contributions, come after two rounds of restructuring following funding cuts from the coalition Government.
Otago Daily Times
6 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
ECan to debate future of local government
Environment Canterbury will hold a workshop on Wednesday, July 9, to debate possible new models for regional government. The workshop follows comments from Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Resources Minister Shane Jones suggesting regional councils could be abolished as part of the Resource Management Act (RMA) reforms. ECan chairperson Craig Pauling said while the recent commentary was ''unhelpful'', a conversation was needed and should involve all levels of government and iwi partners. ''Significant local government and resource management reform has been on Government agendas for some time. ''As a council we agree the current structure and funding for local government needs work. ''Instead of waiting for the Government to make changes, we've proactively been doing work at our council to understand how the reforms might impact Canterbury, and what we can do to ensure good outcomes for our natural resources, our communities and our economy.'' Mr Pauling said the workshop will give councillors an opportunity to discuss representation, local voice, and what services and regulatory functions could be best delivered at a national, regional or local level. ''We're not going to land on a specific structure, or proposed future-state. ''Today's workshop gives us the opportunity to discuss the whole ecosystem of local government decision making, and to test some ideas with each other.'' Deputy chairperson Deon Swiggs said the workshop builds on the momentum from the May council meeting, where councillors reached shared positions on key issues for the region. ''Canterbury's scale, diverse landscapes, and active economies present both opportunities and responsibilities. ''We're a region shaped by a unique environment and strong local industries, and require tailored approaches to our place.'' Dr Swiggs said he believed ECan is is well placed to contribute constructively to national conversations on the future of local government. Former Waimakariri District Council chief executive Jim Palmer led a review of local government, with a report presented to Parliament in 2023. He said unitary authorities or ''combined networked councils'' were possible alternatives, but each region is different. Unitary authorities require ''a certain critical mass to operate effectively'', he said. A combined networked council is where local councils appoint representatives to make decisions at a regional level, similar to the Greater Christchurch Partnership, which brings together representatives from the Christchurch, Selwyn and Waimakariri councils and ECan. Kaikōura Mayor Craig Mackle and Hurunui Mayor Marie Black have both indicated they are open to change, but did not believe their districts had the capacity to form unitary authorities on their own. Mrs Black said the Canterbury Mayoral Forum, a forum of the region's mayors, has worked well this term as the mayors have ''brought into the mantra, if it's good for one, it's got to be good for all''. Christchurch Mayor Phil Mauger has expressed support for a unitary authority. The workshop will run from 10.30am on today (Wednesday, July 9) and will be livestreamed on the Canterbury Regional Council YouTube channel. By David Hill, Local Democracy Reporter ■ LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Scoop
7 hours ago
- Scoop
UN Experts Alarmed By Resumption Of US Deportations To Third Countries, Warn Authorities To Assess Risks Of Torture
GENEVA (8 July 2025) - UN human rights experts today sounded the alarm at the human rights implications of a recent ruling by the United States' Supreme Court that paves the way for deportations of foreign nationals to third countries. The Trump administration's deportation policy allows irregular migrants to be transferred to countries other than their own. 'To protect people from torture and other prohibited cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, enforced disappearances, and risks to life, they must be given an opportunity to express their objections to removal in a legally supervised procedure,' the experts said. 'The US' expedited removal procedure could allow people to be taken to a country other than their own in as little as a single day, without an immigration court hearing or other appearance before a judge,' they said. 'International law is clear that no one shall be sent anywhere where there are substantial grounds for believing that the person would be in danger of being subjected to serious human rights violations such as torture, enforced disappearance or arbitrary deprivation of life,' the experts said. 'That assessment must be individual as well as country-specific.' They recalled that the United States had accepted obligations to prevent refoulement as enshrined, inter alia, in Article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, implicit in Articles 6 and 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and Article 33 of the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees pursuant to its ratification of the 1967 Protocol. 'Other countries that have attempted to outsource their responsibilities have left people stranded in far away places, arbitrarily detained for years on end, and at risk of torture and other inhuman treatment, trafficking, or enforced disappearance,' the experts warned. 'Any diplomatic assurances as to the safety of transferred migrants provided by other countries cannot be taken at face value. The US is required to make a full assessment under its non-refoulement obligations.' 'We urge the United States' Government to refrain from any further removals to third countries, to ensure effective access to legal assistance for those facing deportation, and all such procedures to be subject to independent judicial oversight.' On 23 June 2025, the Supreme Court suspended a lower court order that had blocked forcible removals of foreign nationals to countries not their own due to concerns they had been implemented without adequate human rights safeguards. The specific case involved eight migrants from Myanmar, Cuba, South Sudan, Mexico, Laos and Vietnam, who were deported on a plane reported to be destined for South Sudan. 'It is with deep worry that we understand that the individuals have now been moved from Djibouti, where they were being held on a US military base, and onto South Sudan.' The experts have raised their concerns previously in writing to the Government of the United States and will continue to monitor developments. *The experts: Alice Jill Edwards, the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; Gehad Madi, the Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants; Morris Tidball-Binz, the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions; Margaret Satterthwaite , the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers; Ben Saul, the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism; Siobhán Mullally, the Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially women and children; Gabriella Citroni, (Chair-Rapporteur), Grażyna Baranowska (Vice-Chair), Aua Baldé, Ana Lorena Delgadillo Pérez, Mohammed Al-Obaidi, the .
