Canada won't let this Afghan refugee in from the U.S. His family worries the Taliban might kill him back home
Jalali, her husband, their four adult children and daughter-in-law all found asylum in Canada after fleeing the Taliban's rule in Afghanistan in 2024.
The family secured humanitarian visas from Brazil and paid human smugglers thousands of dollars to guide them by land through 10 countries, including Peru, Ecuador, Colombia, as well as the Darién Gap, a 100-kilometre stretch of jungle connecting North and South America that's considered one of the most treacherous migration pathways in the world.
"We knew that we might lose our lives," 57-year-old Jalali told CBC News through a Farsi translator. "But we were still hopeful to make it."
Although they didn't travel as a family unit, everyone made it to Canada safely and was granted refugee protection — except Jalali's youngest son, Mohammad. The 27-year-old was arrested by ICE agents in Arizona and has been in an immigration detention facility in Livingston, Texas, just north of Houston, for nearly a year. Jalali says she fears U.S. officials will send Younesi back to Afghanistan, where he was previously tortured by the Taliban for his human rights work. "I want the Canadian government to help my son, so that he can come here and be united with us, so that we can have a normal life," said Jalali.
"He is not doing well."
Under the Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement, people must claim asylum in whichever country they get to first, which means they can't leave the U.S. to seek refugee status in Canada — although there are some exceptions, including for family members of Canadian citizens or permanent residents, like Younesi.
A U.S. judge has granted Younesi permission to travel to the Canadian border to claim asylum. But his lawyer's petition to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada for a temporary resident permit to allow that was rejected in June.
"He is currently facing removal to Afghanistan," said Erin Simpson with the firm Landings LLP.
In a letter to Simpson, a deputy migration program officer at the Consulate General of Canada's Los Angeles office wrote that temporary resident permits "can be issued only in exceptional circumstances, or on occasion, when compelling Canadian interests are served. After a careful and sympathetic review balancing all of the factors, I have determined that there are insufficient grounds to merit the issuance of a permit in your case."
In an email statement to CBC News, the Ministry of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada wrote that due to privacy legislation, it could not comment on Younesi's case.
It is absolutely not an overstatement to say that it is a matter of life and death. - Erin Simpson, Mohammad Younesi's lawyer
"It is absolutely not an overstatement to say that it is a matter of life and death," said Simpson. "And that has been our consistent message to the [immigration] minister and our plea for this permit to be issued."
According to a signed affidavit submitted to U.S. officials, Younesi fled Afghanistan after being kidnapped, beaten and forced to perform field labour in December 2023 because of his work with an NGO assisting vulnerable women and girls. "My life is in danger in Afghanistan, and returning would mean facing violence and persecution by the Taliban once again," reads the sworn declaration.
The Taliban retook control of the country in 2021 after the withdrawal of U.S. forces and other allies. The United Nations reports that women's rights have deteriorated drastically as a result, with "oppressive directives that target the rights, autonomy, and very existence of Afghan women and girls."
Younesi said he escaped by running away after being sent to work in the fields. "I seized the opportunity to flee and hid in my aunt's house. Since then, the Taliban have continued searching for me, forcing me to flee Afghanistan." Younesi left Afghanistan with his brother and pregnant sister-in-law in July 2024. The trio travelled to Iran, where they obtained a humanitarian visa to go to Brazil. They made the arduous journey through South and Central America together, but were separated in Mexico. Although the expectant couple were detained briefly by immigration officials in California, they were allowed to continue their travels to Canada, unlike Younesi who was arrested and held by U.S. authorities.
Soon afterward, Jalali, her husband and three adult children made the same journey. They, too, were arrested by ICE officials, but were eventually released from custody with instructions to attend U.S. immigration court hearings. After that, they continued on their journey to Canada to claim asylum. "Anyone who ends up [in detention] would be scared. It was scary for us and it's scarier for Mohammad, because he has been there for a much longer time," said Jalali, who often speaks to her son by phone.
"He says that he doesn't know what will happen to him and to his life."
Jalali and her family are being housed by Romero House, a refugee settlement centre in Toronto. The organization's executive director, Francesca Allodi-Ross, said the family has had difficulty celebrating the fact they've been accepted as refugees with Younesi's future in question.
"It's very difficult for the family to really move forward with this hanging over them," said Allodi-Ross.
"We know what's happening in the U.S. It's very unpredictable. People are being deported to countries that are not even their own, like El Salvador or Mexico or Sudan. And so every day that passes, there's a risk that he will be sent somewhere unsafe."
Unable to hold back her tears, Jalali said she has a hard time sleeping, eating or going out knowing her son is incarcerated in the U.S.
"I have been there and when I think about Mohammad, it just breaks my heart."
Allodi-Ross said Younesi is alone and has no one to protect him. But that could change.
"I think there's a lot of talk about what it means to be Canadian right now," she said.
"Being a place of welcome for refugees and immigrants and people who want to build a better life, is an important part of who we are. And so I'm calling on the Canadian government to live up to that reputation and take this simple, humane act of granting the temporary resident permit for Mohammad and helping him reunite with his family and be safe."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Players' associations urge Congress to reject proposed bill granting NCAA antitrust exemption
Players' associations for the NFL, NBA, Major League Baseball, NHL and MLS issued a joint statement Monday urging Congress to reject proposed legislation that would grant the NCAA and its members an antitrust exemption to address NIL issues. The statement was in response to the Student Compensation and Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements (SCORE) Act, introduced last week by members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. A markup on the bill is scheduled for Tuesday morning. Advertisement In their letter, the players' associations warned that an antitrust exemption would permit the NCAA and its members to 'collude to harm athletes.' 'Whatever progress the athletes have made has been a result of their use of the antitrust laws,' they wrote. 'The SCORE Act would take that weapon away from them.' The proposed legislation from seven Republican and two Democratic sponsors prevents athletes from obtaining employment status and mirrors many of the terms from the recent House vs. NCAA settlement. It would officially end most administrative restrictions on athletes' NIL compensation, but it allows schools and conferences to establish what is and isn't permissible. Should the federal legislation pass, it would override current state NIL laws, which vary from state to state. Earlier Monday, two members of Congress from the state of Washington, Democratic Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, and Republican Rep. Michael Baumgartner, issued a similar statement urging the House committee to delay the markup until there are significant changes. Advertisement 'The bill appears to be a product of the richest conferences to cement into place the current power structure in college athletics that would leave only the wealthiest schools able to compete at the highest levels of college athletics,' the statement said. All of the Power 5 conferences previously issued a statement endorsing the SCORE Act. 'In the absence of federal standards, student-athletes and schools have been forced to navigate a fractured regulatory framework for too long,' they wrote. 'Following the historic House settlement, this bill represents a very encouraging step toward delivering the national clarity and accountability that college athletics desperately needs.' Advertisement Last week, the NCAA said in a statement that it 'has made long overdue changes, mandating health and wellness benefits and ushering in a new system for Division I programs to provide up to 50 percent of athletic department revenue to student-athletes, but some of the most important changes can only come from Congress.' 'This bill reflects many student-athletes' priorities, and the NCAA is committed to working with Congress to build a bipartisan path forward that ensures the long-term success of college sports and the ongoing opportunities they provide to young people,' wrote Tim Buckley, the NCAA's senior vice president of external affairs. SEC commissioner Greg Sankey also praised the bill Monday. 'I think what's happening in college athletics is a nonpartisan issue, but using the typical nomenclature, to have members of both of our major political parties willing to step out and introduce the SCORE Act, is a positive step,' he said. The players' associations' letter noted that only two industries in the United States have antitrust law exemptions: railroads and Major League Baseball (partially). Advertisement 'The NCAA should not have a blank check to impose (its) will on the financial future of over 500,000 college athletes,' they wrote. This article originally appeared in The Athletic. College Football, Men's College Basketball, Women's College Basketball, College Sports 2025 The Athletic Media Company

Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
APS board unanimously approves special election for building referendum
Jul. 14—In a unanimous vote, the Austin Public Schools Board on Monday night voted in favor of a two-question special election this November for a referendum to support building upgrades in the district. Voters will head to the ballot to answer the first question of the building referendum, which is not to exceed $54.7 million and that will be spread across eight buildings in the district. This money will go toward upgrades in each building that will include — among other things — safety, security and accessibility improvements. The second question authorizes $12 million for renovation of the 50-year-old Bud Higgins Pool at Ellis Middle School. This second question relies on the passing of the first question. In total, the district is asking voters to approve a total of $66.7 million. "I think if we can proactively take care of our buildings and make them functional and prepared for the next couple of decades, I think that would be a good investment on the community's part," said Board Chair Carolyn Dube. Board member Peggy Young agreed and added that this was the time to do it rather than kicking the can down the road. "The longer we postpone the more expensive it's going to be," Young said. "These are things that keep our buildings together. We have to be really good at telling folks that these repairs have to be done." READ MORE: APS considers possible referendum for November If passed, the impact to an average home worth $200,000 would increase by about $16. While board members were clearly in agreement about the need for the referendum, it didn't mean there weren't concerns ranging from the timing of bringing this election forward this year to how to get the word out. In particular, some board members referenced the current morale issues that have dominated discussions earlier this summer. "My concern is it's been a rough three or four months for the district, the board, the administration," said Board Member Don Leathers. "We need to do our darndest to win over the sliver of people that are a little bit mad at me and a little bit mad at you." Leathers also pushed for a unified effort to get the word out what the district was attempting to do, referencing a survey conducted early in the process that showed a willingness among community members to consider the questions. Cece Kroc on the other hand said she was worried about this being the only ballot item. "It could bring out more people that say, 'I don't want to pay any more,'" Kroc said. "I believe in the needed money, but there are concerns." However, conversations eventually returned to a will of avoiding postponing the referendum on the grounds of changing and likely rising costs of construction as well as a concern of what happens if the referendum doesn't pass. "My concern is if it doesn't pass we don't have $64 million sitting there in our general fund," Dan Zielke said, explaining that difficult discussions could arise in regard to possible cuts within the district. "If we have to spend this money, it comes from a different source." "What happens if this doesn't pass?" he added.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pentagon inks contracts for Musk's xAI, competitors
The Pentagon announced contracts on Monday with multiple leading US artificial intelligence firms including Elon Musk's xAI, which has faced intense scrutiny in recent days over anti-Semitic posts by its Grok chatbot. Each of the contracts to xAI, Anthropic, Google and OpenAI have a ceiling value of $200 million, the Pentagon's Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office (CDAO) said in a statement. The awards will enable the Department of Defense "to leverage the technology and talent of US frontier AI companies to develop agentic AI workflows across a variety of mission areas," it said. The contract with xAI comes just days after the company was forced to apologize again for controversial posts by its Grok chatbot. After an update on July 7, the chatbot praised Adolf Hitler in some responses on the X social media platform, denounced "anti-white hate," and described Jewish representation in Hollywood as "disproportionate." xAI apologized for the extremist and offensive messages, and said it had corrected the instructions that led to the incidents. The release on Wednesday of Grok 4, the latest chatbot version, was almost met with scrutiny after it appeared to consult Musk's positions on some questions it was asked before responding. The contract between xAI and the Department of Defense comes even as Musk and President Donald Trump have publicly feuded in recent weeks. Musk, a top backer of Trump's most recent presidential campaign, was entrusted with managing the new agency known as DOGE to massively slash government spending under the current administration. After ending his assignment in May, the South African-born entrepreneur publicly criticized Trump's major budget bill for increasing government debt. The president and the businessman engaged in heated exchanges on social media and in public statements before Musk apologized for some of his more combative messages. - 'Critical national security needs' - The government and the defense sector are considered a potential growth driver for AI giants. Musk's xAI announced on Monday the launch of a "Grok for Government" service, following a similar initiative by OpenAI. In addition to the Pentagon contract, "every federal government department, agency, or office (can now) purchase xAI products" thanks to its inclusion on an official supplier list, xAI said. Meta meanwhile has partnered with the start-up Anduril to develop virtual reality headsets for soldiers and law enforcement. OpenAI had previously announced in June that it had secured a Defense Department contract with a ceiling of $200 million. "Establishing these partnerships will broaden DoD use of and experience in frontier AI capabilities and increase the ability of these companies to understand and address critical national security needs with the most advanced AI capabilities U.S. industry has to offer," said the CDAO statement on Monday. tu-gw-des/sla