HONOR set to revolutionise South Africa's smartphone market with Magic V5 launch
Image: Supplied
Tech powerhouse HONOR is set to shake up South Africa's smartphone market this October with the launch of its cutting-edge foldable device, the Magic V5.
At an exclusive media roundtable in Johannesburg, HONOR confirmed that its highly anticipated Magic V5 will be landing in South African stores soon, though the exact release date remains under wraps.
One of the standout features of the Magic V5 is its ultra-slim design. When folded, it measures just 8.8mm thick, making it the thinnest foldable phone in the world — even slimmer than the Galaxy Z Fold 7, which is 8.9mm. Despite being slightly heavier (217g vs. Samsung's 215g), the difference is hardly noticeable in daily use.
While both phones offer smooth 120Hz displays, the Magic V5's cover screen is brighter and easier to read outdoors. It also packs a larger 5820mAh battery with faster charging.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
World's Slimmest Foldable: The HONOR Magic V5 sets a new benchmark with its ultra-thin 8.8mm folded design.
Image: Supplied
Camera-wise, HONOR includes three powerful lenses backed by AI, while Samsung offers a standout 200MP main sensor. In terms of durability, the Magic V5 boasts stronger water and dust resistance (IP58/IP59) and a reinforced hinge design.
Both phones run on the Snapdragon 8 Elite processor, so performance is top-tier either way. But for those who value design, battery life, and durability, the Magic V5 might just have the edge.
Mark Lei, Managing Director of HONOR South Africa, said the company has seen impressive growth since launching locally in 2021.
'We've seen a 600% increase in sales since 2023, and our goal is to become the number one smartphone brand in South Africa by 2028.'
He further explained that the HONOR 400 and 400 Pro will introduce advanced AI-driven features designed to enhance user experience and connectivity. Among these is HONOR Share, a cutting-edge file-sharing function that mirrors the ease and speed of Apple's AirDrop.
However, what sets HONOR Share apart is its cross-platform capability; users will be able to transfer files not just between HONOR devices but also with Apple devices, marking a significant step toward greater interoperability in mobile technology. This move reflects HONOR's commitment to creating a more connected ecosystem that meets the diverse needs of South African consumers.
HONOR is gearing up to launch its innovative foldable smartphone, the Magic V5, in South Africa this October.
Image: Supplied
The tech giant remained tight-lipped about the official pricing of the Magic V5, but hinted that more details would likely be revealed as the launch date approaches. Consumers can expect the full pricing breakdown to be announced closer to its release in South Africa.
The Star
masabata.mkwananzi@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
15 hours ago
- eNCA
SA lawyer forces US tech giant to name site users
JOHANNESBURG - In a story similar to the Biblical David and Goliath, a South African lawyer and owner of the Digital Law Company has forced a US tech giant to disclose information about explicit content. The lawyer, Emma Sadlier, made WhatsApp, Facebook, and Instagram owner Meta Platforms disclose the information of users posting explicit content of South African schoolchildren. The Digital Law Company discovered over 1,000 explicit posts of children, including videos and photos, published by 30 Meta accounts in just a few days.
Daily Maverick
18 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Turning off AI detection software is the right call for SA universities
Universities across South Africa are abandoning problematic artificial intelligence detection tools that have created a climate of suspicion. The recently announced University of Cape Town decision to disable Turnitin's AI detection feature is to be welcomed – and other universities would do well to follow suit. This move signals a growing recognition that AI detection software does more harm than good. The problems with Turnitin's AI detector extend far beyond technical glitches. The software's notorious tendency towards false positives has created an atmosphere where students live in constant fear of being wrongly accused of academic dishonesty. Unlike their American counterparts, South African students rarely pursue legal action against universities, but this should not be mistaken for acceptance of unfair treatment. A system built on flawed logic As Rebecca Davis has pointed out in Daily Maverick: detection tools fail. The fundamental issue lies in how these detection systems operate. Turnitin's AI detector doesn't identify digital fingerprints that definitively prove AI use. Instead, it searches for stylistic patterns associated with AI-generated text. The software might flag work as likely to be AI-generated simply because the student used em-dashes or terms such as 'delve into' or 'crucial' – a writing preference that has nothing to do with artificial intelligence. This approach has led to deeply troubling situations. Students report receiving accusatory emails from professors suggesting significant portions of their original work were AI-generated. One student described receiving such an email indicating that Turnitin had flagged 30% of her text as likely to be AI-generated, followed by demands for proof of originality: multiple drafts, version history from Google Docs, or reports from other AI detection services like GPTZero. The AI detection feature operates as a black box, producing reports visible only to faculty members, creating an inherently opaque system. Other academics have endorsed the use of services like Grammarly Authorship or Turnitin Clarity for students to prove their work is their own. The burden of proof has been reversed: students are guilty until proven innocent, a principle that would be considered unjust in any legal system and is pedagogically abhorrent in an educational context. The psychological impact cannot be overstated; students describe feeling anxious about every assignment, second-guessing their natural writing styles, and living under a cloud of suspicion despite having done nothing wrong. The absurdity exposed The unreliability of these systems becomes comically apparent when examined closely. The student mentioned above paid $19 to access GPTZero, another AI detection service, hoping to clear her name. The results were revealing: the programs flagged different portions of her original work as AI-generated, with only partial overlap between their accusations. Even more telling, both systems flagged the professor's own assignment questions as AI-generated, though the Turnitin software flagged Question 2 while GPTZero flagged Question 4. Did the professor use ChatGPT to write one of the questions, both, or neither? The software provides no answers. This inconsistency exposes the arbitrary nature of AI detection. If two leading systems cannot agree on what constitutes AI-generated text, and both flag the professor's own questions as suspicious, how can any institution justify using these tools to make academic integrity decisions? Gaming the system While South African universities have been fortunate to avoid the litigation that has plagued American institutions, the experiences across the Atlantic serve as a stark warning. A number of US universities have abandoned Turnitin after facing lawsuits from students falsely accused of using AI. Turnitin's terms and conditions conveniently absolve the company of responsibility for these false accusations, leaving universities to face the legal and reputational consequences alone. The contrast with Turnitin's similarity detection tool is important. While that feature has its own problems, primarily academics assuming that the percentage similarity is an indicator of the amount of plagiarism, at least it provides transparent, visible comparisons that students can review and make sense of. The AI detection feature operates as a black box, producing reports visible only to faculty members, creating an inherently opaque system. Undermining educational relationships Perhaps most damaging is how AI detection transforms the fundamental relationship between educators and students. When academics become primarily focused on catching potential cheaters, the pedagogical mission suffers. Education is inherently relational, built on trust, guidance and collaborative learning. AI detection software makes this dynamic adversarial, casting educators as judges, AI detection as the evidence and students as potential criminals. The goal should be advocacy for deep learning and meaningful engagement with coursework, not policing student behaviour through unreliable technology The lack of transparency compounds this problem. Students cannot see the AI detection reports that are being used against them, cannot understand the reasoning behind the accusations and cannot meaningfully defend themselves against algorithmic judgements. This violates basic principles of fairness and due process that should govern any academic integrity system. A path forward UCT's decision to disable Turnitin's AI detector represents more than just abandoning a problematic tool. It signals a commitment to preserving the educational relationship and maintaining trust in our universities. Other institutions following suit demonstrate that the South African higher education sector is willing to prioritise pedagogical principles over technological convenience. This doesn't mean ignoring the challenges that AI presents to academic integrity. Rather, it suggests focusing on educational approaches that help students understand appropriate AI use, develop critical thinking skills and cultivate a personal relationship with knowledge. When tools designed to protect academic integrity instead undermine student wellbeing and the trust essential to learning, they have lost their purpose. The goal should be advocacy for deep learning and meaningful engagement with coursework, not policing student behaviour through unreliable technology. Detection should give way to education, suspicion to support and surveillance to guidance. When we position students as already guilty, we shouldn't be surprised that they respond by trying to outwit our systems rather than engaging with the deeper questions about learning and integrity that AI raises. The anxiety reported by students who feel constantly watched and judged represents a failure of educational technology to serve educational goals. When tools designed to protect academic integrity instead undermine student wellbeing and the trust essential to learning, they have lost their purpose. UCT and other South African universities deserve recognition for prioritising student welfare and educational relationships over the false security of flawed detection software. Their decision sends a clear message: technology should serve education, not the other way around. As more institutions grapple with AI's impact on higher education, South Africa's approach offers a valuable model; one that chooses trust over surveillance, education over detection and relationships over algorithms. In an era of rapid technological change, this commitment to fundamental educational values provides a steady foundation for navigating uncertainty. The future of academic integrity lies not in better detection software, but in better education about integrity itself. DM Sioux McKenna is professor of higher education studies at Rhodes University. Neil Kramm is an educational technology specialist in the Centre of Higher Education Research, Teaching and Learning (CHERTL) at Rhodes University. He is currently completing his PhD on AI and its influence on assessment in higher education.
The South African
21 hours ago
- The South African
Elon Musk's Starlink satellite internet suffers global outage
SpaceX chief Elon Musk's Starlink satellite internet service experienced an hours-long global network outage late on Thursday, which executives attributed to a key software issue. The service interruption was announced on X at about 22:00 (SA time) on Thursday by Starlink's official handle. Users in the United States and Europe began reporting problems with the service an hour before the Starlink announcement on Downdetector, a website that tracks issues in internet-based services. 'Service will be restored shortly,' South Africa-born Musk posted on X, apologising for the outage. 'SpaceX will remedy root cause to ensure it doesn't happen again.' The tech billionaire later reposted a statement from Starlink Vice President of Engineering Michael Nicolls, who said the disruption was due to the 'failure of key internal software services that operate the core network.' Nicolls also said the Starlink network had 'mostly recovered' from the outage, which 'lasted approximately 2.5 hours.' About two hours later, Starlink posted that the issue was resolved and that service was restored. User reports on Downdetector began after 21:00 (SA time), peaking at 21:34 (SA time) and tapering out at 05:00 (SA time). Starlink, a subsidiary of Musk's space rocket venture SpaceX, has deployed more than 6 000 low-orbit satellites to provide high-speed internet to isolated and poorly connected areas. Starlink currently leads the satellite internet race, with European competitor Eutelsat – which is backed by France and the United Kingdom – lagging behind with 600 satellites. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news. By Garrin Lambley © Agence France-Presse
