&w=3840&q=100)
Iran can again restart enriching uranium in 'months', says IAEA chief
Iran capable of restarting nuclear activities
In an interview with CBS' Margaret Brennan, Grossi said that Iran possessed the necessary industrial and technological capacities and that if the country chose to do so, it would be able to resume its nuclear activities. He added that while the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities was significant, it was not complete.
Israel-Iran conflict
The 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran was triggered earlier this month by an unprecedented Israeli strike aimed, according to Israeli officials, at preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Iran has maintained that its nuclear activities are solely for "peaceful purposes".
Following Israel's action, the US launched strikes on three major Iranian nuclear sites before a ceasefire took effect. The scale and success of the damage inflicted have since been subject to intense scrutiny.
Pentagon assessment echoed by IAEA
Grossi's remarks appear to align with an initial evaluation from the US Defense Intelligence Agency, which indicated that the American attacks on key Iranian nuclear facilities last week did not eliminate the essential elements of Iran's nuclear programme. Instead, they likely caused only a short-term setback of several months. Despite the lack of definitive military and intelligence conclusions, Trump has continued to claim the strikes 'completely and totally obliterated' Iran 's nuclear capabilities.
In recent days, US military sources have shared details regarding the strategic planning of the strikes, though they have not presented new evidence confirming their effectiveness. Meanwhile, The Washington Post reported on Sunday that intercepted communications among senior Iranian officials revealed internal discussions suggesting the damage from the strikes was less severe than anticipated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
41 minutes ago
- India Today
Elon Musk declares war on Trump's GOP
What began as the most powerful political alliance in modern American history has spectacularly imploded. Elon Musk, who bankrolled Donald Trump's return to the White House with nearly $300 million in donations, is now threatening to destroy the very party he helped elect. At the centre of this explosive feud lies Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill Act"—a sprawling piece of legislation that would extend tax cuts, slash healthcare programmes, inflate defence spending, and ban AI regulation for a decade. The bill projects over $3 trillion in new debt, leaving even some Republicans once Trump's ultimate kingmaker, has branded the legislation "a disgusting abomination." The world's richest man didn't merely support Trump's presidency—he supercharged it. His America PAC received nearly $240 million, whilst his ownership of X transformed the platform into a Republican war room, amplifying pro-Trump content and throttling As reward for delivering the White House, Musk was handed the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), tasked with cutting government waste. The irony wasn't lost on anyone when Trump's massive spending bill directly contradicted Musk's cost-cutting personal stakes are enormous. The legislation threatens Musk's empire directly—Tesla stands to lose over $1.2 billion as green energy tax credits vanish. His solar and battery ventures face significant blows if clean energy incentives response has been characteristically explosive. He's threatened to form a new "America Party," promising to primary every Republican who supports the bill. "Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!" he has responded with equal venom, targeting Musk's reliance on government subsidies: "Without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa." In a particularly savage twist, Trump has suggested using DOGE to investigate Musk's own the Senate prepares to vote, America watches two titans of influence battle for the nation's future—leaving many wondering who truly runs the country, and who ultimately pays the price.- EndsMust Watch
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Who is Robert, who holds 100GB of stolen emails of Donald Trump's aides? Here's what do these emails contain
A cyberattack group reportedly linked to Iran has claimed to possess a large number of emails belonging to US President Donald Trump's associates. The group has issued threats to release the data, raising concerns about foreign interference in American political affairs. Hackers Claim Possession of Stolen Emails A group calling itself "Robert" claims to have obtained approximately 100 gigabytes of emails. The messages are believed to belong to close aides of President Donald Trump. These include adviser Roger Stone and White House chief of staff Susie Wiles . According to Reuters, the hackers also said they had access to messages from Trump's attorney Lindsey Halligan and Stormy Daniels. Daniels had earlier been involved in a public case involving a payment of $130,000 over an alleged affair with Trump. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Simple Morning Habit for a Flatter Belly After 50! Lulutox Undo The hackers have not confirmed what the emails contain. They also did not say when they would release the information. Some messages had already been leaked during the last US presidential election, according to the same source. Also Read: Watch Project Hail Mary Trailer! What is it about? Here's sci-fi film's plot, cast and crew Live Events US Authorities React to Threat The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued a response late on Monday. It described the incident as an attempt to spread misinformation and to create internal conflict. CISA warned that stolen material may be used to discredit US institutions and leaders. Marci McCarthy, a spokesperson for CISA, stated the attack appeared planned to harm President Trump's public image. She said it targeted people holding official positions in the government. FBI Director Kash Patel released a statement warning that any person linked to a breach of national security would be investigated. He said they would face prosecution under federal law. Also Read: Netflix July 2025 Releases: Here's complete list of TV shows and movies coming on platform this month Previous Incidents and Legal Action In 2024, a similar hacking event occurred targeting Trump's campaign. Some materials were verified by Reuters. Emails from Susie Wiles were included in the earlier batch and were shared with reporters. One of the leaked emails described a financial arrangement involving Trump and lawyers linked to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Another described a discussion about a possible settlement with Stormy Daniels. Last September, the Justice Department charged three members of Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps. They were accused of being involved in previous leaks. However, those efforts did not have a confirmed impact on the election. Tehran has continued to deny any involvement in cyberattacks or election interference. According to Reuters, the hacker group originally had no plans to release the emails after Trump won a second term. But that changed after Trump's response to the Iran-Israel conflict. The hackers told Reuters they now wanted the matter to be made public. Ongoing Investigations and Warnings CISA said the hackers were trying to use stolen and unverified material to influence public opinion. McCarthy called it a campaign designed to discredit Trump and others. The agency warned the attackers that they would be identified and brought to justice. A message posted to X (formerly Twitter) said the government would not offer any protection or leniency to those responsible. FAQs What is the main concern about the Trump email hacking incident? The emails may be used to spread misinformation and create distrust in US leaders during a time of international conflict. Has any of the stolen material been verified? Reuters confirmed parts of the previous leak during the 2024 election, including emails from top aides and legal discussions.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Other Nations Also Enrich Uranium – So Why Is Only Iran A Global Villain?
New Delhi: Uranium enrichment is not rare. Argentina does it. Brazil too. So does Japan. Even the Netherlands. All of them refine uranium for peaceful reasons, mainly for energy. No drama. No threats. No sanctions. Then there is Iran. Same process. Same science. But a global firestorm. Warnings from Washington. Airstrikes from Israel. Sanctions. Suspicion. Why? Let's break it down. Same Process, Different Perception Enrichment means increasing the concentration of Uranium-235. Natural uranium holds just 0.7% of it. Power reactors need around 3-5%. Nuclear bombs need more than 90%. Countries like Argentina and Japan keep enrichment under 5%. No surprises. No secrets. Always under the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) watch. Iran did not stop at 5%. It went to 60%. That is far above energy needs. Just a step away from weapons-grade material. The United Nations' nuclear energy watchdog, IAEA, has flagged it repeatedly. It says Iran holds more than 400 kg of 60% enriched uranium that is enough for making 10 nuclear bombs. 'Secrecy' Fuels Suspicion Iran's nuclear journey has allegedly not been transparent. In 2009, a hidden facility at Fordow was revealed, not by Tehran but by Western intelligence. Before that, the AMAD project (an Iranian scientific project with the aim of developing nuclear weapons) quietly explored weaponisation until 2003. And now, IAEA inspectors are routinely denied access. In 2025, for the first time in two decades, the IAEA formally declared Iran in breach of its obligations. Compare that with Brazil, the Netherlands or Japan. Their programmes stay open and cooperative. No secret bunkers. No hidden centrifuges. The Regional Firetrap Iran sits in a volatile neighbourhood – Israel, Saudi Arabia and U.S. bases in the Gulf nations. Tensions always near the surface. Iranian leaders have issued fiery statements against Israel. Some called for its destruction. That changes how the world views Tehran's nuclear work. Israel does not take chances. It launched airstrikes in 2025 on Iranian nuclear sites – Natanz, Fordow and more. The United States supported it. The message was loud and clear – Iran's nuclear rise will not be tolerated. None of the other uranium-enriching countries face such hostility from their neighbours. No threats. No attacks. No regional war risk. Technology Through 'Backdoor' Iran allegedly did not always develop its nuclear tech legally. It reportedly tapped into the A.Q. Khan network from Pakistan and bought parts from shady vendors in Europe. That purported history still haunts it. Other nations built their systems through public and internationally accepted channels. No smuggling, no cover-ups. JCPOA Gamble, Its Collapse In 2015, Iran signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) with six global powers. It agreed to limit enrichment, reduce stockpiles and allow inspections. In return, it got sanctions relief. Then in 2018, President Donald Trump pulled the United States out. Sanctions returned. Iran responded by allegedly ramping up enrichment again. By 2025, its uranium stockpile was reportedly 22 times higher than JCPOA limits. The agreement collapsed. The trust shattered. Symbol of Sovereignty or Defiance? For Iran, its nuclear programme is a matter of national pride. A stand against what it sees as Western domination. Its leaders say enrichment is a right and a matter of dignity. But to Washington and Tel Aviv, it looks like defiance, a threat and a potential path to the bomb. Japan does not speak this language, nor does Brazil. Their enrichment is a utility. Iran's is a political statement. Double Standard? There is one. Israel reportedly holds nuclear weapons. It never signed the NPT. It faces no sanctions. Iran signed the treaty. It faces the scrutiny, the airstrikes and the economic chokehold. Still, Iran's own behavior – secrecy, enrichment levels and regional aggression (as alleged) – keeps fueling the fire. The World Watches IAEA continues to raise red flags. Sanctions tighten. Talks stall. And yet, other nations with enrichment programmes continue uninterrupted. Argentina refines. The Netherlands develops. Japan innovates. But the spotlight never turns their way. Only Iran stands at the centre of this nuclear storm. Enriching uranium, but also enriching suspicion.
