How US strikes on Iran could lead to spiral of crisis
"Attacking Iran is not a Nike commercial — Just Do It," said Middle East expert Aaron David Miller on the US striking Iran's nuclear sites. US President Donald Trump's decision to get into a war with Iran with ruthless strikes not only displays American power, but changes the dynamics in the oil-rich region. It also pushes the US into a "forever war", like it fought in Iraq and Afghanistan, which Trump vowed not to get the country into.advertisementOn Saturday (US time), American forces carried out coordinated airstrikes on the Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear sites in Iran.The US used six B-2 bombers to drop a dozen bunker-buster bombs on the nuclear site in the Fordow, CNN reported, quoting a US official. "A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow," Trump said on Truth Social.
The strikes, the first direct US military involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict, will lead to a major escalation.However, like Aaron David Miller said, it isn't just a Nike ad."The most important point of today and every day. Attacking Iran is not a Nike commercial — Just Do It. When America puts its forces in harm's way, it's not just can we do it; but should we; what will it cost and what about day after," Miller, a senior fellow at Carnegie Endowment and former US State Department analyst, posted on X.advertisementWell, it could very well be a midsummers night's nightmare for the US, as well as the world.1. US ASSERTION IN THE MIDDLE EAST AMID CHINA CAUTIONIran had positioned itself as a Shia counterweight to Sunni Saudi Arabia, an American ally, and created a Shia superstate. A militarily crippled Iran will tilt the balance of powers in the Middle East.Both China and Russia warned the US against military intervention in Iran after Israel attacked its nuclear facilities and top military commanders nine days ago.After Trump warned Iran of impending strikes last week, Guo Jiakun, spokesman for the Chinese foreign affairs ministry, said any use of force by the US would be seen as an infringement of Iran's sovereignty and security. Russia's foreign ministry's spokeswoman Maria Zakharova too "particularly warned" the US against military intervention, "which would be an extremely dangerous step with truly unpredictable negative consequences".Though China and Russia are least likely to get directly involved in the war, they might help Iran counter the US, which has faced challenges from their covert help to its opponents in the Middle East.The strikes in Iran, in which the fighter jets flew for 37 hours, covering a distance of 11,400 kilometres, shows the US' intent.advertisementTrump has got the US into a Middle East muddle, and everyone is clear about that. What is also clear is Trump's assertion."Iran, the bully of the Mideast, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater," he said in an address from the White House.2. IRAN WEAKENED BUT MIGHT USE PROXIES TO TARGET USTrump claimed that the strikes were a success, but didn't provide any evidence.Even if its nuclear advancements have been destroyed, Iran remains a threat to the US and Israel. It has threatened to strike back, and shown that by firing a volley of missiles into Tel Aviv."The events [the US strikes] this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences," Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi posted on X.So, what can Iran do now?"The Iranians are seriously weakened and degraded in their military capabilities. But they have all sorts of asymmetric ways that they can respond... This is not going to end quick," Miller told Reuters.Iran could use its proxy militia, like the Lebanon-based Hezbollah and the Houthi rebels of Yemen, to hit American and Israeli interests in and around the region.advertisement3. IRAN'S DIRECT ATTACK ON US CENTRES IN MIDDLE EASTThe US has thousands of its troops in the Middle East in bases like Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Iran could make them the target of its retaliation.Though these bases have missile shields, just like Israel's, they might have little time to respond to waves of missiles and swarms of drones given their proximity to Iran, according to an Associated Press analysis.Even with the advantage of geographical distance and sophisticated missile shield, Israel has been unable to shoot down all the missiles from Iran.Eric Lob, assistant professor in the Department of Politics and International Relations at Florida International University, told Reuters that Iran's next move remained an open question. He suggested that "Iran could hit soft targets of the US and Israel inside and outside the region".If Iran kills any American in its attack, Trump and the US will be sucked into a cycle of escalation, which might not have a clear exit.Trump has already promised that."Any retaliation by Iran against the United States of America will be met with force far greater that what was witnessed tonight," Trump posted in all-caps on Truth Social after his speech.advertisement4. OIL'S NOT WELL. ALL EYES ON STRAIT OF HORMUZAny crisis in the Middle East has big repercussions for global trade and oil prices. With Iran, the third-largest producer among members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec), involved, crude oil prices had risen.It isn't just Iranian oil, but the crude trade route that passes through the Strait of Hormuz along Iran's southern coast that has experts and traders worried.About 20% of globally traded crude oil and related products move through the Strait of Hormuz, which is a narrow mouth in the Persian Gulf. At its narrowest point, the Gulf of Hormuz is just 33-km wide.An Associated Press analysis said that Iran's fleet of fast-attack boats and naval mines could make the strait impassable.With the US entry into the war, Iran could launch direct attacks on tankers and energy infrastructure.This was a fear RBC Capital analyst Helima Croft expressed while speaking to Reuters last week.Though the US 5th Fleet, stationed in Bahrain, would intervene, even jitters are enough to send oil prices high, and have a bearing on economies across the world.advertisementA Reuters report from June 19 said the Brent crude futures, a measure for global oil prices, ended 3% up at $78.85 a barrel.Any potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint, could see oil prices surging to a crippling $120-$130 per barrel, according to investment banking firm JP Morgan.5. TRUMP'S LEGACY AND THREAT OF IMPEACHMENTThe US getting embroiled in the Iran-Israel war isn't just slippery for oil prices, it's a slippery slope for Trump's legacy too. American leaders have already started calling for Trump's impeachment over the unilateral decision.The man who was eyeing the Nobel Peace Prize just hours ago and had been formally nominated by its lapdog Pakistan has made the US a party to a regional war.Donald Trump's first stint saw him pull out troops from Afghanistan and broker the Abraham Accords, which would have normalised Israel's ties with Arab nations.And now, just six months into his second stint, Trump has got the US into what he branded earlier as "forever wars".Foreign wars and attempts at regime changes haven't had the desired results for most American presidents.Trump's decision to join the war, though cheered by some, comes against the wishes of many Republicans and MAGA loyalists.Already at war at home with his detention and deportations of immigrants, Trump seems to have made himself a fair game for impeachment with the war in Iran."The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers. He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations. It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment," Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Congresswoman from New York, wrote on X.Trump said his proudest legacy would be that of a peacemaker and unifier but has got the US into another war. If the damages to the three nuclear sites and its nuclear programme are significant, Iran's retaliation will be furious. The world would be cautiously watching how it all unfolds.Must Watch
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pokrovsk in peril? Tensions surge as 111,000 Russian troops gather near Ukraine's frontline hotspot
Ukrainian commander Oleksandr Syrskyi reports that Russia has amassed over 110,000 troops near Pokrovsk, designating it the "hottest spot" on the frontline. Despite repeated offensives and numerical superiority, Russia has failed to capture the city, a key strategic point for connecting military hubs. Russia's persistent efforts are driven by a desire for symbolic victories and psychological impact. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Pokrovsk is 'Hottest Spot' in Ukraine Vladimir Putin's Broader Goal Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why Pokrovsk Matters to Russia The Kursk Diversion That Shifted the Battle What Russia Wants: Symbolism Over Strategy FAQs Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The eastern Ukrainian city of Pokrovsk is bracing for what could become one of the most intense confrontations of the war, as Russia has massed over 110,000 troops near the city, revealed Ukrainian military commander Oleksandr Syrskyi on Friday, as per a CNN Pokrovsk as the 'hottest spot' along Ukraine's 1,200-kilometre frontline, Syrskyi said that Russia appears determined to break through Ukrainian defenses, according to the comes as Russian forces had already been trying to capture Pokrovsk for over a year, staging one grinding offensive after another, and even though they had an advantage in terms of the number of troops and weapons available, Moscow has failed to take over the city, as reported by READ: Iran moves women prisoners to hellhole farm jail after airstrike hits notorious Evin prison Even Russian President Vladimir Putin had asserted that his goal is to seize all of the eastern Ukrainian regions of Donetsk and Luhansk his forces partially occupy, according to the Kyiv and its allies have accused Putin of delaying peace efforts so that his forces can seize more Ukrainian territory, as reported by is a strategic target for Moscow because it is has key supply road and railroad that connect it with other military hubs in the area, and along with Kostiantynivka, Kramatorsk and Sloviansk, it forms the backbone of Ukrainian defenses in the part of Donetsk region that is still under Kyiv's control, according to the READ: No holding, no swiping: California's tough no touch phone law for drivers, simplified Last year, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), a US-based conflict monitor, had revealed that Ukrainian defensive operations in Pokrovsk had forced Russia to leave its initial plan to take over Pokrovsk in a frontal assault as Ukrainian troops started using drones in their defensive strategy and integrated it with their ground forces, according to the CNN Russia was not even able to increase the number of troops in the area a lot, as it was trying to contain the surprise incursion of Ukrainian troops into its own territory in the southern Kursk region, as per the week, Syrskyi highlighted that 'This allowed us to weaken the enemy's pressure on the main fronts and regroup our troops. And the enemy's capture of Pokrovsk, announced back in September 2024, has not yet taken place, thanks in part to our Kursk operation ,' as quoted by on Friday, Syrskyi revealed that Russia continued to try to break through to the administrative border of the Donetsk region, and he said, 'They want to do this not only to achieve some operational results, but primarily for demonstrative purposes. To achieve a psychological effect: to put the infamous 'foot of the Russian soldier' there, plant a flag and trumpet another pseudo-'victory,'' as quoted by 110,000 troops have been positioned near the city, making it one of Russia's largest concentrations in the believes it's more about symbolism, planting a flag and calling it a victory, than genuine strategic control.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iran Behind Hit On Syria's Ahmad Al-Sharaa? Shocking Details Out On Assassination Plot
Iran's FM Issues Chilling Warning After Trump 'Disrespects' Khamenei | 'If You Want Nuclear Deal…' Iranian FM Abbas Araghchi blasts US President Donald Trump's "disrespectful" comments about Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, warning him to "watch his tone" if a nuclear deal is desired. This comes after Trump claimed to have "saved" Khamenei and mocked Iran for claiming "victory" in the war with Israel. Watch our video to know more. 6.0K views | 7 hours ago
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
40 minutes ago
- First Post
Weekend Senate session focuses on contentious GOP tax cuts and budget reductions
Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks read more The Senate is expected to grind through a rare weekend session as Republicans race to pass President Donald Trump's package of tax breaks and spending cuts by his July Fourth deadline. Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The 940-page bill was released shortly before midnight Friday. Senators were expected to take a procedural vote Saturday to begin debate on the legislation, but the timing was uncertain and there is a long path ahead, with at least 10 hours of debate time and an all-night voting session on countless amendments. Senate passage could be days away, and the bill would need to return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. 'It's evolving,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., as he prepared to close up the chamber late Friday. The weekend session could be a make-or-break moment for Trump's party, which has invested much of its political capital on his signature domestic policy plan. Trump is pushing Congress to wrap it up, even as he sometimes gives mixed signals, allowing for more time. At recent events at the White House, including Friday, Trump has admonished the 'grandstanders' among GOP holdouts to fall in line. 'We can get it done,' Trump said in a social media post. 'It will be a wonderful Celebration for our Country.' The legislation is an ambitious but complicated series of GOP priorities. At its core, it would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including for Trump's mass deportation agenda. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But the spending cuts that Republicans are relying on to offset the lost tax revenues are causing dissent within the GOP ranks. Some lawmakers say the cuts go too far, particularly for people receiving health care through Medicaid. Meanwhile, conservatives, worried about the nation's debt, are pushing for steeper cuts. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said he is concerned about the fundamentals of the package and will not support the procedural motion to begin debate. 'I'm voting no on the motion to proceed,' he said. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., pushing for deeper cuts, said he needed to see the final legislative text. The release of that draft had been delayed as the Senate parliamentarian reviewed the bill to ensure it complied with the chamber's strict 'Byrd Rule,' named for the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd, It largely bars policy matters from inclusion in budget bills unless a provision can get 60 votes to overcome objections. That would be a tall order in a Senate with a 53-47 GOP edge and Democrats unified against Trump's bill. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Republicans suffered a series of setbacks after several proposals were determined to be out of compliance by the chief arbiter of the Senate's rules. One plan would have shifted some food stamp costs from the federal government to the states; a second would have gutted the funding structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. But over the past days, Republicans have quickly revised those proposals and reinstated them. The final text includes a proposal for cuts to a Medicaid provider tax that had run into parliamentary objections and opposition from several senators worried about the fate of rural hospitals. The new version extends the start date for those cuts and establishes a $25 billion fund to aid rural hospitals and providers. Most states impose the provider tax as a way to boost federal Medicaid reimbursements. Some Republicans argue that is a scam and should be abolished. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has said that under the House-passed version of the bill, some 10.9 million more people would go without health care and at least 3 million fewer would qualify for food aid. The CBO has not yet publicly assessed the Senate draft, which proposes steeper reductions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Top income-earners would see about a $12,000 tax cut under the House bill, while the poorest Americans would face a $1,600 tax increase, the CBO said. One unresolved issue remains the so-called SALT provision, a deduction for state and local taxes that has been a top priority of lawmakers from New York and other high-tax states. The cap is now $10,000. The White House and House Republicans had narrowed in on a plan for a $40,000 cap, but for five years instead of 10. Republican senators says that's too generous. At least one House GOP holdout, Rep. Nick LaLota of New York, said he cannot support the compromise. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Republicans are rushing to finish the bill before the public fully knows what's in it. 'There's no good reason for Republicans to chase a silly deadline,' Schumer said. House Speaker Mike Johnson, who sent his colleagues home for the weekend with plans to be on call to return to Washington, said they are 'very close' to finishing up. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We would still like to meet that July Fourth, self-imposed deadline,' said Johnson, R-La. With the narrow Republicans majorities in the House and Senate, leaders need almost every lawmaker on board to ensure passage. Johnson and Thune have stayed close to the White House, relying on Trump to pressure holdout lawmakers.
