logo
Arkansas Legislature concludes 2025 legislative session; conflict over planned prison continues

Arkansas Legislature concludes 2025 legislative session; conflict over planned prison continues

Yahoo05-05-2025
The Arkansas Capitol on Nov. 14, 2024. (Mary Hennigan/Arkansas Advocate)
The Arkansas House and Senate adjourned sine die Monday morning, marking the end of the nearly four-month 2025 legislative session.
Sine die — a Latin phrase for 'without day' — means the Legislature isn't scheduled to convene again this year unless Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders calls for a special session. The next scheduled session will be the 2026 fiscal session early next year.
The Legislature ended the business portion of the session on April 16 after considering more than 1,600 bills. Sanders signed 1,026 bills into law and vetoed four others.
Lawmakers can override the governor's vetoes with a simple majority vote in both chambers before sine die adjournment. Both chambers convened briefly Monday but did not vote to override Sanders' vetoes; leaders in both chambers said there was not enough support for this option.
Arkansas governor vetoes two more bills from 2025 legislative session
House Speaker Brian Evans, R-Cabot, said after adjournment that he spoke with the sponsors of two of vetoed bills, Rep. Aaron Pilkington, R-Knoxville, and Rep. Brandon Achor, R-Maumelle. He said neither indicated they wished to attempt a veto override.
Evans said Achor had been in communication with the constituents involved with House Bill 1961, which would have allowed medical providers to temporarily withhold medical records if they had a reasonable belief patients would misinterpret the records in a way that could endanger their health, safety or mental state. Evans said Achor and his constituents were already working on an interim plan and 'believe there will be a good collaborative agreement on that.'
HB 1961 passed the House with 75 votes and the Senate with 18 votes, the minimum needed to advance out of the upper chamber.
Meanwhile, Evans said Pilkington did not feel he had the votes for an override for his bill that would have allowed delivery of marijuana and drive-thru window pickup. House Bill 1889 narrowly passed the House and Senate with 51 votes and 19 votes, respectively.
Prior to adjournment, Evans told his colleagues that legislation passed this year 'will shape our state for years to come.' He reiterated both on the House floor and after adjournment that members of his chamber should take pride in the work they did during the session.
'We worked late into the night, we debated, we disagreed, we discussed; the most important thing, we collaborated,' he said. 'We thoroughly vetted legislation, we brought diverse perspectives to the table and we made good bills through that debate even better.'
Similarly, Senate President and Lt. Gov. Leslie Rutledge told senators they should 'leave here today proud' of their work during the session and that they 'zealously and respectfully advocated' for their constituents.
The House conducted no business in addition to the adjournment, while the Senate confirmed a batch of five gubernatorial appointments to state boards and commissions in a voice vote after no debate. Sen. Matt Stone, R-Camden, was the only audible dissenting vote.
The appointments included Sanders' deputy chief of staff, Judd Deere, to the University of Arkansas Board of Trustees. Deere was appointed in March and will retain his position in the governor's office. Deere is replacing Sheffield Nelson and his term on the board expires March 1, 2035.
Additionally, Larry Walther, former state Treasurer and Secretary of Finance and Administration, was confirmed to the Arkansas Public Employees' Retirement System's board of trustees. Walther is replacing Candace Franks and his term expires March 9, 2031.
Finance and Administration officials announced last week that the state's income tax revenue in April dropped 15.5% compared to a year earlier. Sanders also extended Arkansas' tax filing deadline in light of recent severe weather across the state.
The state has reduced individual and corporate income tax rates four times in the past three years, most recently in June 2024. Three of those instances have been since Sanders took office in 2023, and she supports phasing out the income tax entirely.
Senate President Pro Tempore Bart Hester, R-Cave Springs, said Monday that he hopes the Legislature will cut taxes again in a special session later this year. The fiscal year ends June 30, and state officials should take the year's revenue into account before convening for a special session, he said.
Hester also said he anticipates no other reasons for a special session, including the ongoing controversy over Sanders' plans to build a 3,000-bed prison on 815 acres of land the state purchased in Franklin County.
A $750 million appropriation bill to support the prison's construction died after five failed votes in the Senate in April. State officials, including Republican Sen. Bryan King of Green Forest, and Franklin County residents have fought against the project, citing concerns about transparency, infrastructure and staffing.
Arkansas lawmakers consider other funding methods as they abandon sixth prison appropriation vote
The appropriation would have covered the remainder of the projected $825 million cost of the project. An additional $75 million appropriated in 2022 for prison expansion has already been allocated to the Arkansas Department of Corrections, which can use the funding to move the project forward.
The Legislature also set aside another $330 million for the project in 2023 that hasn't been appropriated yet.
Hester said the state has 'a clear path forward' and 'plenty of money' to complete the prison project. The state has already hired a construction management company, Vanir Construction Management Inc., and started seeking proposals from architectural firms and contractors.
'Once we have the architecture and engineering done, hopefully we can get a hard bid, and I think that will bring a comfort level to a lot of members and ultimately get us the vote we're needing' for the Senate to approve the rest of the funding for the project, Hester said.
King, who represents part of Franklin County, sent Sanders' office a letter Monday asking for the 2022 appropriation funds to be used for their original purpose, which would add 525 beds to the state prison in Calico Rock.
Sanders has pushed for the new penitentiary to alleviate overcrowding in county jails, but King said Monday morning in a news conference that the Calico Rock expansion would be 'much faster and much more economical.' He criticized the possibility of building water and sewer lines between the prison and the city of Fort Smith, saying it would be a waste of money.
Arkansas prison board approves contractor search for Franklin County prison
Evans told the Advocate there were existing issues with Calico Rock's infrastructure that impacted its expansion previously, adding that he was 'not aware' of any new developments on that front.
'I feel like if that had been a reasonable option early on in the Sanders administration' then it already would have been acted upon, he said.
King's letter also calls for the expansion of 'smaller regional facilities' in Benton, Sebastian and Washington counties, which are among the state's most populous, since they already have 'basic infrastructure in place' to house more inmates.
About 20 opponents of the prison joined King at the news conference at the state Capitol, including members of the Chickamauga Nation, an Indigenous tribe with a presence in Franklin County.
King letter to Sanders
'If you're going to put a megaprison in a community, it's certainly going to change their DNA … The fact that the governor went ahead and just tried to railroad the people without doing a basic needs infrastructure [assessment] is wrong,' King said.
Chickamauga burial sites and a 'ceremonial stone structure' surround the property designated for the prison, and building the prison would have a negative impact on those sites, said Justin Flanagan, a chief with the tribe.
'We're here today providing pamphlets with this information to the House and the Senate so that all deniability is removed,' Flanagan told the Advocate. '…With all the evidence we're providing, there should be no reason not to do a three-phase archaeological study and cultural environmental impact study [of the land].'
King said he is willing to meet with Sanders and discuss ways to reduce prison overcrowding, and he added that addressing the issue 'probably doesn't need to wait' until next year's fiscal session.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cory Booker's pathetic stunts reveal the sad state of the Democratic Party
Cory Booker's pathetic stunts reveal the sad state of the Democratic Party

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Cory Booker's pathetic stunts reveal the sad state of the Democratic Party

Sen. Cory Booker's latest stunt offered yet another eye-opener about the Democratic Party's current dead-endism. Booker went bananas on the Senate floor Tuesday, demanding that Democrats join him in voting NO — on a bipartisan bill — to supposedly prove that they aren't 'bending the knee' to Donald Trump. That is, it was a 'grand gesture' utterly unrelated to the cause he claimed to be serving. Advertisement Booker almost made Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) cry when he thundered that the humdrum package of bills (to improve police staffing and give cops more access to mental-health treatment) would represent 'complicity with an authoritarian leader.' These bills — which, as Klobuchar pointed out, passed unanimously out of a committee Booker sits on — were classic feel-good, no-brainer legislation. But Spartacus 2.0 still paced the Senate floor like a caged Colosseum lion, shouting, 'Don't question my integrity!' when Klobuchar noted that Booker had actually skipped the hearing at which he could have raised any objections. Advertisement Why not question his integrity, or at least his devotion to actually stopping a bill he was treating as the essence of Trumpism? This isn't the first time kooky Cory has gone in big on empty performance art. In July, he staged a walkout during Emil Bove's judicial confirmation hearing — as if his absence would change anything. Advertisement Then there was his record-breaking 25-hour 'filibuster,' without any actual bill on the floor to filibuster against. This posturing isn't new for Booker: As a lowly Newark city councilman, he years ago went on a 10-day hunger strike — in a tent, no less — to 'protest crime.' (It's safe to say that this awakened not a single criminal's conscience, nor anyone else's.) Senator Stuntman is plainly gearing up for another presidential run. 'The Democratic Party needs a wake-up call!' he thundered amid Tuesday's tantrum, practically begging for activists to make the moment viral. The sad part is that Booker's antics are only a bit cheesier than other Democrats' performative 'resistance,' whether it's sit-ins at ICE facilities, kumbaya-style teach-ins on the steps of the Capitol, holding up grumpy signs at the State of the Union address, or filming cringy TikToks. Advertisement It's not simply that Democrats are out of power, but that they're out of ideas (unless you count unpopular ones). Which leaves Booker and all the rest desperately trying to feign passion about . . . absolutely nothing.

Republican Senate candidates seeking to replace McConnell aim to define themselves at Fancy Farm
Republican Senate candidates seeking to replace McConnell aim to define themselves at Fancy Farm

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Republican Senate candidates seeking to replace McConnell aim to define themselves at Fancy Farm

CALVERT CITY, Ky. (AP) — Three Republicans competing to succeed longtime Sen. Mitch McConnell tried to define themselves before the political attacks that could come Saturday when they share the spotlight at the Fancy Farm picnic, a daunting rite of passage for candidates seeking statewide office in Kentucky. 'You're going to hear some barbs tomorrow, but what I want to focus on is my vision for serving in the United States Senate,' Daniel Cameron, one of the candidates, told a GOP crowd Friday evening. Cameron's rivals in next year's Senate primary — U.S. Rep. Andy Barr and businessman Nate Morris — used their speeches at the event to introduce themselves to Republican voters in western Kentucky. All three could shift into attack mode against each other Saturday afternoon at the Fancy Farm picnic — the Bluegrass State's premier political event. Politicians compete to land the sharpest — and sometimes most outlandish — barbs, and have to endure shouting and heckling from their rivals' supporters. The picnic could turn into a Republican skirmish since Democratic politicians are mostly skipping the event. McConnell, the longest-serving Senate party leader in U.S. history, revealed in February, on his 83rd birthday, that he won't seek another term in Kentucky and will retire when his current term ends. His pending retirement has set up a fierce competition for his seat. Warming up for their appearance that will air on statewide TV at Fancy Farm, the three GOP rivals kept to one script they've all shared — lavishing praise on Republican President Donald Trump. Barr portrayed his congressional experience as an advantage that sets him apart. He represents a district stretching from central Kentucky's bluegrass region to the Appalachian foothills. 'I'm an 'America First' fighter in the United States Congress,' Barr said Friday night. 'Other people like to talk about being a Trump guy or being with Trump. I've been with President Trump from day one. I'm not just talking about supporting President Trump. I've done it. I'm continuing to do it.' Giving voters a glimpse into his political philosophy, Barr said: 'I'm a guy who was raised in the era of Ronald Reagan. I believe in limited government, free enterprise and a strong national defense.' Morris, a tech entrepreneur, portrayed himself as a populist and a political outsider while trying to attach himself to Trump's popularity in Kentucky. 'What we've seen with this president is that he has put emphasis back on the American worker,' Morris said Friday night. 'And the people that have been in Washington for all this time — the elites – they sold out the American worker.' Morris also touted his hardline stance on immigration. He said he supports a moratorium on immigration into the United States until every immigrant currently in the country illegally is deported. Cameron, who is Black, used his speech to rail against diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. 'We don't need … an America built on DEI,' Cameron said. 'We need a country that's built on MEI – merit, excellence and intelligence.' Cameron entered the Senate campaign with one clear advantage — a higher statewide name recognition than his rivals. Cameron served one term as state attorney general and lost to Democrat Andy Beshear in the 2023 governor's race. 'You've been with us in the past,' Cameron told the GOP group Friday night. 'I hope that you'll be with us this time. We're going to get it done because we know that what happens in this seat will have reverberations across this country.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

'Was the president up for the job?' Steve Ricchetti defends Biden's fitness as GOP seeks answers
'Was the president up for the job?' Steve Ricchetti defends Biden's fitness as GOP seeks answers

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

'Was the president up for the job?' Steve Ricchetti defends Biden's fitness as GOP seeks answers

Steve Ricchetti was the gatekeeper for former President Biden. But House Republican investigators hoped Ricchetti was the key to unlocking answers about Mr. Biden's cognitive state when he was commander in chief. The House Oversight Committee summoned Ricchetti for a closed-door deposition recently. Ricchetti worked for President Clinton, was Biden's top aide when he was Vice President and served as a key advisor in the Biden White House. He frequently visited Capitol Hill as President Biden and Congressional Republicans negotiated a debt ceiling pact in the spring of 2023. "What's your message to the committee today?" yours truly asked Ricchetti when he materialized on the third floor of the Rayburn House Office Building for a voluntary, transcribed interrogation. "I'm not going to say anything on the way in. I'm just going to go in and give an interview," replied Ricchetti. "Was the President up for the job?" I inquired. "Of course he was," answered Ricchetti. "Of course he was." In a statement, Ricchetti conceded that former President Biden "occasionally stumbled." But he argued the former president was fit for the job. Ricchetti added that no one "usurped President Biden's Constitutional duties." In their inquest, Republicans have specific questions about the former President's use of the autopen and about legal documents bearing Mr. Biden's signature. "Who was signing any of these documents and who was running the White House?" asked Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., on Fox. "That's the biggest, weirdest scandal probably in American history since Woodrow Wilson's wife was running the White House." That refers to First Lady Edith Wilson. Historians generally believe that she took over day-to-day executive functions after President Woodrow Wilson suffered a stroke. "Anything that had the force of (law) that was signed by autopen should be null and void," argued Rep. Pat Fallon, R-Texas, on Fox Business. Unlike Ricchetti, three other Biden figures have ducked questions when summoned for closed-door interviews. The Oversight Committee issued subpoenas for former Biden administration aide Annie Tomasini, former Jill Biden aide Anthony Bernal and the President's former physician, White House doctor Kevin O'Connor. All three invoked the Fifth Amendment during their sessions before the House Oversight Committee, declining to answer questions. "I think the real witness is the doctor. And unfortunately, he took the Fifth," said Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan. Marshall himself is an OB-GYN. "A doctor certainly has an obligation ethically to protect (a patient) for privacy. But the needs of the country – the national security issue, legal issues – trump that relationship as well," said Marshall. Democrats contend Republicans are flailing in their probe of the former President. Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., believes the GOP should focus on the economy and affordability issues. "Message to House Republicans," declared Welch. "You won the election. I mean, I'm not quite sure why they want to waste time on this." "He's not the president," said Sen. John Fetterman, D-Penn., of former President Biden. "I think we really should just move (on)." Fetterman himself faced questions about his health after suffering a stroke during his 2022 campaign and hospitalization for depression after taking office as a senator in 2023. But Republicans contend the Biden investigation is critical. Former President Biden's medical state isn't clear, although the public saw his performance in the debate last June. Republicans insist their probe is about figuring out what to do if a future President struggles cognitively. "What we're doing today is setting sort of a template for the future," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. "How can we make it better? Because it's a Democratic President today. It may be a Republican President tomorrow." It's not just a challenge for the presidency. But for lawmakers, too. In recent years, Capitol Hill has witnessed uncomfortable, steady declines of late Sens. Strom Thurmond, R-S.C., Thad Cochran, R-Miss., Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Rep. Kay Granger, R-Tex. "Hopefully all of us make the right decision when it's appropriate," said Welch. "And we have people around us to do the right thing." Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., is one of the most conservative, politically pragmatic Democrats in the House. She represents a district President Trump carried three times. And even though Sens. Patty Muray, D-Wash., and Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., routinely win statewide, they fail to carry Gluesenkamp Perez's district. Gluesenkamp Perez bested GOP nominee Joe Kent - for a second time – by four points in 2024. The 36-year-old Gluesenkamp Perez introduced a plan requiring cognitive standards for persons to serve in the House. The House Appropriations Committee rejected her amendment late last month. However, there are Constitutional and legal problems with imposing a cognitive exam on prospective lawmakers. Article, I, Section 5 of the Constitution says the House and Senate "may determine the Rules of its Proceedings." So, it's possible the House or Senate could impose a "rule" dictating a test. The same part of the Constitution says each body may judge "the qualifications of its own Members." But imposing an additional provision for eligibility to serve could be extra-constitutional. For instance, Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution says House Members must be at least 25-years-old, have been a citizen for seven years and reside in the state from which they were elected. A senator must be 30, a citizen for nine years and live in the state they represent. However, heaping another mandate on top of that is a problem. This is why the Supreme Court found term limits to be unconstitutional. An additional "rule" – such as how long one can serve – introduces an extra qualification not outlined in the Constitution. That's why the Supreme Court ruled against term limits proposals. It's likely the High Court would follow suit with additional stipulations to serve in Congress. Moreover, installing an acuity credential holds the potential to undo the will of the voters. Late Rep. Adam Clayton Powell, D-N.Y., faced ethics issues in the late 1960s. Voters re-elected Powell in 1966. But the House refused to seat him. Powell sued. In Powell v. McCormick, the Supreme Court found that the House didn't have the right to exclude Powell. The High Court argued that the House's refusal to seat Powell wasn't Constitutional since it placed additional conditions on his service in Congress. There's no easy solution on how to handle an impaired President or lawmaker. It is often said Congress simply reflects the rest of the country. There are cognitively-diminished persons serving in every walk of life in the U.S. And that's a reality for those in government, too.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store