Convicted killer of school teacher jailed for five years and two months for drug dealing
The convicted killer of a County Clare school teacher has been jailed for five years and two months for drug dealing.
At Ennis Circuit Court, Judge Francis Comerford imposed a 62 month prison term as part of a number of concurrent sentences on Harry Dinan (44) formerly of Oakwood Drive, Ennis for having in his possession a total of €50,106 of cannabis and cocaine with intent to supply at locations in Ennis on November 14th 2022.
The drug dealing sentence is two months more than the five years in jail Mr Dinan initially received at Ennis Circuit Court in 2010 for the manslaughter of Lissycasey school teacher, Brian Casey (26) on December 26th 2009.
That court heard that in an unprovoked assault, Mr Dinan struck Mr Casey 'a haymaker' on St Stephen's night in O'Connell Square, Ennis and the blow broke Mr Casey's jaw in two places. The Lissycasey man hit the ground with the back of his head and Mr Casey never regained consciousness and died two days later.
The DPP appealed the undue leniency of the sentence and the Court of Criminal Appeal increased Mr Dinan's prison term by two years.
Coincidentally, the jailing of Mr Dinan for drug dealing at Ennis Circuit Court follows Lissycasey GAA only last weekend honouring the memory of Brian Casey and other deceased members of the club's 2007 Clare Senior Football Championship-winning team with the unveiling of a memorial plaque at the club grounds.
Detective Garda Aoife O'Malley told Ennis Circuit Court that the Drugs Unit of the Clare Garda Division had targeted Harry Dinan and witnessed him attend a secluded area of Ballybeg Woods on the western outskirts of Ennis on November 14th 2022.
Det O'Malley said that after Mr Dinan exited from the woods, an unmarked Garda car gave chase and whilst driving at high speed, a package was thrown from the passenger window of Mr Dinan's car and it was later found to be cannabis worth €4,970.
Det Garda O'Malley said that Mr Dinan's car eventually came to a stop at a roundabout at Ennis national School as school had just finished and traffic was heavy.
Det Garda O'Malley said that Mr Dinan's ex-partner and then five year old son were in the car at the time.
Det Garda O'Malley said that Mr Dinan was arrested and Gardai recovered a tick-list from a note on Mr Dinan's phone which showed that he was owed €16,215 for drugs.
She said that a search of his home found drug dealing paraphernalia including baggies and scales and money totalling €2,365 including €500 that was found on Mr Dinan earlier.
Det Garda O'Malley said that the drugs recovered from Ballybeg Woods totalled €18,882 which was subject to the 62 month prison term for the Section 15 (a) drugs offence being drugs valued in excess of €13,000.
She said that the value of all the drugs removed from Mr Dinan's house, car and the location in Ballybeg Woods totalled €46,606 in cannabis and €3,500 in cocaine resulting in the overall total of €50,106.
Det Garda O'Malley said that the accused has 82 previous convictions including 54 for road traffic offences.
She said that Dinan has six previous convictions for the sale and supply of drugs and is a father of three.
Counsel for Mr Dinan, Patrick Whyms BL (instructed by solicitor, Tara Godfrey) said that his client has no trappings of wealth and was dealing drugs to feed his cocaine addiction.
He said that Mr Dinan is quite entrepreneurial and was in the process of setting up a 'bouncy castle' business at the time of his arrest.
Judge Comerford said that there was no evidence that Mr Dinan was involved at high levels in a criminal operation but he wasn't at the lowest level.
Harry Dinan
Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 8th
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Daily Mirror
16 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Debunked: Conor McGregor makes series of misleading claims in court rant
Conor McGregor has made a number of misleading claims - after losing his appeal of a civil finding that he raped Nikita Hand. In a lengthy and rambling post on social media platform X, McGregor sensationally stated that he has no intention of paying the legal fees of James Lawrence - who the High court previously heard he referred to his solicitors and admitted paying his bills. In his post McGregor referred to the November High Court case which he lost and the appeal case which he also lost as a 'shake down,' and insisted he didn't say he was paying Lawrence's fees. 'You are out of your f*cking mind if you think I am paying James Lawrence legal costs, folks. Who said I was paying his fees?'I said I didn't know if I was, when the accusers barrister asked me on the stand, as I didn't. (who is paying his own fees I should have asked him at that time) ???' he posted. However in the High Court case itself McGregor was pressed by trial Judge Alexander Owens if he was paying Lawrence's fees or not. In response to cross examination first from Ms Hand's Counsel McGregor stated that he 'possibly' paid James Lawrence legal fees and referred him to them. 'I'm not 100 per cent. I get staggering legal bills.' The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week Judge Owens then stated to McGregor that it was a simple question - did he pay Lawrence's bills or not. McGregor responded by saying: 'I believe I did.' In refusing Lawrence costs at the conclusion of the High Court case in November, Judge Owens said both men were acting in "lockstep" in their defence of the action and it would be inappropriate to award costs to Mr Lawrence even though the jury found he did not rape Ms Hand. The Court of Appeal this week refused to allow Lawrence to be paid his costs as they too found that the money would ultimately end up going to McGregor, who was paying his fees. Nikita Hand speaking to the media after attending the Court of Appeal (Image: Collins Photos) McGregor goes on to claim in his new post that he was 'on the stand in a world of fog being accused of a crime I didn't commit, and that I was actually cleared of criminally and exonerated by every witness present, as well as believed twice over by the public prosecutor, but still up on a stand civilly, in absolute shock.' This statement is also misleading - as McGregor was not in fact 'cleared' or 'exonerated.' Gardai did investigate the alleged rape and sent a file to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). However the DPP decided not to take the case and therefore no criminal charges were levelled against the UFC fighter. This by itself does not mean McGregor was 'cleared' or 'exonerated' of the claims - just that he was not charged or convicted of any criminal offence. However the finding by the civil jury in November that he was liable for assault - whereby the assault in question was the rape that occurred in the Beacon Hotel in Sandyford in 2018, means the fighter can hardly claim he was 'exonerated.' The finding of the jury has also now been upheld by the three Judges of the Court of Appeal. McGregor goes on to make claims about why the criminal case did not go ahead - stating that there was plenty of evidence of CCTV footage which he claimed showed Ms Hand 'partying away, messaging away' and leaving and coming back to the hotel 'not a f*cking laughing, dancing, kissing, biting, play fighting. It's some watch. I was home HOURS and this is all going on,' he wrote. All of the footage was played in full and repeatedly re shown to the jury in the civil trial - with them ultimately siding with Ms Hand who stated she was drunk and not in the right state of mind at the time of the footage. Having been shown this footage and heard arguments from both sides they nonetheless sided with her, that she had been raped in the room by McGregor. McGregor goes on to attack Ms Hand in his post by saying: 'How people sleep at night is beyond me. I'm sure they don't. Not soundly anyway, no way. Impossible. To falsely accuse someone of rape and lose, then attempt to ignore that fact/brush it under the rug is truly heinous on another level!' However Ms Hand did not lose her case - she in fact won it, and had it re affirmed this week by three learned Judges of the Court of Appeal. Mr McGregor can continue to claim he did not rape Ms Hand - and it is a fact that he is not convicted of the criminal offence. He has however been found to have raped Ms Hand and is liable for it, by a civil jury. He now claims he 'welcomes' the new case taken by Ms Hand against him and the suddenly withdrawn proposed witnesses, couple Samantha O'Reilly and Stephen Cummins. Ms Hand is suing McGregor, Ms O'Reilly and Stephen Cummins for damages for 'malicious abuse of the process of the court.' It comes after McGregor's own Counsel announced at the opening of the appeal earlier this month that they would not be called as witnesses - after admitting that the evidence was not sustainable. Now in his new post McGregor is trying to claim that the evidence of Ms O'Reilly and Mr Cummins ought to have been heard - despite his own legal team arguing it shouldn't. 'I believed their claim, as portions of it was verified through the response affidavit to it,' he claimed. 'Why these two witnesses were not called, i will never know. It was on the very morning of. They were present and very eager to testify,' he claimed. 'It seemed they were pulled out of fear from my appointed team tbh. For what I don't know. These people said they seen something, let us all hear. If it's legit, great, it sounds very legit to me. If it's not, it's on them.' After the evidence was suddenly withdrawn the Judges of the Court of Appeal made the decision to refer the matter to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), after reading submissions from Ms Hand's legal team about the couple. Ms Hand's Counsel flagged concerns that potential perjury had been committed by the couple - and subornation of perjury by Conor McGregor himself for attempting to introduce the now withdrawn 'evidence.' He now claims he is 'happy this is still ongoing' - despite now being liable for a staggering €2M legal bill he has to pay Nikita Hand - and the remainder of the €250,000 award. Sign up to the Irish Mirror's Courts and Crime newsletter here and get breaking crime updates and news from the courts direct to your inbox.
Sunday World
a day ago
- Sunday World
Man who beat victim to death with shovel told gardai ‘I hope the c**t is dead'
GUILTY PLEA | Joseph Cahill (46) pleaded guilty to the unlawful killing of 43-year-old Gerard 'Ger' Curtin Joseph Cahill A sentencing hearing for Joseph Cahill (46), who pleaded guilty to the unlawful killing of 43-year-old Gerard 'Ger' Curtin, heard that Cahill had previously threatened to kill the deceased after Mr Curtin came to his house, threw stones at his windows, threatened to burn the house down and demanded money. Mr Curtin left after Cahill's partner gave him €300. Inspector James Ruddle of Roxboro Road Garda Station in Limerick told the court that Curtin returned to Cahill's house in the early hours about two weeks later, again demanding money. CCTV footage showed the deceased smashing a window of the Cahill home with a rock. The lock on Cahill's front door was broken so he had propped a shovel against it to keep out intruders. Cahill took the shovel, opened the door and struck the victim on the head, causing him to immediately fall to the ground, the inspector said. Cahill then struck Mr Curtin three more times as he lay "defenceless and immobile" on the ground. Gerard Curtin Before delivering the blows, Cahill called emergency services and asked for the police. After delivering the fatal blows, with Mr Curtin lying motionless on the ground, Cahill told the call-taker that a man was trying to get into his house. He waited a further eight minutes and 30 seconds before telling the call taker to send an ambulance. When asked why he needed an ambulance, Cahill said: "I think he's dead... I had to protect my kids. I don't give a fuck about going to jail. I beat a shovel off his head and I kept beating, to tell you the truth." The first garda at the scene made a note of Cahill saying: "I hit him with a shovel, I hope the c**t is dead." Garret Baker SC, for the Director of Public Prosecutions, told Ms Justice Eileen Creedon that Cahill was originally charged with murder. He said the DPP accepted the manslaughter plea on the basis that Cahill honestly believed that he was protecting himself, his property and his children but that the force he used in striking Mr Curtin four times with the shovel was excessive. On May 30 this year, Cahill, of Sarsfield Avenue, Garryowen, Limerick pleaded guilty to the unlawful killing of Gerard Curtin on November 4, 2023 outside his home. Mr Baker said the offence warrants a headline sentence of ten to 15 years. In an impact statement, Bianca Hickey told the court that the deceased was a brother, father, partner and friend. She said the family has always been "close-knit" but the killing tore them apart. Joseph Cahill News in 90 Seconds - Thursday, July 31 She said they have watched their parents become "completely different people". Their mother "traded nights at bingo for sleepless nights and endless nightmares" while their father lost interest in his hobbies and no longer loves chatting and laughing with his family. They never got to say goodbye or kiss him one last time because his injuries were so catastrophic that his coffin had to be closed. Inspector Ruddle agreed with Michael O'Higgins SC, for Cahill, that gardai were aware of allegations over many years that Mr Curtin had smashed windows of houses and threatened the occupants. The court heard that eight days after the killing, Cahill's home was petrol bombed and the family was forced to move out of the area. Cahill's sister's home was also petrol bombed at 5am while all people living there were in bed, the court was told. When Mr O'Higgins began to read a letter of apology from his client, the deceased's family stood up and walked out of court. In the letter, Cahill said he wanted to "express how deeply sorry I am" to the victim's partner and children. He said he carries the "massive burden" of what he did every day and has turned the lives of his own family upside down. "I never set out or imagined that night going to bed that anything like this would happen," he said. Mr O'Higgins said his client has a long history of mental illness, polysubstance abuse and a gambling addiction. He pointed to a psychiatric report which states that due to childhood trauma, Cahill is predisposed to act irrationally and to overreact to threats against himself and his family. He has no relevant previous convictions and, Mr O'Higgins said, is not likely to come before the courts again. Counsel asked the court to take into account that Cahill was woken on the night by a volatile man smashing his windows and trying to cross the threshold into his home. The four blows took just four seconds, he said, and although the force used was excessive, counsel asked the court to consider how quickly his brain could process what was happening. While Mr O'Higgins said the court would have to impose a custodial sentence, he asked Ms Justice Creedon to offer the "maximum leniency" possible. Ms Justice Creedon adjourned sentencing to November 24.
Sunday World
a day ago
- Sunday World
Pervert's suspended sentence for bombarding boy with explicit chat is overturned
James Varian (32) was found to have 7,781 child pornography images on his mobile phone James Varian (32), with an address at Lois na Greine, South Douglas Road, Cork was found to have 7,781 child pornography images on his mobile phone, with the majority of the files related to prepubescent children under the age of 12. Varian pleaded guilty to using information and communication technology to facilitate the sexual exploitation of a child contrary to section 8 (1) of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2017. He also pleaded guilty to the possession of child pornography contrary to section 6 (1) of the Child Trafficking and Pornography Act 1998, as amended by section 14 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2017. The judge also took into consideration an offence of attempting to pervert the course of justice contrary to common law. James Varian talks to our reporter at his Cork home On November 19, 2024, Varian was sentenced by Judge Dermot Sheehan in Cork Circuit Criminal Court. He received four years fully suspended for the charge of facilitating the sexual exploitation of a child, and two years fully suspended for the possession of child pornography. The Director of Public Prosecutions had appealed the sentence on the grounds that it was too lenient. At the original sentencing hearing, Detective Sergeant Brendan Corry said that on January 4, 2022, gardai were called to an address and spoke to a father who said that images and other media files of a sexual nature were found on a home computer a 15-year-old boy had been using. Det Sgt Corry said that gardai found messages of a sexually explicit nature were being sent to the boy, mostly through the messaging site Telegram. He said that on January 5, the respondent phoned gardai to say that he was the subject of a garda enquiry and on January 6 a warrant was obtained to search his home. He said that the communication discovered by gardai was 'alarmingly excessive, with in excess of two thousand five hundred messages exchanged over a period of nine days spanning between December 26, 2021 and January 4, 2022." At the time of offending, Varian was 28 years old, while the boy was 15. Det Sgt Corry said that on January 4, upon discovering that gardai were investigating, Varian also directed the boy to 'purge chats, delete everything'. James Varian talks to our reporter at his Cork home He said that Varian was arrested on May 30, 2022, was detained and interviewed on two occasions, where he made no admissions at interview. He said that the seized phone was found to contain 7,781 images classed as child pornography, with 6,431 of these images deemed as 'child animation'. Counsel for the DPP, Emmet Boyle BL, told the Court of Appeal that the sentencing judge erred in failing to attach appropriate weight to aggravating factors in the case. He said these factors included the amount of messages sent to the child, the disparity of age between the defendant and the victim, his urging the boy to delete the messages and his risk of reoffending which was outlined by the probation services. Mr Boyle also said that the sentencing judge put undue weight on the mitigating factors in the case, like Varian's lack of previous convictions and his early guilty plea. Defence counsel for Varian, Jane Hyland SC, said that the decision to fully suspend his sentence was justified and the judge was exercising within his discretion in the sentencing. She said that her client lost his job as a result of the incident, that he suffers from mental health problems and that he also suffered reputationally from the incident. Returning judgement, Mr Justice John Edwards said that the sentencing judge's reasons for fully suspending the sentences were 'relatively sparse', giving only Varian's age and the fact that he was a first time offender. He said that the judge acted in error to fully suspend the sentences and that the decision was not proportionate to the gravity of the offending. He said that the sentencing was 'outside the norm and unduly lenient'. James Varian He also said that although the court noted Varian's assertions of his remorse, his letter of apology presented to the judge failed to mention his young victim at all. Mr Justice Edwards said that the court decided to quash the original sentences and proceeded to resentencing. He said that there was no issue with the original headline sentences imposed at six years for sending explicit messages and four years for the possession of child pornography. He said that the court also accepted the discount of two years for both counts given in mitigation by the sentencing judge. The Court of Appeal sentenced Varian to four years in custody with the final 12 months suspended for a period of 12 months for the count of sending explicit messages. They also sentenced him to two years in custody for the count of possession of child pornography, to run concurrently with the first.
