Should heavier cars be taxed more to cover the cost of fixing potholes they create?
Some 48 per cent of drivers think weightier cars should pay more Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) to reflect the greater impact they have on road conditions, according to a study by Kwik Fit.
While there are calls for vans and big cars to incur a pothole levy to pay for the much needed improvements to Britain's crater-filled roads, the majority of drivers think operators of HGVs should make the biggest contribution to repairs.
Almost three in five of the 2,000 drivers surveyed said that HGVs should pay an additional levy to be set aside for road maintenance budgets, while 44 per cent believe delivery vans should pay an additional tax for the same purpose.
This comes after This is Money reported the true cost of Britain's pothole crisis for drivers has risen to £320 - this is the average associated repair bill motorists face, according to figures from road safety charity IAM RoadSmart.
Britain's roads are so littered with craters - over one million - that the Asphalt Industry Alliance (AIA) has revealed it will take an estimated £16.78bn to tackle the backlog of repairs, leading the Government to announce new measures to tackle them.
While the majority of drivers are all for heavier cars and vehicles paying more to use the roads in order to compensate for the added toll on tarmac, not everyone is in favour.
A small number, 17 per cent, disagree that HGV operators should pay an additional levy, while 23 per cent are against vans facing additional charges. One in five (21 per cent) are opposed to heavier cars paying more road tax.
And when drivers were asked if they would be happy to cough up more money to improve road surfaces around the UK, the research clearly shows that motorists already feel they are personally paying enough to support our road maintenance budgets.
In contrast to a levy on HGVs or vans, only a quarter of drivers would be prepared to pay more 'road tax' to be ring-fenced for road repairs in their local area.
Dan Joyce, operations director at Kwik Fit, said: 'Our new research highlights that there are no easy answers as to how this [road maintenance] is funded. Motorists already feel that they are contributing enough so it is understandable that they want the additional burden to be on the heavier vehicles believed to do the most damage to road surfaces.
'Of course, any costs placed on businesses through levies on HGVs or delivery vans are likely to be passed through to the end consumer, so it's critical that potential measures are not looked at in isolation.'
Kia's £65,000 EV9, which has a kerb weight of 2,664kg and a maximum load weight 3,240kg
Heavier cars are increasing damage to UK roads
The AIA in 2024 found that Britain's growing road repair crisis has been fuelled by 'increased average vehicle weights on a deteriorating network'.
New cars have been growing at an annual average of 10kg heavier and half a centimetre wider in recent years, also driven by growing demand for SUVs, reports have found.
The increase in heavier vehicles and cars was said to be helping push Britain's crumbling roads to 'breaking point'.
Just last week the Government announced that millions of drivers will have an updated category B driving licence - by far the most common type held by tens of millions of motorists in the UK - to allow these licence holders to get behind the wheel of heavier vehicles.
Drivers can now pilot vehicles with a heavier maximum authorised mass (MAM) of up to 4,250kg, having previously been limited to 3,500kg.
However, the new rules apply to electric vehicles only because electric SUVs - which are laden with weighty battery packs to deliver long ranges on a full charge - are now teetering dangerously close to the previous MAM restriction.
How much are drivers having to shell out to fix pothole damage to vehicles?
This year's ALARM Report from the AIA revealed that the estimated £16.8billion road repair backlog bill has increased by 42 per cent since 2016.
Kwik Fit Pothole Impact Tracker published earlier this year highlighted how the cost to drivers has increased during the same period: Motorists are facing higher costs of 150 per cent to repair pothole-caused damage.
Last year, the country's drivers paid a total of £1.7billion to repair vehicle damage caused by potholes.
And while the IAM RoadSmart data last week put the average repair bill at £320, other drivers are having to stump up three times that to repair or replace damaged wheels, shattered suspension components and broken steering parts.
Some five per cent say they paid more than £1,000 getting their motors fixed after driving through a pothole during the 12-month period.
The road safety charity said potholes are not just a 'danger to motorists and cyclists alike' but they have become a 'substantial financial burden' on drivers.
Our five-step guide to making pothole compensation claims
1. Collect the evidence
If you're a motorist looking to make a claim for a repair bill for pothole-related damage, or a cyclist putting in a damage or personal injury claim after hitting one in the road, the first port of call is to make a note of where the pothole is located, the time and date of the incident, and take a photo of the pothole.
A pothole needs to be at least 2 inches deep to be deemed a pothole in the eyes of councils.
And it's not just the depth and size of the pothole that councils will try to use to refuse paying out compensation.
Local authorities may defend a claim if they successfully argue that the pothole was not an obvious hazard - or if they were unaware of it, despite having in place a reasonable system of inspection and repair.
To improve your chances of a successful claim, it will help to demonstrate whether the pothole was an obvious danger or not.
Where possible, take photos at the scene, just in case the council repairs the pothole before you can return to take them.
If you didn't do this at the time of the incident, you can return to the scene to take pictures.
You should also take a photos of the damage the pothole has caused to your vehicle (or person, if you have been injured).
If possible, take your car to a garage and ask for a mechanic's report in writing for the projected cost to fix the issue caused – or if your motor isn't drivable, phone a reputable repair centre and request a quote.
2. Work out who is to blame
To make a claim for compensation, first you need to know who should pay out.
If the pothole is on a motorway or main trunk road, the chances are it is a National Highways (formerly Highways England) problem.
For local roads, you will need to research which council is responsible.
Once you've identified the party you need to contact, request a copy of highway maintenance schedules and number of reported incidents on the particular road for the previous 14 days as evidence that the road hasn't been properly maintained or a reported pothole hasn't been addressed.
3. Make the claim
You'll need to issue a formal claim to the local authority or National Highways and most responsible parties will have a template you can request from them.
4. What to do if you do - or don't - get a compensation offer
After making the claim, you should be notified if compensation is being granted.
Though you can still reject the value of the offer if you believe it isn't sufficient, especially if you have evidence that the pothole had already been reported but the responsible party had not acted to rectify it.
If the council refuses compensation, you can seek legal advice or make a case through the courts.
However, a word of warning that this could be a time-consuming process and is likely to be worthwhile only if the repair bill is considerable.
5. Final option: Make a claim through your insurance
If you have comprehensive cover, you can claim for pothole damage on your insurance policy.
However, it's worth considering the cost of the damage as well as your excess payments and if this action will affect your No Claims Bonus.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
The race is one to better 'the electric vehicle experience'
The deadline is just a decade away. From 2035, if you buy a new car in the UK, it will have to be 100% emissions free. But while the pressure to move to electric vehicles (EVs) is transforming the car making landscape, there are firms in the East seizing an opportunity and creating will, however, have to overcome the barriers that studies show still deter motorists from making the switch – cost, range anxiety, charging time and Department for Transport said one in five new cars sold in May was electric, with the UK leading Europe in EV sales this race to develop consumer-friendly EV technology is on. Rules imposed to speed up the transition to electric vehicles in the UK partly drove the decision to close the Vauxhall plant in Luton in March, with the loss of more than 1,000 jobs. For manufacturers, the goal is to make EVs as quick and easy to use as petrol and diesel cars. The Cambridge start-up company, Nyobolt, believes that starts with battery track tests, in a purpose-built sports car, a new battery developed by Nyobolt charged from 10% to 80% in four minutes and 37 seconds - from a 350kW charger. It also has a long life span – able to charge 4000 full cycles while maintaining over 80% battery president Ramesh Narasimhan says it is "like filling up with fuel"."Most cars today, even with fast charging, take around 40 minutes to charge," he said."That takes time away from the customer, and it means planning journeys more." The race to develop this technology is Chinese company BYD announced an ultra-fast charging battery earlier this year. It has overtaken Tesla as the best-selling EV maker in the world, and has just launched a car in the UK. In China, which has prioritised advances in this area, EVs are now the success of Nyobolt's current technology relies on consumers accepting something is not producing batteries with long ranges, because government data suggests 99% of car journeys in the UK are within 100 miles (161km). The test car had a range of 155 miles (250km)."Who needs a battery that will last 1,000 miles?" said Mr Narasimhan. "Why not have a smaller, lighter, cheaper battery which uses fewer natural resources to make?"But Tom Stacey has his doubts. As a senior lecturer at Anglia Ruskin University, he studies consumer attitudes to EVs."Nyobolt's approach is definitely common sense," he said."But drivers have spent decades using cars that are fast to fill up and last for three or four hundred miles, so it's hard for them to accept anything else."It's different in industry and business because they focus on reducing downtime and cost - so they would see the advantage of technology like this." The secret to Nyobolt's battery lies in the anode - the part of the battery which receives electrons when charging and releases them when the battery is being company uses Niobium Tungsten Oxide which Steve Hutchins, vice president of engineering and operations, says has addressed some of the issues associated with lithium-ion batteries."It means the battery can charge faster, using higher power, without getting mega hot and entering the conditions which cause them to potentially catch fire," he said. The company is manufacturing its anode material at a new factory in Haverhill, Suffolk because "it's really important to have production close to the researchers in Cambridge".About 70 staff are expected to work at the site once fully operational, but that relies on demand for the product. The company is in talks with a number of manufacturers, but even though EV sales are increasing, it takes time for companies to invest. "Given the safety tests that have to take place, it could take around four years to get this to market," the company Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders says the charging infrastructure remains the biggest hurdle in changing attitudes to EVs. "With the UK public charging network expanding but far from complete and still costly, many drivers understandably prefer longer-range models," said chief executive, Mike Hawes. As of May 2025, there were 80,998 public charging points in the UK - 8,284 of them were 150kW or above. Nyobolt's batteries charge with a 350kW device. BYD's newly unveiled battery charges at 1000kW. Gridserve, a company specialising in EV charging infrastructure, has started to roll out 350kW devices at service stations along the M1, M4 and "electric forecourts" in Norwich and Braintree - but they make up a small fraction of the overall public system. Mr Narasimhan, however, thinks there is still time to address that problem."If the manufacturers spoke to the government now and said 'we'll have this technology ready in a few years' then work can start on the necessary charging network at the same time," he Department for Transport said it was investing £4bn in helping people switch to EVs and that the public charging network was "expanding at the rate of one every 29 minutes."As a result, EV uptake is accelerating," a spokesperson said. "One in five new cars sold in May was electric, and the UK led Europe in EV sales in early 2025. Infrastructure will continue to match rising sales." No specific data was available on 350kW chargers. For now, Nyobolt's batteries are powering robots - a market which is faster to break into. It also recently secured $30m in funding to continue its research and to develop batteries for heavy vehicles. The government wants the UK to become a leader in battery technology, and runs a scheme to help, which Nyobolt has benefited from, but it is clear that even when companies develop a viable product, the journey to adoption can be slow and uncertain. Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Top Gear
an hour ago
- Top Gear
'We're not the taste police': meet Chloe Dowsett, the specialist artist at Rolls-Royce
Interview When it comes to bespoke project requests, if you want it, you can have it Skip 6 photos in the image carousel and continue reading "There's bespoke and there's bespoke ... and there's complete one-off bespoke, which is where we fit in.' Chloe Dowsett is demonstrating how she provides Rolls-Royce's clients with the most bespoke interior detailing service since someone ushered Michelangelo into the Sistine Chapel and asked 'Reckon you can make this gaff look mint?' In minutes she turns a chalk outline into the most vivid 2D kingfisher we've ever seen, so lifelike that it might leap off its leather canvas and flitter around the room. Chloe works in the interior trim centre in a super-secret studio deep within Rolls' Goodwood HQ, off limits to prying eyes and, er, Top Gear photographers. To understand how she wound up there, we need to rewind. Born into a creative family, Chloe spent her childhood painting, drawing and sculpting. Yep: if you dream of being a master craftsperson for the world's most luxurious car brand, start with papier-mache. She was on Neil Buchanan's kids TV classic Art Attack , and her certificate for it hangs next to that of her art degree at home. 'They are equally as important.' Too right. Advertisement - Page continues below After her studies followed a string of jobs that took her as far afield as New York, and as niche as writing gags for a CGI reboot of The Wombles as one of the project's storyboard artists. She later started her own business doing everything from murals to signwriting, but began to panic she was saying 'yes' to work that didn't represent her as an artist. 'A fine artist wants to prove a point,' she explains. 'You're like a scientist. There's an intention. You have an idea and you want to create something out of it.' Photography: Tom Barnes You might like That led her to Rolls, initially sewing seats on the production line, and then on to the small team led by the acclaimed Mark Court, whose freehand coach lines have made him a cult hero. Because nothing else says Rolls like having one man to meticulously hand-paint pinstripes. Although, when he started the company made a few hundred cars a year; these days it's around 6,000. New recruits were inevitable. 'Coachline's like his baby,' says Chloe. 'He's so proud to be there and he wants it to be the best.' So like an old-school apprenticeship she studied him for months, getting hands on only occasionally at first and then more frequently as she earned his trust. Chloe was used to using 10 per cent of a brush tip for her own art, but Mark taught her to lay the whole thing onto the car's surface. 'Which felt so alien,' she explains, while inside thinking 'How dare you tell me how to hold a paintbrush! Advertisement - Page continues below 'But you do, you have to push it all the way down to the bristle and pull it along so it almost pulls itself.' It sounds like trying to copy someone's handwriting. 'It's worse! There's no two goes at it. You can't practice on the side of a car. There is a lot of pressure.' We've got painters now, so let's celebrate translucency, accidental marks, brushstrokes Chloe emerged with flying colours, absorbing Mark's sense of care and tradition in the process. 'In my new job they call me the paintbrush police,' she says of her scrupulous cleaning regime. 'But how cool would it be in 30 years if I've got the brush I started with?' Very cool. And very Rolls. So, the new job: if you want to treat the inside of your Phantom as the world's most sophisticated blank canvas, Chloe is who you call. She can turn her hand to almost any leather surface inside the car, from tiny embellishments to full headliners. They get all sorts of requests – including pet likenesses, because of course – but Rolls doesn't judge. 'We're not the taste police,' Chloe insists. 'If you want it, you can have it.' Fido on the glovebox, anyone? Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox. Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox. Leather is stretchy, so Rolls spent years developing techniques with an acrylic paint that's applied before the leather's protective coating, for maximum durability. Its waxy surface means it absorbs the paint, but not to the point you lose the colour. Which is the same wet as it is dry. Easier to visualise, you see. The skin is textured, and ripples as it's painted, something that's now second nature to Chloe. 'If I painted on paper it'd be strange.' While Rolls' designers will often simply hand Chloe some requests and let her crack on, she does meet some customers to give her input. 'The percentage of artistic license we have is increasing all the time. You're buying into what we are able to do... and then you have to look at it every single day. 'If you want something abstract, let's celebrate paint because if you're doing something neat, you could print it. You could laser etch it. You could embroider it. We've got painters now, so let's celebrate translucency, accidental marks, brushstrokes. That's what's great about painting, all painted cars are a one-off.' Chloe doesn't think she'll get bored any time soon, and can see herself taking on 'the whole process' from concept to application in the future. 'Ideally I'd bring my own artwork in and maybe do a car that was my own design. That'd be great.' You could call it the ultimate in creative freedom. Which is what all artists crave, right? 'One hundred per cent. Always. It's such a curse.'
Top Gear
an hour ago
- Top Gear
Why can't Red Bull find an adequate second driver?
Interview Racing Bull's team principal tells TG: 'You can't find a Max Verstappen every year' Skip 6 photos in the image carousel and continue reading Red Bull's got a massive problem. Since last year's British Grand Prix, Max Verstappen has bagged a world championship, several race wins, many more podiums and 353 points. In that time the second car has scored… 40. That's disastrous. And aside from Max never having a wingman, it also means the team is effectively fighting for the constructors' championship with one hand tied behind its back. Like a gladiator going into battle with a bludgeon in one hand and a damp cotton bud in the other. Advertisement - Page continues below It's not a new problem either. Since Daniel Ricciardo left the team in 2018, Verstappen has made a string of promising youngsters look bang average. Pierre Gasly, Alex Albon, Liam Lawson and now Yuki Tsunoda have all been steamrollered by the Red Bull x Verstappen freight train. Even outside hire Sergio Perez – a race winner and tyre whisperer who'd spent most of his career nabbing podiums in midfield cars that didn't deserve them – was resoundingly crushed. No wonder everyone thinks the seat is cursed. You might like So has the Red Bull young driver programme failed? Laurent Mekies, team principal of the Racing Bulls junior squad, doesn't think so: 'I look at the F2 and F3 races and there is Red Bull drivers winning every weekend,' he says. 'I look at Yuki in Formula 1 now in Red Bull Racing. I look at Isack [Hadjar] being the new sensation. 'You can't find a Max Verstappen every year. Before Max, Sebastian won four titles. Max won four titles. In the meantime you have a pipeline of guys and Daniel [Ricciardo] in the middle of it. I'm not sure you could have done much more, you know? Advertisement - Page continues below 'So I think the programme is working well. Let me put it this way: when Red Bull Racing has a driver need, if they are able to rely on the programme to fill that need, it means the programme is working. If they are not able to rely on the programme, then it means we should probably do a better job.' He has a point. Albon has found a new home at Williams and his reputation has soared; Gasly won the Italian Grand Prix after being spat out by Red Bull and is now a solid runner at Alpine; Carlos Sainz (Verstappen's first teammate, don't forget) was deemed worthy of Ferrari and won four grands prix in red. Why Red Bull made no attempt to bring him back for 2025 is mildly baffling. Lawson is the most recent case of being thrown in at the deep end long before he was ready for it. Rather than get a season or four to learn the ropes, the New Zealander had just 11 races of prep (over two separate campaigns) before being promoted to the big time. The outcome? His first and last races for Red Bull were just seven days apart. His record went like this: qualified P18, crashed; qualified last, sprint race P14; qualified last, P12. And then it was all brought to an end with a (presumably quite awkward) phone call. Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox. Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox. Mekies doesn't consider that a win, right? 'No, this is not success,' he agrees. 'I think none of us anticipated the difficulties that Liam would get over there.' But that doesn't mean Liam might not come good in the future, he argues, and the fact RB had two drivers on the roster who were at least worth a shot should count in the team's favour, he reckons. Again, he has a point. After taking his time to recover from such a tough chapter, Lawson finished a career-best P6 in Austria last weekend and with both him and the immensely likable Hadjar scoring decent points lately, the VCARB satellite is right where the mothership wants it – at the sunnier end of the midfield battle. READ MORE Isack Hadjar's impressive F1 start has surprised his own team But back to that first question: why can't Red Bull find a driver who can get remotely close Verstappen? If any number of hotshoes end up looking like rank amateurs at Red Bull then the culprit must be… the car. Red Bull's cars are typically oversteer-y, making the rear end extremely sensitive. Verstappen has genius-level ability to deal with this type of setup, and make it fast. He might be the only driver in the world who can do it. But if you need a once-in-a-generation talent to make your car work… you're going to get found out, aren't you? Red Bull is arguably facing the music already: it lost Adrian Newey last year and its pace has dived dramatically since. Next year it will build its own engine (with some help from Ford) for the very first time, and you only need to pump 'Honda Alonso GP2' into the YouTube search bar to see how crippling a duff power unit can be. And with Max Verstappen leaving for Mercedes a real possibility, Red Bull could – we repeat, could – genuinely find itself near the back of the grid next year. Which would be some fall from its almost undefeated season in 2023. The team needs some back-up geniuses, and soon. And Peter Bayer, Racing Bulls' CEO, has an idea of where to look. 'One of the things we are currently discussing – and which I know Helmut Marko ultimately is responsible for – is whether we have to extend into the world of karting which, so far, Red Bull has not done strategically. 'What you're seeing now when you go into a kart track, you'll have a Williams representative, an Alpine representative, Mercedes has a representative, and they're signing kids at the age of 10, 11, 12 years old. Ferrari, I think now also is reaching out into that world. 'It's something we need to look at. Otherwise you'll end up with F4 as your entry point, and you might be too late. Because you miss out on a talent, or you have to buy a talent out from another squad.' There's a lesson, boys and girls: find the most oversteer-y go-kart you can get your hands on and don't come in for tea until you can slide it in your sleep. Then give Racing Bulls a call.
