&w=3840&q=100)
From pineapples to chips and rare earths, China weaponizes everything
From blocking Taiwanese pineapples to slapping tariffs on Australian wine and restricting chip exports to the West, China has long used trade as a tool of geopolitical pressure.
According to a Financial Times report, now, the country is turning to something far more strategic and potent: rare earth elements.
Soon after Beijing imposed new restrictions on exporting rare earth minerals and the specialised magnets made from them, the global auto industry warned of potential shortages that could lead to factory shutdowns.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
China's strategic use of rare earth sanctions this spring was likely a decisive factor behind Washington's decision to roll back its tariff increases on the country, added the report.
This marks a new chapter in Chinese economic statecraft, demonstrating a sanctions approach capable of exerting pressure not just on smaller neighbours, but on the world's largest economy as well.
According to the report, while China has frequently employed economic sanctions in recent years, many of these actions have been blunt and only partially effective.
Often, punitive measures were subtle or officially denied - for instance, claims that Chinese tourists lost interest in visiting the Philippines, Taiwanese pineapples failed health inspections, or Chinese consumers simply chose not to buy Korean products.
Government-backed boycotts have inflicted economic pain on China's trade partners but delivered mixed political results. They've deterred some countries from hosting the Dalai Lama or contesting Beijing's South China Sea claims, yet faltered on core national interests, added the report.
Australia stood firm despite China's wine import cuts over policy disputes. South Korea kept its missile defence system despite Chinese sanctions. And China's earlier sanctions against the US — including blacklisting defence companies and imposing licensing regimes on certain mineral exports — have been more political signal than economic substance.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Rare earth export controls
The new rare earth export controls are different.
In weeks, they threatened to close major auto factories — the largest sector in advanced economies — and pressured the US into rolling back its trade war measures.
According the Financial Times report, in just a handful of weeks they threatened to shutter key factories across the auto industry — the largest manufacturing sector in most advanced economies.
They also brought the US president to heel on his signature initiative: the trade war.
The White House believed it had secured escalation dominance, assuming soaring tariffs would force Beijing to negotiate due to unbearable costs. However, China's leaders were willing to bear the political fallout from the tariffs, while Washington couldn't overlook the critical loss of rare earth materials and its severe impact on the auto industry, added the report.
Why these sanctions worked
China's latest sanctions succeeded in part because Beijing has refined its toolkit, creating a legal framework to restrict strategic exports and gaining deeper insight into the vulnerabilities of its trading partners, reported FT.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
It has even extended its reach extraterritorially, demanding that companies abroad avoid using Chinese minerals in products destined for the US defence industry. Beijing's strategy relied on the assumption that other major partners would not blame China for the rare earth restrictions, but instead pressure Washington to ease tariffs, added the report.
Since April, Chinese exports of rare earth minerals and magnets have dropped not only to the US but also to key partners like Japan and South Korea.
Indian automakers have cut production amid material shortages, while European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen highlighted rare earth magnets at the June G7 meeting to urge greater non-China production. The EU is now prioritising rare earth exports in its diplomatic talks with China.
China's rare earth restrictions have had broad global effects, revealing limits in its ability to precisely target only the US. It's easier to control specialised equipment than widely traded commodities like rare earth oxides, which other countries can still sell quietly to American buyers.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The most striking issue is how unprepared Western governments and companies were. Despite widespread awareness of China's dominance, the West has failed to secure alternative suppliers since China first cut rare earth exports to Japan in 2011.
Some progress was made — South Korea built stockpiles and Japan invested in Australian mines — but most Western critical minerals strategies lacked funding. Manufacturers claim resilience but often keep just a week's supply of rare earth magnets. This was a clear vulnerability they ignored — and Beijing's move was no surprise.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
23 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump administration seeks to ban China from buying US farms
The Trump administration has a message for China: Keep off the farm. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said Tuesday the administration will work with state lawmakers to ban sales of U.S. farmland to buyers from China and other countries of concern, citing national-security interests. Rollins, joined by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, said the government is ratcheting up scrutiny on existing land owned by Chinese buyers and is looking at ways to potentially claw back past purchases. 'We'll never let foreign adversaries control our land," said Rollins. State and federal lawmakers for years have warned that China and other countries could use U.S. farmland to facilitate spying or wield influence over the U.S. food supply chain. Chinese-owned entities hold nearly 300,000 acres—roughly 0.02%—of U.S. farmland, according to Agriculture Department data, an area about the size of Los Angeles. Republicans and Democrats alike have sought to curb foreign ownership of American farmland, at times seeking to increase government scrutiny of purchases and investments. Critics have raised fears that foreign owners could drive up land prices or sidestep environmental rules. China's government has played down such concerns as overblown. Representatives of China's embassy in Washington, D.C., had no immediate comment. Rollins said on Tuesday that U.S. farms are under threat from China and other countries that are trying to infiltrate American agricultural research and steal technology. 'No longer can foreign adversaries assume we aren't watching," Hegseth said. Some state and municipal lawmakers have taken steps in recent years to block China-backed investment or ownership in U.S. agriculture. The city of Grand Forks, N.D., in 2023 halted the construction of a Chinese-owned corn mill after a U.S. Air Force official said the planned $700 million facility could represent a national-security risk because of its proximity to a nearby base. Some China-based ownership of U.S. farmland involves prominent U.S. agriculture companies. Pork giant Smithfield Foods and seed and pesticide supplier Syngenta have both faced criticism from government officials and lawmakers because of their Chinese owners. Smithfield is majority-owned by Chinese pork company WH Group and Syngenta is a subsidiary of China National Chemical. The companies' American leaders have pushed back, saying their China-based owners have helped them invest in U.S. farmers and create jobs. Smithfield in the past represented roughly half of the U.S. farmland owned by Chinese entities, via its Hong Kong-based parent. Much of that had been tied up in hundreds of company-owned hog farms and processing plants, according to federal data. WH Group acquired Smithfield in 2013, aiming to harness its technology and expertise to boost WH's operations in China. Smithfield returned to the U.S. public markets earlier this year, raising roughly $500 million after listing its shares on the Nasdaq Stock Market. WH Group owns about 93% of Smithfield's shares. 'We're an American company, American management team and made in America," Smithfield Chief Executive Shane Smith said in an interview earlier this year. Smithfield last year sold more than 40,000 acres of its U.S. farmland, leaving it with roughly 85,000 acres. Shares of Smithfield fell about 1% on Tuesday. Syngenta, the largest pesticide seller in the U.S., has said it owns a small amount of land for research, development and regulatory trials. The company, which employs about 4,000 people in the U.S., has previously faced calls to sell its farmland holdings. Two years ago, Arkansas ordered Syngenta to sell about 160 acres in the state, where it maintained an agricultural research facility with a few dozen employees. Syngenta at the time called the state's decision shortsighted. A Syngenta spokesman said Tuesday that the company is in the process of selling its remaining U.S. farmland and currently owns less than 1,000 acres in the country. Write to Patrick Thomas at


Deccan Herald
39 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
CDS Gen Chauhan warns against Pak-China-Bangladesh 'collusivity' for India's security interests
Gen Chauhan said there were no unusual activities by the Chinese side along the northern border when India and Pakistan were engaged in the four-day conflict.


Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Beyond the glitch: How China's Foxconn executive recall could reshape India's electronics future
New Delhi: Foxconn's recent recalls of key Chinese technology specialists from its Indian arm may hurt Apple's capacity to scale up the production of iPhones in India, hampering the country's ability to quickly boost its net earnings by churning out these high-end smartphones, government officials, industry executives, and analysts told Mint. Four people that Mint spoke with said that while the withdrawals may not lead to a major disruption of operations for Apple or Bharat Foxconn International Holdings Limited (FIH), at stake is India's ability to expand its assembly lines without oversight from China-based technology experts, partners and stakeholders. For now, China's move appears to be restricted largely to Rising Stars Hi tech—a wholly-owned subsidiary of Foxconn's India unit, Bharat FIH, a senior government official said. Also read | Land, power, skill: Inside the high-stakes battle to build the next Foxconn City The 'net' earnings from India's electronics industry, commonly referred to as 'domestic value addition', refers to the industry's total contribution to India's economy—after paying all due royalties to foreign entities supplying the requisite infrastructure. It is this that came under the scanner after Bloomberg reported on 2 July about China urging Taiwan's Foxconn to strategically recall key executives—thus halting localization of technologies critical to expanding the electronics manufacturing ecosystem in India. Foxconn has pulled over 100 key Chinese tech leaders, who were deputed to the company's India operations, in phases over the past six months. The Centre is not too worried at the moment—underlining that India's electronics economy should 'find a way to chart its own growth path in the long run, and some disruptions are a part of the usual process." 'Whenever there is a significant geographical shift of an established supply chain—such as that we're seeing Apple undertake—there is some amount of disruption and adjustments that happen as part of the technology transfer process. The government, as part of the established process under Press Note 3 (of 2020), issues visas to visiting delegations of foreign nations based on their applications. Even as some Chinese nationals are being withdrawn, there are executives from the US, Taiwan and Vietnam who have replaced them. Any impact on the Indian electronics ecosystem is thus likely to be limited, and short-term," the government official cited earlier added, requesting anonymity. The Press Note 3 in question was a special-provision move by the Centre made in 2020, restricting foreign investment and executive movements from 'nations that share a land border with India"—notably including China, in light of the clash between the two nations in Ladakh's Galwan Valley. Source of issue To be sure, the key point of the current issue stems from Rising Stars Hi Tech, alongside Tata Electronics, being involved significantly in ramping up Apple's electronics supply chain in India. With US president Donald Trump's trade pressures, Apple sought to shift its US supply chain from China to India for iPhones. However, this requires India to significantly expand its own assembly line capacities to produce '80-90 million iPhones per year", said Navkendar Singh, associate vice-president at market research and consultancy firm International Data Corp (IDC) India. 'To execute this expansion phase—without even taking the question of value addition into account, technology specialists from China make for a crucial resource in terms of establishing the local infrastructure, localizing the machineries, and training senior executives within India to retrain other executives to take over. This process is still an ongoing one, and is what will likely be hit in the long run as a result of China's silent strictures," Singh said. Also read | Mint Quick Edit | Foxconn's India plans should cheer us up The training and domestic value addition factors, however, are of utmost importance for India's electronics goals. India aims to scale its electronics economy to $500 billion by 2030, from $150 billion currently. By this time, with Apple picking India as an assembly destination of choice, iPhones could single-handedly and directly contribute up to $80 billion to this economy, significantly higher than the current $20-25 billion. Indirectly, Apple's impact is significantly higher. The company is the world's single-largest smartphone maker, and sells at 3x the average selling price of smartphones in most markets. As a result, Apple choosing India as a source of assembly is set to bring more supply chain and components ecosystem vendors to the country—thereby building a circular electronics economy within India in the long run. It is this localization that would further enhance domestic value-addition, which, as per Tarun Pathak, director and partner at market researcher and consultant Counterpoint India, is at 16% currently. This means that for every iPhone assembled in and shipped from India, 16% of the total manufacturing cost goes towards boosting the country's gross domestic product (GDP). By 2030, India hopes to double the domestic value addition, as per Singh, Pathak, and the Centre's own estimates. Doing so will double the net domestic revenue that is added to India's GDP from iPhone assembling. However, stalling the arrival of key executives could present a considerable near-term threat to the doubling of local earnings. Critical for expansion A senior industry executive familiar with the current movements said, requesting anonymity, that 'the involvement of senior technology specialists from China is critical to expand manufacturing supply chains, since India has not upskilled enough engineers at scale to fully replace the need for foreign partners within the electronics engineering firms." A second industry executive who works with a rival of Rising Stars Hi Tech in India, requesting anonymity, added that 'a lot of specialized machinery that is set up for the first time requires senior executives with technical knowhow from China, since the machine operation interfaces are often proprietary—and also in Chinese." 'This requires specialized training for Indian tech executives to undertake—and subsequently localize these processes to ensure that the licensing fees paid to foreign entities go down each year. But, without hand-holding right now, the localization process will face a significant slowdown," the second executive added. Read more | Dixon is becoming India's Foxconn For the long run, the Centre has rolled out a $2.7-billion components localization incentives scheme for vendors to enter India. Last week, a $12-billion research, development and innovation (RDI) scheme under the Department of Science and Technology (DST) also sought to provide critical electronics makers with long-term concessional loans to build their own machinery and other processes. 'Threats such as giving in to China's pressure of withdrawing technology executives will happen even more frequently, if India does not start ramping-up its licensed technologies and its own patents in the electronics industry. It will also be left open to losing business because of foreign disruptions, and that should be avoided at all costs," said Ajai Chowdhry, industry veteran, and co-founder of HCL and electronics body Epic Foundation.