
Scientists have found a cricket evolving rapidly to beat a new threat
Some newcomers quietly adapt to their new environs. Others go rogue and become invasive, throwing the lives of native species in chaos. These invasions are becoming more common, which means more and more native species are being forced to make a choice: evolve to survive or perish.
A love song vanishes
On the Hawaiian islands, Pacific field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) evolved — and how. To avoid being hunted by an invasive parasitoid fly called Ormia ochracea, they have started remixing the songs they've been using to find mates. But according to a study published recently in Current Biology, these escape plans might not be foolproof, at least not yet.
About 30 years ago, as O. ochracea flies flew into Hawaii from tropical America, the sound of Pacific field crickets' love songs vanished from the islands. Using their acute sense of hearing, the flies were able to zero in on male crickets as they sang and laid their eggs inside the crickets' bodies. When the larvae hatched, they fed on the nutrients around them and eventually burrowed out, killing the crickets.
'About 20 years ago, we discovered a population on Kauai [in Hawaii] that had gone completely silent because a mutation on their wing erased the sound-producing structures in these crickets,' University of Denver professor Robin Tinghitella said. 'Males still rubbed their wings together but no sound came out. It was a pretty wild discovery. The mutation swept through the island because it protected crickets from flies.'
Recently, however, Tinghitella's group discovered populations of Pacific field crickets that still sang — but the music was somewhat different: it contained some additional subdued purrs and rattles. It differed in both frequency and amplitude from the original music. The researchers found that it was still loud enough to attract females but quiet enough to evade O. ochracea flies.
To Tinghitella, the crickets' new adaptation signalled a 'rapid pace of evolutionary change'.
Step by step? No, thanks
'This got us wondering: could the flies be evolving to keep up?' she continued. 'This kicked off a series of lab and field experiments to see if the neural and behavioural responses of flies were responding to changes in cricket songs'.
To test if the flies were evolving in sync with their prey, the researchers compared the sensitivity of Hawaiian flies to certain sounds and frequencies with that of lab-maintained native flies from Florida. The ancestral Floridian flies were most sensitive to sounds around 4-6 kHz, which is also the frequency most field crickets call at. On the other hand, the researchers found, the O. ochracea flies had broadened their hearing range, tuning into sounds from 6 to 20 kHz.
Next, they placed a live fly on a spherical treadmill with speakers on either side. When they played synthetic pre-recorded cricket songs, the Hawaiian flies were more responsive to the purrs and rattles of Pacific field crickets than their ancestral counterparts.
Despite the crickets' efforts to stay under the radar, the flies could still find them.
'What we are seeing isn't a classic incremental step-by-step co-evolution, where the cricket changes a little bit in one direction and then the fly carefully tracks that, and so on,' said Tinghitella. 'Instead, the flies have become more responsive to a broad range of sounds that might allow them to track a variety of changes in cricket song.'
When the male crickets make new sounds, they aren't changing the way they interact with flies alone. Female crickets have also become less picky in this time about male songs. 'If the females had still preferred only the traditional song, males with the mutations [that cause purrs and rattles] would not have succeeded. They would have gone locally extinct,' Tinghitella said.
A new challenge
How much and how quickly a species can evolve depends on its resilience, generation time, the plasticity of its traits, and ecological pressure. For example, organisms with short generation times, like insects, reproduce rapidly so they have more chances to evolve, potentially allowing them to respond faster to new threats. Likewise, more long-lived species may be more vulnerable. Even beyond these considerations, unexpected and synergistic pressures may still destabilise either type of species, Viraj Torsekar, an ecologist at GITAM Deemed to be University, Hyderabad, said.
The populations of insects are falling in many parts of the world. Their extinction rates are estimated to be eight-times higher than those of birds, mammals or reptiles. Their vulnerability means even if conditions become more unfavourable than usual for a short period — e.g. a year with bad weather — populations are liable to collapse than more long-lived organisms that can better face a fluctuating threat, Cleo Bertelsmeier, professor in the department of ecology and evolution at the University of Lausanne, Switzerland, said.
As global warming, extreme weather, and biological invasions intensify, predicting how species with varying ecological needs will respond to compounding pressures is becoming increasingly challenging. Many researchers are looking at the genomic architecture of wild insect species to predict their ability to adapt.
According to Tinghitella, rapid evolution could explain why some invaders do so well or why some species manage to cope. To predict how these interactions are going to play out in the long-term, understanding how evolution happens in these situations is key.
Rupsy Khurana is Science Communication and Outreach Lead at the National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bengaluru.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
Did spiders swim before they could crawl? Fossil analysis reveals shocking information
Image credits: X/@PondManUK While many are understandably scared of snakes, what most seem to be terrified of are little, crawling creatures called spiders. Now it seems these crawlers were swimming in good ole waters before adapting to land and engaging in a never-ending game of I-spy with humans. According to the analysis of an "exquisitely preserved" fossil that existed 500 million years ago, spiders and their arachnid relatives may have actually originated in the sea. In a research published in the journal Current Biology, researchers at the University of Arizona performed a detailed examination of the brain and central nervous system of an extinct animal called Mollisonia Symmetrica. The species was previously believed to represent a specific group of arthropods called chelicerates that lived during the Cambrian period, between 540 and 485 million years ago. They were believed to be the ancestors of horseshoe crabs. However, after finding the neural arrangements in the creature's fossilized brain, the researchers understood that they were not organized like those in horseshoe crabs. Instead, they were organized akin to the ones in modern spiders and their relatives, said the researchers. The anterior part of Mollisonia's body -- the prosoma -- contains a radiating pattern of segmental ganglia that control the movements of five pairs of segmental appendages, the researchers said. Additionally, an unsegmented brain in their body extends short nerves to a pair of pincer-like "claws" similar to the fangs of spiders and other arachnids. Apart from all of this, the decisive feature that classifies the fossil as an early arachnid is the organisation of its brain, which has a reverse order to the front arrangement found in present-day crustaceans, insects, centipedes and horseshoe crabs, as per the researchers. It's as if the brain has been "flipped backwards," which is what is seen in modern spiders," said Nick Strausfeld, lead author of the paper and a regents professor at the University of Arizona, in a statement. The back-to-front arrangement in the spider brain provides shortcuts from neuronal control centres to underlying circuits, which control their movement. It also helps them with the stealth for hunting and dexterity for spinning webs. Why is the study shocking? Image credits: X Well, first, it changes our entire belief that spiders have been crawling the surface of the planet forever. Spiders and scorpions have existed on the planet for about 400 million years with little change, thus being the most successful group of arthropodan predators. The study challenges the long-held belief that the arachnids lived and diversified only on land. "It is still vigorously debated where and when arachnids first appeared, and what kind of chelicerates were their ancestors, and whether these were marine or semi-aquatic like horseshoe crabs," Strausfeld said. According to the researchers, the Mollisonia's lineage gave rise to spiders, scorpions, sun spiders, vinegarroons and whip scorpions.


Indian Express
3 days ago
- Indian Express
Study led by IISER Pune decodes mechanisms that help plants regrow injured parts with original shape
Gardeners are often seen pruning shrubs or tree branches to maintain plant health and promote fresh growth. Soon, however, the pruned branches regrow with stunning resemblance to their original form. An international group of scientists, led by biologists at the Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune (IISER), has now zeroed in on the key mechanisms in plants that help restore damaged parts to their original shape. Unlike animal cells, plant cells are far more rigid and depend more on growth rates and anisotropy (how a material's physical characteristics change depending on its direction) during cell regeneration. Roots are important facilitators that support nutrient intake. Their naturally tapered shape and conical tip aid better soil penetration. When they get damaged due to natural or external causes, it is observed that the lost cell types and layers get restored and the root regrows to the original tapered shape. In the latest paper published on July 25 in the journal Current Biology, mathematicians and physicists from IISER, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram, Netherlands' Wageningen University, and UK-based John Innes Centre, have attempted to track the mechanisms that may be responsible for restoring the root's tapered shape. In the study, the researchers describe a distinct geometric pattern as per which plant roots regrow after being damaged. This understanding, they said, could help establish fundamental cellular processes, like cell shape and cell regeneration in plants and, in particular, plants vital for food cultivation and securing food security. Instinctive responses of injured roots The group studied the regeneration of the Arabidopsis thaliana root after it was surgically chipped off. They observed notable behaviour in the root regrowth from the 12th hour since being chipped. Instinctively, the injured root's first response was to generate new cells at the wound site. And their goal was to remain oriented in the right direction and help restore the shape and function of the root and maintain its original function. 'The usual cuboidal root cells got morphed into rhomboid shapes. These altered cells then divided diagonally, producing triangular prism-like cells. The diagonal divisions redirected the growth of neighbouring cells along a slanted path — collectively recreating the lost tapered tip,' Kalika Prasad, biologist at IISER-Pune and co-author of the paper, told The Indian Express. After about 18-19 hours post-cutting, the previously flat root end had grown and bulged. By 24 hours, it had become more prominent, indicating the onset of some trigger mechanisms. Corresponding to about 12 hours post the injury, the researchers said, a mechanical tension was noted developing during the growth stage of the injured root. And this tension, they said, guided and controlled the new cells to align and develop in a certain geometric manner. The root tip has multiple cell layers. While cells in the outermost layer grow slower, the cells present in the innermost layer grow rapidly. 'This differential growth then leads to build up in mechanical tension within the cells and, as a response, their shape or geometry starts aligning. In the end, we found the regrown root to have restored perfectly with respect to cell types and the shape. It functioned optimally like an uninjured root,' Prasad said. Similar post-injury cell regeneration behaviour was demonstrated by a mustard plant called Brassica, which the team tested.


The Print
4 days ago
- The Print
COVID-19 pandemic may have aged your brain, even if you weren't infected, finds UK study
According to the researchers, however, these changes could be 'partially reversible' but the most significant aspect highlighted in the study was how much simply living through the uncertainty and isolation of the pandemic affected brain health. Using brain scans from nearly 1,000 healthy adults from before and after the pandemic, researchers found signs of faster brain ageing, especially in older adults, men, and those from disadvantaged backgrounds. Of these samples, those who were infected with COVID-19 also showed some decline in thinking speed and flexibility. But overall, the pandemic's stress alone did shift brain structure in all individuals whose scans were reviewed. New Delhi: A new study from the University of Nottingham has found that just living through the COVID-19 pandemic may have aged people's brains faster, even if they never got infected with the virus itself. The peer-reviewed study was published on 22 July in the journal Nature Communications and is based on data from the UK Biobank Study. It's a powerful reminder that our environment matters for our brain's growth. Read more here. Also Read: A UK health study has collected a whopping 100,000 full-body scans, and Neanderthals had 'family recipes' Spiders originally came from the sea? Next, we might have evidence that spiders could have originally been sea creatures. At least that is what a new peer-reviewed study published in the journal Current Biology on 22 July suggests, after researchers closely examined a preserved fossil from half a billion years ago. The fossil is called Mollisonia symmetrica, and it has a nervous system very similar to that of modern-day arachnids like spiders and scorpions. Until now, scientists thought these creatures only evolved once their ancestors moved onto land 400 million years ago and have remained the same ever since. But this new study flips that theory on its head, quite literally. It cites evidence of the brain of the fossil Mollisonia, which shows a reversed organisation—a signature trait seen in today's arachnids. This arrangement may have given them faster reflexes, better control, and precision, which are all traits modern-day spiders use to hunt and weave webs. The fossil places Mollisonia as a close relative of modern arachnids, meaning these creatures might have started evolving in the ocean long before they crept onto land. Read more here. Scientists genome sequence 100-yr-old Spanish Flu virus A 100-year-old lung sample from Switzerland helped scientists decode the deadliest flu in human history. A new peer-reviewed study by researchers from the Universities of Basel and Zurich published in BMC Biology Journal on 1 July sequenced the genome of the 1918 'Spanish flu' virus. They used preserved tissue from a young patient who died during the pandemic's first wave in Switzerland. The Spanish flu that spread across Europe and Asia in the 1910s is said to have killed between 20-100 million people. By decoding the genome, scientists now have insights into how this flu had already adapted to humans early on. They found three key mutations in the genome—two which helped the virus evade the human immune system, and one which boosted its ability to infect human cells. What makes this study stand out is also how they conducted the study. In viral flus, the genetic information rests in the RNA, not the DNA. The RNA is very quick to degrade but these scientists developed a method to recover ancient viral RNA. This technique could open the door to learning more from historic outbreaks. Read more here. Arctic winter is melting, and researchers have noticed it A group of scientists led by Dr James Bradley from Queen Mary University, London, published a commentary in Nature Communications on 21 July talking about the 'shockingly warm' winter conditions in the Arctic. The team described how they had geared up for winter Arctic fieldwork in Svalbard, wearing layers of thermal clothing, only to find themselves drenched in rain, standing on bare grass, and working without even needing gloves in what is supposed to be the middle of winter in February 2025. Svalbard is a Norwegian archipelago located where the Arctic Ocean converges with the Atlantic Ocean. In the commentary, they raised alarms about melted snow pools, blooming vegetation, and rain replacing snow in the Arctic Circle during winters. Svalbard is heating up six to seven times faster than the global average, and the Arctic winter is no longer reliably frozen, said the team. These conditions not only disrupted their research but also raised safety concerns, like how to retreat from polar bears without their snowmobiles working. The team warns that winter warming in the Arctic is not a fluke but rather the new norm. The message sent by the commentary is clear: climate policy needs to catch up, and fast. Read more here. Also Read: A fiery side-effect of melting glaciers & paging Dr Droid for gallbladder surgery