Before pushing NYC congestion pricing, Gov. Hochul was an anti-toll ‘pioneer'
From her perch on the upstate Hamburg town board to her time in Congress, Hochul fought to get NYS Thruway toll booths torn down and railed against toll hikes, arguing that they placed 'a heavy burden on the communities and businesses' — a stark contrast from her vehement defense of the controversial $9 fee in NYC.
In 1998, town board member Hochul described the tolls in a Buffalo News op-ed as a 'noose' that was 'strangling' the city and having a 'chilling effect' on business.
'The citizens of Buffalo and its first- and second-ring suburbs should not be penalized every time they leave their boundaries by paying tolls to drive to work, go to the mall, visit downtown attractions or take the kids to play hockey,' Hochul wrote.
In an ironic foreshadowing how critics now describe her own congestion-pricing cash grab for the MTA, Hochul argued, 'It's time for the state Thruway Authority, a non-elected entity, which spends over $40 million just to collect tolls, to stop nickel-and-diming us to death.'
The 35-cent Thruway tolls, which were initially charged to pay off bonds and were expected to expire in 1996, were a 'nail in the coffin' for business people, she said.
The same idiom has been employed by taxi industry leaders and restaurant owners in describing NYC congestion pricing, which opponents say is a tax on the working class and bad for business.
In 2003, as deputy county clerk, Hochul convinced her boss, then-County Clerk David Swarts, to join her in lobbying against tolls.
When the Thruway Authority jacked tolls up to 75 cents two years later, she participated in a 'Penny Protest,' where drivers handed over the fee one cent at a time, according to the Niagara Falls Reporter.
By 2007, some of the tolls had been successfully removed and Hochul, newly elected as Erie County Clerk, bragged on her website about having 'championed' the pet project for nine years.
'I want to build on the success we had in removing the … tolls as I undertake new challenges representing you and the residents of Erie County,' she said.
In 2012, as a member of Congress, Hochul pivoted to another toll crusade, writing to then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo to oppose a 45% toll hike on truck drivers. 'If implemented, this would seriously hinder economic activity in our region,' she contended.
She said drivers would have to avoid the Thruway altogether or pass on the additional costs to customers — just as NYC-area businesses from funeral homes to event planners have been forced to pass on the new congestion charges to customers since the program began.
Months later, Hochul boasted in a press release that she was dubbed the 'stop-the-tolls pioneer' by the Buffalo News.
Her Encyclopedia Britannica entry even includes her 'crusade' against highway tolls early in her political career.
New Yorkers slammed Hochul for changing her tune and supporting NYC tolls, which charge $9 for cars and up to $21.60 for trucks traveling below 60th Street during peak hours. This week, she and MTA Chair Janno Lieber vowed to defy an order from President Trump to shut down the program.
Susan Lee, president of the group New Yorkers Against Congestion Pricing Tax, slammed Hochul's reversal as 'hypocritical.'
'If Western New Yorkers [couldn't] afford the [Thruway] toll, what makes her think everyday New Yorkers can afford the [congestion pricing] toll?' Lee told The Post.
Lee said Hochul may have championed the working class back in the day but her support for congestion pricing is clearly a ploy ahead of her re-election campaign to curry favor from lefties who back the costly program.
'She needs to get the votes from that segment of the population, so she doesn't care about the true effects of this regressive tax on every day New Yorkers,' Lee added.
Queens Councilman Robert Holden agreed Hochul's decisions are 'purely political.'
'Kathy Hochul has always been a flip-flopping politician with no real principles and certainly no integrity,' Holden told The Post.
'She knows the congestion scam tax is bad for New York — she's admitted as much before — but, as always, her decisions are purely political, not based on what's right for the people,' he added.
A spokesperson for Hochul defended her support of congestion pricing, saying it 'meets the unique needs of New York City.'
'New York City had the worst traffic congestion in the world until Governor Hochul took bold action to help commuters,' the spokesperson said, adding, 'It's reducing congestion, reducing pollution, improving drive times, investing in public transportation and bringing more foot traffic directly to small and local businesses — and the results speak for themselves.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US House clears procedural hurdle on cryptocurrency legislation
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives cleared a key procedural hurdle Wednesday, setting the stage for likely passage of several cryptocurrency bills a day after President Donald Trump intervened to save the initiative. The vote paves the way for House lawmakers to vote on passage of the several crypto bills, which would mark a huge victory for the digital assets sector. It came one day after conservative Republicans helped defeat a similar procedural measure amid a dispute over how to proceed with the bills. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


UPI
19 minutes ago
- UPI
New York joins multistate lawsuit after Trump administration's FEMA cuts
July 16 (UPI) -- The state of New York joined several other states Wednesday in a lawsuit against the Trump administration's closure of a protective arm of FEMA. New York Attorney General Letitia James announced in a press release that her state has joined 19 others in litigation against Federal Emergency Management Agency chief David Richardson, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and the federal government that seeks the restoration of FEMA's Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities, or BRIC, program. "I'm suing the federal government with a group of [Attorneys General] over its deadly decision to end FEMA's BRIC program and slash billions of dollars that protect communities from natural disasters," James wrote in an X post Wednesday. According to the release, BRIC had "supported critical infrastructure to protect communities from disasters before they happen" with the provision of billions of dollars to state and local governments in order for municipalities to prepare for natural disasters. In a press release that has since been deleted from the FEMA website, FEMA announced in April it was ending BRIC, and canceled all applications sent to BRIC from Fiscal Years 2020-2023, then canceled the fiscal year 2024 notice of funding opportunity. Any grant funds that hadn't been distributed were reabsorbed and returned to either the U.S. Treasury or the Disaster Relief Fund. The dissolution of BRIC followed an Executive Order made in March that, among other decrees, ordered the Secretary of Homeland Security to "propose changes to the policies" related to "national preparedness and response policies and recommend to the President the revisions, recissions, and replacements necessary to reformulate the process and metrics for Federal responsibility." The statement from James noted that the loss of the BRIC program could specifically affect New York, which is noted as being "among the states receiving the most BRIC funding" due to its coastal communities. New York currently has 38 BRIC projects that total over $380 million located across its boundaries, which would be jeopardized by the termination of BRIC. New York City alone was expected to receive BRIC funds for almost 20 different projects, including a $50 million mitigation action plan intended to provide protection from flash flooding of the Harlem River. "This administration's decision to slash billions of dollars that protect our communities from floods, wildfires, and other disasters puts millions of New Yorkers at risk," said Attorney General James in the Wednesday press release from her office. "New Yorkers depend on quality roads, floodwalls, and other vital infrastructure to keep them safe when disaster strikes," she continued. "This administration has no authority to cut this program that has helped save countless lives, and I will continue to fight to ensure New York gets the support we need to prepare for dangerous natural disasters."


Chicago Tribune
20 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and other Trump officials embrace psychedelics after FDA setback
WASHINGTON — For decades, proponents of psychedelic drugs have come to Washington with a provocative message: Illegal, mind-altering substances like LSD and ecstasy should be approved for Americans grappling with depression, trauma and other hard-to-treat conditions. A presidential administration finally seems to agree. 'This line of therapeutics has tremendous advantage if given in a clinical setting and we are working very hard to make sure that happens within 12 months,' Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently told members of Congress. His suggested timeline for green-lighting psychedelic therapy surprised even the most bullish supporters of the drugs. And it comes as psychedelics are making inroads in deep red states like Texas, where former Trump cabinet secretary and ex-governor Rick Perry has thrown his full support behind the effort. The administration's embrace of psychedelics has sparked both excitement as well as concern from those in the field, who worry the drugs might be discredited if they appear to be rushed onto the market or are too closely linked with Kennedy, who is known for controversial views on vaccines, antidepressants and fluoride. 'I'm quite optimistic,' says Rick Doblin, whose organization has pursued the medical use of MDMA (or ecstasy) since the 1980s. 'But I'm also worried that the message the public might get is 'Well, RFK likes psychedelics and now it's approved.'' Under President Joe Biden, the FDA rejected MDMA as a treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder, citing flawed data and questionable research. Regulators called for a new study, likely taking several years. It was a major setback for Doblin and other advocates hoping to see the first U.S. approval of a psychedelic for medical use. But the agency appears ready to reconsider. FDA chief Marty Makary, who reports to Kennedy, has called the evaluation of MDMA and other psychedelics 'a top priority,' announcing a slate of initiatives that could be used to accelerate their approval. One new program promises to expedite drugs that serve 'the health interests of Americans,' by slashing their review time from six months or more to as little as one month. Makary has also suggested greater flexibility on requirements for certain drugs, potentially waiving rigorous controlled studies that compare patients to a placebo group. That approach, considered essential for high-quality research, has long been a stumbling point for psychedelic studies, in which patients can almost always correctly guess whether they've received the drug or a dummy pill. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and FDA also recently hired several new staffers with ties to the psychedelic movement. 'These are all very promising signs that the administration is aware of the potential of psychedelics and is trying to make overtures that they're ready to approve them,' said Greg Ferenstein, a fellow at the libertarian Reason Foundation, who also consults for psychedelic companies. 'We didn't hear anything about that in the Biden administration' A spokesperson for HHS did not respond to a request for comment. As a presidential candidate, Kennedy discussed how his son and several close friends benefited from using psychedelics to deal with grief and other issues. A number of veterans lobbying for psychedelic access have already met with Trump's Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Doug Collins. 'What we're seeing so far is positive,' Collins told House lawmakers in May. But some experts worry the hope and hype surrounding psychedelics has gotten ahead of the science. Philip Corlett, a psychiatric researcher at Yale University, says bypassing rigorous clinical trials could set back the field and jeopardize patients. 'If RFK and the new administration are serious about this work, there are things they could do to shepherd it into reality by meeting the benchmarks of medical science,' Corlett said. 'I just don't think that's going to happen.' As officials in Washington weigh the future of psychedelics, some states are moving ahead with their own projects in hopes of nudging the federal government. Oregon and Colorado have legalized psychedelic therapy. And last month, Texas approved $50 million to study ibogaine, a potent psychedelic made from a shrub that's native to West Africa, as a treatment for opioid addiction, PTSD and other conditions. The research grant — the largest of its kind by any government — passed with support from the state's former GOP governor, Perry, and combat veterans, some who have traveled to clinics in Mexico that offer ibogaine. Ibogaine is on the U.S. government's ultra-restrictive list of illegal, Schedule 1 drugs, which also includes heroin. So advocates in Texas are hoping to build a national movement to ease restrictions on researching its use. 'Governmental systems move slowly and inefficiently,' said Bryan Hubbard of Americans for Ibogaine, a group formed with Perry. 'Sometimes you find yourself constrained in terms of the progress you can make from within.' Ibogaine is unique among psychedelics in both its purported benefits and risks. Small studies and anecdotal reports suggest the drug may be able to dramatically ease addiction and trauma. It was sold for medical use in France for several decades starting in the 1930s, but the drug can also cause dangerous irregular heart rhythms, which can be fatal if left untreated. Some veterans who have taken the drug say the risks can be managed and ibogaine's healing properties go far beyond antidepressants, mood stabilizers, counseling and other standard treatments. Marcus Capone struggled with anger, insomnia and mood swings after 13 years as a Navy Seal. In 2017, at the urging of his wife Amber, he agreed to try ibogaine as a last resort. He described his first ibogaine session as 'a complete purge of everything.' 'But afterward I felt the weight just completely off my shoulders,' he said. 'No more anxiety, no more depression, life made sense all of a sudden.' A nonprofit founded by the Capones, Veterans Exploring Treatment Solutions, or VETS, has helped over 1,000 veterans travel abroad to receive ibogaine and other psychedelics. But federal scientists have looked at the drug before — three decades ago, when the National Institute on Drug Abuse funded preliminary studies on using it as an addiction treatment. The research was discontinued after it identified 'cardiovascular toxicity.' 'It would be dead in the water,' in terms of winning FDA approval, longtime NIDA director Nora Volkow said. But Volkow said her agency remains interested in psychedelics, including ibogaine, and is funding an American drugmaker that's working to develop a safer, synthetic version of the drug. 'I am very intrigued by their pharmacological properties and how they are influencing the brain,' Volkow said. 'But you also have to be very mindful not to fall into the hype and to be objective and rigorous in evaluating them.'