logo
Ottawa weighing plans on AI and copyright as OpenAI fights Ontario court jurisdiction

Ottawa weighing plans on AI and copyright as OpenAI fights Ontario court jurisdiction

OTTAWA – Canada's artificial intelligence minister is keeping a close watch on ongoing court cases in Canada and the U.S. to determine next steps for the government's regulatory approach to AI.
Some AI companies have claimed early wins south of the border and OpenAI is now fighting the jurisdiction of an Ontario court to hear a lawsuit by news publishers.
Evan Solomon's office said in a statement he plans to address copyright 'within Canada's broader AI regulatory approach, with a focus on protecting cultural sovereignty and how [creators] factor into this conversation.'
But there are no current plans for a stand-alone copyright bill, as Solomon's office is 'closely monitoring the ongoing court cases and market developments' to help chart the path forward.
It's unclear how long it will take for those court cases to determine whether artificial intelligence companies can use copyrighted content to train their AI products.
The sole Canadian case to pose the question was launched late last year by a coalition of news publishers, and the Ontario Superior Court is set to hear a jurisdictional challenge in September.
The coalition, which includes The Canadian Press, Torstar, the Globe and Mail, Postmedia and CBC/Radio-Canada, is suing OpenAI for using news content to train its generative artificial intelligence system.
The news publishers argue OpenAI is breaching copyright by scraping large amounts of content from Canadian media, then profiting from the use of that content without permission or compensation.
They said in court filings that OpenAI has 'engaged in ongoing, deliberate, and unauthorized misappropriation of [their] valuable news media works.'
'Rather than seek to obtain the information legally, OpenAI has elected to brazenly misappropriate the News Media Companies' valuable intellectual property and convert it for its own uses, including commercial uses, without consent or consideration.'
OpenAI has denied the allegations, and previously said its models are trained on publicly available data and 'grounded in fair use and related international copyright principles.'
The company, which is headquartered in San Francisco, is challenging the jurisdiction of the Ontario court to hear the case.
It argued in a court filing it's not located in Ontario and it does not do business in the province.
'There is no real or substantial connection to Ontario as between the defendants and the issues alleged in the statement of claim,' the company said.
OpenAI also argued the Copyright Act doesn't apply outside of Canada.
OpenAI is asking the court to seal some documents in the case. The court is scheduled to hold a hearing on the sealing motion on July 30, according to a schedule outlined in court documents.
It asked the court to seal documents containing 'commercially sensitive' information, including information about its corporate organization and structure, its web crawling and fetching processes and systems, and its 'model training and inference processes, systems, resource allocations and/or cost structures.'
'The artificial intelligence industry is highly competitive and developing at a rapid pace. Competitors in this industry are many, and range from large, established technology companies such as Google and Amazon, to smaller startups seeking to establish a foothold in the industry,' says an affidavit submitted by the company.
'As recognized leaders in the artificial intelligence industry, competitors and potential competitors to the defendants would benefit from having access to confidential information of the defendants.'
A lawyer for the news publishers provided information on the court deadlines but did not provide comment on the case.
Numerous lawsuits dealing with AI systems and copyright are underway in the United States, some dating back to 2023. In late June, AI companies won victories in two of those cases.
In a case launched by a group of authors, including comedian Sarah Silverman, a judge ruled AI systems' use of published work was fair use, and that the authors didn't demonstrate that use would result in market dilution.
Wednesdays
Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture.
But the judge also said his ruling affects only those specific authors — whose lawyers didn't make the right arguments — and does not mean Meta's use of copyrighted material to train its systems was legal. Judge Vince Chhabria noted in his summary judgment that in 'the grand scheme of things, the consequences of this ruling are limited.'
In a separate U.S. case, a judge ruled that the use by AI company Anthropic of published books without permission to train its systems was fair use. But Judge William Alsup also ruled that Anthropic 'had no entitlement to use pirated copies.'
Jane Ginsburg, a professor at Columbia University's law school who studies intellectual property and technology, said it would be too simplistic to just look at the cases as complete wins for the AI companies.
'I think both the question of how much weight to give the pirate nature of the sources, and the question of market dilution, are going to be big issues in other cases,' Ginsburg said.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 19, 2025.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Japanese trade deal with U.S. creates lower tariff rate for vehicles than Canada faces
Japanese trade deal with U.S. creates lower tariff rate for vehicles than Canada faces

Calgary Herald

time24 minutes ago

  • Calgary Herald

Japanese trade deal with U.S. creates lower tariff rate for vehicles than Canada faces

Article content A new U.S.-Japan trade deal reportedly gives the Asian country a 15 per cent flat tariff rate — providing a potential edge in key export areas such as auto manufacturing, where Canadian finished vehicles currently face a 25 per cent tariff rate. Article content United States President Donald Trump announced the deal with Japan on Tuesday but details remain vague, as no official text of the deal was released. Article content Article content Article content That is similar to other trade deals that the U.S. has announced in recent weeks, where the details remain undisclosed. Still, as Canada inches toward an August deadline on negotiations with the U.S., auto industry professionals offered mixed reactions as to how Japan's deal could affect the competitiveness of Canada's sector. Article content Article content 'If you're Japan, and you're looking around and saying where are my competitors, you're feeling pretty good,' said Eric Miller, president of Washington, D.C.-based Rideau Potomac Strategy Group, a consulting firm on trade policy. 'Autos are about a quarter of their exports, and the auto access was a significant piece of this.' Article content Indeed, according to the World Bank, auto and related exports accounted for about 20 per cent of Japan's trade in 2022. Article content Within Canada's auto sector, the agreement spurred mixed reactions. Article content Article content On the one hand, if Japanese-built vehicle exports to the U.S. face a lower duty than Canadian built ones, this could in theory incentivize some automakers to move production to Japan. Article content Article content On the other hand, that is considered unlikely by many within the auto industry who hold out hope that in the end, Canadian-built autos are likely to receive a lower tariff rate than Japan. Article content 'That's certainly the hope,' said David Adams, president of the Global Automakers of Canada, a lobbying group that represents Honda Motor Co. Ltd. and Toyota Motor Corp. among other foreign automakers. Article content He and others say that vehicles built in Canada, often in border towns such as Windsor, have far more spillover effects in terms of creating jobs in the U.S. than vehicles built in other countries that are separated from the U.S. by an ocean. Article content In reality, Canadian automakers are already paying below 15 per cent in many cases. That is because the Trump Administration adjusted its policies such that automakers can declare the value of any Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) compliant parts contained within a vehicle and deduct that amount from the total value of the vehicle subject to a tariff.

Corby Announces Fourth Quarter & Year-End 2025 Results Release Date and Conference Call
Corby Announces Fourth Quarter & Year-End 2025 Results Release Date and Conference Call

Cision Canada

time24 minutes ago

  • Cision Canada

Corby Announces Fourth Quarter & Year-End 2025 Results Release Date and Conference Call

TORONTO, July 23, 2025 /CNW/ - Corby Spirit and Wine Limited ("Corby" or the "Company") (TSX: CSW.A) (TSX: CSW.B) announced today that it will report its 2025 fourth quarter and year-end results after market close on Wednesday, August 20, 2025. Nicolas Krantz, President, and Chief Executive Officer, and Juan Alonso, Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer will host a conference call for the investment community the following day, Thursday, August 21, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. (ET). To access the conference call, please dial 1-437-900-0527 or toll-free 1-888-510-2154. You can also join via webcast here: About Corby Spirit and Wine Limited Corby Spirit and Wine Limited ("Corby") is a leading Canadian manufacturer, marketer and distributor of spirits, wines and ready-to-drink beverages. Corby's portfolio of owned-brands includes some of the most renowned brands in Canada, including J.P. Wiser's®, Lot 40®, and Pike Creek® Canadian whiskies, Lamb's® rum, Polar Ice® vodka and McGuinness® liqueurs, as well as the Ungava® gin, Cabot Trail® maple-based liqueurs and Chic Choc® spiced rum, Cottage Springs® and Nude® ready-to-drink beverages, and Foreign Affair® wines. Through its affiliation with Pernod Ricard S.A., a global leader in the spirits and wine industry, Corby also represents leading international brands such as Absolut® vodka, Chivas Regal®, The Glenlivet® and Ballantine's® Scotch whiskies, Jameson® Irish whiskey, Beefeater® gin, Malibu® rum, Kahlúa® liqueur, and Mumm® champagne. Corby also represents Jacob's Creek®, Stoneleigh®, and Campo Viejo® wines. Corby is a publicly traded company based in Toronto, Ontario, and is listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the trading symbols CSW.A and CSW.B. For further information, please visit our website or follow us on LinkedIn.

Carney, Kinew rev up economic engines, drown out Indigenous, environmental concerns
Carney, Kinew rev up economic engines, drown out Indigenous, environmental concerns

Winnipeg Free Press

time24 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Carney, Kinew rev up economic engines, drown out Indigenous, environmental concerns

Opinion It's one of the great trade-offs in politics: invest in something that has ambiguous public support on the promise that it will lead to significant economic growth. You can see it at work all over Canada. Prime Minister Mark Carney is in full trade-off mode, having passed Bill C-5 to fast-track infrastructure projects of 'national interest' in an effort to jump-start the economy, Trump-proof it from the whims of our tariff-obsessed neighbours to the immediate south, advance the interests of Indigenous peoples and promote 'clean growth.' Prime Minister Mark Carney (The Canadian Press files) It's a pledge that Canadians support, in general. However, when you start looking at the individual projects under consideration, you quickly see that it is unlikely he will be able to accomplish all the bill promises. Carney has not yet decided exactly which projects to fast-track, but under serious consideration are the extraction of critical mineral deposits in northern Ontario's famed Ring of Fire and a second pipeline from the Alberta oilsands to the West Coast. A majority of Canadians support the construction of additional natural gas pipelines but are less certain about those that transport oil. And, in an age of violent climate events driven by carbon emissions, there are parallel concerns about making that the focus of Carney's efforts. The public is even more conflicted about promises to fast-track critical mineral extraction in the Ring of Fire. A recent public opinion survey commissioned by the National Ethic Press and Media Council of Canada found the public is evenly split on whether to fast track projects in the James Bay Lowlands region. The poll found that the public is OK with bypassing local government bylaws and even some environmental regulations, but two-thirds said they cannot be expedited against the wishes of Indigenous people. What has the prime minister said about all this potential opposition to his plans? After promising during the last federal election campaign to 'build big, build bold,' Carney has said only that his government will make the projects as 'clean' as possible, and will consult with Indigenous peoples. However, he has steadfastly argued the projects to be fast-tracked under C-5 will be 'the core of our domestic response' to trade threats from the Trump administration. The bill, Carney has maintained, is Canada's response to a growing economic crisis. 'If you don't think we're in a crisis, go to Sault Ste. Marie,' he told the House of Commons when C-5 passed in early July. 'Go to Hamilton. Go to Windsor. Go to any lumber or forestry project. There's more coming.' The trade-off here is pretty clear to see: in exchange for economic growth and security, the prime minister is asking Canadians to stow their concerns about the impacts on the climate, the broader environment and Indigenous rights. And make no mistake about it, despite heightening opposition — particularly from Indigenous leaders in northern Ontario — Carney will be able to proceed on fast-tracking projects with little or no political opposition. A similar trade-off is unfolding in Manitoba, where Premier Wab Kinew is promoting plans for a trade corridor to the Port of Churchill that could include a petroleum pipeline. It's a proposal that has already landed itself on the short list for Carney's fast-tracking plans. Kinew has heard plenty from environmentalists and Indigenous leaders about their concern for this plan, particularly the suggestion it could include a pipeline. Although Kinew has said little about the politics of building oil and gas pipelines against a backdrop of worsening climate events, he has expressed confidence 'there's a way that we can do that while maintaining our leading status as being a climate-friendly jurisdiction.' Kinew has a similarly optimistic but vague position — essentially the same posture that Carney is using — when it comes to confronting the grievances of affected First Nations. Both leaders are operating on the belief that right now, with an existential economic threat lurking in Washington, Canadians will ultimately support government investment in growing the economy, even if it compromises principles on issues such as climate change and Indigenous rights. It should be noted that they are not wrong about the potential for economic growth from these projects. The so-called 'mega-project' infrastructure investments undertaken by government do pay dividends in terms of increased GDP. That is generally true, whether it's building new highways, dams, pipelines or fast-tracking a mining development. Tuesdays A weekly look at politics close to home and around the world. It's even true in the context of Carney's pledge to double Canada's annual defence spending to placate the Trump administration. Canadians may not like why he did it, but as Industry Minister Melanie Joly said this week, it's going to be a huge boost to GDP. 'History has shown us that when you're able to have defence and the private sector really work together, you're able to spear up innovation, make sure that your country is peaceful and, ultimately, create jobs,' she told the Globe and Mail. We should remember that there is, to date, no example of Kinew or Carney approving projects above the objections of Indigenous people, or significant segments of the population at large. But they have promised us that we can have our environmental, Indigenous and economic cake, and eat it, too. And that very much remains to be seen. Dan LettColumnist Dan Lett is a columnist for the Free Press, providing opinion and commentary on politics in Winnipeg and beyond. Born and raised in Toronto, Dan joined the Free Press in 1986. Read more about Dan. Dan's columns are built on facts and reactions, but offer his personal views through arguments and analysis. The Free Press' editing team reviews Dan's columns before they are posted online or published in print — part of the our tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store