logo
FACT FOCUS: Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' does not let him delay or cancel elections

FACT FOCUS: Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' does not let him delay or cancel elections

Social media users are falsely claiming that President Donald Trump's sprawling tax bill, which passed the Senate Tuesday after a turbulent overnight session, will give Trump undue influence over U.S. elections.
'The reason the GOP isn't concerned about the midterms and why they are pushing this bill is because it gives Trump power to cancel elections,' reads one X post. 'If this bill passes — it's the end of the country. Democracy is over.'
The bill contains no such provision. Here's a closer look at the facts.
CLAIM: President Donald Trump's tax bill will allow him to delay or cancel elections.
THE FACTS: That's false. There is nothing in the legislation that would allow Trump, or any future president, to stop an election from going forward. According to legal experts, a constitutional amendment would have to pass for anyone to have the ability to cancel a federal election. The timing of elections for federal offices is stipulated in federal law and it is highly unlikely that Congress would pass a bill allowing the president to change that timing, experts said.
'Although President Trump might like to cancel or postpone an upcoming election if he thought his party was going to fare poorly, the One Big Beautiful Bill does not actually grant him that power,' said Barry Burden, director of the University of Wisconsin-Madison's Elections Research Center and a political science professor.
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson called the false claims 'obviously fake news.'
Burden and other experts agree that these allegations may stem from a misunderstanding of a section of the bill on judicial enforcement that was included in the version passed by the House. That section was removed from the bill after Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough ruled that it violates the so-called Byrd Rule, which essentially bars policy matters in budget reconciliation bills.
Section 70302 could have made it easier for Trump to disregard federal court rulings, requiring parties seeking preliminary injunctions or temporary restraining orders to put down a 'security,' such as a cash bond, before the court could issue contempt penalties.
Regardless, such a provision would not allow Trump to delay or cancel elections, even if he tried.
'If Trump announced, I'm canceling the elections, that has as much power as my announcing I'm canceling the elections,' said Justin Levitt, a professor at Loyola Marymount University who specializes in constitutional law and the law of democracy.
Asked whether section 70302 would have given Trump power over whether elections occur, Richard Pildes, a professor of constitutional law at New York University, replied, 'Obviously not.'
The U.S. Constitution gives state legislatures the power to set the time of elections, subject to any laws Congress enacts that 'make or alter such Regulations.'
Congress set standard federal election dates with a series of laws, starting in 1845. That year, it was determined that states would choose presidential electors 'the Tuesday next after the first Monday in the month of November.' Presidential elections have been held every four years on this day since 1848, including through the Civil War, World War I and World War II. Congress aligned House elections with presidential races in 1872 and in 1914 aligned the election of Senators with biennial House elections.
The Constitution states that the term for president and vice president is four years, the term for senators is six years and the term for representatives is two years. Unless they are reelected, there is no mechanism for any of these officials to remain in office after their term ends. Only a constitutional amendment could change this.
Some states have a provision that allows voting in federal races to continue after Election Day in 'extraordinary and catastrophic' circumstances, such as a natural disaster. There is no other way to delay a federal election.
Levitt explained that theoretically Congress could pass a law giving the president the power to choose when a federal election happens, but that such a scenario is 'extremely unlikely.' ___
Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Latest: Trump says US and Iranian officials will talk next week as ceasefire holds
The Latest: Trump says US and Iranian officials will talk next week as ceasefire holds

Toronto Star

time25 minutes ago

  • Toronto Star

The Latest: Trump says US and Iranian officials will talk next week as ceasefire holds

The fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran appeared to be holding on Wednesday while U.S. President Donald Trump said that U.S. and Iranian officials will talk next week. Trump, who helped negotiate the ceasefire that took hold Tuesday on the 12th day of the war, told reporters at a NATO summit that he wasn't particularly interested in restarting negotiations with Iran, insisting that U.S. strikes had destroyed its nuclear program.

Killing the Digital Services Tax is a step backwards
Killing the Digital Services Tax is a step backwards

Toronto Star

timean hour ago

  • Toronto Star

Killing the Digital Services Tax is a step backwards

Prime Minister Mark Carney, left, and U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a group photo during the G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Alta., on June 16. DARRYL DYCK THE CANADIAN PRESS flag wire: false flag sponsored: false article_type: Opinion : sWebsitePrimaryPublication : publications/toronto_star bHasMigratedAvatar : false : Kean Birch is an Ontario research chair in science policy at York University. Opinion articles are based on the author's interpretations and judgments of facts, data and events. More details

FIFA Should Press US on Immigration Policies
FIFA Should Press US on Immigration Policies

Canada News.Net

timean hour ago

  • Canada News.Net

FIFA Should Press US on Immigration Policies

(Washington, DC) - FIFA, the world soccer governing body, should press the Trump administration to reverse immigration policies that create serious human rights risks around the 2026 World Cup, 90 groups including Human Rights Watch said today in a letter to Gianni Infantino. In their letter, the groups warned that FIFA risks becoming a public relations tool to whitewash the Trump administration's abuses. They urged the United States government to reverse immigration policies that put the rights of fans, players, journalists, and host communities at risk. "Cutting the world out of the 2026 World Cup is not just bad for business, but it is also at odds with the human rights strategy and related commitments that have been in place since the US bid to host the 2026 World Cup with Canada and Mexico in 2018," said Minky Worden, director of global initiatives at Human Rights Watch. Human Rights Watch wrote to FIFA on May 5, 2025, requesting information on the steps FIFA is taking to ensure "that the US government will permit players, fans and journalists from around the world to safely attend the 2026 World Cup," including any steps FIFA is taking to advocate for "changes in policies to align with international human rights, FIFA's Statutes, and FIFA's Human Rights Policy." FIFA's response on June 3 did not meaningfully address any of the issues Human Rights Watch raised. It said that "if FIFA becomes aware of potentially adverse human rights impacts ... we will engage with the relevant authorities."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store