A ‘mockery' or ‘flimsy attack'? ANC and DA scrap over Tshwane city manager's appointment
The appointment of Tshwane city manager Johann Mettler was conducted in a manner that creates a mockery of the prescripts governing the appointment of senior managers, claims the ANC.
'The ANC will request its councillors to ensure that the speaker is requested to convene a special council meeting as soon as possible, in order to allow the council to take a resolution on the validity of the appointment of the city manager,' the party said this week.
The party has accused Mettler of lacking experience for the job. It said applicants were required to have 12 years of experience, of which at least five years must be at the senior management level, but Mettler only had 11 years of experience and should have been eliminated at the initial stage of shortlisting.
'His inclusion in the names of the shortlisted candidates is unlawful and irregular. Therefore, the appointment of Mettler as the City Manager is null and void and stands to be set aside in a competent court.'
DA consulting lawyers
DA Tshwane caucus leader Cilliers Brink said he wrote to Tshwane mayor Nasiphi Moya to warn her against any move to have Mettler's appointment terminated or to use a baseless legal pretext to pressure him to resign.
Brink said the DA, as a party represented in the council, were consulting lawyers in the matter
'Aside from the flimsy legal attack on Mettler's appointment mouthed by the ANC, it is clear that the ANC coalition in Tshwane wants to replace Mettler with one of their own deployed cadres.
'On a number of occasions, Mettler has been attacked by the EFF. Obakeng Ramabodu, the EFF Tshwane leader and the MMC has said in the Tshwane council that the party will get rid of Mettler. He has also accused him, without any evidence, of leaking confidential information,' he said.
Brink said the most notable of these attacks happened when it became clear that the city would not drop the case against city officials implicated in an irregular contract award to a consortium led by ANC funder Edwin Sodi.
'Whatever legal pretext the ANC coalition devises, the point is that the party would prefer one of their own deployed cadres, not an independent professional, in the job of municipal manager.'
ALSO READ: Tshwane speaker survives a motion of no confidence
Mayor consulting with MEC
ActionSA national chairperson Michael Beaumont said ActionSA would not allow instability in the city.
'While ActionSA acknowledges the ANC's right to express its opinion, we also affirm that coalitions must make space for differing perspectives, provided this does not undermine stability.
'The multi-party coalition in Tshwane has deliberated on this matter and noted concerns that the panel which interviewed Mettler included additional panellists beyond what is potentially permitted by the relevant regulations,' he said.
Beaumont said this procedural irregularity occurred during the term of the DA-led mayoralty.
'We further note the concerns raised by the ANC regarding Mr Mettler's alleged lack of relevant experience and possible non-compliance with the requirements of the Municipal Finance Management Act.
'It is important to emphasise that these matters have not been raised by the MEC and have not yet been fully deliberated upon by the coalition.
'That said, the legal implications of asking the council to reverse an appointment at this stage remain uncertain and would require careful consideration,' he added.
Beaumont said the coalition had mandated mayor Moya to engage with MEC Mamabolo on this matter, with the aim of clarifying the issues and identifying a resolution that upholds both the law and the stability of the city's administration.
'Her ongoing engagement with the MEC on senior appointments, as resolved by the political management committee, is both appropriate and constructive.
'We urge all coalition partners to be guided by this resolution and to refrain from unilateral actions that may jeopardise the hard-won progress of this coalition government,' he said.
Beaumont said ActionSA's position is clear and consistent.
'We will not support the removal of any senior manager unless there is a clear, lawful and governance-based reason for doing so.
'This position reflects a core coalition principle that prioritises stability, continuity and performance in the city's senior administration.'
NOW READ: Tshwane makes strides in corruption fight as city tackles R13bn irregular expenditure backlog
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
24 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Steenhuisen has made a bad situation worse with tactical blunders
It is unfortunate that Steenhuisen oversaw the DA's entry into the arrangement on such disadvantageous terms. What a cringingly embarrassing week this has been for DA leader John Steenhuisen and his party. In response to President Cyril Ramaphosa firing deputy trade minister Andrew Whitfield over an unsanctioned trip to the US in February, Steenhuisen lost the plot. He launched into a foot-stomping, shin-kicking display of petulance worthy of a thwarted two-year-old. In the end, it had much the same effect as most childish tantrums: none. It was the wrong move over the wrong issue at the wrong time. ALSO READ: Steenhuisen warned of 'insubordination' over national dialogue stance Yes, Whitfield had applied for permission to travel and the habitually prevaricating Ramaphosa had not replied. But the president had expressly forbidden any member of his administration to travel to the US. Yes, Ramaphosa is firing Whitfield for a minor peccadillo while retaining several patently corrupt ministers in his Cabinet. But that is his presidential prerogative. To aggravate matters, Steenhuisen omitted salient facts from his public rendition of what happened, which made it look like he was hiding the truth to spin the narrative. He then made grandiose threats that fizzled, yet again, into nothing. The DA issued a 48-hour ultimatum. Unless corruption-accused ANC ministers were fired, 'all bets are off'. The party again failed to follow through and simply backed off. Instead, Steenhuisen has now committed the DA to vote against the departmental budgets for ministers under a cloud. He has also pulled the DA out of Ramaphosa's national dialogue. These actions have great potential to backfire. The DA is hoisted on its own petard of the 'doomsday scenario'. READ MORE: Steenhuisen calls national dialogue a 'band-aid on the ANC's electoral wound' The mantra is simple and simplistic: 'The DA must remain in the ANC-led unity government because a doomsday coalition that involves the EFF and MK is too ghastly to contemplate.' As is the fate of most mantras it has, over time, become a substitute for rational thought and is now plainly wrong. The ANC would be happy for the GNU to collapse if the DA could be blamed. The DA, too, must be close to gatvol with the GNU's negatives outweighing the positives. In some ways, the GNU has become the 'doomsday coalition' that Steenhuisen thought he was thwarting when, in June last year, he hitched his wagon to that of Ramaphosa. The ANC is a little more urbane, a little less crass than the EFF and MK. But in many essential and apparently irreversible aspects, it is as 'hard-left' ideologically. On economically debilitating issues such as cadre deployment, tenderpreneurship, race quotas in employment and the bailing out of state entities, there are no substantive differences. On expropriation, the ANC will do with a legal scalpel what the EFF and MK would find more emotionally satisfying to do with a knobkerrie. The same is true of the political postures which the ANC shares with the radicals in the EFF and MK. The reflexive support for pariah states and its open sympathy for terrorist outfits have begun to carry real economic costs. READ MORE: National dialogue: Ramaphosa slams DA 'hypocrisy', says party will miss out on 'biggest show in SA' It is unfortunate that Steenhuisen, one of the staunchest proponents of the GNU, oversaw the DA's entry into the arrangement on such disadvantageous terms. He has since made a bad situation worse with tactical blunders that have had the ANC chortling with glee and DA supporters shaking their heads with despair. The DA has surely reached the point where it has to decide whether the GNU, as presently constructed, is still fit for purpose. It is a debate that inevitably links to whether its leader, too, is still fit for purpose.
Eyewitness News
25 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
Steenhuisen rehashes warnings about doomsday coalition as DA defends decision to stay in GNU
JOHANNESBURG - Democratic Alliance (DA) leader John Steenhuisen has rehashed warnings about a doomsday coalition as the party defends its decision to stay in the Government of National Unity (GNU) amid renewed fractures in the multiparty coalition. The two biggest political parties in the GNU, the African National Congress (ANC) and DA, continue to lock horns a year after their marriage. ALSO READ: Steenhuisen stands by DA's decision to pull out of upcoming National Dialogue In their latest spat, the two parties have been at odds with each other over the firing of the DA's Andrew Whitfield as the trade and industry deputy minister. The move by President Cyril Ramaphosa saw the DA pull out of the National Dialogue. Speaking on the party's weekly podcast on Sunday, Steenhuisen again defended the party's decision to stay put in government. 'I see there's a lot of talking heads and analysts that are very upset that we didn't walk away from government this past week and everyone's got an opinion and until you're in the arena, those opinions are worthless because they don't have a grip, they don't know the dynamics here. But the reality is, if we walk away from government, there are going to be serious consequences here.'
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
National dialogue is been used as the beating stick for ANC, DA
We all agree South Africa is not working like it should and an intervention is needed. It was always just a matter of when, not if, the ANC and DA's unusual marriage in the form of the government of national unity (GNU) would find itself in turbulent waters. South Africa's two biggest parties have such different ideologies, so the relationship taking strain over an issue or decision taken that either of the two did not support or like was always on the cards. Since the formation of the coalition, there's been disagreements and challenges to various Bills. ALSO READ: Steenhuisen warned of 'insubordination' over national dialogue stance But President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to fire former deputy minister of trade, industry and competition Andrew Whitfield has opened up a can of worms, with DA leader John Steenhuisen pulling out of the national dialogue. It reached an awkward war of words between Ramaphosa, former president Thabo Mbeki and Steenhuisen late last week and doesn't seem to be dying down. We are not even 13 months into the GNU, yet it faces its biggest test yet – and Ramaphosa's national dialogue is been used as the beating stick for both parties. DA federal council chair Helen Zille has a point when she questions the manner in which the threats are being thrown around. 'A dialogue is entered into voluntarily by its participants. You can't instruct people to dialogue, especially when the ANC is clearly planning a monologue.' Whether you think the national dialogue is a good or bad thing – especially when it's going to cost taxpayers R700 million – it needs people and leaders from all walks of society if it is to stand any chance of succeeding. READ MORE: Steenhuisen calls national dialogue a 'band-aid on the ANC's electoral wound' We all agree South Africa is not working like it should and an intervention is needed. But if the very form of the intervention is flawed, nothing good will come out of it. National bickering and finger pointing will only hurt the country. But, at the same time, everyone needs to be reminded that a dialogue is a two-way street.
