Time to make presence felt, India voice for Global South: S Jaishankar ahead of G7
India, whose Prime Minister has been invited to the G7 starting on Sunday, is eager to represent the Global South on the world stage, acting as a "bridge" between different countries, Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said.India is not a member of the G7 -- which comprises Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States -- but the world's most populous nation and one of its biggest economies has been invited to summits since 2019.advertisement"We have been an outreach country in the G7 for many years, and I think it brings benefits to the G7," he told AFP in Paris.
"There are very strong feelings in the Global South about the inequities of the international order, the desire to change it, and we are very much part of that," he added."It is important for us to organise ourselves and make our presence felt."The leaders of the G7 kick off a yearly summit in the Canadian Rockies on Sunday.They have invited Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, along with the leaders of Ukraine, Mexico, South Africa and South Korea, to attend at a time of global turmoil and a radical new US approach to world affairs.The member nations are also expected to deliberate on troubled relations with China and Russia.advertisementIndia is a leading member of BRICS -- a bloc of leading emerging economies that includes Russia and China, whose leaders are set to meet in early July.BRICS has growing economic clout and is increasingly seen as a G7 rival.Jaishankar said India had "the ability to work with different countries in a way without making any relationship exclusive"."To the extent that that serves as a bridge, it's frankly a help that we do to international diplomacy at a time when, mostly what you see are difficult relationships and excessive tensions," he added.NO NEED FOR 'MORE TENSION'The External Affairs Minister said India had been in favour of direct talks between Russia and Ukraine to end the conflict since 2022.But Jaishankar -- whose nation is a political ally of Russia and trades with Moscow -- said sanctions such as those against President Vladimir Putin's government did not work."Where sanctions are concerned, you could argue that it has not actually had much impact on policy behaviour," he said.Europeans are in favour of a plan for a "secondary" sanctions plan, including a 500-percent tariff on countries that buy Russian oil, gas and raw materials."The world does not need more tension, more conflict, more hostility, more stresses," the former Indian ambassador in Washington said.advertisementUS President Donald Trump is expected at the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alberta.Modi is expected to meet him to push a trade deal with the United States -- India's largest trading partner -- before the July 9 deadline when Washington's punishing 26 percent tariffs are set to resume.Jaishankar said Trump "clearly, in many ways, represents a discontinuity"."He is definitely a very nationalistic person who puts his country's interests very strongly ahead," he added.'STABLE RELATIONSHIP' WITH CHINAAs for China, it was a balancing act, said the minister.India and China, the world's two most populous nations, are intense rivals competing for strategic influence across South Asia, and their 3,500-kilometre (2,200-mile) shared frontier has been a perennial source of tension.Their troops clashed in 2020, killing at least 20 Indian and four Chinese soldiers, and forces from both sides today face off across contested high-altitude borderlands.Despite both country's differences, "we are also today the major rising powers in the world", Jaishankar said."Where we (India) have to be strong and firm, we will be strong and firm. Where we have to forge a stable relationship, we are prepared to do that," he added.advertisementChina has also been a staunch partner of India's arch-enemy Pakistan.Pakistan used Chinese jets against India when the nuclear-armed foes fought an intense four-day conflict last month in which 70 people were killed, their worst standoff since 1999.The fighting was triggered by an April 22 attack on civilians in Jammu and Kashmir that New Delhi accused Pakistan of backing -- a charge Islamabad denies.But Jaishankar dismissed fears at the time of a nuclear escalation.These were "only the concerns of people who were completely uninformed," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India's trade strategy with China will have to rely on a ‘managed rivalry'
Written by Soumya Bhowmick India's trade relationship with China sits at the intersection of economic necessity and national security anxiety. While bilateral commerce continues to thrive in volume, it remains fundamentally distorted by strategic asymmetries. India's widening trade deficit, its reliance on Chinese technology inputs, and Beijing's growing support for Islamabad have sharpened the dilemma facing Indian policymakers: How to engage economically without compromising sovereignty and security. In response, New Delhi is reimagining its economic diplomacy through a 'China-plus-one' playbook — anchored in diversification, industrial policy, and regional recalibration. Bilateral trade remains substantial between the two countries, but it is significantly imbalanced. In FY2024–25, India's two-way merchandise trade with China reached approximately US$127.7 billion, making China India's second-largest trading partner after the US. However, this came at the cost of a record trade deficit of US$99.2 billion — the highest on record — highlighting deep structural dependencies in India's economy, particularly in the technology and pharmaceutical sectors. In light of these dynamics, Indian policymakers have adopted a cautious approach. Under a policy introduced in 2020, all foreign direct investment (FDI) from China and other countries sharing land borders with India must obtain prior government approval. In April 2025, Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal reiterated that India 'does not intend to encourage' Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) from China. By the end of 2024, Chinese firms accounted for only about 0.37 per cent of India's total FDI inflows. While easing these restrictions in non-sensitive sectors such as solar energy and batteries may be helpful, the prevailing geopolitical climate has stalled such proposals. Instead, India has intensified scrutiny of Chinese technology and infrastructure investments, banned dozens of Chinese apps, and maintained strict regulatory oversight over the telecom and electronics sectors. China's overt support for Pakistan has further deepened Indian scepticism. Beijing's financing and arming of a country India considers a direct security threat has amplified concerns about the strategic costs of deeper economic ties. In response, India has adopted diversification strategies, including strengthening economic partnerships with the United States, Japan, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as promoting domestic manufacturing under the 'Make in India' initiative. These measures aim to reduce dependency on any single partner while retaining space for selective engagement with China. This hedging strategy reflects a broader shift in India's foreign economic policy — from passive openness to strategic selectivity. India's answer to the widening trade gap with China is a two-pronged strategy: Build deeper commercial coalitions with trusted partners and turbo-charge domestic manufacturing so that tomorrow's supply chains run through, not around, India. The result is a deliberate 'China-plus-one' realignment that now threads through New Delhi's engagements with Washington, Tokyo, and ASEAN while anchoring at home under the Make in India and Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) drives. This strategy is not just about trade — it is about securing India's place in a reconfigured global production map. Such shifts reflect the growing convergence of commercial logic with strategic alignment. Washington has become India's largest goods-trade partner for the fourth consecutive year, with bilateral merchandise commerce reaching US$131.8 billion in FY 2024-25 — up from barely US$88 billion in 2019 — and resulting in India having a healthy surplus of more than US$41 billion. The new backbone of that relationship is the Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technologies (iCET), which has already green-lighted joint semiconductor, AI, and space projects and prodded both governments to prune export-control frictions. Tokyo complements this pivot by underwriting supply-chain security and industrial upgrading. More than four-fifths of Japanese firms operating in India intend to expand over the next two years, according to JETRO's latest global survey, by far the highest figure among major host economies. At the policy level, the Supply-Chain Resilience Initiative (SCRI), in collaboration with Japan and Australia, has targeted investment in electronics, batteries, and rare-earth processing hubs in India, specifically designed to mitigate single-country dependency. Japan's role is pivotal, not just as an investor, but also as a norm-setter for resilient and transparent value chains. Southeast Asia forms the third pillar. India's two-way goods trade with ASEAN hovers around US$110 billion. Still, both sides have agreed to fast-track a review of the ASEAN-India Trade in Goods Agreement to reduce non-tariff barriers and open services markets. Simultaneously, niche collaborations — such as semiconductor ecosystem talks with Singapore and defence-manufacturing tie-ups with Indonesia — are knitting India into 'China-plus-one' production networks across the region. This eastward economic orientation reinforces India's Indo-Pacific vision and places regional connectivity at its core. External diversification is reinforced at home by the PLI programmes, which now span 14 sectors with approved investments of approximately US$18.7 billion. One headline success is electronics: India has become the world's second-largest mobile phone maker, producing 99 per cent of the handsets sold domestically. Smartphone exports alone surged 55 per cent in FY 2024-25 to US$ 24.1 billion, leap-frogging petroleum and diamonds to become India's single most oversized export item and signalling a decisive shift toward higher-value manufacturing. India's industrial push is not only about import substitution — it is about export-led competitiveness in sunrise sectors. India's evolving economic strategy increasingly hinges on deepening ties with alternative partners across the Indo-Pacific. This pivot is also visible in recalibrating subregional engagement through BIMSTEC (Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation). As SAARC remains paralysed by India–Pakistan tensions, BIMSTEC has emerged as the primary forum for regional cooperation, offering a platform that bypasses Islamabad and aligns with India's Act East policy. At the 6th BIMSTEC Summit in Bangkok in April 2025, member states adopted the Bangkok Vision 2030. They signed new agreements on maritime connectivity and security cooperation, signalling intent to re-anchor the Bay of Bengal as a geoeconomic hub. For India, BIMSTEC complements its external diversification efforts by linking its northeastern states to Southeast Asian economies, spurring regional infrastructure, trade, and logistical corridors that sidestep China. Finally, India's evolving engagement with China reflects a strategy of managed rivalry — balancing selective cooperation with strategic hedging. Rather than decoupling, India is recalibrating its economic and diplomatic posture by diversifying partnerships, securing resilient supply chains, and reducing dependence on China, especially as Beijing deepens ties with Pakistan. This marks a shift from reactive diplomacy to a tactically layered approach, where competition is contained without collapsing ties. The writer is a Fellow and Lead, World Economies and Sustainability at the Centre for New Economic Diplomacy (CNED) at Observer Research Foundation (ORF)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
30 minutes ago
- First Post
Canada ‘elbows up' as Carney backs down on digital tax to have trade deal with Trump
Canada has dropped its plan to tax US tech firms and resumed trade talks with America. The move has left many Canadians disillusioned, as the 'elbows up' slogan that once signalled standing firm against US pressure has now become merely symbolic. read more US President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. The Canadian PM earlier in May said his government is talking to the US about joining the Golden Dome missile defence program. AFP 'Elbows up', a slogan that began as a protest against President Donald Trump's tariffs, has now become somewhat ironic after Canada resumed trade talks with the US. Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that his government had dropped its plan to tax American technology companies. Many Canadians took to social media to share their disappointment, with some calling the move an 'elbows down' decision. Others mocked the government, posting comments such as: 'Good job, Liberals! You got duped! 'Elbows up' actually means tariffs up!' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We are starting to get a sense of the character of the government and that it is a kind of chicken dance government. It is elbows up, elbows back down, elbows up, elbows back down.' — Garnett Genuis (@GarnettGenuis) June 30, 2025 'We are starting to get a sense of the character of the government, and that it's a kind of chicken-dance government. It's elbows up, elbows back down, elbows up, elbows back down,' said Canada's Shadow Minister of Employment, Garnett Genuis. Origins of 'elbows up' slogan 'Elbows up' became a slogan Canadians used to show resistance against US trade pressure. The phrase comes from hockey, where players keep their elbows up to protect themselves and hold their ground in tight situations. It grew popular after comedian Mike Myers used it in a sketch on Saturday Night Live, and Prime Minister Mark Carney echoed it in speeches to signal Canada's determination during disputes over US tariffs and political tensions. Started in hockey, meaning to protect yourself and push back Became a national slogan, appearing on signs, merchandise, and in political speeches, reflecting Canada's resolve to defend its economic and political interests Trade talks back on track as Carney backs down Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Sunday that trade talks with the United States have resumed after Canada dropped its plan to tax American tech companies. US President Donald Trump had paused trade discussions on Friday because of Canada's proposed Digital Services Tax, which he called 'a direct and blatant attack on our country.' The Canadian government announced it would cancel the tax 'in anticipation' of a trade deal. The tax was due to take effect on Monday. Carney's office confirmed that he and Trump had agreed to restart negotiations. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Today's announcement will help resume talks aiming for the 21 July 2025 deadline we set at this month's G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis,' Carney said in a statement.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
31 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Canada resumes trade talks with US following suspension of tech tax plan
Trade talks between Canada and the United States are back on track following Canada's decision to withdraw its proposed digital services tax targeting American technology companies, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Monday. This development follows US President Donald Trump's decision on Friday (June 27) to halt discussions, criticising Canada's digital tax plan as 'a direct and blatant attack on our country'. The Canadian government confirmed it would cancel the implementation of the Digital Services Tax, which had been scheduled to take effect Monday, citing the move as a gesture made 'in anticipation' of securing a broader trade agreement, Associated Press reported. According to Carney's office, both leaders have now agreed to move forward with talks. 'This decision paves the way for renewed negotiations aimed at meeting the July 21, 2025 deadline that was outlined during this month's G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis,' Carney said in an official statement. Carney previously met with President Trump at the White House in May, where their discussions were described as cordial but assertive. Trump later visited Canada for the G7 summit in Alberta, where both sides agreed to a 30-day timeframe to finalise key aspects of the trade deal. Digital tax draws US ire Trump, in a post on his social media platform on Friday said that Canada had notified the United States of its intention to move forward with implementing a digital services tax. The measure would target both domestic and international companies that interact with Canadian online users. The proposed tax, set at 3 per cent, would have impacted major tech firms such as Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber, and Airbnb. It was also designed to be retroactive, potentially resulting in American companies receiving a combined bill of approximately $2 billion by the end of the month, Associated Press reported. Tariffs remain a point of contention Ongoing negotiations between the US and Canada have also focused on a series of tariffs Trump previously imposed. These include 50 per cent duties on steel and aluminium and a 25 per cent levy on automotive imports. Additionally, a 10 per cent tariff on imports from several countries remains in effect, with the potential for rate hikes after July 9, once a 90-day negotiation window ends. Under measures aimed at curbing fentanyl smuggling, Canada and Mexico are also subject to additional tariffs of up to 25 per cent. However, certain goods remain shielded by provisions in the 2020 United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which was signed during Trump's first presidential term.
