Planned Rakiura 1080 drop slammed
The planned 1080 poison drop over Stewart Island is an "ecological disaster that's waiting to happen", a tour operator says.
Last year, the Department of Conservation (Doc) announced plans to drop 1080 cereal bait to reduce the feral cat population endangering the southern New Zealand dotterel. The bird population has declined in the past four years, despite trapping and other efforts to reduce cat numbers.
Now there are about 105 birds left.
The bait will kill rats and possums which the cats will feed on. The first phase is a trial to gain understanding for Predator Free Rakiura, and will take place in 7000ha area inside the 43,000ha area where the second phase of the bait drop will happen.
About 108 tonnes of cereal bait containing 162kg of 1080 will be dropped.
The bait pellets contain cereal, cinnamon or orange lure, sugar, green dye and small amounts of 1080 (0.15% per pellet). It will be spread at a rate equivalent to about four to eight pellets in a tennis-court-sized area.
Ruggedy Range Wilderness Experience owner Furnah Ahmad has been a tour operator on Stewart Island for the past 25 years.
Ms Ahmad said 1080 was "harmful to everything that breathes air", and would adversely affect the island.
"It is harmful to our wildlife and environment, it's harmful to human beings and it will have an impact on the livelihood and wellbeing of people in our community."
New Zealand was known for its clean green image and attracted many visitors who did not want to walk "through a national park full of dead carcasses", unable to drink the groundwater and seeing animals sick or dying because of "horrendous poison", she said.
Paterson Inlet was part marine reserve, a food gathering source and contained salmon and mussel farms that could be poisoned with 1080 that flowed down the waterways to it, Ms Ahmad said.
The manufacturers of the poison recommended that all animals poisoned with 1080 should be buried, but this would not happen on the island.
Doc director national programmes Ben Reddiex said Stewart Island was the last breeding site for pukunui, and the bird could be lost without urgent intervention.
Aerial 1080 was the most effective tool to control predators including rats, possums and feral cats over large areas and in rugged terrain, Mr Reddiex said.
Research showed biodegradable 1080 was safe and the Environmental Protection Agency approved the use of 1080.
In 2011, the independent Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment conducted a review of the use of 1080 and recommended it should be used more.
Studies showed that 1080 has no detectable impact on invertebrate populations and did not affect native fish, including eels/tuna, or introduced trout, and freshwater crayfish/kōura.
The poison broke down more slowly in dry and cold environments, but conditions on Stewart Island were like Fiordland where aerial 1080 was successfully used, he said.
Doc staff would monitor the results of the bait drop to determine when no residue remained in carcasses and it was safe to resume activities in the area.
Rakiura National Park, including bookable hunting blocks, will remain open during the operation. Doc would ensure people were well-informed about how to keep safe.
In March, a trial was held to test bait laced with deer repellent, and bait with deer repellent will be used within bookable hunting blocks only.
New Zealand Deerstalkers Association president Callum Sheridan said the group opposed the aerial dropping of 1080 as it indiscriminately killed not just game animals and impacted the environment.
Even though 1080 was said to break down fast, recently he had seen undissolved pellets in snow grass near Murchison that had been dropped more than three months ago.
The dosage in the pellets was not enough to kill a deer immediately.
"It takes days for them to die and they are basically exploding from the inside out — it's quite a horrible way to go."
He would not be keen to eat meat shot in an area where 1080 had been dropped, he said.
He estimated the Stewart Island bait drop would cost about $80 million.
The money might be better spent employing people to monitor bait stations and trap pests, he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
6 days ago
- Newsroom
Jones says he wants to break up DoC
Twice in the last week, minister Shane Jones has said he'd like to 'break up' the Department of Conservation. He said so once during Scrutiny Week hearings, and again at a local government conference in Wellington when he said he wanted 'all of that gone'. Now, the pro-mining, 'Make New Zealand Great Again'-wearing resources minister says there will always be a place for conservation in the government, but he wants to see the department's extensive land estate dismantled and opened for development. Jones' support for mining projects has been constant and consistent. During an appearance at Scrutiny Week, the minister once again donned his 'Make New Zealand Great Again' cap with 'Drill Baby Drill' written below the slogan. When asked by National's Vanessa Weenink about the prospects of future gold mining in the South Island, Jones lamented that the Department of Conservation had 'weoponised and catastrophised' preservation and endangered species. This focus on preservationism had cost the country whatever profit it might have made mining its mineral wealth, including from gold. Earlier in the week Jones presented at Wellington's Local Government New Zealand conference, where he told a room of regional government representatives that his party didn't see the need for local government as we know it. Incoming changes to the Resource Management Act meant the justification for local government would not 'continue to exist', said Jones. The minister then took aim at the Department of Conservation. Because the Wildlife Act enabled it to be a 'major impediment' to development, Jones said 'I want all of that gone'. But speaking to Newsroom, Jones clarifies that what he really means is the department's land holdings. In his eyes, Jones is actually seeking to liberate the department 'from the statutory riddle they're having to live in' as a consequence of being made responsible for stewardship land – land he says was put under their care decades ago because it simply had nowhere else to go. Jones does not think the department is capable of – nor should even be responsible for – legislative matters like 'making expeditious decisions that open up the DoC estate to a variety of other uses'. With legal responsibility for nearly a third of the country's land, the conservation estate includes areas containing gold and rare minerals like antimony. Jones says New Zealand 'cannot afford' not to mine these resources. Even so, Jones does not believe the department should go the way of the Archey's Frog – a native, endangered New Zealand species found atop a rich gold deposit, to which the minister was willing to say 'goodbye, Freddie' last year. 'There will always be a need for an agency that represents conservation and national parks and other rare blocks of land,' Jones says. 'But we cannot have a situation where nearly a third of the country's landscape is managed for preservation purposes. New Zealand cannot afford that.' Jones feels 'some sympathy for the DoC workers', as he sees them pulled in opposite directions by the dual agendas of economic development and preservationism. The Department of Conservation has faced litigation from 'a whole variety of stakeholders, including hapū', says Jones, which does nothing to increase its efficiency. The department is best-suited to looking after national park land and 'catching rats and killing cats and stray dogs and various other critters that are undermining biodiversity'. Much of the tension hinges on the status of stewardship and conservation land, technically under the department's purview but never intended to be permanently so. Jones says it was just 'parked there as a part of Rogernomics'. 'There's nothing to stop us from exploring the creation of a Public Lands Commission, and that commission can hold land that isn't actually required for Department of Conservation purposes,' Jones says. Green MP Steve Abel, who followed Jones' original remarks in the select committee hearing, disagrees. Abel says stewardship land ought to be gazetted as conservation estate. Among it is 'some of the most extraordinary ecological values, of the highest ecological worth that we have in the whole conservation estate – it just hasn't been designated yet as that'. Jones' description of stewardship land as unworthy of conservation 'misleads people to think that stewardship land hasn't got huge ecological value, which much of it does'. Jones' remarks probably wouldn't wash with majority sentiment, Abel says. 'I don't believe New Zealanders want to see our environment pressed for the profits of some Aussie gold miners.'
1News
18-06-2025
- 1News
Iwi files court action against minister, DOC over Ruapehu ski fields
A central North Island iwi has filed court action against Minister of Conservation Tama Potaka and the Department of Conservation (DOC) over concession made to the commercial operators of Tūroa and Whakapapa ski fields on Ruapehu. The iwi, Te Patutokotoko, alleges the Crown failed their legal obligations under the Treaty of Waitangi by failing to engage with them and actively protect their interests in their ancestral maunga by continuing to deal with private owners over them. Lead claimant Te Kurataiaha Te Wanikau Tūroa told RNZ the the iwi has been looking for a solution to the issue for years, but was "shrugged off no matter what plan we put forward". Tūroa said the iwi had spoken directly to the minister about their concerns. "We actually put in an interest for Whakapapa 18 months back, we got right to the end of it... the Crown just shut us off at the 12th hour. ADVERTISEMENT "It was a let down. But we didn't cry. We just carried on. That's what we're doing," Tūroa said. Conservation Minister Tama Potaka. (Source: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone) Earlier this year, Whakapapa Holdings Limited and Pure Tūroa were granted 10-year concessions by DOC to operate the north and south sides of the maunga respectively. The previous owner went into receivership in 2022 and the successful bid by the private companies came as a relief to Ruapehu mayor Weston Kirton who said the ski fields were vital to the district's economy. Te Kurataiaha Te Wanikau Tūroa said he did not want the companies to be kicked off the mountain, but wanted the iwi to have more say on how the maunga was operated. "It's an activity that our people, and New Zealanders, and foreigners come to do. It just needs to be run better. "We still have no coexistence with iwi our people in this, and that's where the breakdown is," Tūroa said. In a statement, Conservation Minister Tama Potaka said it would not be appropriate to comment as the matter was before the courts.
RNZ News
18-06-2025
- RNZ News
Iwi files court action against minister and DOC over Ruapehu ski fields
Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone A central North Island iwi has filed court action against Minister of Conservation Tama Potaka and the Department of Conservation (DOC) over concession made to the commercial operators of Tūroa and Whakapapa ski fields on Ruapehu. The iwi, Te Patutokotoko, alleges the Crown failed their legal obligations under the Treaty of Waitangi by failing to engage with them and actively protect their interests in their ancestral maunga by continuing to deal with private owners over them. Lead claimant Te Kurataiaha Te Wanikau Tūroa told RNZ the the iwi has been looking for a solution to the issue for years, but was "shrugged off no matter what plan we put forward". Tūroa said the iwi had spoken directly to the minister about their concerns. "We actually put in an interest for Whakapapa 18 months back, we got right to the end of it... the Crown just shut us off at the 12th hour. "It was a let down. But we didn't cry. We just carried on. That's what we're doing," Tūroa said. Earlier this year, Whakapapa Holdings Limited and Pure Tūroa were granted 10-year concession by DOC to operate the north and south sides of the maunga respectively. The previous owner went into receivership in 2022 and the successful bid by the private companies came as a relief to Ruapehu mayor Weston Kirton who said the ski fields were vital to the district's economy. Te Kurataiaha Te Wanikau Tūroa said he did not want the companies to be kicked off the mountain, but wanted the iwi to have more say on how the maunga was operated. "It's an activity that our people, and New Zealanders, and foreigners come to do. It just needs to be run better. "We still have no coexistence with iwi our people in this, and that's where the breakdown is," Tūroa said. In a statement, Conservation Minister Tama Potaka said it would not be appropriate to comment as the matter was before the courts.
