California state senator accused of DUI cleared after blood test shows no signs of drugs or alcohol
Sen. Sabrina Cervantes (D-Riverside) was cited on suspicion of DUI after police interviewed her at a Sacramento hospital, where she was being treated after a car crash near the Capitol on May 19.
At the hospital, Sacramento police questioned the state senator for hours and concluded she showed signs of intoxication and cited her.
But in a statement, prosecutors said they reviewed all of the evidence, police reports, witness statements and laboratory results presented by police and decided not to charge her. Cervantes, 37, a first-year state senator, represents the 31st Senate District, which covers portions of Riverside and San Bernardino counties, and previously served in the state Assembly.
"Based on our ethical duty and the burden of proof in a criminal trial, the Sacramento County DA's Office declines to file any charges in this case," the Sacramento County district attorney's office said in a statement.
Prosecutors received the toxicology results from a blood sample taken after the crash that tested negative for "any measurable amount of alcohol or drugs," according to a statement from the district attorney's office.
Cervantes' dealings with Sacramento law enforcement began after her SUV was T-boned by another vehicle. She left the scene around 1:30 p.m. and received a ride to a hospital, where police eventually showed up and questioned her.
The officers who interviewed Cervantes said she refused a field sobriety test and they "observed objective signs that led them to believe she may have been impaired while operating a motor vehicle," the department said in a statement.
Cervantes strenuously denied driving while impaired after news of her citation became known.
'The accusation that I was driving under the influence is utterly false,' she said in a statement after the citation. 'The Sacramento Police Department's accusations are unjust and hold no truth.'
Cervantes' office then released redacted medical records from her treatment at a Kaiser Permanente hospital in Sacramento. She said the report shows there was no alcohol or drugs in her system. Her vital signs and behavior were not irregular either, she said.
Cervantes' office did not immediately respond to requests for comment about no charges being filed against her.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bill limiting use of sales tax passes
GUILFORD COUNTY — Voters will be asked again to approve a sales tax increase of 0.25% of a penny for every $1 of sales, but this time legislation dictates how the revenue must be spent if the increase is approved. House Bill 305 was amended by Sen. Phil Berger Sr., R-Rockingham and Senate president pro tem, to set parameters on how the revenue, estimated at $28.7 million a year, would be allocated, with most of it going for teacher pay. The bill passed the General Assembly this week. The Guilford County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously in mid-June to place the sales tax referendum issue on the November 2026 general election ballot. A little more than a week after the commissioners' action, Berger amended House Bill 305 to address the sales tax proposal. Berger, whose legislative district includes Guilford County and some precincts in High Point, has said he placed directives on allocating the tax revenue to assure Guilford County voters on how the money would be spent. Although the county commissioners have pledged that all revenue raised by the proposed sales tax increase would go to teacher pay, there was no provision in state law preventing the money from being directed to other purposes. 'House Bill 305 now provides them with information so they can make an educated decision,' Berger previously said. If the proposed tax increase is approved by voters and raises $28.7 million, this is how the money would have to be allocated, according to the new legislation: • Teacher pay supplements in Guilford County Schools, $19.2 million. • Guilford County Fire and Rescue Council for equipment purposes and capital expenditures, $5.5 million. • Guilford Technical Community College capital projects, $2.7 million. • Allocations for Whitsett, Summerfield, Stokesdale, Pleasant Garden and Oak Ridge, $1.3 million. Berger's allocation approach apparently was the first time that has been applied in North Carolina to a sales tax referendum. Whether it will change how Guilford County voters view the proposal is uncertain. Voters have rejected the same proposed sales tax increase six times in the past 20 years, most recently in the November 2024 general election. Solve the daily Crossword
New York Post
2 days ago
- New York Post
Zohran Mamdani passed only one bill in Albany this year — and he skipped the vote
ALBANY – Zohran Mamdani skipped the vote on the one bill he passed this year as a state lawmaker, The Post has learned. The chronically-absent Mamdani didn't bother visiting the state Capitol after New York's budget was approved in May, The Post previously reported — as he cast aside his duties as an elected state Assembly member to campaign for New York City mayor. While on the trail he missed the June 13 vote for his only piece of legislation that passed the Assembly this year, as first reported by the Albany Times Union on Thursday. Advertisement Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani didn't vote on his only bill to pass the state Assembly this year as he was on the campaign trail running for NYC mayor. AFP via Getty Images Instead, Mamdani was in the Big Apple announcing a cross endorsement in the primary race with city Comptroller Brad Lander as both Democrats angled for a boost from each other's voters in a ranked-choice primary election. The following day, he hosted a rally with fellow socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY). Advertisement Mandani's legislation, a non-controversial bill that would extend enhanced public input requirements for certain regulatory decisions made by state agencies, was approved with only one vote against it in both the Assembly and state Senate. The socialist pol missed more than half of the Assembly's roll call votes this year, a feat made even worse given that the chamber allows members to vote remotely during situations such as 'disability, illness, caregiving responsibilities, or any other significant or unexpected factor.' The New York Assembly allows remote voting for members. Hans Pennink His lone bill was sponsored in the upper chamber by state Senate Deputy Majority Leader Michael Gianaris (D-Queens). Advertisement Mandani's campaign did not return a request for comment. 'Zohran became a top tier candidate for NYC mayor while maintaining a near perfect attendance record through the conclusion of the weeks-delayed New York State Budget,' a spokesperson for his campaign told The Post asked about his voting record in Albany earlier this year.
San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Amid Epstein scandal, California navigates its own sex trafficking panic
With the Jeffrey Epstein scandal and Sean Combs trial jarring public attention around sex trafficking, Gov. Gavin Newsom on Wednesday signed a bill that aims to increase penalties for traffickers of teens and their customers. But more than three dozen civil rights, survivor and immigrant organizations — and even some legislators who voted for the bill — say the well-intentioned Assembly Bill 379 revives a vague, Jim Crow-era law that Newsom largely struck from the books three years ago because of its discriminatory application against Black and gay communities. And the opponents say that AB379 could inadvertently help the Trump administration deport California immigrants who have done nothing wrong. 'None of us want minors to be sex trafficked. None of us want anyone to be sex trafficked,' said Ann Block, a senior staff attorney with the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, a national policy organization that opposed AB379. '(But) this bill is so vague. … I can't imagine how this will not sweep up a lot of people who have nothing to do with prostitution.' AB379's emotionally fraught, five-month journey to becoming law underscores a political dichotomy: At a time when President Donald Trump is being hammered by his MAGA base for withholding the so-called Epstein files, in Sacramento it is the Democrats who are on the defensive regarding one of society's darkest crimes. Introduced in February by Assembly Member Maggy Krell, D-Sacramento, AB379 sharpens criminal penalties against adults who solicit sex from teens and civil penalties against businesses that enable them. It does this by making the solicitation of 16- and 17-year-olds a 'wobbler' offense that prosecutors can charge as a felony if the perpetrator is more than three years older than the victim. The age-gap provision was added to make sure older teens and young adults wouldn't face sex-crime felonies for being in consensual relationships with younger partners, and quieted one of the first dustups over the bill. But the real battle erupted over a portion of the legislation that has gotten little media attention. AB379 also makes it a misdemeanor to loiter in a public place with the intent to purchase commercial sex, a crime the bill says can be evidenced by 'circling an area in a motor vehicle and repeatedly beckoning to, contacting, or attempting to contact or stop pedestrians or other motorists, making unauthorized stops along known prostitution tracks, or engaging in other conduct indicative of soliciting to procure another to engage in commercial sex.' Opponents say that language is so broad it can apply to day laborers, rideshare drivers, outreach workers and people who live and work in neighborhoods where prostitution occurs, an argument the impartial Senate Rules Committee bolstered in an analysis warning the definition 'may be constitutionally overbroad.' 'It could be (challenged),' said Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, one of only two legislators to vote against AB379. 'Loitering laws inherently raise potential constitutional issues, because they're so vague in terms of the behaviors that are being criminalized.' Wiener was the one to introduce Senate Bill 357 in 2022, which deleted the crime of loitering with the intent to engage in prostitution because of its fuzzy definition and discriminatory history against Black, brown and LGBTQ communities. A 2019 study by the Los Angeles County Public Defender's Office found the charge resulted in hugely lopsided arrests of young Black women because of how they were dressed. When he signed SB357 in July 2022, Newsom pushed back against law enforcement criticism that it would legalize prostitution. 'It simply revokes provisions of the law that have led to disproportionate harassment of women and transgender adults,' the governor wrote in his signing statement, adding a cautionary note that he'd be watching 'crime and prosecution trends for any possible unintended consequences and will act to mitigate any such impacts.' Newsom, largely speculated to be considering a 2028 presidential campaign, did not release a signing statement for AB379. A month after SB357 took effect in 2023, San Diego's police chief claimed it prevented his officers from rescuing trafficked sex workers by arresting them. The California Penal Code includes multiple laws against human trafficking, pimping and pandering and prostitution. 'To be clear, the police don't need anti-loitering laws to protect or help survivors or hold traffickers accountable,' Jess Torres, a child sex trafficking survivor who was formerly incarcerated and undocumented, said during the Senate Public Safety Committee hearing on June 10. 'Human trafficking continues to be illegal and we already have a trafficking law that criminalizes persons who pay for sex with minors.' Opponents have also raised the issue that the loitering misdemeanor can be a deportable offense and gives the Trump administration another avenue into California's immigrant communities, which have been under siege from Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids at worksites, courthouses, clinics, campuses and homes. 'ICE are going after people who are arrested, who enter the criminal justice system at all. They're arresting people at arraignment, without prior contact,' said Kate Chatfield, executive director of the California Public Defenders Association, which opposed the bill. 'Just expanding the net of arrests for people, whether or not they're ultimately convicted, you are putting them in ICE's crosshairs.' Krell, who had her authorship stripped from AB379 during the bill's sharp-elbowed journey, contested that argument. 'I would love to see ICE go after sex traffickers, but they're not. And this bill won't change that,' she said. AB379's 51 registered supporters, including 25 law enforcement agencies and unions, as well as seven cities and some survivor groups, have also dismissed the immigration concerns as catastrophizing while shifting focus onto the bill's other changes. 'The most important aspect of this bill is creating a felony around solicitation,' said Yasmin Vafa, executive director of the Washington D.C.-based nonprofit Rights4Girls, an AB379 cosponsor. Vafa testified during committee hearings that this was a racial justice issue, involving affluent white male buyers and Black girl victims. 'If we were talking about white girls, this wouldn't be a debate.' In California, the federally funded National Human Trafficking Hotline said it identified 1,261 acts of sex-related trafficking among callers in 2024, a 10-year high and 48.5% higher than in 2015, the earliest year for which the hotline provided annual totals. The hotline, operated by the national anti-trafficking nonprofit Polaris, said its callers also reported the highest numbers of sex-trafficking cases occurring on the street (122) and in residences (111) since at least 2015 last year. According to the Human Trafficking Institute, California's federal courts saw 14 new sex-trafficking prosecutions in 2023, the second most behind Texas (21). Federal courts are where more trafficking prosecutions occur. Both the Human Trafficking Institute and Polaris caution that their numbers do not reflect the true prevalence of sex trafficking. Krell, a former deputy attorney general who prosecuted trafficking cases in the California Department of Justice, said she made sure AB379 only brings back the loitering misdemeanor in a way that can be used against sex buyers, not the sellers. 'It's targeted at those who are looking to buy,' said Krell, who has also introduced bills this session that would require social media companies to remove more child sexual abuse material and expand relief for people who were convicted of crimes as a result of being trafficked. 'It doesn't go after sex workers and it definitely doesn't go after victims.' But AB379 does make sex workers eligible for $1,000 fines that would go into a special fund for prosecutors and diversion programs like the one run by Community Against Sexual Harm, a bill co-sponsor and a survivor-led organization started by a Sacramento police officer in 2013. Republicans in the Legislature rallied around AB379, and have used sex trafficking as a cudgel to hammer away at the supermajority party and enhance their influence. 'I have to say, I'm tired of excuses,' Sen. Suzette Martinez Valladares, R-Santa Clarita, said before the Senate's July 14 floor vote. 'We should all be able to agree on this. There is no moral or rational argument against protecting children from being bought and sold for sex.' While Democratic lawmakers raised concerns about reviving a loitering law that was first used against the state's indigenous residents in the 1800s, all but seven voted for AB379, with five abstentions, and expressed their wish that the issues be addressed after it became law. Wiener, who said he would have voted for AB379 if it was just about soliciting teens for sex and who said he endured slurs and death threats in the years he worked to repeal loitering, said he would not be the one to clean up the Legislature's 'mess.' Block, of the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, characterized AB379's success as an instance where narrative overpowered the facts. 'In the times that we're in with the federal administration attacking California and many other states, perhaps this was a way of saying, 'Look, we're doing something about sex trafficking,' she said. 'That is something that is hard for legislators to vote against.'
