
Over 90 nations call for preserving A-bomb memories in UN meeting
The move to issue the joint statement was led by Japan, with this year marking the 80th anniversary of the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. From among nuclear weapons states, Britain was the only one that joined.
"Among the disarmament education efforts around the world, the invaluable testimonies of those who experienced and witnessed the devastation caused by nuclear explosions and its aftermath have played an indispensable role," the 94 state parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty said, touching on the contribution of Japan's leading atomic bomb survivors' group Nihon Hidankyo, which received the 2024 Nobel Peace Prize.
But the statement warned that "With time, it is becoming more and more difficult to have the opportunity to hear firsthand accounts," making each remaining testimony "even more precious."
All NPT members were encouraged to "ensure the stories and memories of those affected are preserved and passed on to future generations," the statement said.
The document was read out by Tomiko Ichikawa, ambassador to the delegation of Japan to the Conference on Disarmament, during the third session of the preparatory committee for the 2026 NPT review conference, which will continue through May 9 at the U.N. headquarters in New York.
The NPT recognizes Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States as the so-called nuclear weapons states and obligates them to pursue nuclear disarmament. But progress has been slow, leading to a buildup of frustration among aging atomic bomb survivors and some nonnuclear nations.
The joint statement, joined by countries including South Korea, Australia and Ukraine, said education on disarmament must "continuously evolve" and that education providers must "adapt accordingly" to the advance of information and communication technologies, including artificial intelligence, in reaching the younger generations.
Atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the final days of World War II in August 1945, killing an estimated 214,000 people by the end of that year and leaving numerous survivors grappling with long-term physical and mental health challenges.
Nihon Hidankyo, or the Japan Confederation of A- and H-Bomb Sufferers Organizations, received the Nobel Peace Prize last year for its efforts to achieve a world free of nuclear weapons and for demonstrating through witness testimony that nuclear weapons must never be used again.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Today
7 hours ago
- Japan Today
Iran says it will work with IAEA but inspections may be risky
FILE PHOTO: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi attends a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia June 23, 2025. Sputnik/Sergei Karpukhin/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo Iran plans to cooperate with the U.N. nuclear watchdog despite restrictions imposed by its parliament, Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said on Saturday, while stressing that access to its bombed nuclear sites posed security and safety issues. A new law passed in Iran following last month's Israeli and U.S. bombing campaign stipulates that inspection of Iran's nuclear sites by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) needs approval by the Supreme National Security Council, Iran's top security body. The Israeli and U.S. strikes targeted a nuclear program which Western countries have long said was aimed at building an atomic weapon. Iran has long said its nuclear program is purely peaceful. Any negotiations over Iran's future nuclear program are likely to require its cooperation with the IAEA, which angered Iran last month by declaring on the eve of the Israeli strikes that Tehran was violating non-proliferation treaty commitments. "The risk of spreading radioactive materials and the risk of exploding leftover munitions ... are serious," state media cited Araqchi as saying. "For us, IAEA inspectors approaching nuclear sites has both a security aspect ... and the safety of the inspectors themselves is a matter that must be examined." While Iran's cooperation with the nuclear watchdog has not stopped, it will take a new form and will be guided and managed through the Supreme National Security Council, Araqchi told Tehran-based diplomats. "The IAEA's requests for continued monitoring in Iran will be ... decided on a case-by-case basis by the Council with consideration to safety and security issues," Araqchi said. Iran will not agree to any nuclear deal that does not allow it to enrich uranium, Araqchi reiterated. Iran would only agree to talks limited to its nuclear program and not encompassing defense issues such as its missiles. Axios cited sources on Saturday as saying Russian President Vladimir Putin had voiced support for the idea of an accord in which Tehran would be barred from enriching uranium. Iran's semi-official news agency Tasnim quoted an "informed source" as saying Putin had not sent any such message to Iran. Speaking to the state news agency IRNA, Araqchi said Iran was carefully considering the details of any renewed nuclear talks with the U.S. and seeking assurances that Washington would not again resort to military force. "We are in no hurry to enter into unconsidered negotiations," he added. Araqchi also said any move by Britain, France and Germany to reimpose international sanctions on Iran through a so-called "snapback" mechanism under an earlier nuclear deal would "end Europe's role" in Iran's nuclear issue. Under the terms of a U.N. resolution ratifying a 2015 nuclear pact, the three European powers could reimpose United Nations sanctions against Tehran by October 18, 2025. © Thomson Reuters 2025.


Japan Today
a day ago
- Japan Today
Israeli officials signal they want U.N. to remain key Gaza aid channel
By Michelle Nichols Israeli officials have signaled they want the United Nations to remain the key avenue for humanitarian deliveries in Gaza, the deputy head of the World Food Program said on Friday, noting the work of a controversial U.S. aid group was not discussed. "They wanted the U.N. to continue to be the main track for delivery, especially should there be a cease fire, and they asked us to be ready to scale up," Carl Skau, deputy executive director of the U.N. food agency, told reporters on Friday after visiting Gaza and Israel last week. The U.S., Egypt and Qatar are trying to broker a ceasefire in the war between Israel and Palestinian militants Hamas in Gaza. Hamas said on Wednesday that the flow of aid was one of the sticking points. Israel and the United States have publicly urged the U.N. to work through the new Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, but the U.N. has refused, questioning the group's neutrality and accusing the distribution model of militarizing aid and forcing displacement. Skau said he met with Israeli authorities at different levels last week and that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation "did not come up in those conversations." "I think there were rumors of the U.N. being pushed out, but it was very clear in my engagement that they want the U.N. to continue to be the main track in delivery," Skau said. Since Israel lifted an 11-week aid blockade on Gaza on May 19, allowing limited U.N. deliveries to resume. The GHF launched its operation, using private U.S. security and logistics firms to transport aid to distribution hubs, a week later. The United Nations human rights office said on Friday that it had recorded 615 deaths near GHF sites and 183 deaths "presumably on the route of aid convoys" operated by the U.N. and other relief groups. GHF has repeatedly said there have been no deaths at any of its aid distribution sites. The group said on Friday that it has so far delivered more than 70 million meals in Gaza. The U.S. State Department has approved $30 million in funding for the GHF, which touts its model as "reinventing aid delivery in war zones." Israel and the United States have accused Hamas of stealing aid from the U.N.-led operations, which the militants deny. Throughout the conflict, the United Nations has described its humanitarian operation in Gaza as opportunistic - facing problems with Israel's military operation, access restrictions by Israel into and throughout Gaza, and looting by armed gangs. But the U.N. has said its aid distribution system works, and that was particularly proven during a two-month ceasefire, which Israel abandoned in mid-March. The U.N. said it got 600-700 trucks of aid a day into Gaza during the truce and has stressed then when people know there is a steady flow of aid, the looting subsides. © Thomson Reuters 2025.


Japan Times
2 days ago
- Japan Times
Dual surnames for married couples in focus ahead of Japan poll
One of the main topics in the July 20 Upper House election is the proposed introduction of a dual surname system for married couples. The Legislative Council, an advisory panel to the justice minister, proposed a bill to revise the Civil Code in 1996 that includes the introduction of a selective dual surname system. However, even more than 30 years after the proposal, the revision has not yet been realized. In May this year, bills related to the system were deliberated at the Lower House's Judicial Affairs Committee for the first time in 28 years, but the panel failed to hold a vote. The legislation is set to be discussed at an extraordinary parliamentary session, which is expected to be held this autumn. The U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women has urged the Japanese government to introduce the system four times. Iori Warita, 30, a company worker in the town of Utazu, Kagawa Prefecture, emphasizes that his surname is an important part of his identity. When Warita decided to marry corporate worker Nanami Takei, 30, he realized that he did not want to change his surname. To avoid forcing his wife to do what he himself did not want to do, the two decided to register their marriage only after the realization of a selective dual surname system. But they have faced problems as a couple that is not legally married. For example, they could not use their companies' special leave for marriage or receive the local government's subsidies for newlyweds. "I feel like society is telling us, 'You two aren't married.' And I think de facto marriage may have other pitfalls," Warita said. According to a March survey conducted by nongovernmental organization Asuniwa, which covered 530 people in de facto marriages, some 30% said that they chose not to register their marriage because they or their partners did not want to change their surname. Also, nearly half of respondents said that they would marry legally if a dual surname system were introduced. Some conservative lawmakers say that a dual surname system will damage families' sense of unity. Warita disagrees, saying, "The feeling of being a family doesn't change even if surnames are different." He is skeptical of opposing opinions, feeling that they do not justify blocking the introduction of the system. Takei said that a selective dual surname system affects people's psychological well-being. "Having more choices will make life easier for more people, so I hope for the early introduction" of dual surnames, she said.