logo
Fugitive hood fled from Dubai nightclub when approached by Steven ‘Bonzo' Daniel

Fugitive hood fled from Dubai nightclub when approached by Steven ‘Bonzo' Daniel

Scottish Sun14-05-2025
Sources claim an offer was made to compensate Miami for a dodgy £500,000 cocaine deal
CLUB SHOWDOWN Fugitive hood fled from Dubai nightclub when approached by Steven 'Bonzo' Daniel
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
THE fugitive hood who kicked off Scotland's gangland war fled when approached by Steven 'Bonzo' Daniel in Dubai, it has been claimed.
The drug dealer, dubbed 'Miami', bolted from a top nightclub after spotting the rival crime boss and some of his heavies were nearby, sources said.
4
Steven 'Bonzo' Daniel is said to have travelled to the UAE to speak with the fugitive Scot
4
Associates of Mark Richardson have been targeted during the ongoing gang war
4
The drug dealer, dubbed 'Miami', bolted from Bla Bla Dubai
They also told how it was the latest bid to broker truce talks with the ambitious crook who, it's claimed, sees himself as the successor to caged mob boss Jamie 'Iceman' Stevenson, 60.
It's believed the ex-Rangers ultra is backed by Glasgow's feared Lyons gang and Iceman's former right-hand man Stephen 'Jimmy' Jamieson, 42.
An insider said: 'Miami was knocking back Champagne in Bla Bla Dubai when Bonzo and a crew approached him to talk about what's been going on.
'But when as he realised they were looking for him, he was off like a shot. Bonzo also tried to talk to him by encrypted phone but it came to nothing.
'This guy has the backing of Jamieson, who has basically been running the show since Iceman got jailed.'
Sources claim an offer was made to compensate Miami for a dodgy £500,000 cocaine deal that sparked the feud more than two months ago.
But so far he has refused to halt ongoing attacks across Edinburgh and Glasgow on associates of the Daniel family and Mark Richardson, 38.
Our insider said: 'They can't do a thing to him out in the UAE but they made an offer over the drug deal which he has not accepted.
'Miami knows he is safe in Dubai. That's why some people say it's a coward's paradise.
'There is no way you would cause this much carnage over a £500,000 deal — it's a drop in the ocean and bad for business.
The FULL story of Scotland's biggest gangster Jamie 'The Iceman' Stevenson Coming This Sunday
'So this turf war has more to do with someone trying to make a name for himself.
'But some think he is getting carried away and that he wants to be the new Iceman.'
We told how the home of Bonzo's cousin Kelly 'Bo' Green, 45, was attacked by firebomb thugs this week.
A front window at the pad in Drumchapel, Glasgow, was left scorched. Green's dad was the late crime boss Jamie Daniel.
4
Kelly 'Bo' Green's home in Drumchapel is the latest property targeted
Cops have nicked more than 30 people since the mayhem began in Edinburgh when associates of caged crime kingpin Richardson were targeted. His Daniel allies then came under attack in the Glasgow area.
Stevenson was jailed for 20 years last October over a plot to smuggle cocaine from South America in boxes of bananas and also supply street Valium.
His jail term was cut in February to 16 years.
A man, 23, was charged in connection with damage at two homes in Edinburgh last Saturday plus reset.
He was arrested on Wednesday after cops investigating gangland violence raided a house in the city's Gilmerton.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bonnie Blue doc fury as kids can watch despite strict new porn age-check rules
Bonnie Blue doc fury as kids can watch despite strict new porn age-check rules

Daily Mirror

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Bonnie Blue doc fury as kids can watch despite strict new porn age-check rules

Channel 4 is facing probes by politicians and broadcasting regulator Ofcom over the documentary about the former Only Fans content creator, who claims to have had sex with 1,057 men in 12 hours The shadow Home Office minister has labelled it 'bizarre' that children can view a TV documentary about sex marathon star Bonnie Blue, despite new stringent age checks designed to prevent them from accessing pornography. ‌ Channel 4 is currently under scrutiny by lawmakers and Ofcom, the broadcasting watchdog, for airing a show about the ex-Only Fans content creator who boasts of sleeping with 1,057 men in just 12 hours. ‌ Despite the channel's policy requiring viewers to be at least 16 to create an account, the absence of a robust age verification system allows minors to simply falsify their birth dates to gain access. It comes after Katie Price worries fans with appearance in family photo after explaining weight loss. ‌ The programme, which includes explicit scenes of Bonnie nude, engaging in sexual acts, and creating adult films with other porn stars, seems to contradict the Government's fresh Online Safety Act that mandates age verification to block underage users from adult content websites. When quizzed on Times Radio about the feasibility of a credible online safety framework given the ease of accessing such material on a public broadcaster's platform, shadow Home Office minister Katie Lam remarked: "It seems bizarre to me," reports the Daily Star. ‌ She added, "There is clearly a consistency problem both in terms of content and in terms of platform." However, Channel 4 has defended its streaming service, insisting that it employs industry-standard controls to prevent those under 18 from viewing content that's not suitable for their age group. Bonnie Blue - whose real name is Tia Billinger from Nottinghamshire - has boasted of raking in as much as £1.5 million monthly through the OnlyFans platform via publicity stunts including her world record bid to sleep with the maximum number of men within a 24-hour period - until she received a ban from the platform. ‌ Policing minister Dame Diana Johnson admitted she hadn't realised just how accessible the documentary was for viewers to watch. When questioned whether Channel 4 had erred in airing the programme and if Ofcom ought to step in, she responded: "That's an important question that I think is worth considering." She continued: "I am very happy to go away and consider that.". The spokesman said: "I haven't actually clicked on in the way that you suggested is available.". The spokesman said: "But I'm very happy to do that and to look and to raise it with the technology secretary Peter Kyle." Fresh legislation called the Online Safety Act came into force last week, aimed at safeguarding youngsters on the internet by establishing fresh regulations for social media platforms and search engines. ‌ The most robust safeguards within the legislation were crafted to stop children from viewing dangerous and unsuitable material. This encompassed age checks for adult websites like YouPorn. The documentary - titled 1000 Men and Me: The Bonnie Blue Story - tracks the influencer as cameras document her everyday existence. The documentary synopsis reveals that it delves 'behind the headlines, clickbait and rage bait to discover what life's really like in Bonnie's wild orbit, how she got here and what's really going on behind those steely blue eyes'. ‌ It also probes the contentious question surrounding her - is she a 'dangerous predator' pandering to male fantasies and perpetuating the patriarchy, or an empowered, sex-positive businesswoman having the last laugh? Audiences were taken aback by the content. One viewer expressed their shock on Twitter: "Literally 3 seconds in and Bonnie Blue is already disgusting." Before its release, director Victoria Silver emphasised the importance of explicit scenes for the documentary. She stated: "If I was making a film about a musician or some other kind of performer their work would be in there.". The spokesman said: "I think it's really important to see what she does." Channel 4's commissioning editor Tim Hancock argued that it was the broadcaster's 'job to tell stories like this that are at the edge of modern morality'.

Scot accused of murdering wife joked he would ‘kill her and move to Thailand'
Scot accused of murdering wife joked he would ‘kill her and move to Thailand'

Scottish Sun

time12 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Scot accused of murdering wife joked he would ‘kill her and move to Thailand'

His lawyer said it was nothing but a "quip" 'KILLING' QUIP Scot accused of murdering wife joked he would 'kill her and move to Thailand' Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A SCOT accused of murdering his wife while kayaking joked to a friend that he would 'kill her and move to Thailand' if she left him and took half of his pension, a court has heard. Graeme Davidson, 56, was charged over the 2020 death of Jacqueline Davidson in May after arriving back in Australia from Thailand. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Ex-Army captain Graeme Davidson is accused of murdering his wife Jacqueline in November 2020 The ex-Army major had moved there several months after his 54-year-old wife drowned, and later married a Thai resident. Mrs Davidson's death at Lake Samsonvale, north of Brisbane, was initially considered to be an accidental drowning but was later deemed by detectives to be suspicious. Davidson, originally of Glasgow, was also charged with fraud and attempted fraud, in relation to insurance claims he made totalling more than £500,000. He is making a bid for his release on bail in Brisbane's Supreme Court. Defence lawyer Craig Eberhardt told the court the Crown's case against his client was "fundamentally weak". He also insisted the case against Davidson may be "non-existent," at worst and "arguable" at best. The court heard claims that the only piece of evidence the prosecution could refer to in its case was the statement of one of Mr Davidson's friends, relating to an alleged conversation in mid-July 2017. Mr Eberhardt said they were talking about another friend, whose wife had left him on the day of his retirement, took half of his pension and one of the parties moved to Thailand. The court heard the statement alleges Mr Davidson replied and said, "oh sh*t yeah, I'd kill her and move to Thailand too," but his lawyer said it was nothing but a "quip". Mr Eberhardt said when put in context, the statement is "not nearly as sinister as it sounds" and said police were told of this conversation eight years after it is said to have occurred. Mum-of-two 'raped & murdered by coercive ex-fiance' at hotel after agreeing to celebrate his 60th birthday He added: "And so, one wonders if firstly, if that is reliable, secondly, if it's even admissible." Mr Eberhardt argued there was no evidence to suggest Mrs Davidson had told her husband she intended to leave him or take half of his pension. But the court heard some witnesses told police she had raised the idea of separating with him, after she learned her husband had an affair with a local woman during an army posting in Papua New Guinea, which caused "significant matrimonial upset". However, Mr Eberhardt said Mrs Davidson later told friends that she wanted to stay to try and make the marriage work. The Supreme Court was told Davidson did move to Thailand after his wife's death, and remarried in 2022, but was in "constant communication with the coroner's office and police," and came back to Australia twice between when he left, and when he was arrested. The defence will continue its submissions next week where prosecutors are expected to oppose Davidson's application for bail.

Anatomy of a Kremlin assassination
Anatomy of a Kremlin assassination

New Statesman​

time17 hours ago

  • New Statesman​

Anatomy of a Kremlin assassination

Russian law enforcement agents carry the body of former Transportation Minister Roman Starovoyt, who was found dead from a gunshot wound in an apparent suicide, outside Moscow, Russia. Photo by Evgeniy Razumniy/AP It bore all the hallmarks of a classic Kremlin assassination. This month, Russia's ex-Transport Minister Roman Starovoyt was found shot dead in his car. It was mere hours after Russian President Vladimir Putin had dismissed him amid rumours of Starovoyt's implication in a corruption probe. Suicide, proclaimed the Russian government. Well, it would do, wouldn't it? Yet, according to Mark Galeotti, Honorary Professor at UCL's School of Slavonic and East European Studies, that probably was the manner of Starovoyt's passing. He likely realised he was a scapegoat and chose death over hard labour: Russia's government has no need to assassinate a man it can easily imprison. 'It'll go after defectors abroad, but the Kremlin doesn't kill people at home,' says Galeotti. There are notable exceptions – opposition leader Alexei Navalny and ex-Wagner boss Yevgeny Prigozhin, whose high-profile challenges to Putin made their deaths desirable to deter others. Yet, Galeotti stresses that, on the whole, 'this is a system in which everyone has their own skeletons in the closet and so the instruments of the Kremlin are arrests, high-profile trials, imprisonments and expropriation of wealth rather than hurling people out of windows'. Russian businessmen do have an unfortunate habit of getting defenestrated – or, in the case of ex-Lukoil manager Alexander Subbotin, dying from a toad venom hangover treatment administered by a shaman. They can't all be suicidal or clumsy or unlucky with toads. Galeotti believes such deaths are more likely to be murders stemming from business rivalries at a time of increasing competition for resources and rising contract killings. The Kremlin is reluctant to take out foreigners like diplomats, spies or journalists. 'I'd hesitate to say they never would, but it would be a big escalation,' he says. 'Putin has this distinction between 'enemies' and 'traitors'. Enemies you fight with, but the hope is you'll meet some modus vivendi with them. Traitors you can do nothing with but kill'. A notable exception would be the alleged 2024 plot to assassinate Rheinmetall CEO Armin Papperger and other European defence industry executives arming Ukraine. While US and German intelligence claim to have foiled such a plan, Galeotti remains 'dubious' about it, given how little information has been supplied and what an escalation it would be from the standard Kremlin playbook. Russian oppositionists abroad are another story, though. Ksenia Maximova, founder of the Russian Democratic Society, recalls that she and her compatriots marked the one-year anniversary of the invasion of Ukraine by projecting onto the Russian Embassy in London. Ambassador Andrei Kelin unexpectedly dashed out in his slippers to film them. Not long afterwards, she discovered via a fellow activist that she was on a Kremlin hitlist, complete with the patronymic only available on her Russian passport. She was reassured by Ukrainian government contacts that it was more likely to be 'psychological pressure' than the beginnings of anything more sinister. Then came attempted hackings and a sophisticated phishing attack, in which she received a realistic-looking email purporting to be from Natalia Arno, head of the Free Russia Foundation – someone she had been expecting to hear from. Underside, a Telegram channel linked to Russia's FSB intelligence service, posted an investigation into Maximova that was later featured on Russian television. It contained information on her activities dating back years, protest footage in which individuals had clearly come close to film her, and even her 19-year-old daughter's name, university, and photo. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe She was amused by its portrayal of her. 'It was definitely to scare me, but it made me laugh.' The dossier claimed she had help from the Ukrainian government, exiled Kremlin critic Mikhail Khodorkovsky and a friend of ex-premier Boris Johnson, presumably in the belief that 'there's no way a blonde ex-model could do all this by herself! I messaged the Ukrainians: 'Where's all my protection from the Ukrainian government?'' Maximova can rest easier knowing that the proxies upon which the Kremlin now relies are – in her own words – 'notoriously crap'. Recent plots have not been well-executed and so neither have the targets. This year, six Bulgarians were imprisoned in the UK for their roles in a Russian spy ring. The trial revealed their plot to murder exiled Russian journalist Roman Dobrokhotov: the Bulgarians quarrelled about how to kill him, one dismissing an accident in the shower as 'not dramatic enough' and proposing to poison him with ricin, spray him with acid or publicly burn him alive. Plans to transport the target back to Russia by launching him in a dinghy from Norfolk faltered over doubts about whether their handlers would trust them with a submarine. Five other men were convicted this month of an arson attack on a London warehouse filled with supplies for Ukraine. They had also received orders to kidnap Putin critic Yevgeny Chichvarkin and burn down his restaurant and wine shop. One of the ringleaders messaged his Russian handler about establishing a 'partisan movement' in the UK to 'punish Russian traitors,' conduct sabotage and spy on the British government – all of which came to naught when he was arrested in a B&Q car park. As Galeotti explains, the mass expulsion of Russian agents from embassies following the Ukraine invasion made Moscow turn to messaging apps and the darknet to hire local criminals and sympathisers. 'Their tradecraft is terrible,' he says, 'but they get it done. A thug with a hammer can do a lot of harm too. It's cheap, you can treat these assets as disposable, they're harder to identify in advance and there's always some other maladroit violent misfit willing to get hired'. Even if they fail to carry out instructions or get caught, Moscow doesn't mind, because 'everyone gets worried' all the same and 'Russia wants people to be scared of it. It likes plausible deniability with a knowing wink.' And who's behind the screen, issuing orders? The Bulgarians' internal discussions imply substantial latitude on determining the where and when of a hit. Last year, ex-MI6 chief Richard Moore claimed that Russia's intelligence services had 'gone a bit feral'. But those agents are still on a leash. 'A killing generally requires sanction from the very top,' confirms Galeotti. He explains that the 2015 murder of opposition leader Boris Nemtsov sparked a 'massive crisis' in Russia, not only because he was 'regarded as one of us by the elite', but also because 'this had not been sanctioned. This was something by Chechnya's Ramzan Kadyrov'. When the Kremlin does give that green light, it does not want targets removed quietly. Take the 2018 Salisbury poisonings targeting ex-spy Sergei Skripal. 'This was sanctioned from the top,' Galeotti says. 'It was complex and unnecessarily expensive. You use more outré methods because you are playing to the theatre of assassination, you want it to be shocking, bizarre and a news story. They wanted Skripal's death to be a lesson to other defectors or would-be defectors about what happens if you break the rules around your release'. While swapped agents are usually safe if they stay out of espionage, Moscow suspected Skripal of dabbling again, with the approval of the British government. 'Going after him was also a warning to the British government of 'don't try to double-cross us'.' So what should you do if you end up on a Kremlin hitlist? Stay calm, Maximova advises. 'If you're constantly afraid, it's futile because if they really decide to, there's not much you can do. Otherwise, you just get on with it'. [See more: Trump goes to Scotland] Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store