PM Modi invited for state dinner, Xi Jinping pulls out of BRICS Summit for the first time in 12 years
Chinese President Xi Jinping is set to miss the 17th
BRICS
Summit in Rio de Janeiro next week, in what would be his first absence from the high-level annual meet since assuming office in 2013. The news was reported by South China Morning Post (SCMP), quoting multiple diplomatic sources.
Premier
Li Qiang
, a close aide of Xi and currently China's Premier, is expected to lead the Chinese delegation at the summit, scheduled for 6–7 July. He had also represented China at the G20 Summit in New Delhi in 2023.
Brazilian officials are said to be displeased by the move. One senior source in Brasília told the SCMP that President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva had travelled to Beijing in May 'as a gesture of goodwill' and in 'expectation that the Chinese president would reciprocate' by attending the Rio summit in person.
China says 'scheduling conflict'; Brazil sees a snub
Beijing has officially cited a scheduling conflict. However, Brazilian officials suggest other motives may be at play. According to SCMP, some in China believe that the state dinner invitation extended to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi may have tipped the balance. The optics of such a moment—Modi and Lula in the spotlight—could make Xi appear, in the words of one diplomat, 'a supporting actor'.
For a leader used to centre stage at global forums, the symbolism might matter.
Live Events
Adding to this, Chinese officials have pointed out that Xi and Lula have already met twice in under a year—first during a state visit to Brasília in November 2023, and again at the China-CELAC forum in Beijing in May 2024. They argue that this frequency makes another in-person engagement less necessary.
Still, Brazil appears to view the absence as a diplomatic slight. Lula's special adviser for international affairs, Celso Amorim, had raised the matter directly with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi as early as February. 'I said to them, 'Brics without China is not Brics,'' Amorim told SCMP. He added, 'He [Hu Jintao] stayed only one day, but he came,' referring to the 2010 BRICS summit in Brasília, which Hu attended despite a major earthquake in China.
Strategic optics and the Modi factor
Much of the discomfort, according to diplomats, revolves around the perception that Modi is fast becoming the key figure at such multilateral platforms. A state dinner invitation to him—on Lula's home turf—has added weight to that impression.
In an era where image and alliances are tightly choreographed, it's not just about who shows up, but who gets photographed shaking hands, delivering keynotes, and raising toasts.
The Modi-Xi dynamic has remained strained since the 2020 Himalayan border clashes. While the two met in October 2024 on the sidelines of the BRICS Summit in Russia, ties remain tense. If Xi skips Rio, the next potential meeting point between the two leaders could be the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit, which Beijing is set to host later this year.
Official silence, unofficial discontent
The Brazilian foreign ministry has not commented officially on Xi's absence, stating it 'will not comment on internal deliberations of foreign delegations'.
But the frustration is evident.
China, for its part, continues to voice support for Brazil's BRICS presidency. 'Information about participation in the summit will be shared at the appropriate time,' Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun told Brazilian newspaper Folha. He added that Beijing aims 'to promote deeper cooperation' among BRICS members.
'In a volatile and turbulent world, BRICS nations maintain their strategic resolve and work together for global peace, stability and development,' Guo said.
A bigger bloc, a bigger test
The BRICS grouping—founded as BRIC in 2009 and expanded to include South Africa in 2010—has grown significantly in the past year. New full members now include Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Fifteen other countries, from Bolivia to Uzbekistan, have been invited as partners.
But expansion brings complexity.
Xi's expected absence could be an early signal that unity among the old core members is beginning to fray—especially as India and China seek to define their respective global roles differently. And Brazil, left navigating between both, is feeling the strain.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Ravi Shankar Prasad at Idea Exchange: ‘No leader can dare to impose an Emergency. That's the biggest positive consequence of that struggle'
Senior BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad looks back at the Emergency 50 years later, the institutional guardrails that ensure it does not happen again and the upcomig Bihar elections. The conversation was moderated by Liz Mathew, Deputy Editor, The Indian Express. Liz Mathew: How do you look back at the Emergency 50 years later? The Emergency was the darkest chapter of India's independent history. The whole country was turned into a prison. I was an intermediate student when the JP (Jayaprakash Narayan) movement started and we became big leaders in the Bihar student movement. Mrs Gandhi was losing her appeal, there was an economic downturn, price rise, and corruption. This is when the movement gathered steam. In Bihar, torture began before the Emergency. I was arrested under MISA (Maintenance of Internal Security Act) in front of my house. Ten policemen jumped over me in the dead of night while I was going on a tour to Bhabua. I suffered an injury and was put in jail. Mrs Gandhi was becoming an authoritarian. And then her election was set aside by the Allahabad High Court. The brave judge Jagmohanlal Sinha, who never had any limelight, was a pre-collegium appointee. And thereafter, Emergency was imposed in the dead of the night. In that dark period, there was one light of hope, The Indian Express and Ramnath Goenkaji. Every attempt was made to take over The Indian Express by sinister means. I was underground during the Emergency and I have seen the torture from close quarters. JP once told us that he was arrested in the same guest house in Haryana, where he saw Morarji Desai walking in the garden. JP's kidney was seriously damaged and he was shifted to Jaslok hospital. When his condition became critical, he came to Patna. God saved him because he had to save the democracy of India. Dev Kant Barooah was the president of the Congress party. He coined the expression, 'Indira is India and India is Indira'. Sycophancy was at its extreme. The Supreme Court failed us shockingly. Nine High Courts of India quoted a detention order as arbitrary. When the matter went to the Supreme Court, it was reversed. One judge asked Niren De, the then Attorney General, if a detainee was shot inside the jail, would he have any remedy? He said, 'no, he has no remedy'. That argument was effectively upheld by the court. It was a shameful moment for the Indian judiciary. There was one brave judge, Hans Raj Khanna, who gave a dissenting judgment. And he was denied the post of the key justice for two months and was superseded. These are very emotional moments. Being under JP has been one of the most extraordinary experiences of my life. He was a great leader, a great freedom fighter. He scaled the 30-foot wall of Hazaribagh Jail and ran away. He struggled, was tortured, and arrested at the Nepal border. Nehruji liked him. He offered him to join the government and become the deputy prime minister. He said, no, I will work for Sarvodaya and Bhoodan. In 1977, when BJP won, all because of him, he could have been the PM, but he said, no. Liz Mathew: What do you remember about your time in jail? Those who were political prisoners were treated differently and the others were treated horribly. This was a great influence on me when I became a lawyer in Patna High Court. I decided I will take up the cases of these inmates. During the Emergency, many people — socialist leaders, Sarvodaya leaders, and RSS leaders were arrested and tortured. But I remember many young RSS Swayamsevaks whose nails were extracted to get confessions. It was torture and it was extreme. The lesson I learned in jail was to help the needy and the undertrials. Liz Mathew: The 77th government formation — the coming together of Opposition parties with a lot of hope and optimism to provide an alternative post the Emergency — failed miserably. Why do you think that happened? It was pure craving for power. JP was disenchanted, so were we. This whole fight — Charan Singh, Raj Narayan, among others, was very unfortunate and the Opposition lost out. But what is the biggest lesson of the Emergency? People of India know who they are and what they owe to themselves. They know for sure they can defeat any political party by the power of their vote. Indira Gandhi lost. Sanjay Gandhi lost. The Congress Party was wiped out in North India, and only one seat was won by Kamal Nath… I would've appreciated Rahul Gandhi or his party to have publicly apologised for all the atrocities against journalists, against the supersession of judges, against public leaders. But that is not forthcoming. Liz Mathew: In the run-up to the 2024 election, various parties came together. They say that an undeclared Emergency is happening now. They have the right to ask questions. What else will they say? After all, the NDA led by Narendra Modi is winning elections. The point is ab aapko vote nahi milta toh hum kya karein? Aap jeet jaiye. Get the votes. Every day they hold a press conference, every day they shower classic abuses on Narendra Modi. They also keep on chasing us. That is what democracy is about. On the emergency | It was pure craving for power… I would have appreciated Rahul Gandhi or his party to have publicly apologised for the atrocities against journalists, against public leaders. But that's not forthcoming Aakash Joshi: MISA became a symbol of the oppression of the Emergency. Why do you think no government has been able to get rid of preventive detention, which is not only allowed, but also being used by the government, and various agencies? Do the victims of terror have human rights or not? Commander Narwal, who was killed brutally in Pahalgam, does his wife have a human right or not? Similarly, does India have threats or not? From Maoists, from terrorists, from their network? Therefore, in many cases, you have to resort to preventive detention because of the sheer nature of the challenge. The larger question is, when India became free, why was it kept? There is a proper safeguard in the Constitution: if you are arrested in preventive detention, you have to be present before the advisory board, which confirms it, and thereafter, you can challenge it in court. In many cases, courts have quashed the detention order if it does not satisfy the grounds of detention. That is a safeguard. Vikas Pathak: While JP was the face of the movement, who do you think are the three or four people who did a creditable job? Lalu Prasad Yadav was in jail with me, though much senior to me. Nitish Kumar was there. In the strategy part, I think Ram Bahadur Rai, KN Govindacharya and Nanaji Deshmukh. I remember Nanaji Deshmukh moving throughout the country in his Fiat and he'd keep the literature in the stepney of the car. No leader can dare to impose an Emergency in India now. That's the biggest positive consequence of that struggle. Shalini Langer: Why do you think Indira Gandhi called off the Emergency or called for elections? That is a million-dollar question. The only thing which strikes me is that there were a lot of international campaigns against her. In the US, in the UK, particularly. India's growth was nothing, but we used to be proud of the fact that we were a democracy. That was also snatched away. There were protests abroad. Remember JP was a socialist leader. All the socialist internationals also stood by him. Perhaps they pressured her. She misjudged. Her system had informed her she will sweep the polls. Amitabh Sinha: Fifty years after the actual Emergency, what institutional guardrails have we set up to make sure that no leader can think about imposing an Emergency? First are the newspapers, journalists, the TV media and social media; second is judicial: PIL, public opinion; and third is that all the political groups know that if we impose Emergency, people will drop us. Amitabh Sinha: Why are more active efforts not made to get the 42nd Amendment reversed? Parts of it were challenged. There is only one thing which was accepted. In the Preamble, secularism was introduced, but it was not touched for obvious reasons. The Fundamental Duties remain. Let the people and political parties not misunderstand me, but India has to become a big sporting power. Shouldn't sports come under the concurrent list? The government of India and the state government can pool their resources. If India's tourism has to become global, these are questions which will come. Amitabh Sinha: But the objection to the 42nd Amendment was not just on the content but also on the process itself. The whole 42nd Amendment process was conceived in sin. To make Mrs Gandhi the president. Autocracy or benign autocracy, as the case may be, and the rest is history. The election law was changed retrospectively to ensure her success. Liz Mathew: Often we see arrest warrants or FIRs against journalists. Draconian laws are imposed on YouTubers. How do you justify that? Freedom of the Press is sacrosanct. Independence of the judiciary is sacrosanct. And if Indian democracy has become what it is today over 75 years, apart from political activism and the people, the judiciary and media have played a crucial role. And obviously, if a CM in the East arrests someone for a cartoon… Those who are in politics need to understand one thing: Fun, pun, vyangya and cartoons are a part of democracy. Let us learn to accept it. But is all the YouTubers' content proper? Is there not a case of some YouTubers pandering to (content from) across the borders? You cannot generalise it. Article 19.1 gives the freedom of speech and expression. Article 19.2 in the same Constitution says that reasonable restrictions can be imposed. On freedom of press | Freedom of the Press is sacrosanct. Those who are in politics need to understand one thing: Fun, pun, vyangya and cartoons are a part of democracy. Let's learn to accept it Liz Mathew: What do you think of the widespread criticism of the role of media, especially visual media, during Operation Sindoor. I don't accept this general criticism. When there is a big Army operation, some degree of sanctity has to be given. There cannot be an hourly briefing. One briefing was done by the foreign secretary along with two very distinguished women officers of the armed forces. Thereafter, all the DGs of military operations of the Air Force, Navy and Army gave a wonderful presentation. I had gone to Europe and addressed media in London, Paris, Brussels, Germany, and think tanks. I was asked repeatedly: 'why did you send your forces inside?' And then we said, you can send your armed forces 12,000 kilometres and kill Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan. The life of an ordinary Indian is as costly or precious as that of an American or European. We went only four kilometers. Then they say, why don't you discuss? We were very clear that we have not come to seek your mediation. We are capable of handling Pakistan as we have handled wars. But today, terrorism is a cancer, knocking at your door. And any terrorist attempt, be it in 9/11, in New York, in London, in Paris, in Marseille, in Brussels or Germany, it is either a Pakistani terrorist or one trained in Pakistan. The generals in command in Pakistan are not the political leaders and have vested interests to have these terrorists — their assets to wage a war. In that scenario, whom to talk to? Liz Mathew: During your visit to these multiple cities as part of an all-party delegation, what do you think India should do more? I learned that the committee system of the European Parliament is very powerful. There is a need to utilise this interaction. And when I would introduce my team and say that I am the leader of BJP, we have Congress members, Shiv Sena members, and we have thinkers, then they used to appreciate the diversity of India's politics. The second is, they are deeply impressed by the economic performance of India. Europe wants to have good relations with India. Liz Mathew: The world is facing conflict after conflict. But we don't see India as a player of significance. The global scenario is becoming complex with alarming regularity. What about multilateralism? What about global institutions? What I foresee is this: apart from the UN, many other institutions like the G7, like G20, like Quad, are emerging. I think in all this, India's role is very powerful. As far as the conflict between Israel and Iran is concerned, India has a good equation with both. Therefore, the ceasefire is something we welcome. But the way India rescued its citizens in Iran and Israel is commendable. Liz Mathew: In the Donald Trump era, do you think that India is in a dilemma over how to deal with the tariffs? Let us trust the seasoned capability of Indian negotiators to have a good deal. Trade is a factor which is conditioned by a lot of supplementary factors. You cannot be judgmental today. A lot of give and take, is there. I would refrain from making any comment. On Bihar not developing A second-rung leadership | Nitish Kumar and our relationship goes way far back… If he has been taken as a leader, it doesn't mean the capable people are not there. We will win Bihar again, convincingly Amitabh Sinha: On the judicial reforms, what are the few things that need to be prioritised apart from the Collegium vs NJAC (National Judicial Appointments Commission) debate? With a very good judicial data grid available now, we know how long the cases have been pending in the district courts. All the criminal cases pending for trial for more than five to 10 years and all the pending criminal and civil appeals must be prioritised. There should be a conscious attempt to write off all these outstanding matters. NJAC was brought in by me as the Law minister. There were a lot of recommendations of the Constitutional Review Commission of the Law Commission. And for the first time in the contested polity of India, every party supported it. In the Rajya Sabha, only Ram Jethmalani was a dissenting voice. It has been quashed. We have accepted the judgment. The PM, assisted by his Cabinet, is the key player in the appointment of the President, the Vice President, the three army chiefs, the CVC, the CAG, and the Public Service Commission. He holds the nuclear button. But through the assistance of his law minister, he cannot be trusted to appoint a fair judge, is too sweeping a comment. Liz Mathew: Nitish Kumar has been the Bihar CM for 20 years and will be leading the coalition. Do you think BJP has failed to nurture a second-rung leadership in Bihar? Nitish Kumar and our relationship goes way far back. He was the first to join the BJP alliance in the Samata Party. In the fodder scam, he was the first to oppose Lalu Prasad and came to our support. He was with the Vajpayee government in 1996, in 1998, 1999. Vajpayee ji and Advani ji pushed him as the chief minister in 2000. And from 2005, he became the chief minister. There was a little hesitation in his own camp to let him become the leader of the coalition. How has Bihar changed? I'll give you only one instance. The size of Lalu Prasad's last budget was Rs 23,000 crore. Now it is 3,07,000 crore. The roads are coming, the airports are coming, things are changing. There is a lot of scope to do more, but we can see the transformation. We respect that coalition. If we begin a coalition, we maintain our relationship. We don't kick out our coalition partners. If anyone leaves, it is a different matter; we don't leave. And if Nitish Kumar was taken as a leader, it doesn't mean the capable people are not there. We will win Bihar again, convincingly.
The Hindu
34 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Brazil's ex-leader Jair Bolsonaro rallies supporters in Sao Paulo to protest his Supreme Court trial
Former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro on Sunday (June 30, 2025) attended a public demonstration in Sao Paulo to protest against his ongoing Supreme Court trial in the South American country. A couple of thousand people gathered on Paulista Avenue, one of the city's main locations, in a demonstration that Mr. Bolsonaro, before the event, called 'an act for freedom, for justice". Mr. Bolsonaro and 33 allies are facing trial over an alleged plot to overturn the 2022 Presidential election results and remain in power. They were charged with five counts related to the plan. The former President has denied the allegations and claims that he's the target of political persecution. He could face up to 12 years in prison if convicted. 'Bolsonaro, come back!' protesters chanted, but the former president is barred from running for office until 2030. Brazil's Superior Electoral Court ruled last year that he abused his political power and made baseless claims about the country's electronic voting system.
Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Scouting for 6 mid-air refuellers, IAF begins technical evaluation
The Indian Air Force (IAF) is in the process of conducting technical evaluation of mid-air refuellers that it has been seeking to procure since 2007 as a vital strategic asset, The Indian Express has learnt. According to sources, three to four firms have submitted bids for six mid-air refuellers that the IAF seeks to acquire. 'The technical evaluation stage is currently underway,' an official said, adding that the mid-air refuellers fielded by the three to four firms are under consideration. Once finalised, an Indian maintenance partner for these tankers will likely be sought. The IAF currently operates a fleet of six Ilyushin Il-78MKI tankers procured from Uzbekistan in 2003-04. In February 2024, the Defence Acquisition Council, headed by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, cleared the procurement of another six mid-air refuellers. In 2023, The Indian Express reported that the IAF was looking to procure six 'pre-owned' aircraft which could be modified into tankers to meet its tanker requirement for 25-30 years. In March this year, the Ministry of Defence signed a contract with Metrea Management – it's a US-based private entity which specialises in air-to-air refuelling solutions – for wet leasing of one flight refuelling aircraft (FRA) for providing air-to-air refuelling training to pilots of IAF and Indian Navy. The Ministry said that Metrea would provide FRA (KC-135 aircraft) within six months – it would be the first FRA to be wet leased by IAF. It is not immediately clear whether all companies in the fray have pitched pre-owned aircraft for the contract. This is the IAF's third attempt since 2007 to buy the tankers. Two of its earlier tenders were cancelled due to pricing disputes. The idea behind opening the door for buying pre-owned aircraft as tankers was that many global companies would transition to advanced aircraft with new engines as they do away with their older aircraft models in the next few years, thus ensuring the availability of an adequate number of pre-owned aircraft in the market for modification into tankers. FRAs would be a vital strategic asset and force multiplier for the Armed Forces as these allow fighter jets to stay airborne longer. The need to induct the tankers is significant and stem from the IAF's long-term plans to induct a range of fighter jets capable of receiving fuel in air to add to its existing number of squadrons. Of the IAF's six existing II-78 tankers, procured in 2003-04, only three to four are serviceable at a time. Their maintenance and serviceability issues were highlighted in an August 2017 report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) that studied their operations from 2010 to 2016. The tankers were bought in 2003-2004 at Rs 132 crore per aircraft. The IAF also provides limited refuelling efforts to the Navy's MiG-29K fighter jets. In the past, the Airbus A330 multi-role tanker transport and the Ilyushin Il-78 had both fought to secure the contract. State-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) had also signed an agreement with Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) to convert Boeing 767 passenger aircraft into tankers in India.
