School cellphone ban approved by Alabama House of Representatives
HB 166, sponsored by Rep. Leigh Hulsey, R-Helena, passed the chamber 79-15. It requires local school boards to adopt a policy to store student cellphones during class hours. Hulsey said during a floor debate on Thursday that the devices could be stored in a device like a Yondr Pouch or a shoe organizer.
'The majority of the schools already participating in this are storing the cellphones in the classroom in various ways,' Hulsey said.
Yondr Pouches are an expensive option compared to a $10 plastic over-the-door shoe organizer. Pike Road Junior High School Principal Christy Wright showed the Senate Education Policy Committee how the school implements a ban in February. The $30 Yondr Pouches at Pike Road were purchased with a grant.
According to the bill, cell phones can be stored in a locker, car or other storage device so long as the device is not on the student's person. According to the Pew Research Center, 72% of U.S. high school teachers say that cellphone distraction is a major issue in their classrooms.
Democratic representatives were concerned about how a student would access their phones in an emergency. Rep. Barbara Drummond, D-Mobile, said that with school shootings a constant threat, a child should be able to contact their parents. According to the K-12 School Shooting Database, there were 332 school shootings in 2024. There have been 52 in 2025 so far.
'We as a body need to protect our kids since we will not pass a bill to keep guns away from our school children,' Drummond said.
Drummond has sponsored bills over the last several years that would effectively require parents to safely store firearms at home. The bills would also have allowed parents to be charged with misdemeanors if a child brought an unsecured weapon to school. But the legislation has not moved. A House committee killed Drummond's latest version of the bill in February.
More: Alabama Senate passes bill expanding religious exemptions from vaccines
Rep. Napoleon Bracy, D-Prichard, brought up another potential event that could develop at school where a child may need to contact their parents. He said a student could need a change of clothes in the middle of the day.
'It's not a situation where it's life or death, it's not like somebody is coming in for a school shooting,' he said. 'I just think it's overreaching.'
According to the bill, a student can have access to their phones under three exceptions: if they study under an Individualized Education Plan that allows it; for teacher-approved instruction and for medical purposes.
Hulsey claimed that there is data that shows that cell phone bans cause improved test scores, retained information and students' mental health. Rep. Mary Moore, D-Birmingham, said she would like to see that data.
'I've just not seen the preponderance of students playing games while the teacher is trying to teach, the room being disrupted and out of order,' she said. 'I would just like to see that data at some point.'
Alabama Department of Mental Health Commissioner Kimberly Boswell said in February the mental health of students would improve under the ban. Rep. Terri Collins, R-Decatur, echoed that and supported the legislation on the House floor Thursday.
'It's going to make a difference,' Collins said.
The House approved an amendment that removed punishments on schools that do not comply. Hulsey said she wished that was still in the bill but would bring a bill in a few years after seeing compliance. There is a survey required in the legislation to monitor compliance.
'I haven't passed a bill yet that I've loved every single thing about it,' Hulsey said. 'All of it takes compromise to move the needle a little bit.'
Rep. Pebblin Warren, D-Tuskegee, said that enforcement could be difficult without sanctions.
'We need to put some teeth into this bill,' Warren said. 'If we don't we're going to be in the same position next year as we are this year.'
The legislation moves to the Senate. Sen. Donnie Chesteen, R-Geneva, has filed a companion bill in that chamber.
This article originally appeared on The Tuscaloosa News: Will Alabama ban students' cellphones in public schools?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats say Biden needs to quit taking GOP bait
Democrats are slamming former President Biden's response to a series of investigations of him by Republicans on Capitol Hill and the Trump administration, arguing he is again taking the GOP bait to the detriment of his own party. At a time when Democrats have sought to go on offense over President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' and the MAGA World furor over the Jeffrey Epstein controversy, party operatives are scratching their heads at Biden's need to insert himself into the conversation — not to mention his defensive rhetoric. They say Biden is again helping Republicans with his actions, though they say there are ways for him to engage without interfering in the party's strategy. 'If he's able to go out and be a spokesperson on the issues that matter to him, if he wants to go talk about Medicaid, if he wants to go and offensively talk about that or other pressing issues, I think that makes sense and that does the work,' said one Democratic strategist. 'But I don't think you have that conversation on Donald Trump's terms. I don't see the logic on what the Biden inner circle is thinking here.' 'You'd have to question a lot of his PR decisions over the last two years,' the strategist added, arguing Biden and his aides did too little to sell his accomplishments in office. 'The selling of his presidency falls short, and this falls short,' the strategist said. One Democratic consultant, asked about the weekend interview, was blunt: 'He is adding nothing. Not a thing. And at this point, he's making it worse.' Since Biden left office in January, Democrats have grown increasingly frustrated with the former president as he has taken up oxygen with a string of public remarks and appearances. In May interviews on the BBC and 'The View,' Biden shifted the focus away from the party's rebuilding effort, some Democrats argue. Biden sat for an interview with The New York Times last Thursday, responding to allegations made against him in the investigation of his use of an autopen to sign pardons. Republicans have levied Biden's use of the autopen to bolster their narrative that Biden's aides were running his administration. The Democrats critical of Biden's latest interview say the subject was tangential, at best, to the national discourse. And they say that the autopen investigation will have no bearing on voters in the 2026 midterms. 'Democrats need to be on the offensive, and we cannot be running a rear guard operation to defend the Biden administration,' said Democratic strategist Garry South. 'It's not a helpful factor for him to reemerge publicly at this point, particularly in terms of … defending his administration.' 'There is still a lot of disappointment, if not downright anger, that he decided to run again and left the party in the position of having to switch horses midstream in last year's election, leading to the second term for Donald Trump,' South added. Enthusiasm within the Democratic Party continues to wane in the wake of a devastating loss in 2025, a new poll by the Democratic super PAC Unite the Country revealed. Voters view Democrats as 'weak,' 'woke' and 'out of touch,' the same poll showed, and there is a prevailing perception of the party as weak. At a fundraiser in New Jersey on Friday, former President Obama criticized the party's feeble strategy and urged Democrats to take a different approach in countering Trump. ''I think it's going to require a little bit less navel-gazing and a little less whining and being in fetal positions,' Obama said. 'And it's going to require Democrats to just toughen up.'' A few Democrats said Biden's interview would hardly hurt the party. 'Trump's approvals are going down pretty precipitously. I don't think that Biden talking to the times about autopen is going to change that,' said David Litt, a speechwriter for Obama who recently published a new book, 'It's Only Drowning,' about searching for common ground during a politically divisive moment for the nation. 'It's almost off to the side of this broader conversation that people will vote on in the midterms. … It's just kind of a niche subject, and … there are just so many bigger fish to fry in all directions,' Litt said. Litt said he could even see a short-term scenario in which Biden's response to the autopen investigation taken together with the Epstein controversy helps Democrats and hurts Trump. Trump's 'willingness to go down any rabbit hole … unless that rabbit hole involves Jeffrey Epstein … is going to be the story this week,' said Litt. 'And to the extent that Biden sort of highlights Trump's hypocrisy … I think that could actually turn out to be politically helpful for people who are not fans of Trump.' 'If the Republicans in Congress say, 'We're going to investigate a bombshell,' and it's not the Epstein files, people's biggest question is going to be, 'Why isn't it the Epstein files now?' From both the right and the left,' Litt added. 'So I actually think that it may coincidentally be a moment that highlights Trump's willingness to investigate everything other than Jeffrey Epstein.' Other Democrats are harsher critics of Biden's latest interview and his reemergence altogether. They acknowledge that Biden will likely hold minimal influence over the midterms but worry that his appearances drag the party back to the very moment they are trying to build back from. Party operatives also question Biden's ability to be an effective counter to Trump, saying that he propagates the perception of Democrats as a weak contrast to Republicans. 'In his diminished state, he simply can't come off as a powerful voice against Trump, even though one can sympathize with his anger at how Trump and his partisans have tried to depict him,' South said. Litt said that Biden's remarks are a bad attempt at a good strategy, one that indicates growth and a proactive posture within the party. 'A broader lesson that Democrats are learning is engaging more and earlier is better in this day and age,' said Litt. 'It used to be that Democrats would see these conspiracy theories bubble up on the internet, and they would say, 'OK, we'll just let it run its course.'' 'What you're seeing in general from Democrats, and I suspect that Biden is an example of this … is a recognition that these days, if somebody sort of right wing comments or tweets something that goes viral, it can very quickly become policy, and so you can't just let it run its course,' Litt added. 'Internet trolls are really the tail-wagging dog of a lot of Trump administration policies here.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Adams must drop out — Curtis Sliwa is the only NYC candidate who can beat Mamdani
The nomination of socialist Zohran Mamdani as the Democratic New York City mayoral candidate has turned the race into a battleground for the Republican Party to lodge a rare victory in urban America. This contest is set against the backdrop of President Trump's rebranding of the Republicans as the party of the working class, which has gained success nationwide but struggled in major cities. Over two decades ago, as president of the Brooklyn Young Republican Club, I began to witness first-hand the steep climb Republicans face in securing victories. The club's modest goal was to elect a few city council members from the outer boroughs. Today, while New York City's political landscape remains heavily Democratic, Mamdani's radical platform, which includes launching government-run supermarkets, has sparked fresh debate about Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa's viability as a candidate who can appeal beyond traditional GOP voters. Sliwa's campaign and life align with the Republican Party's Trump-led shift toward appealing to working-class voters, emphasizing law-and-order and grassroots community engagement. His decades leading the Guardian Angels have earned him credibility across party lines. He notably achieved record-breaking support among Asian American voters in his unsuccessful 2021 mayoral bid. Yet some New York Republican leaders are pushing Sliwa to withdraw in favor of Mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat with serious ethical problems who is running as an independent because he had no chance in his party's primary. They argue that Sliwa's roughly 30 percent support base from 2021 would shift to Adams and block Mamdani. This effort reflects a broader tension within the Republican Party: short-term electoral pragmatism versus long-term party-building in urban strongholds. The smarter path would be to rally behind Sliwa and urge Adams — a Democrat plagued by trust issues — to step aside. Sliwa's support is rooted in genuine enthusiasm, not merely opposition to Mamdani. In contrast, Adams's minimal backing, as WABC radio host Sid Rosenberg put it, hinges on his being 'not as bad as' Mamdani. This weak position is not the formula for a winning campaign. Gov. Andrew Cuomo's recent primary loss to Mamdani is only further evidence of that. To force Sliwa out is to risk alienating his base, who may skip Election Day rather than support a Democrat. Instead, if Republicans unite behind Sliwa, it could position him to attract independents and moderate Democrats wary of Mamdani's agenda, potentially finally fostering a real two-party system in New York City. Sliwa's appeal to moderate Democrats far outweighs Adams's ability to win over Republicans, given the latter's baggage. Republicans who want to push Sliwa aside should also recall his longstanding commitment to local grassroots Republican groups, which he has supported for many years to try to balance the political landscape in New York for the better. Indeed, I still remember him as a regular guest speaker at my Brooklyn Young Republican club meetings more than 20 years ago. Nationally, the stakes are high. A strong Sliwa performance could serve as a bellwether for the GOP's urban strategy, offering a blueprint for challenging Democratic dominance in cities. It could also bolster Republican prospects in the 2026 New York State gubernatorial race and other local contests. Although Mamdani may still win, it would strengthen Republicans' foothold in America's largest city if they support Sliwa instead of settling for another Democrat. Republicans must rally behind a candidate who has connected with diverse voters throughout his storied life to seize this rare opportunity to reshape urban politics as Democrats veer dangerously toward socialism.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Carville: ‘Big, beautiful bill' should be Democrats' ‘rallying cry,' Epstein a ‘distraction
Longtime Democratic strategist James Carville said Monday that President Trump's recently signed 'big beautiful bill' should be a rallying cry for Democrats while calling the controversy over disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein just a 'distraction.' 'I think the Democrats have just this wonderful opportunity [with] the 'big, beautiful bill.' People detest this. And the more that they find out about it, the more they detest it,' Carville said Monday night on CNN's 'AC360' alongside former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel. 'So, we have a rallying cry here, and it's going to be up to the whole party to pick up the baton and run with this thing, but then they're stuck with this vote and they want people to forget about it.' 'Rahm's right. The Epstein thing is a distraction, but at the end of the day, I think people are going to vote on this. And express their utter anger and disgust at this bill,' he told host Anderson Cooper. 'This thing is the most unpopular piece of legislation that has ever passed the United States Congress in the history of polling. That's how unpopular it is.' Carville, who was critical of the GOP's massive spending and tax bill as it was moving through Congress, previously argued that the measure's passage would be seen as a 'mass extinction event' and would help the Democrats take the House in the 2026 midterms. 'And I like with the unified party — every Democrat voted against this. Every Democrat, regardless of the ideology, their ethnicity … we can all rally around this, and we can run on this single issue all the way to 2026,' Carville said earlier this month, while supporting estimates that Democrats could pick up 40 or more seats in the lower chamber. The 'big, beautiful bill,' signed by Trump on July 4, is full of his domestic priorities, including money allocated for hiring more border patrol agents and finishing the border wall. The law also extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts and features sweeping cuts to Medicaid and some food assistance programs. Carville's latest advice comes as House Democrats, Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), said in recent days that the Trump administration should release all of the documents related to the Epstein case. Some Democrats have also moved to introduce resolutions that would force the administration to do so. 'The American people deserve to know the truth,' Jeffries told reporters on Monday. 'What, if anything, is the Trump administration and the Department of Justice hiding?' Many within the MAGA base have also aired frustration with the administration after the DOJ and FBI released a memo earlier this month concluding there is no evidence that Epstein had a 'client list' and confirming that he died by suicide in 2019. Attorney General Pam Bondi has in particular faced strong backlash from Trump supporters over her previous interviews where she pledged transparency around the case. She also said in February that the so-called 'client list' was sitting on her desk for review — remarks she walked back this month. Trump has defended the attorney general, writing on Saturday that Bondi is doing a 'FANTASTIC JOB' and urging the voter base 'not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about.'
