logo
The UK-India FTA tilt the balance in favour of patent owner and undermines access to medicines: experts

The UK-India FTA tilt the balance in favour of patent owner and undermines access to medicines: experts

The Hindu25-07-2025
The U.K. -India Free Trade Agreement (FTA) provisions on patents tilt the balance in favour of the patent owner and undermines the access to medicines, said experts on Friday at a discussion on the agreement's implication for access to medicines.
Expressing their concerns over provisions in the recently signed agreement that could impact access and affordability of medicines in India, experts noted that certain intellectual property (IP) and regulatory clauses may delay or limit the production of life saving generics, impacting patients in India and across the Global South.
'There is a progressive movement towards accepting the demands of FTA partners, which systematically debasing the public interest safeguards available in the Indian Patents Act,'' warned professor, Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, JNU (Retd), Biswajit Dhar, explaining that the preference on voluntary licenses leaves the access to medicines in the hands of market forces and undermines the role of the government in facilitating access to medicines.
'Often voluntary licenses contain onerous conditions on the licensee and fail to bring sharp price reduction compared to the compulsory licenses,' he said.
He further said that under the Indian Patents Act every year the patent holder must submit details of working of patents in India. The annual submission information will now be submitted once in three years and the confidential information contained in the submission shall not be made available in the public domain.
Added Jyotsna Singh, co-convenor of the working group on Access to Medicines and Treatment: ``This effectively compromises the ability of potential compulsory license applicants to prove unmet demands, which constitute a ground for compulsory license. It clearly tilts the balance heavily in favor of the pharmaceutical transnational corporations allowing them to easily get away by hiding the denial of access to medicines due to high prices on access. '
'There are also provisions in the IP chapter which can potentially undermine the safeguards preventing evergreening of patents,'' said K. M. Gopakumar, co-convenor of Working Group on Access to Medicines and Treatment adding that though couched in best endeavor language there are provisions 'facilitate the sharing and use of search and examination work of the Parties'.
'The implementation of this provision would lead to the harmonization of patentability criteria and undermine safeguards against evergreening such as Section 3 (d) of the Patents Act,'' he said.
Meanwhile, Sanjaya Mariwala, executive chairman and managing director of OmniActive Health Technologies welcoming the move said that India's exports to the UK went up by 12.6% last year, and this deal gives us a chance to build on that growth.
'But it's not just about trade volumes—what stands out is the scope it opens-up in healthcare. With regulatory barriers coming down, Indian healthcare companies will find it easier to operate in the UK, and that can lead to more affordable services and better collaboration between the two systems. That's a space worth watching. At the same time, we can't lose sight of the fact that Free Trade Agreement (FTAs) only work well when businesses at home are strong. As more of these agreements are signed, we need to back our local entrepreneurs and MSMEs with the right support—finance, infrastructure, policy clarity,'' he said.
Adds Bhavin Mukund Mehta, director, Kilitch Drugs: 'The India UK FTA by formalising zero duty access for nearly 99% of Indian pharmaceutical and medical device exports, provides long term clarity and a much needed boost for the Indian pharma industry. With the UK's pharma market projected to grow from about $45 billion now to $73 billion by 2033, and India's generics segment already crossing $910 million in exports in FY 24, this agreement will strengthen India's presence in UK drug stores and broader supply chains. For niche, high quality manufacturers that align with global standards, this is truly a game changer.''
Previously the Commerce Ministry had said that zero tariff provisions under the FTA are expected to significantly enhance the competitiveness of Indian generics in the UK market, which remains India's largest pharmaceutical export destination in Europe.
Currently, India exports $23.31 billion globally and the UK imports nearly $30 billion, but Indian pharma accounts for under $1 billion. The pharma sector has 56 tariff lines, which is just 0.6 per cent of the total, the document stated.
Despite the small representation, the pharmaceutical sector holds high value and strategic importance, especially in global trade, the document added.
India's pharmaceutical industry is the world's third largest by volume and 14th largest in terms of value. The sector's exports rose 10% year-on-year to $30.5 billion in FY 2024-25. The industry is leading in the manufacture of high-quality generic drugs at competitive prices over the last 30 years. India is the largest supplier of generic medicines with a 20 per cent share in the global supply by manufacturing 60,000 different generic brands across 60 therapeutic categories.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India-UK CETA: Let's not overlook what we gave up to secure this deal
India-UK CETA: Let's not overlook what we gave up to secure this deal

Mint

time6 hours ago

  • Mint

India-UK CETA: Let's not overlook what we gave up to secure this deal

Most reports on the recently-signed Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between India and the UK have focused on positive aspects of the agreement. But the CETA, as with any negotiated outcome, is also a compromise between the competing interests of the two countries. It is therefore important to understand the possible implications for India. Here are some key takeaways from this trade pact. First, with the UK eliminating customs duties on almost 99% of India's exports, significant opportunities would open up for labour-intensive sectors such as textiles and clothing, gems and jewellery and leather products, which currently face 4-16% duty. This will provide an edge for these exports over competitors from Bangladesh, China and Vietnam. However, an increase in India's exports of manufactured products would depend on the UK not imposing a carbon tax. The ability of exporters in labour-intensive sectors to scale up production of high-end products and comply with sustainability requirements will also be key. Also Read: Mint Quick Edit | India-UK FTA: Fair play in the trade arena Second, in the agriculture and marine sectors, most of India's exports will enjoy duty-free access. But two products of India's export interest—milled rice and sugar—will not receive tariff cuts. Further, to convert export potential into actual consignments, India's exporters of agricultural and marine products will have to comply with the UK's onerous health standards and traceability requirements. Due to high costs and technical complexities, this may be problematic for small exporters, thereby limiting their ability to benefit. Third, India's service exports to the UK, presently around $20 billion, are set to gain significantly, especially business services, IT/ITeS and professional services. In addition, the Double Contribution Convention is likely to benefit almost 75,000 Indian workers in the UK. That said, with the CETA silent on the UK granting 'data adequacy' status to India, our negotiators appear to have missed a golden opportunity to boost exports of digitally delivered services. Fourth, India has given deeper access to its government procurement market to the UK than it conceded to the UAE in its free trade agreement (FTA) with it. In procurements to be made under the Preference for Make In India Order, UK suppliers will be treated at par with Class 2 Indian suppliers, a concession that was not extended to UAE. This could undermine the Atmanirbhar Bharat and Make in India programmes. Also Read: Mint Quick Edit | An India-UK FTA at long last! Further, India has sharply lowered the threshold above which non-discriminatory treatment would apply to the procurement of goods and services from ₹225 crore in its FTA with the UAE to merely ₹5.5 crore under the CETA with London. This could hurt micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) seeking government contracts, as they would now have to compete with UK suppliers even for low-value contracts above the ₹5.5 crore threshold. Since India has given the UK greater access to its government procurement market than it did to the UAE, it is likely to face strong pressure to offer even deeper concessions in ongoing trade talks with the EU and possibly the US. As annual procurement by the UK government from sources outside its territory and the EU has historically been very low—estimated to be less than £10 billion—Indian exporters are unlikely to make any substantial export gains in the UK government procurement market. Fifth, by recognizing that the preferable and optimal route to ensuring access to medicines is through voluntary licensing, India appears to have almost given up the possibility of using a provision for policy flexibility under the TRIPS Agreement at the World Trade Organization (WTO) to promote affordable healthcare—compulsory licensing. Arguing that voluntary licensing is a 'Global best practice'—as is being said in favour of the CETA's provision—would support Big Pharma's attempts at preventing developing countries from using WTO -compliant provisions such as compulsory licensing. This also risks eroding India's credibility as the voice of the Global South on international platforms related to health issues. Also Read: India-UK trade pact: A new paradigm for the digital economy Sixth, by agreeing to the broadly aligned template of developed countries on non-trade issues such as labour, environment and gender, India's implementation of its domestic laws and regulations on these will be subject to monitoring and scrutiny by London through various committees under the CETA—this looks like a loss of sovereignty for no obvious gain. These provisions could also open the door for more onerous and legally enforceable commitments in future trade agreements, including the imposition of trade sanctions for non-compliance. The fact that the CETA offers the UK extraordinary concessions on government procurement is a sombre reminder of what could happen on non-trade issues in India's ongoing bilateral negotiations. Overall, in the short-term, the India-UK CETA has the potential to lift India's exports to the UK to about $4 billion each year, as estimated by the UK government. However, alarm bells may start ringing if some of the possible adverse impacts materialize. These are the author's personal views. The author is an expert on international trade issues.

Donald Trump defends tariff strategy, seeks ‘fairness, not leverage' after slapping duties on India & others
Donald Trump defends tariff strategy, seeks ‘fairness, not leverage' after slapping duties on India & others

Mint

time8 hours ago

  • Mint

Donald Trump defends tariff strategy, seeks ‘fairness, not leverage' after slapping duties on India & others

President Donald Trump emphasised that the United States aims for fairness in tariff negotiations, not leverage. He expressed a desire for reciprocity and noted that the world's biggest economy will benefit financially from these negotiations. Speaking to the reporters in Pennsylvania, Trump was quoted saying, "I'm not looking for leverage, I'm looking for fairness." He added, "We want to see reciprocal wherever we can, and all I can say is this: our country will be taking in hundreds of billions of dollars." Trump's comments came after the US signed several trade agreements, while still engaged in negotiations with multiple countries, including India. On July 30, the US President announced a 25% tariff on India, citing high duties and non-monetary trade barriers. He also criticised India's energy and military purchases from Russia, while imposing an additional penalty. In a post on his Truth Social handle, Trump wrote, 'Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country.' He pointed out that India imports military equipment and oil from Russia, the country responsible for the war in Ukraine, according to Trump. Therefore, he intends to impose a 'penalty' on India. Following the tariff announcement, India has maintained that it is continuing talks with US negotiators over a Free Trade Agreement (FTA), which was initiated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Trump during a meeting in Washington in February. India is considering various options, such as increasing US imports, but has ruled out immediate retaliation against President Donald Trump's tariff threat, according to a Bloomberg report citing people familiar with the matter. Over the past few months, India and the US have conducted multiple rounds of trade negotiations. New Delhi chose to lower tariffs on products such as Bourbon whiskey and motorcycles. (With inputs from agencies.)

Pakistan backs Iran's nuclear programme, sets $10 billion bilateral trade target
Pakistan backs Iran's nuclear programme, sets $10 billion bilateral trade target

India Today

time15 hours ago

  • India Today

Pakistan backs Iran's nuclear programme, sets $10 billion bilateral trade target

During high-level talks in Islamabad on Sunday, Pakistan reaffirmed its support for Iran's peaceful use of nuclear energy and agreed to increase bilateral trade between the two countries from USD 3 billion to USD 10 billion annually. The announcement followed discussions between Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Iranian President Masoud also signed 12 agreements and Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) to improve cooperation in areas including trade, agriculture, science and technology, innovation, communications, and maritime Minister Sharif on Sunday said that the leadership of Pakistan and Iran were keen to enhance the bilateral trade volume to the target of USD 10 billion as soon as possible," the state-run Associated Press of Pakistan (APP) reported. SHARIF BACKS IRAN'S RIGHT TO NUCLEAR ENERGY During the joint press conference, Prime Minister Sharif repeated Pakistan's support for Iran's peaceful use of nuclear energy and condemned recent Israeli aggression against Tehran."Pakistan stands with Iran for the acquisition of peaceful nuclear power," Sharif stated. He also praised Iran's response to Israeli Pezeshkian stated that the recently signed MoUs reflect "serious and sincere efforts" by both countries to elevate cooperation across sectors and fast-track a long-awaited Free Trade Agreement (FTA).Later, Pezeshkian also met with Pakistan's President Asif Ali Zardari, who lauded Iran's principled stance on regional affairs and reaffirmed Islamabad's commitment to promoting peace and prosperity through bilateral collaboration."President Zardari appreciated Iran's principled positions on regional issues and acknowledged Tehran's consistent support for regional cooperation," according to Radio expressed gratitude to Pakistan for its support during the recent 12-day conflict with Israel and appreciated Islamabad's efforts in promoting de-escalation and dialogue. President Pezeshkian reached Lahore on Saturday and went to Islamabad later that evening. Earlier in the day, Pakistan's Commerce Minister Jam Kamal Khan held talks with Iranian Minister for Industry, Mines and Trade Mohammad Atabak, where the two sides reaffirmed their commitment to boosting bilateral to a statement from Pakistan's Commerce Ministry, both ministers stressed the need to remove trade bottlenecks, improve infrastructure at border crossings, and prioritise trust-based partnerships across strategic emphasised the value of regional trade by drawing parallels with Asean economies. "Geography is an advantage. Pakistan and Iran must utilise this discount of distance. If we don't, we lose both time and cost benefits," he proposed the formation of targeted trade delegations from provincial and federal chambers of commerce to explore market access opportunities. Atabak backed the idea and proposed a dedicated business-to-business (B2B) day during all future high-level ministers identified priority areas for collaboration, including agriculture, energy, cross-border logistics, and services. Atabak also urged swift implementation of the newly signed agreements and suggested expanding trade ties to include Central Asia, Turkey, Russia, and West Asia, paving the way for a broader regional economic Centre for Strategic and Contemporary Research (CSCR), a policy think tank in Islamabad, noted that formal trade between Pakistan and Iran stood at USD 2.3 billion in 2022, with the balance largely favouring Iran. Iran exported petroleum gas, electricity, and petroleum coke worth USD 1.488 billion to Pakistan, while Pakistan exported iron pipes, medical tools, and utility meters worth USD 842.8 million.- EndsWith inputs from PTIMust Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store