After military strikes, US planning to hold nuclear talks with Iran in Oslo next week: Report
The proposed meeting would bring together White House envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi for discussions on reviving stalled nuclear negotiations, sources familiar with the matter told the outlet.
If confirmed, it would mark the first direct engagement between Washington and Tehran since the US struck three nuclear sites in Iran last month. However, neither country has officially confirmed the meeting, and a final date has yet to be set, Axios added.
This comes hours after the US Department of Defence said that Iran's nuclear programme had been set back by at least a year, as per news ANI.
Sean Parnell, chief spokesperson of the Pentagon, said that the intelligence assessments in the department estimated that Iran's nuclear programme has faced withdrawal by 'one to two years'.
Iranian president orders suspension of cooperation with IAEA
Meanwhile, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Wednesday reportedly ordered suspension of cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
This came after the country's parliament passed a law to this effect, which was given the go-ahead by a constitutional watchdog, the Associated Press reported.
Araghchi took to X to slam the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. "After years of good cooperation with the IAEA—resulting in a resolution which shut down malign claims of a 'possible military dimension' (PMD) to Iran's peaceful nuclear program—my country is once again accused of 'non-compliance','Araghchi said.
The Iranian foreign minister said that instead of engaging with the country at the IAEA, 'the E3 is opting for malign action against Iran'.
Nuclear experts' warning after US strikes on Iran
The US claims that Iran's uranium stockpile – 400 kilograms of which is reportedly 60% enriched – is inaccessible and 'sealed off from the outside world' due to the damage after American strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.
However, nuclear proliferation experts believe that these strikes could make Iran take a more dangerous path to obtaining nuclear arms, as per an ABC News report. Apart from IAEA, Iran is also mulling withdrawal from the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty (NPT), which says that countries other than those certified as nuclear powers cannot develop nuclear weapons.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘America Party' launched: Musk hints at election plans; Can he run for president in 2028?
announced his new political outfit, the 'America Party,' on Saturday against the backdrop of a strained relationship and public fallout with US President Donald Trump, his former ally. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The agenda of this new party is aimed at challenging the 'one-party system', which Musk calls 'formed to give you back your freedom'. The new announcement has sparked speculations about whether Musk would run for president in 2028 or who would be the other party leaders. Replying to X user who asked Musk about his election plans, 'Midterms or 2028?', to which he responded, 'Next year'. Under current constitutional rules, Musk is ineligible to seek the presidency. Article II, Section 1 of the US Constitution requires presidential candidates to be natural-born citizens, which legally disqualifies Musk from running for the nation's highest office. In 2024, Musk publicly acknowledged his ineligibility, stating, 'I cannot be president because of my African birth.' He also said at the time, 'My grandfather was American, but I was born in Africa, so I cannot be president.' While campaigning for the 2025 elections alongside Trump last year, Musk made his political ambitions clear when he said, ' I actually don't want to be president. I want to build rockets and cars.' Musk committed to working on government efficiency if Trump is re-elected. He said, 'I'm hoping that we get President Trump elected, and then I'll work hard on the Department of government efficiency.' Cut to July 4, when Musk posted a poll on his social media platform X asking users whether they wanted 'independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system.' The poll received over 1.2 million responses, with the majority voting in favour. Musk responded, 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' He also posted a meme depicting a two-headed snake with the caption 'End the Uniparty,' indicating his push for an alternative to the traditional Democratic and Republican dominance in US politics.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Iran's supreme leader makes first public appearance since Iran-Israel war started
Iran' s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Saturday made his first public appearance since the 12-day war between Israel and Iran began, attending a mourning ceremony on the eve of Ashoura. Khamenei's absence during the war suggested the Iranian leader, who has final say on all state matters, had been in seclusion in a bunker — something not acknowledged by state media. State TV in Iran showed him waving and nodding to the chanting crowd, which rose to its feet as he entered and sat at a mosque next to his office and residence in the capital, Tehran. There was no immediate report on any public statement made. Iranian officials such as the parliament speaker were present. Such events are always held under heavy security. After the U.S. inserted itself into the war by bombing three key nuclear sites in Iran, U.S. President Donald Trump sent warnings via social media to the 86-year-old Khamenei that the U.S. knew where he was but had no plans to kill him, 'at least for now.' On June 26, shortly after a ceasefire began, Khamenei made his first public statement in days, saying in a prerecorded statement that Tehran had delivered a 'slap to America's face' by striking a U.S. air base in Qatar, and warning against further attacks by the U.S. or Israel on Iran. Trump replied, in remarks to reporters and on social media: 'Look, you're a man of great faith. A man who's highly respected in his country. You have to tell the truth. You got beat to hell.' Iran has acknowledged the deaths of more than 900 people in the war, as well as thousands of injured. It also has confirmed serious damage to its nuclear facilities, and has denied access to them for inspectors with the U.N. nuclear watchdog. Iran's president on Wednesday ordered the country to suspend its cooperation with the watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, further limiting inspectors' ability to track a program that had been enriching uranium to near weapons-grade levels. Israel launched the war fearing that Iran was trying to develop atomic weapons. It remains unclear just how badly damaged the nuclear facilities are, whether any enriched uranium or centrifuges had been moved before the attacks, and whether Tehran still would be willing to continue negotiations with the United States over its nuclear program. Israel also targeted defense systems, high-ranking military officials and atomic scientists. In retaliation, Iran fired more than 550 ballistic missiles at Israel, most of them intercepted, killing 28 people and causing damage in many areas.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
We have to formalise our ties with governments: Sikyong Penpa Tsering on Tibet's political future, global outreach
Reuters Sikyong Penpa Tsering, the head of Tibet's government-in-exile The political head of the Tibetan government in-exile is called the Sikyong. This democratically elected position was established in 2011 when the Dalai Lama relinquished his political responsibilities. The current Sikyong, Penpa Tsering, was born in a Tibetan settlement in Bylakuppe in Karnataka and now works out of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) office in McLeodganj, Himachal Pradesh. In a conversation with Nirmal John, Tsering, a fan of South Indian cuisine, especially parotta and fish curry, details his plans to counter the many problems facing the Tibetan community. Edited excerpts Q: It is nearly 15 years since the decoupling of the political and spiritual parts of the Tibetan administration. How has it worked out so far? A: His Holiness (the Dalai Lama) knows he will live up to a certain point. So, he has prepared the Tibetans to take care of themselves. It took a long time. Our people had no idea of what democracy meant and the organs of democracy needed. We started slowly. In 1991, he made our parliament a fully legislative body. In 2001 we had a direct election of the head of government. Then in 2011, he devolved all his political responsibilities. I feel we have grown over the years. I spent a lot of time visiting every single community, bringing in more efficiency, building databases. I am also committed to making sure His Holiness is not unduly bothered by small issues happening within the community. Q: His statement on Wednesday emphasised tradition in the process of finding the next Dalai Lama. One impact of that would be the long wait for what would be a small kid to grow up. In the interim, the office of the Sikyong will become even more critical. A: That's a question we are always asked—if there is a reincarnation in future, wouldn't things be difficult in the interim period? Of course, it'll be. But as the leadership of the Tibetan community, we are trying. Now His Holiness is there, so we get some respect from governments, parliamentarians, foreign officers and all that. We have to now start institutionalising our relationship with governments and others so that the same dignity, the same recognition that we are given right now when His Holiness is present, may continue when he is not there. I don't want to praise our own administration, but I think we have done pretty well in the last four years, reaching out to the international community, keeping our people together. Q: One of the problems you are facing is young people moving out, thereby diluting the community's fightback. A: Young people moving out is a problem. We have started a big project called BBCC—building back compact communities. Since people moving out causes problems for the sustainability of compact communities here, we are trying to provide housing to those who don't have it. Many people who came from Tibet over the last 30-40 years don't have housing. The idea is to address the immediate need of housing, and then the long-term sustainability of the community. Many have become citizens of other countries. They speak the language, they understand the system. Now, if they understand what's happening in China, what's happening in Tibet, then as Tibetans for Tibet, they could be the best advocates for Tibet. But the downside is that the next generation will be born in a totally different environment. We are just beginning to explore having compact communities globally, starting with a project in Minnesota. I'm speaking with 100 young Tibetan students flown in from around the world at the International Youth Forum here. If we do this for 10 years, we'll have more than 1,000 young Tibetans, who will be the next generation of Tibetan leadership. Q: How has US President Donald Trump's USAID cuts affected your budget? A: The total US funding is around $14 million. $2 million is for PRM—population, refugees, migration—and for health issues, which is directly under the State Department, so it was not cut. Of the remaining $12 million, $5 million is for two specific projects—$3 million to build the capacity of institutions and individuals at CTA, which is a five-year project and we are on year four, so we need to mobilise to finish this. Another project is the digitisation of all Tibetan scriptures. $7 million is for education, health, rehabilitation—it is connected with so many departments here. That has been restored. For the other two specific projects we have reached out to other governments; they are interested in supporting. Our sources are not just countries, there are organisations and individuals too. But for the last seven months it has been a setback, from January to now. Q: Which governments are interested in supporting? A: Germany is one. And, of course, the Indian government is the largest benefactor. If it was not for the government of India, we wouldn't exist.Q: What more can India do? A: What more can India do? On humanitarian grounds, there is no other country that has done as much. Of course culturally, linguistically, we feel part of India in that sense. The Tibetan script, Devanagari, came from India. The Nalanda system of Buddhism came from India. All these historical connections are there, and perhaps for all these reasons India has been kind. We never had a war, in that sense, having been neighbours for centuries. Politically, of course, we would like the Indian government to take a more visible stand, but we also understand there are so many things on the table between India and China. If there has to be a resolution (on the issues between India and China), it is better to resolve the Sino-Tibet dispute first. That can contribute more trust between China and India. If you look at the larger geopolitical scenario also, if there is better trust between India and China after the resolution of the Tibet conflict, then would China need to maintain such a relationship with Pakistan to contain India?Q: You mentioned back-channel diplomacy with the Chinese in a presser. Do you see common grounds? A: There is no common ground. It's just to convey messages. Like this time, to say don't do anything during the 90th birthday that will spoil the mood of the Chinese government. During the earthquake, I asked them whether there's anything we can do from outside. At least some messaging here and there, but we are not very keen right now to push this, because you don't have a leadership that is willing to listen. Q: What do you see is happening in the political circles in China? A: There are symptoms of a bigger malaise in the political circles now, and I think his (Xi Jinping's) friends are shrinking as he's removing the very people he appointed. That also questions his choice of people. If you look at the last one and a half years, there have been a lot of signs of things not being well in the political circles. Q: I have heard that the office of the Dalai Lama and CTA see some of the most cyberattacks. A: We have an organisation in Canada that helps us with internet security, and several people work pro bono. According to them, we are one of the most attacked websites, or whatever platform, from the Chinese side. We have no issues because we have nothing to hide. We have always said we are transparent. Q: Is there infiltration? A: That has always been there. They themselves admit they have sleepers. They have people listening. They are on social media; they listen to what the community is saying as we have a very vibrant social media community
