Kangana Ranaut says ‘stay strong Jammu' as Indian air defence neutralises Pakistani drones: See Inside
. This time, she responded to the drone and missile attacks on
by praising the
Indian air defence
and saluting the bravery of the soldiers protecting the nation.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Kangana's message for Jammu
Soon after news broke that Pakistani drones had attacked Indian airspace and were taken down by the Indian Air Defence system in Jammu, the 'Queen' actress posted a message on her Instagram Stories.
She wrote, 'Jammu on target! Indian Air Defence neutralises
drone in #Jammu. Stay strong #Jammu.'
Praising India's 'Sudarshan Chakra'
The 'Manikarnika' actress didn't stop there. She shared more about India's air defence system and reminded everyone of the strength the country holds.
She proudly wrote, 'Our Sudarshan Chakra — the S-400 Air Defence System — demolished the Pakistani air attack! Among the world's most powerful defence technologies, the S-400 deal was signed by PM
's govt with Russia in 2018. #OperationSindoor."
Saluting the armed forces
The 'Tanu Weds Manu' actress had earlier expressed her concern about the ongoing situation and praised the courage of the Indian soldiers and the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
She stold ANI, 'Country is in a war and we are all nervous. Our security forces protect us, may God protect them…PM Modi named this operation as
. At the sight of our mothers and daughters, their husbands were gunned down…those deaths are being avenged.'
A heartfelt prayer for the soldiers
As part of her tribute to the Armed Forces, a few days ago Kangana had also posted a touching message wishing safety and success for the soldiers who risk their lives every day for the country.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
She wrote, 'Jo humari Raksha kare hain, Ishwar unki raksha kare. Wishing our forces safety and success. #OperationSindoor."
Government cracks down on Pakistani content
In a strong move related to the growing tension, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting issued a notice to all OTT platforms in India. As reported by ANI, the order asked them to stop streaming any content that has come from Pakistan, including web shows, films, music, podcasts, and more.
The advisory clearly stated, "In the interest of national security, all OTT platforms, media streaming platforms and intermediaries operating in India are advised to discontinue the web-series, films, songs, podcasts and other streaming media content, whether made available on a subscription based model or otherwise, having its origins in Pakistan with immediate effect.'
Stars Unite: Chiranjeevi, Riteish Deshmukh Praise Swift Action in Operation Sindoor
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
China's insertion into India-Pakistan waters dispute adds a further ripple in South Asia
With the future of a crucial water-sharing treaty between India and Pakistan up in the air, one outside party is looking on with keen interest: China. For 65 years, the Indus Waters Treaty has seen the two South Asian rivals share access and use of the Indus Basin, a vast area covered by the Indus River and its tributaries that also stretches into Afghanistan and China. For much of that history, there has been widespread praise for the agreement as a successful demonstration of cooperation between adversarial states over a key shared resource. But experts have noted the treaty has long held the potential for conflict. Drafters failed to factor in the effects of climate change, and the Himalayan glaciers that feed the rivers are now melting at record rates, ultimately putting at risk the long-term sustainability of water supply. Meanwhile, the ongoing conflict over Kashmir, where much of the basin is situated, puts cooperation at risk. With treaty on ice, China steps in That latest provocation threatening the treaty was a terrorist attack in the Indian union territory of Jammu and Kashmir on April 22, 2025. In response to that attack, which India blamed on Pakistan and precipitated a four-day confrontation, New Delhi temporarily suspended the treaty. But even before that attack, India and Pakistan had been locked in negotiation over the future of the treaty – the status of which has been in the hands of international arbitrators since 2016. In the latest development, on June 27, 2025, the Permanent Court of Arbitration issued a supplementary award in favor of Pakistan, arguing that India's holding of the treaty in abeyance did not affect its jurisdiction over the case. Moreover, the treaty does not allow for either party to unilaterally suspend the treaty, the ruling suggested. Amid the wrangling over the treaty's future, Pakistan has turned to China for diplomatic and strategic support. Such support was evident during the conflict that took place following April's terrorist attack, during which Pakistan employed Chinese-made fighter jets and other military equipment against its neighbor.
Scroll.in
18 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Indian history for children: From 1200 to 1850, a brief history of the North Eastern states
The term 'north-east' in its simple lexicographical sense indicates a direction – and raises the question north-east of what? The answer to the question in the case of Indian history and culture is simple: north-east of the Gangetic plain and peninsular India. But the term cannot be restricted, in the case of India, to merely its dictionary meaning. Northeast India – or in shorthand just the Northeast – has come to denote histories and cultures that are distinct from those of the Indian heartland. As things stand today, the Northeast consists of seven separate states – Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, and Tripura. Each of these states has its distinctive culture and history. But in the past, before the Indian republic fashioned these seven states, this vast geographical territory was referred to as Assam, which harked back to the land of Kamrup, which stretched from the eastern points of the Brahmaputra valley to the river Karatoya. In the early 13th century, Kamrup, already in ruins, saw the arrival of the Turko-Afghans from Bengal, and the Ahom settlers from Upper Burma. From this period to the coming of the British in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, this area did not see any centralised ruling structure. Political authority was fragmented – tribal state formations, and non-tribal and armed landed sections of the population known as Bhuyan or Bhaumik exercised power. The dominance of the Bhuyan was concentrated in the western and central parts of the region. One of the more important tribal formations was that of the Ahoms. They used the plough and made their own village settlements and established their authority over other tribal villages. The Ahoms were ruled by a king chosen from the royal clan; the king allocated domains to the nobility but the king could also be removed by the council of great nobles. The system was thus based on loyalty and service. The two other major tribal formations – the Chutiyas and the Kacharis – were either subjugated or pushed back to the southwest by the Ahoms who also pushed westward at the cost of the Bhuyans. These were processes that occurred in the 16th century. Another tribal state formation was that of the Koch which during the 16th century established its power in the western part of the region from the Karatoya to the Barnadi. In 1562, the Koch were powerful enough to march to the Ahom capital of Garhgaon and sack it. But the power of the Koch dissipated when the kingdom split into the Koch-Bihar and the Koch-Hajo. The latter overlapped with the western part of what is today known as Assam. In the Khasi Hills there emerged in the 15th century the state of Jaintia. Under the dispensation of the Koch and the Ahoms, the Bhuyans were absorbed into the official class and formed an elite. They could attain this status because of their knowledge of the scriptures, measurements, and arithmetic, and their ability to use arms. The Bhuyans were mostly high-caste migrants from North India who wielded considerable local political authority. Some of them were Muslims. Their power base was control over land and over armed tenants whom they could mobilise. Sometimes they formed partnerships against a common enemy. The Bhuyans were very often pioneers in land reclamation and in dyke-building activities for water control. The Koch-Hajo areas were subjugated by the Mughals but this was not permanent. The Ahoms in 1682 annexed the Koch-Hajo areas. This meant that Ahom control extended right up to the Manas River. The conflict between the Ahoms and the Mughals opened up the region to external influences. In economic terms, since the Ahoms knew the use of the plough, there was a shift among the tribal populations they subjugated to permanent cultivation. The use of the plough and the prevailing ecology facilitated wet rice cultivation. This is not to say that hunting and fishing and other tribal occupations disappeared in a geography where forests and swamps were prominent. Increasingly, however, the rice economy gained in importance. Under the Ahoms, the militia (regular members of the civil population trained to serve as a military force) played a crucial role in the extension of rice cultivation by reclaiming land, settling the population, and building embankments as safeguards against floods. The land was also carefully levelled. An observer in the second half of the seventeenth century wrote, referring to the lands the Ahoms controlled: 'In this country they make the surface of the field and gardens so level that the eyes cannot find the least elevation in it up to the extreme horizons.' During the course of the 16th century, the Vaishnava movement became very popular in the region and by 1700, there were around 1,000 monasteries (sutra). The latter also enhanced the process of land reclamation and the extension of cultivation. The monks sought for themselves exemption from obligatory military service to the state. There was a period when the Ahom state attempted to suppress the monasteries and force the monks to join labour camps to build roads and embankments. But this was a passing phase. By the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the Ahom state was making revenue-free grants of wastelands to the monasteries. Originally, the militia system was not very coercive but from the reign of Pratap Singha (1603–41), coercion became an integral part of the militia. The entire male population, with the exception of serfs, priests, and those of noble birth, within the age group of fifteen to sixty, was expected to be part of the militia. The system was organised in such a fashion that at any given point of time one-fourth to one-third of the militia was available for work. In the Koch and Kachari kingdoms and also in the neighbouring kingdoms of Jaintia and Manipur a somewhat similar system operated. Excerpted with permission from A New History of India for Children: From Its Origins to the Twenty-first Century, Rudrangshu Mukherjee, Shobita Punja, and Toby Sinclair, Aleph Book Company.
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
No fundamental right of Indians to adopt US citizen child of relative: Bombay HC
An Indian does not have the fundamental right to adopt a child of American nationality even from among relatives when the child is neither "in need of care and protection" nor in "conflict with law", the Bombay High Court has said. A division bench of Justices Revati Mohite Dere and Neela Gokhale on Wednesday refused an Indian couple's plea to adopt their relative's son, who is a US citizen by birth. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category Digital Marketing Data Analytics Others PGDM Healthcare MBA Design Thinking Product Management Operations Management Data Science Management Finance Leadership Technology Data Science Degree MCA Public Policy Artificial Intelligence Project Management healthcare CXO Skills you'll gain: Digital Marketing Strategies Customer Journey Mapping Paid Advertising Campaign Management Emerging Technologies in Digital Marketing Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Digital Marketing and Analytics Starts on May 14, 2024 Get Details The child in the present case does not fall within the definition of either a ' child in need of care and protection ' or a 'child in conflict with law' as per provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act and Adoption Regulations , the HC said. "There is no provision in the Juvenile Justice Act nor the Adoption Regulations providing for adoption of a child of foreign citizenship even between relatives unless the 'child is in need of care and protection' or a 'child is in conflict with law'," it stated. The bench also refused to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction to allow the adoption and said there is no "fundamental right" of the petitioners to adopt an American child. Live Events Neither is there any violation of any fundamental right of the child of American nationality to be adopted by an Indian citizen, it added. The couple will have to complete all necessary formalities of adopting the child from the US as per American laws and procedure, only after which they can go ahead with the post-adoption procedure in terms of bringing the foreign child adopted to India, the HC said. The couple sought to adopt their relatives' child, who is a citizen of the United States of America by birth. The Central Adoption Resource Agency (CARA) refused to register the couple as prospective adoptive parents as the Adoption Regulations do not facilitate adoption of an American citizen. As per CARA, provisions of the Juvenile Act only permit adoption when the child is in need of care and protection or is a child in conflict with law. The child was born in the US in 2019, but the petitioner couple brought him to India when he was a few months old. The boy has since then been living with them and they were desirous of adopting him. The CARA informed the HC that it cannot give clearance for the adoption without the child first being adopted in the US under laws applicable in that country. The bench dismissed the petition, saying it was not inclined to allow the adoption. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
