logo
Nobel laureates plea for diplomacy to prevent nuclear war

Nobel laureates plea for diplomacy to prevent nuclear war

USA Today4 days ago
On Monday's episode of The Excerpt podcast: USA TODAY White House Reporter Davis Winkie breaks down what nuclear experts said last week about the current state of nuclear threats and what to do about it. Support for President Donald Trump's immigration policies fell in a new poll. USA TODAY National Immigration and Border Reporter Lauren Villagran discusses Louisiana's place as a major immigration detainer. Israeli fire killed 67 people seeking aid in Gaza. WNBA All-Stars make a CBA statement with 'Pay Us What You Owe Us' shirts.
Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text.
Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here
Taylor Wilson:
Good morning. I'm Taylor Wilson, and today is Monday, July 21st, 2025. This is USA TODAY's The Excerpt. Today what nuclear experts are saying about present-day threats, plus support for Trump immigration policies drops in a new poll, and we hear how one state in the south is approaching immigration detention facilities.

Top nuclear experts gathered last week to offer world leaders a playbook for reducing the risk of nuclear war. I discussed with USA TODAY White House reporter, Davis Winkie. Thanks for joining me, Davis.
Davis Winkie:
Good to be back, Taylor.
Taylor Wilson:
All right, just tell us a bit about this meeting of Nobel Prize winners and nuclear experts in Chicago, why was this held?
Davis Winkie:
Nobel Prize winners and physicists have long considered themselves the guardians, so to speak, of the nuclear world, because of their pivotal role in the creation of the nuclear bomb. A couple of physics Nobel winners thought the threat of nuclear war keeps creeping higher and higher in recent years, so this year, to mark the 80th anniversary of the Trinity nuclear test near Los Alamos, New Mexico, this group of Nobel laureates assembled in Chicago, and brought together nuclear policy experts, former government officials, diplomats, et cetera, to face down the challenges in reducing the risk of nuclear war right now, and to provide a declaration of policy recommendations that could help world leaders to reduce that risk.
Taylor Wilson:
Well, Davis, in terms of what they functionally did here, it's clear many of them hammered home the point that international agreements are key to reducing some of the risk of nuclear war. Let's start with the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. Can you help us understand what that is, and how did this come up during these discussions?
Davis Winkie:
The CTBT, as it's known in nuclear circles, arose in the mid 1990s, after a lot of leading nuclear powers agreed to stop nuclear testing. A handful of the world's countries have at least signed this treaty, and have agreed to pause testing. However, it has not gone into binding effect, because nine countries that are specified in the treaty as needing to ratify it, or have their legislatures or governing bodies formally approve it. The United States is one of those countries, as is Russia, as is China, as is North Korea. The CTBT has always existed at the limit of its current potential. It has an organization headquartered Vienna, that does incredibly sophisticated technological monitoring of seismic activity around the world, satellite imagery, et cetera, that allows them to tell us in near real time whether something that has occurred is a nuclear test or not. That's incredibly valuable for international stability, but it's limited because of the fact that the treaty is not in enforced, and now you have Russia, China, and the U.S. potentially considering resuming explosive nuclear testing, because they are not bound by this treaty, because they've not ratified it.
Taylor Wilson:
Well, shifting gears, AI is entering basically every facet of society at this point. Does it have a role in nuclear spaces, Davis?
Davis Winkie:
Taylor, you've touched on something very hotly debated in nuclear policy circles right now, what is the appropriate extent in areas in which that AI can be integrated? Everybody pretty much agrees that the AI should not, SKYNET style, decide when and where the missiles are being launched. You cannot give control of the missiles over to AI. Former president, Joe Biden, and Chinese president, Xi Jinping, actually agreed to that publicly last year. So there's common ground among the nuclear powers on some of the limits of AI, but there's questions still swirling around what's the proper role of AI in things like early warning systems. It's a good thing, Taylor, that we've never had a global thermonuclear war. What that means, however, is that there is not global thermonuclear war data on which to train AI models for something like early warning, or targeting solution, or any of these other potential applications across nuclear command control and communications enterprise.
One of the major things that came out at this conference though is the Vatican's representatives there was really outspoken about wanting there to be an independent faith leader component of assessing the morality of AI integration, which largely does align with some of the other initiatives regarding AI that we have seen coming out of the Vatican recently. I, for one, am really interested to see how these further policy recommendations and such develop in the months and years ahead.
Taylor Wilson:
USA TODAY White House reporter, Davis Winkie. Thank you, Davis.
Davis Winkie:
Thanks for having me.

Taylor Wilson:
Support for President Donald Trump's immigration policies fell in a new poll with stark differences between Republicans and Democrats on deportations, and the use of detention facilities. The poll out yesterday from CBS YouGov found that immigration is the top issue that swayed respondents' opinion on the president. 61% said immigration and deportation policies mattered a lot, followed by inflation and the economy. Overall, the poll puts Trump's approval rating at 42%, with disapproval at 58%. The survey previously found Trump's approval rating was 45% last month. In the latest CBS poll, 56% disapproved of the president's immigration stances, marking a 10-point drop from polling at the beginning of Trump's second term in February, the outlet reported. Support for Trump's immigration policies is split along party lines, nearly all Republicans surveyed, 91% say they approve of the president's deportation program. Among Democrats, 14% say they approve. You can read more with a link in today's show notes.

One state in the south, long known for its prison economy now houses more ICE detention facilities than any other non-border state. I spoke with USA TODAY national immigration and border reporter, Lauren Villagran, to learn more. Thanks for joining me, Lauren.
Lauren Villagran:
Thanks for having me, Taylor.
Taylor Wilson:
How involved is Louisiana with detaining migrants? How many detention facilities do they have?
Lauren Villagran:
I think a lot of Americans don't realize that Louisiana is actually one of the biggest ICE detention center posts in the country. So Texas is the largest, and has the most ICE detention centers, but Louisiana is number two, with nine total dedicated ICE detention facilities.
Taylor Wilson:
How and why has the state become such a deportation hub? When did this begin?
Lauren Villagran:
Back in 2017, the state was going through a criminal justice reform. The result of that bipartisan reform was that many of Louisiana's prisons, the state is known as one of the world's largest incarcerators per capita, were emptied of many prisoners who were in jail for low-level offenses, and that's around when some communities turned to the federal government. ICE at the time was looking for ways to expand immigration detention, and they came to Louisiana, saw that there were empty beds, and they had people to fill them with. So you started to see a pretty dramatic expansion of ICE detention around 2019 in Louisiana. Several organizations have studied this phenomenon, the ACLU of Louisiana, Tulane University, researchers, and we had the opportunity to travel to Louisiana last month.
Taylor Wilson:
Yeah, I want to hear about that trip, Lauren. What did you see? Tell us about this experience.
Lauren Villagran:
Photographer, Omar Ornelas and I traveled around the state. Many of these detention centers are located far from New Orleans, the sort of metropolitan center of the state at the southern tip. You have to drive 3, 5, 7 hours to reach some of these facilities, many of which are located in rural communities, sometimes deep in the woods. There were, in July, more than 7,000 people detained in ICE detention in Louisiana.
Taylor Wilson:
Wow. Lauren, what are some of the advantages of Louisiana for immigration officials? And what are some of the advantages for Louisiana?
Lauren Villagran:
As of this recording, DHS had not responded to multiple requests for comment from USA TODAY. We asked why DHS, why ICE went to Louisiana, so far from the border, and we didn't get a response. Now, what we learned from community members, from immigration advocates who work in the area is that Louisiana had a number of advantages. One, it had these empty jails and prisons, so there were facilities and infrastructure already available. There were members of the community who know how to do corrections work, and the immigration advocates will say there was another reason as well, Louisiana is located in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, it's a circuit that has historically been very difficult for immigration advocates to win their cases, the immigration judges in Louisiana are considered some of the toughest in the nation.
Taylor Wilson:
And in terms of some of those advantages for the state itself, you're hearing similar things on the ground there?
Lauren Villagran:
Certainly for the smaller rural communities that had facilities that were an anchor to the economy, of course. The federal government offered to pay more than the state per bed, per night. And a facility where you've got several hundred people working there when your community is maybe a population 4,000 or so is a pretty big deal. It was considered economic development.
Taylor Wilson:
President Trump is increasingly leaning on Republican-led states far from the U.S.-Mexico border to detain and deport immigrants, as you write. Are other states following Louisiana's lead as more federal funding moves to ICE detention?
Lauren Villagran:
We saw Congress give ICE $45 billion for detention over the next four years, that quadruples the agency's annual budget currently. So we're going to see likely a huge expansion of immigration detention in this country.
Taylor Wilson:
We went through some of the apparent advantages for some of the players here. What do critics say about using these states to detain migrants in this way? What are some of the due process concerns and other worries?
Lauren Villagran:
There's been a practice for a long time now that seems to have accelerated under the current administration of detaining people far from their families. Now, previously, immigration detention was often used for recent border crossers. For example, under the Biden administration and under the first Trump administration, you saw moves to detain asylum seekers at the border. People would cross the border, and then be transferred to Louisiana. Now, as interior enforcement has ramped up, you're seeing people get picked up all over the country for immigration violations. But unlike local jails where folks might be taken into custody in their community, in this case, immigrants are being sent very far from their communities and their families. Some of the higher-profile detainees that we've seen under the Trump administration, Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia University student activist, Kseniia Petrova, the Harvard University researcher from Russia, they were removed from respectively New York and Boston, and sent to Louisiana.
Taylor Wilson:
All right, Lauren, great reporting work on this story. I found it really eye-opening. Lauren Villagran covers the border and immigration for USA TODAY. Thanks, Lauren.
Lauren Villagran:
Really appreciate it, Taylor. Thanks.

Taylor Wilson:
Israel opened fire and killed dozens of Palestinians as they waited for UN aid trucks in Northern Gaza yesterday according to the Gaza health ministry, as Israel issued new evacuation orders for certain areas. There are continued starvation concerns in the enclave. Palestinian health officials said hundreds of people could soon die as hospitals were inundated with patients suffering from dizziness and exhaustion due to the scarcity of food and a collapse in aid deliveries.
And Pope Leo called for an end to what he said was the barbarity of war as he spoke of his pain over an Israeli strike on the sole Catholic Church in Gaza that killed three people on Thursday. Israel and Hamas are engaged in indirect talks in the nation of Qatar, aimed at reaching a 60-day truce and deal to release Israeli hostages held in Gaza, though there has been no sign of breakthrough.

All eyes were on the WNBA, as the best players in the league gathered in Indianapolis over the weekend for the All-Star game, and they used that opportunity to make a bold statement to the league, walking onto the court for warmups in black T-shirts that read pay us what you owe us. One of the main items on the All-Star Week agenda was a face-to-face meeting between the players and league on collective bargaining agreement negotiations, as the current contract expires at the end of the 2025 season. According to multiple players, that meeting did not go well. Still, more than 40 players turned out for the first meeting with league officials in months. WNBA commissioner, Cathy Engelbert, had a different tone, saying she believed the meeting with players had been productive.

Thanks for listening to The Excerpt. You can get the podcast wherever you get your audio, and if you're on a smart speaker, just ask for The Excerpt. I'm Taylor Wilson, and I'll be back tomorrow with more of The Excerpt from USA TODAY.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel says hundreds of truckloads of aid are waiting to enter Gaza. Why can't the U.N. bring them in?
Israel says hundreds of truckloads of aid are waiting to enter Gaza. Why can't the U.N. bring them in?

Los Angeles Times

time13 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Israel says hundreds of truckloads of aid are waiting to enter Gaza. Why can't the U.N. bring them in?

TEL AVIV, Israel — The United Nations and experts say that Palestinians in Gaza are at risk of famine, with reports of increasing numbers of people dying from causes related to malnutrition. Yet Israel says hundreds of truckloads of aid are waiting at the border for the U.N. to distribute in Gaza. On Thursday, Israel's military took journalists to the Gaza side of the Kerem Shalom crossing, where hundreds of boxes of aid were on pallets filling a huge lot. Israel says it has allowed in around 4,500 aid trucks since it lifted a total blockade in May — around 70 truckloads a day, one of the lowest rates of the war and far less than the several hundred the U.N. says are needed each day. Israel says it lets in enough aid and faults U.N. agencies for not doing enough to retrieve and get it to those in need. The U.N. says it is hampered by Israeli military restrictions on its movements and incidents of criminal looting. Here's a look at why the aid can't be delivered. To retrieve the aid at the border — or move around most of the Gaza Strip — U.N. trucks must enter zones controlled by the military after obtaining its permission. Once the aid is loaded, the trucks must get safely to the population. The whole trip can take 20 hours, the U.N. says. Large crowds of desperate people, as well as criminal gangs, overwhelm trucks as they enter and strip off the supplies. Witnesses say Israeli troops regularly open fire on the crowds, causing deaths and injuries. 'Taken together, these factors have put people and humanitarian staff at grave risk and forced aid agencies on many occasions to pause the collection of cargo from crossings controlled by the Israeli authorities,' said Olga Cherevko, a spokesperson for the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, or OCHA. At least 79 Palestinians were killed while trying to get aid entering Gaza this week, according to Gaza's health ministry. A U.N. official who was not authorized to discuss the issue publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity said Israeli forces opened fire toward crowds who tried to take food from an entering truck convoy. Israel's military said soldiers shot at a gathering of thousands of Palestinians in northern Gaza who posed a threat, and it was aware of some casualties. On its website, OCHA said there is a breakdown of law and order, which is partly due to the collapse of Gaza's Hamas-run civilian police force, leading to insecurity at the crossings and for convoys moving within Gaza. It said this is further compounded by the increase of armed gangs. The military frequently assigns routes for trucks to use that are 'unsuitable, either impassable for long truck convoys, passing through crowded markets, or controlled by dangerous gangs,' OCHA said. When the U.N. objects to a route, the military provides few alternatives, it said. The U.N. also struggles with facilitation from the military. It says more than half of its movement requests, 506 out of 894, were either denied or impeded by the military in May, June and July. There are also regular delays by Israel's forces in coordination. The delays result in lost time, difficulty planning and wasted resources as convoys spend hours waiting for the 'green light to move only to be denied,' OCHA said. Israel says it doesn't limit the truckloads of aid coming into Gaza and that assessments of roads in Gaza are conducted weekly, when it looks for the best ways to provide access for the international community. Col. Abdullah Halaby, a top official in COGAT, the Israeli military agency in charge of transferring aid to the territory, said there are several crossings open. 'We encourage our friends and our colleagues from the international community to do the collection, and to distribute the humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza,' he said. An Israeli security official who was not allowed to be named in line with military procedures told reporters this week that the U.N. wanted to use roads that were not approved. He said the army offered to escort the aid groups, but they refused. For much of the war, U.N. agencies were able to safely deliver aid to those who need it, despite Israeli restrictions and occasional attacks and looting. The Hamas-run police provided public security. But as Israeli airstrikes targeted the police force, it has been unable to operate. The U.N. says being escorted by Israel's army could bring harm to civilians, citing shootings and killings by Israeli troops surrounding aid operations. The U.N. and aid groups also say that looting of trucks lessens or stops entirely when enough aid is allowed into Gaza. 'The best protection for us is community buy-in,' said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric. 'And to get that community buy-in, communities have to understand that trucks will come every day, that food will come every day.' 'That's what we're asking for,' he said. Mednick writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations contributed to this report.

Moderate Dems get tougher on Netanyahu
Moderate Dems get tougher on Netanyahu

Politico

time41 minutes ago

  • Politico

Moderate Dems get tougher on Netanyahu

With help from Joe Gould, Phelim Kine and Daniel Lippman Subscribe here | Email Eric The rapidly deteriorating humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip is causing even some of Israel's staunchest defenders in the Democratic party to pile some harsh criticism on the U.S. ally. The top Democrats on the Senate Armed Services, Intelligence, Foreign Relations and Judiciary Committees and relevant foreign policy and defense Appropriations subcommittees issued a joint statement today calling on President DONALD TRUMP to apply more pressure on Israeli Prime Minister BENJAMIN NETANYAHU to end the war in the Gaza Strip and restore the distribution of food and other humanitarian aid into the territory. None of these Democrats — Sens. JEANNE SHAHEEN of New Hampshire, JACK REED of Rhode Island, MARK WARNER of Virginia, DICK DURBIN of Illinois, CHRIS COONS of Delaware and BRIAN SCHATZ of Hawaii — are avowed critics of Israel. Most have only rebuked Israel periodically since the Gaza war broke out and have supported aid to Israel throughout their careers. And they join a whole host of pro-Israel Democrats who have voiced their discomfort with Israel's actions over the course of this week. That includes Sen. MARK KELLY (D-Ariz.), who on Tuesday became one of the first prominent Democratic moderates to do so, and Sen. AMY KLOBUCHAR (D-Minn.), the third-highest ranking Democratic leader in the Senate. Klobuchar issued a sharp rebuke to Israel in a floor speech Thursday. On the House side, Rep. RITCHIE TORRES (D-N.Y.) got into a spat Thursday on X with Rep. RANDY FINE (R-Fla.) after Fine said that Palestinians should 'starve away' in the Gaza Strip until Hamas released the remaining Israeli hostages in its captivity. Torres has previously come under fire from critics of Israel for at times being too dismissive about the plight of Palestinians in the enclave. The moderates are sounding more and more like progressives, who have been lashing out at Israel for its approach to the Gaza war and calling on the White House across two administrations to use every tool possible to push Netanyahu to alleviate human suffering in the enclave. It's a critical moment in the conflict. The Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has struggled to distribute aid to Palestinians in the enclave, exacerbating widespread starvation in the territory. Israeli troops are accused of firing on Palestinians seeking aid, killing hundreds of Palestinian civilians in recent weeks. Israel has downplayed concerns about the inadequacy of humanitarian aid, blaming Hamas for the violence associated with aid not getting to people and arguing it's a question of inadequate distribution, not volume, of aid entering the territory. The Trump administration has repeatedly pointed the finger at Hamas for the plight of Palestinians in the enclave. Some Democrats have acknowledged in recent weeks that they're facing considerably more pressure to call out Israeli actions in the Gaza Strip from the base. But don't expect the Democratic Party to abandon Israel anytime soon. The pro-Israel group Democratic Majority for Israel, a major player in Democratic primaries, put out a statement today that principally singled out Hamas for the issues with aid. A number of Senate Democratic defenders of Israel, including Minority Leader CHUCK SCHUMER and Sen. JOHN FETTERMAN (D-Penn.), have also not spoken out. Most Republicans, meanwhile, are keeping mum, making it deeply unlikely the worsening crisis in Gaza moves the White House to use its leverage on Netanyahu. The Inbox MUSK'S OTHER SHUTDOWN: ELON MUSK ordered the shutdown of vital Starlink communications satellite services for Ukraine along the frontline in September 2022, according to a Reuters report. The cut affected service around Kherson, which Ukraine was attempting to reclaim from Russia, and areas in eastern Ukraine. The Starlink shutdown led to the failure of a Ukrainian operation to retake the town of Beryslav, a Ukrainian military official told Reuters. Starlink terminals are vital to Ukraine's military operations, serving as the communications linchpin between command, drone and artillery units. The U.S. military is also increasingly using Starlinks for its own forces. It's not clear why Musk ordered the shutdown. However, the cut-off happened around the time when U.S. officials believed Russia might use a nuclear weapon to attack Ukraine. Reuters also reveals other findings that Musk ordered the shutdown of Starlink services in Russian-occupied Crimea in September 2022 to prevent a Ukrainian attack on Russian ships there. Musk later said he had not shut down services but rather never activated them in Crimea. WORSENING FIREFIGHT IN ASIA: Fighting between Thailand and Cambodia along their border continued into today, forcing thousands of civilians on both sides to flee the area. The two countries have been in talks for a ceasefire. But with them trading fire from powerful rocket launchers and artillery, that's looking increasingly unlikely. Acting Thai Prime Minister PHUMTHAM WECHAYACHAI said the conflict could become a war, threatening yet greater violence between the two historic adversaries. Thailand has accused Cambodia of intentionally targeting civilians. The brewing conflict could complicate efforts for the U.S. to counter China in the Indo-Pacific. Thailand, the militarily more powerful nation, is a close U.S. ally. Cambodia is more aligned with China, Vietnam and Russia, from whom it has received military supplies. NUDGING A NUKE DEAL: With the New START Treaty set to expire in 195 days, arms control advocates are urging Trump and Russian President VLADIMIR PUTIN to strike an interim deal to avoid a surge in nuclear weapons. 'Unless Trump and Putin reach an interim deal to maintain existing limits, we could soon see each side increasing the size of their deployed nuclear arsenals for the first time in more than 35 years by uploading warheads on existing missiles, which is no one's interests,' DARYL KIMBALL, executive director of the Arms Control Association, said in a statement. The comments came after Trump signaled support for renewed talks, telling Russia's TASS, 'We are starting to work on that. That is a big problem for the world, when you take off nuclear restrictions, that's a big problem.' SOME NEWS ON THE HOME FRONT: Are you a NatSec Daily reader who also cares deeply about the economic changes the Trump administration is ushering in? We have good news for you. POLITICO's flagship financial newsletter has a new Friday edition built for the economic era we're living in: one shaped by political volatility, disruption and a wave of policy decisions with sector-wide consequences. Each week, Morning Money: Capital Risk brings sharp reporting and analysis on how political risk is moving markets and how investors are to know how health care regulation, tariffs or court rulings could ripple through the economy? Start here. The first issue dropped today. Read it here. IT'S FRIDAY! WELCOME TO THE WEEKEND: Thanks for tuning in to NatSec Daily! This space is reserved for the top U.S. and foreign officials, the lawmakers, the lobbyists, the experts and the people like you who care about how the natsec sausage gets made. Aim your tips and comments at ebazail@ and follow Eric on X @ebazaileimil. While you're at it, follow the rest of POLITICO's global security team on social media: @dave_brown24, @HeidiVogt, @jessicameyers, @RosiePerper, @ @PhelimKine, @felschwartz, @connorobrienNH, @paulmcleary, @reporterjoe, @JackDetsch, @samuelskove, @magmill95, @johnnysaks130 and @delizanickel Keystrokes LIE TO ME: The five leading Chinese artificial intelligence chatbots provided false or unhelpful information more than half the time in a test run by analytics company NewsGuard, the company said today. In the test, the company presented chatbots with 10 false narratives spread by Chinese official media and pro-Chinese media. The narratives included that the U.S. had severed relations with China and that Taiwan was calling up draftees in preparation for war with China. In 40 percent of cases, the chatbots — Ernie, DeepSeek, MiniMax, Qwen and Yuanbao — presented false information. In 20 percent of cases, the chatbots did not debunk the false narratives. In one case, a chatbot presented Chinese government policy on Taiwan without being explicitly asked to do so. The failure rates were similar in Mandarin and English. It's a troubling finding for users in China, but also elsewhere as Chinese chatbots are increasingly popular across the world. The Complex NASA EXODUS: NASA will lose 20 percent or more of its staff, including thousands of senior personnel, under a Trump administration push to slim the federal government, Sam reports in POLITICO's Space newsletter. The voluntary departures include 2,892 civil servants in the agency's GS-13 through GS-15 pay levels — senior positions reserved for those with significant technical or managerial responsibilities, like planning Mars missions or leading work on space telescopes. The losses could affect U.S. plans to land astronauts on the moon by 2027, a key goal as the U.S. races to beat China back to the lunar surface. In an open letter to interim NASA Administrator Sean Duffy, a group of current and former NASA employees protested this week that the departures would eliminate 'highly specialized, irreplaceable knowledge crucial to carrying out NASA's mission.' Still, the departures, which the administration has incentivized through a range of offerings to employees, may not be enough for the Trump administration. The White House wants to cut over 5,000 staff from NASA from its 2024 staffing level, meaning that NASA may have to fire more than 1,000 additional staff. POLISH ARMS: The United States on Friday announced a $4 billion loan guarantee to Poland under the Foreign Military Financing program, a big boon for one of the NATO allies most in the Trump administration's good graces. The announcement did not name any specific acquisition programs that the loan guarantee might support. Poland has gone on a buying spree of U.S. arms in recent years, a binge that has included 96 Apache helicopters and over 400 High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems. 'Poland remains one of America's strongest and most dependable allies in Europe,' State Department spokesperson TAMMY BRUCE said in a statement. Poland's spending of more than 4 percent of its gross domestic product on its military places it favorably among European nations for the Trump administration, which has pressed for NATO members to spend five percent of GDP on defense. NATO members agreed to hit this goal by 2035 at the most recent summit. Poland aims to hit that number by 2026, officials have previously said. Broadsides CHINA CRIES COLONIALISM: The Chinese government's hands-off approach to the worsening cross-border military skirmishes between U.S. treaty ally Thailand and China-aligned Cambodia isn't curbing Beijing from blaming Western countries for the dispute. 'The root cause of this issue stems from the legacy of Western colonialism from years past, and now requires a calm and prudent approach to resolution,' Chinese Foreign Minister WANG YI told ASEAN Secretary-General KAO KIM HOURN in Beijing today, per a Chinese Foreign Ministry statement. Wang made clear Beijing is leaving it to ASEAN — of which Cambodia and Thailand are both members — to undertake 'mediation efforts' between Bangkok and Phnom Penh to end the fighting. As in Ukraine, the conflict provides Beijing a real-time opportunity to observe and analyze military tactics and the relative performance of U.S. and Chinese-supplied weaponry. Transitions — DILLON McGREGOR is now acting assistant secretary for legislative affairs at the Department of Homeland Security. He most recently was a senior adviser at DHS. — BRIAN SATTLER is now strategic planner for the senior adviser to the secretary for the Coast Guard. He most recently was director for maritime and industrial capacity at the National Security Council. — PALOMA CHACON has been promoted to press secretary for the Department of Homeland Security. — RAVI SINGH has been promoted to be senior vice president and CFO of the Export-Import Bank of the United States. — JOEL VALDEZ is now acting deputy press secretary for the Pentagon. He most recently was communications director and senior adviser for Rep. LAUREN BOEBERT (R-Colo.) and has previously worked for MATT GAETZ. What to Read — Glenn Gerstell, The New York Times: Remember the TikTok Ban? Does Anyone? — Marton Dunai, The Financial Times: Could Hungary's faltering economy topple Orbán? — Katharine Houreld, The Washington Post: As Kenya's protests intensified, two friends bled on opposite sides Monday Today — Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 11 a.m.: Violence in Suwayda: No 'Plan B' for Syria? — Hudson Institute, 4:30 p.m.: What Taiwan Can Learn from Ukraine's Battlefield Experience. Thanks to our editors, Heidi Vogt and Emily Lussier, who provide us with false or unhelpful information more than half the time.

'South Park' creators 'apologize' for latest Trump episode: 'We're terribly sorry'
'South Park' creators 'apologize' for latest Trump episode: 'We're terribly sorry'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

'South Park' creators 'apologize' for latest Trump episode: 'We're terribly sorry'

SAN DIEGO – The day after one of the most controversial episodes in the show's history, 'South Park' creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone had a succinct response to the ruckus they caused. 'We're terribly sorry,' Parker said with a sly grin at a Comedy Central's Comic-Con animation panel next to Stone, 'Beavis and Butt-Head' honcho Mike Judge and 'Digiman' creator Andy Samberg. The Season 27 premiere of 'South Park' tore into President Donald Trump, showing him literally getting into bed naked with Satan, and referenced their Paramount bosses' settlement with the president, the '60 Minutes' flap and the surprise cancellation of CBS's "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert." All followed Wednesday by an agreement between Paramount and the 'South Park' creators for 50 new episodes and a lucrative new streaming deal on Paramount+. White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers slammed the episode in a statement to USA TODAY, calling "South Park" a "fourth-rate show" that "hasn't been relevant for over 20 years." When Comic-Con panel moderator Josh Horowitz joked that he had a subpoena with him, Parker responded, 'It's fine; we're ready.' Parker and Stone talked at length about the speed of today's topical comedy and making newsy jokes. 'It's not just 'SNL' anymore,' Stone said. Parker revealed that they were at their studios this morning trying to figure out next week's episode. 'Right now we don't know,' Parker said. 'It's super stressful.' And when working on the July 23 season premiere, 'three days ago I didn't know if anyone's going to like this,' Parker added. They were looking at newspapers and changing things on the fly right up until they needed to be done. As far as big ideas for the season go, 'my whiteboard's blank, dude,' Parker said. So much so that when they were asked to do a summer promo video hyping the new season, they made up a bunch of scenes just for that sizzle reel. 'You seriously think we went and made a bunch of shows ahead of time and banked them?' Then Stone chimed in, mock seriously: 'No politics. We're not doing any of that (stuff).' Stone said he feels most competitive with 'what the kids are doing on TikTok and YouTube.' In fact, he and Parker admitted they now get a lot of their entertainment online and from social media. 'We have a great gig, but I'm jealous. You see someone do something in their front yard and it's really funny.' Contributing: Brendan Morrow This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: 'South Park' creators 'apologize' for Trump episode at Comic-Con Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store