logo
Scammers target bars, cafes and restaurants

Scammers target bars, cafes and restaurants

By Rachel Helyer Donaldson of RNZ
Fraudsters are targeting cafes, restaurants and bars, with at least two scams doing the rounds of the capital's dining scene, as well as some in Christchurch.
Hospitality NZ spokesperson Sam McKinnon says one scam doing the rounds in the capital involves a man claiming to be a diner, whose partner had become severely ill after eating there.
In several cases it was alleged the woman had gone into anaphylactic shock after eating onions which she was allergic to.
Another cafe was asked for a refund by a man who said his companion had had food poisoning.
The businesses realised it was the same person, after the scam was flagged up on a hospitality sector Facebook page, McKinnon said.
It was "disappointing and frustrating" for the sector, particularly in the tough economic climate, he added.
Fortune Favours venue manager Rachael Lee said she believed her bar was targeted by the same man earlier this month.
"He was claiming he'd ordered food and his wife, who was allergic to onions, had been given onions, and due to the fact that they weren't New Zealand citizens they had been over-charged hospital bills and now it was on us to pay them.
"We never want to have someone be over-charged, so we always try to check receipts and look through past transactions. But there was never any proof, just demanding money without providing any evidence."
Her suspicions were confirmed when she heard other venues had been targeted by similar scams. She was aware of about 10 bars targeted by the onions scam and thought at least several of them fell for it, which could have been potentially costly, she added.
"Some people have smelt a rat and said no, go away. But others have been called out and handed over the money."
None of the stories matched, she said. "If I hadn't seen the [Facebook group] post that he had already hit other bars, we probably would have been scammed out of a lot of money."
Maura Rigby - the co-owner and director of Beach Babylon and Little Beer Quarter - said both venues had been targeted by people running "the overcharging or double charging scam" at least twice in the past six months.
Staff had been alerted to two attempts to get refunds based on fabricated credit card statements, she said. "We're talking about $200 to $300, not huge numbers, when you compare it to large scams like bank fraud. But for the hospitality industry, it's a nuisance and it's a significant amount of money."
When the person making the claim was asked for extra evidence, "we found that the person just disappeared". The same thing had happened this year, although she was not sure if it was a different person, or group of people, she said.
"We're a customer service industry, we want to please our customers and put any problems, anything not done right, as quickly as possible.
"Initially we're always really receptive to hear if there was a mistake and we thoroughly investigate it. But now we'll just be asking for a little bit more information so that we can ensure that it actually matches up with transactions that happened at our businesses, rather than just people targeting us because we like to please our customers.
"It's not a great time for us. I guess other people are doing it tough too, and that might be why there's a rise of scams like this. But we don't have the margins to withstand extra expenses like this at the moment."
Restaurant Association chief executive Marisa Bidois said it had been alerted to the scams by members in both Wellington and Christchurch. The association was sending out a notice to alert others who may not have heard about it, she added.
Scams put additional stress on restaurants in challenging economic times. "Having to deal with this and figuring out what's genuine and what's not can be a bit of a minefield."
It was important for companies dealing with these sorts of complaints to request a receipt, establish the details correctly, and have a clear refund and complaints policy, she said.
"It is surprising how often people will claim to have been in a restaurant and eaten a certain dish, and then later on the owner will discover they definitely weren't here, as they didn't serve that dish that night. In some cases, we've seen people stating that they've consumed something that isn't even on the menu. It definitely pays to gather all the information."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Investigation into abduction claim
Investigation into abduction claim

Otago Daily Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Investigation into abduction claim

Sarah Amazinnia told a Te Pataka o Rakaihautu Banks Peninsula Community Board meeting in June she believed a man, well-known in the community, had tried to abduct her. She made a Facebook post about the alleged incident which led to other Lyttelton women sharing their own experiences with predatory behaviour from men. Amazinnia put together a document with responses from 35 of the women and presented it to the community board in June to advocate for women's safety. She also told the meeting of the alleged abduction and also contacted the man's hapu, which told him he had to contact his employer. The employer then stood the man down from his position, which has led to the investigation that starts tomorrow. The man told The Star the incident did not happen. He said he could not comment further. Amazinnia did not report the alleged abduction to the police in April, when she says it happened. When asked by The Star after the June community board meeting why, she replied: "My experience with the police was so poor, I didn't feel like I would get any traction.' She said she had made up to 30 complaints to police about a man who she said had been stalking her for the past two-and-a-half years. Each time he was either spoken to by police or arrested and 'let out on bail', she said. 'It just got to the point where it felt like there wasn't enough of a consequence for that individual to actually stop their behaviour,' she said. But she told The Star this week she had now 'filed a police report' over the alleged abduction. She would not say when she filed the report or if she had been spoken to by police since. The alleged abductor is not the same person Amazinnia says had been stalking her. Amazinnia told The Star the man asked to meet her in his car to discuss an upcoming project in Lyttelton. When she met with him, the conversation turned into a 'sexual nature'. She said he started touching her inappropriately and said they should go for a drive. She said no, but he started to drive off. Amazinnia said she distracted the man and he stopped the vehicle, where she opened the door and got out. The man drove off. The man told The Star he and his lawyer were requesting an explanation from the hapu why he has been stood down from his duties on the basis of an accusation. Amazinnia has set up a working group to look at ways to negate predatory behaviour issues in Lyttelton. Senior Sergeant Roy Appley spoke to the community board on Monday. 'While I can't say that it absolutely isn't happening, I'm not aware of it (predatory behaviour) to the extent that it seems to have been spoken about on social media,' he said. He also said the police need to look at why the community board is being made aware of issues and not the police. Amazinna's concerns have led to kits to test for drink spiking being made available for patrons in some Lyttelton bars and information on predatory behaviour.

Wife's subtle move after CEO husband caught on Coldplay kiss cam in alleged affair
Wife's subtle move after CEO husband caught on Coldplay kiss cam in alleged affair

NZ Herald

time6 days ago

  • NZ Herald

Wife's subtle move after CEO husband caught on Coldplay kiss cam in alleged affair

Footage of the incident quickly spread across social media and it didn't take long for internet sleuths to identify the two individuals. The viral video has racked up millions of views on TikTok and has been shared widely across all social media platforms, sparking a deluge of comments from internet users. While the alleged affair has not yet been confirmed, social media users believe they have further evidence that the kiss cam footage tells a story. Byron's wife, Megan Kerrigan Byron, was initially reported to have removed his last name from her social media profiles, reverting to her maiden name of Megan Kerrigan. Social media users overwhelmingly approved the subtle move and encouraged the wife to 'laugh all the way to the bank' after the incident. Andy Byron's wife has now dropped her married name on Facebook👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 and left comments open on her Facebook! What a class act! Go Megan 👏🏼 Get that divorce lawyer and get the money — Mrs. SpaceX ™️ (@anuibi) July 17, 2025 She appears to have since wiped her social media presence altogether, including removing her Facebook and Instagram accounts. 'What a class act! Go Megan. Get that divorce lawyer and get the money,' someone commented on social media. 'Get that check, girl,' another social media user said. JUST IN: Astronomer CEO Andy Byron's wife removes his last name from her Facebook profile. — Polymarket (@Polymarket) July 17, 2025 Kerrigan's Facebook account was open to public comments before being deleted and many social media users took the chance to post their support for the woman. 'Sorry you're going through this,' said one comment, which was echoed by many similar ones. 'If you're going to cheat, learn some chill' As the video continues to spread on social media, internet users have pointed out the reason it is getting so much attention is because the two protagonists tried to hide it. The result is a variation of the Barbra Streisand effect, a phenomenon where an attempt to hide or remove online information about an incident ends up increasing public awareness of that incident. Had they acted normally, they wouldn't have gone viral… — 🐈‍⬛ (@NatCatNFT) July 17, 2025 'Had they acted normally, they wouldn't have gone viral,' one person posted on X. 'Seriously. I'm no fan of cheating but if you're going to do it, learn some chill,' someone else replied. 'Would had [sic] been better off playing it off. Start dancing crazy and laughing, then separate like they did it for the camera intentionally,' another social media user commented. As the Herald's Jenni Mortimer wrote, Byron's affair 'is a lesson in karma and poor choices'. CEO gushed about HR director in hiring announcement A post from the Astronomer CEO describing Cabot as 'a proven leader' at the time she joined the company as HR director late last year has resurfaced after the viral video. 'Kristin's exceptional leadership and deep expertise in talent management, employee engagement, and scaling people strategies will be critical as we continue our rapid trajectory,' Byron said in November 2024. 'She is a proven leader at multiple growth-stage companies and her passion for fostering diverse, collaborative workplaces makes her a perfect fit for Astronomer.' Cabot said in the same press release that she was 'energised in my conversations with Andy and the Astronomer leadership team about the opportunities that exist here'. Viral moment leads to memes Internet users did not miss the opportunity to make jokes after the viral incident, which quickly became fertile ground for memes. Guy whose wife went to a Coldplay concert with her boss last night logging in today — Parody CEO (@parody_ceo) July 17, 2025 Me liking every post about the cheating CEO and Chief People Officer from Astronomer at the Coldplay concert — Rational Takes (@rationaltakes) July 17, 2025 chris martin at the coldplay concert — Saint Hoax (@SaintHoax) July 17, 2025 CEO of Astronomer walking into the office today — Trung Phan (@TrungTPhan) July 17, 2025 the camera guy zooming in at Andy Byron, CEO of Astronomer — Daniel Merja ( (@danielmerja) July 17, 2025 My X timeline today: — Prison Mitch (@MidnightMitch) July 17, 2025 And, finally, a nod to this absolute icon, who knew how to avoid getting caught at a concert she did not want to be seen at:

Trial begins as Meta investors, Zuckerberg square off over alleged privacy violations
Trial begins as Meta investors, Zuckerberg square off over alleged privacy violations

RNZ News

time16-07-2025

  • RNZ News

Trial begins as Meta investors, Zuckerberg square off over alleged privacy violations

By Tom Hals , Reuters Meta boss Mark Zuckerberg Photo: AFP A US$8 billion (NZ$13.4b) trial by Meta Platforms shareholders against Mark Zuckerberg and other current and former company leaders kicked off on Wednesday (US time). It centres on claims they illegally harvested the data of Facebook users in violation of a 2012 agreement with the US Federal Trade Commission. The trial started with a privacy expert for the plaintiffs, Neil Richards of Washington University Law School, who testified about Facebook's data policies. "Facebook's privacy disclosures were misleading," he told the court. Jeffrey Zients, White House chief of staff under President Joe Biden and a Meta director for two years starting in May 2018, is expected to take the stand later on Wednesday in the non-jury trial before Kathaleen McCormick, chief judge of the Delaware Chancery Court. The case will feature testimony from Zuckerberg and other billionaire defendants including former chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg, venture capitalist and board member Marc Andreessen as well as former board members Peter Thiel, Palantir Technologies co-founder, and Reed Hastings, co-founder of Netflix. A lawyer for the defendants, who have denied the allegations, declined to comment. McCormick, the judge who rescinded Elon Musk's $56b Tesla pay package last year, is expected to rule on liability and damages months after the trial concludes. The case began in 2018, following revelations that data from millions of Facebook users was accessed by Cambridge Analytica , a now-defunct political consulting firm that worked for Donald Trump's successful US presidential campaign in 2016. The FTC fined Facebook $5b in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, saying the company had violated a 2012 agreement with the FTC to protect user data. Shareholders want the defendants to reimburse Meta for the FTC fine and other legal costs, which the plaintiffs estimate total more than $8b. In court filings, the defendants described the allegations as "extreme" and said the evidence at trial will show Facebook hired an outside consulting firm to ensure compliance with the FTC agreement and that Facebook was a victim of Cambridge Analytica's deceit. Meta, which is not a defendant, declined to comment. On its website, the company has said it has invested billions of dollars into protecting user privacy since 2019. The lawsuit is considered the first of its kind to go to trial that alleges that board members consciously failed to oversee their company. Known as a Caremark claim, such lawsuits are often described as the hardest to prove in Delaware corporate law. However, in recent years, Delaware courts have allowed a growing number of these claims to proceed. Boeing's current and former board members settled a case with similar claims in 2021 for $237.5 million, the largest ever in an alleged breach of oversight lawsuit. The Boeing directors did not admit to wrongdoing. The Meta trial comes four months after Delaware lawmakers overhauled the state's corporate law to make it harder for shareholders to challenge deals struck with controlling shareholders like Zuckerberg. The bill, which did not address Caremark claims, was drafted after the state's governor met with representatives of Meta. Most publicly traded companies are incorporated in the state, which generates more than a quarter of the state's budget revenue. Meta, which was reportedly considering leaving Delaware earlier this year, is still incorporated in the state. Andreessen Horowitz, the venture capital fund co-founded by Andreessen, said earlier this month that it was reincorporating in Nevada from Delaware and encouraged other companies to do the same. The company cited the uncertainty of the state's courts and referenced the Musk pay ruling. Andreessen is expected to testify on Thursday. In addition to privacy claims at the heart of the Meta case, plaintiffs allege that Zuckerberg anticipated that the Cambridge Analytica scandal would send the company's stock lower and sold his Facebook shares as a result, pocketing at least $1b. Defendants said evidence will show that Zuckerberg did not trade on inside information and that he used a stock-trading plan that removes his control over sales and is designed to guard against insider trading. -Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store