Effigies of Kneecap, Irish flags and sectarian slogans top loyalist bonfires
It comes the night after effigies of migrants in a boat were burned on top of a bonfire in Moygashel in Co Tyrone despite widespread condemnation and concern.
Earlier, Stormont Environment Minister Andrew Muir urged that a contentious loyalist bonfire off the Donegall Road in south Belfast should not be set alight.
The bonfire is on a site that contains asbestos and is also close to an electricity sub-station, which powers two major hospitals in the city.
Mr Muir pleaded with anyone who is set to attend the fire to 'exercise caution'.
The Northern Ireland Environment Agency (NIEA) said late on Thursday that suspected asbestos had been found at five locations on the bonfire site and 20kg of material was removed.
Elsewhere, posters depicting the Irish rap group Kneecap, Irish flags and Palestinian flags appeared on other bonfires on Friday evening.
Effigies of the band members have appeared on a bonfire at Roden Street in south Belfast, as well as a sign written in the Irish language.
A bonfire in Eastvale Avenue in Dungannon, Co Tyrone, features the group on a poster with the wording 'Kill Your Local Kneecap', seemingly in response to a clip that emerged from a gig in 2023, which appeared to show a member saying: 'The only good Tory is a dead Tory. Kill your local MP.'
The Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) said on Thursday that the force would not agree to a request from Belfast City Council to remove the pyre on the site off the Donegall Road.
Later, the NIEA said an inspection had taken place at the site.
A statement said: 'The Northern Ireland Environment Agency can confirm that fragments of suspected asbestos were found at five locations around the site.
'Approximately 20 kilogrammes of suspect material was identified and was immediately removed.'
It added: 'The risk assessment that NIEA has provided to partners has consistently indicated that there was a strong possibility that fragments of asbestos could be elsewhere on the site.
'NIEA understand the landowner is due to arrange the removal of all of the asbestos from the site next week, commencing on July 16 2025, but it is important to note that removing the asbestos will be a highly specialised, complex and delicate operation that will require the site to be fully vacated.
'Indeed, the work is of such complexity that the full removal will take a number of weeks.'
Mr Muir, an Alliance Party MLA, told the BBC: 'There are many ways to celebrate, but not at this site.
'Personally, I respect how important the 11th and 12th is, I understand its importance, but I'd plead with people to exercise caution and not to light this bonfire if they could.'
He added: 'The removal of asbestos is very complex and delicate, it requires the site to be completely vacated.
'The site has not been vacated and that's one of the important issues.'
Dr Alan Stout, chairman of the British Medical Association Northern Ireland Council, urged people to stay away from the site.
'If there's asbestos there, just don't go there,' he told the BBC.
'Any other circumstance, any other environment, be it a school, be it a hospital, be it a leisure centre, if there is asbestos there, you rope it off, you secure it and you remove it in a safe manner and you do not expose your general population to it.'
The Grand Secretary of the Orange Order Rev Mervyn Gibson said people should 'go and enjoy themselves' at the bonfire.
He told the BBC that a council committee vote earlier this week to remove the bonfire was a 'political decision'.
He said: 'I believe the council voted a couple of weeks ago for the bonfire to go ahead.
'A few days before it, then Sinn Fein and Alliance and the SDLP decide to vote against it.'
Sinn Fein MLA Pat Sheehan accused the DUP of political cowardice.
He also urged people to stay away from the bonfire site, on account of what he described as a health and safety issue.
'It's clear that this site is completely contaminated with asbestos, it beggars belief,' he said.
'This is not an attack on Orange culture, this is clearly a health and safety issue.
'We're living in some sort of crazy parallel universe where an illegal bonfire (is) going to be lit, a fire which could cause criminal damage on a site contaminated with asbestos and right beside a power substation which provides power to the two main hospitals in Belfast.
'It is one particular party that isn't giving leadership … at the end of the day, I can't imagine anything similar happening in the constituency that I represent without every political leader here out shouting for its safe removal.
'The DUP have been absent, they are afraid to take on these people. They are political cowards when it comes to this, and it's disgraceful what they are doing.'
Hundreds of bonfires will be lit on Friday night ahead of the Orange Order's July 12 parades on Saturday.
The traditional fires are lit ahead of the main date in the parading calendar of Protestant loyal orders, the Twelfth of July.
A small number of bonfires were lit on Thursday night, including the controversial pyre in Moygashel, Co Tyrone, which had been widely criticised by political representatives and church leaders after it was topped with an effigy of migrants in a boat.
In a statement released ahead of the fire being lit, the PSNI said they were investigating a hate incident in relation to the fire.
The boat on top of the bonfire contained more than a dozen life-sized mannequins wearing life jackets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
15 minutes ago
- Spectator
France's decision to recognise Palestine is a mistake
Emmanuel Macron has announced that France will recognise Palestinian statehood. The French president will make his historic proclamation, the first among G7 countries, at the UN General Assembly in September. In a statement on X, Macron said that 'there is no alternative', adding that 'the French people want peace in the Middle East'. Many French people, however, do not want their country to recognise Palestine in the manner Macron intends. A poll last month found that only 22 per cent were in favour of immediate and unconditional recognition; 31 per cent were opposed and 47 per cent would accept recognition once Hamas had laid down its arms and released all the Israeli hostages. Not for the first time, Macron is swimming against the tide of public opinion in France. Jordan Bardella, president of the National Rally, condemned what he called a 'hasty decision'. Even some of Macron's centrists MPs disapproved. Caroline Yadan, said it was a 'political, moral and historical mistake'. The left, however, from the Greens to the Communists to the radical la France Insoumise, are delighted. Jean-Luc Melenchon, the leader of the latter, described the decision as a 'moral victory'. As usual, Macron has sided with the progressive left, as he does on all the major issues of the day: Palestine, mass immigration, assisted dying, law and order and Net Zero. This should surprise no one. 'I am left-wing,' he proclaimed in 2016. 'That is my history.' It also explains why he and Keir Starmer are 'firm friends'. As a consequence, there is growing discontent within Macron's coalition government from those ministers who hail from the right. In May, Macron scolded three of them, Bruno Retailleau, Gerald Darmanin and Sophie Primas, for their failure to toe the party line and for being too 'ambitious'. How ironic. When Macron declared his allegiance to the left in 2016, it was as a justification for launching his own party, En Marche. At the time he was serving as the minister of the economy in Francois Hollande's Socialist government. The left, said Macron, was 'my family' but 'part of my family is afraid of a changing world'. The Socialist party wasn't progressive enough for Macron. So he quit and ran for president, winning the election after the favourite, the conservative Francois Fillon, was brought down by a financial scandal – a scandal many on the right believe was engineered by the deep state. One of Fillon's closest advisors during his ill-fated campaign was Bruno Retailleau, who since September has served in Macron's coalition government as his Minister of the Interior. The pair can't stand the sight of each other. The depth of their mutual disdain was laid bare on Wednesday in an interview with Valeurs actuelles, a conservative magazine not a million miles ideologically from The Spectator, to whom Retailleau also spoke this week. Retailleau was withering in his summation of 'Macronism', saying it will die as soon as the president leaves office in 2027 'because Macronism is neither a political movement nor an ideology: it is essentially based on one man'. It is a cult, in other words, with a leader who demands devotion from his followers. Woe betide those whose faith wavers. Macron has worked his way through 158 ministers since 2017, more than any other president of the Fifth Republic. But will he dare dispense with Retailleau, his most defiant minister to date, the man who declared this week that he doesn't believe in Macronism because it 'fuels powerlessness'? Sack Retailleau and the fragile government would likely come crashing down. The pair were scheduled to have a one-to-one meeting at the Elysee on Thursday morning, but Macron cancelled at the 11th hour and, according to the French media, instructed his prime minister 'to restore discipline among his troops'. A dressing down from Francois Bayrou is unlikely to have much effect on Retailleau. If he has lost respect for the president, why should he retain it for his prime minister, a long-time political ally? The French people appear to have given up on the pair; an opinion poll this week revealed that Bayrou's approval rating is at 18 per cent, one point behind the president's, which is a record low in his eight years in office. Retailleau's dilemma is whether to stay in his post, or to leave and focus on his presidential campaign. He said this week that he wants to achieve a 'union of right-wing voters…in order to win in 2027' because of the very real possibility that a divided right could result in a victory for the left. The left encompasses not just Mélenchon, the Socialists and the Greens but also the progressivism practised by Macron's party. 'Everyone should agree on the failure of progressivism,' explained Retailleau. 'Progressivism has detached the individual from society…it is up to the right to propose a social project that breaks with the principles laid down by the left.' Remaining in government gives Retailleau a platform to address the public, which he did on Thursday. On a visit to a Paris police station, Retailleau pledged his unflinching support to officers across the country who have come under attack from mobs of youths this month. 'On one side, there is the France of heroes, and on the other, the France of bastards, who shoot at our police officers, our gendarmes and our firefighters,' he said. The rhetoric is inflammatory, and honest, but it's not what Emmanuel Macron wants to hear. He is in denial about the disintegration of France, preferring to focus his energy on bringing peace to Gaza and Ukraine. Retailleau's priority is France. He remains in government, he says, because he is 'motivated by a deep conviction: only France's interests matter.' Macron's deep conviction is the EU. That is the fundamental difference between him and Retailleau; one puts France first and other believes Brussels is paramount.
BBC News
15 minutes ago
- BBC News
Shouts of 'shame' ring-out during Swindon council asylum debate
Conservative councillors were heckled with shouts of "shame" during a council debate on asylum motion, which failed to pass, proposed the Cabinet produce a report on how Swindon can avoid its housing stock from being used to house asylum seekers, saying working Swindon people feel like "second class citizens".Council Leader Jim Robbins said there are no asylum seekers in council properties calling the proposal "poorly thought out".During the debate which included several passionate speeches, Labour Councillor Repi Begum, spoke about her lived experience and called the arguments from the opposition "racist tropes" - something that was denied. The motion was proposed by Conservative Councillor Daniel Adams and seconded by fellow Tory Councillor Gayle Cook who said that local people should be "put first" adding "charity starts at home".Labour and Liberal Democrat councillors voted unanimously against the motion with 12 Conservatives voting for it - resulting in it failing to Adams also asked for £238,000 of council money to be put into local services and not into housing asylum Robbins said this money is used for emergency accommodation which prioritises Swindon families with children but that also includes giving those granted a right to remain in the UK a temporary home whilst permanent accommodation is that he was "really pleased the motion was defeated" and that he was "proud" of Swindon's history of "welcoming people from all over the world". During the debate references were made to the youth of Swindon being unable to afford housing or rent in the Begum said using arguments like "our children can't get homes is an age-old racist trope - they're taking our homes"."When people hear leaders using that language it allows the average Joe Bloggs to act up and that's why we had the race riots of Summer 2024," she added."It endangers people like me, a third generation Brit, a hard working, law abiding, higher rate tax paying, decent, civilised human being who happens to be British - like it or not."After several arguments for and against the motion, Mr Adams, said: "I never mentioned race once, I'm truly shocked, it's this rhetoric that's designed to shutdown debate and lead to the issues we're seeing on our streets today."Ms Begum closed the debate by saying: "When you say this isn't about racism, you haven't been attacked with a baseball bat walking down the street because politicians like you decide to tell who has a right to be here and who hasn't got a right to be here." In a recent report by the BBC the Business Secretary, Jonathan Reynolds said the government shared the public's "huge frustration" at the pressure the asylum system puts on housing acknowledged concern about the Home Office competing with local councils to find temporary homes for asylum seekers and homeless people said the solution lay in building more homes, processing asylum applications faster, removing those with no right to be in the UK and cutting small boat crossings.
Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Council order owner to repaint over Palestinian flag beach hut on iconic seafront because it does not adhere to 'standards'
A Labour-led council have ordered an owner to repaint over their Palestinian flag beach hut on an 'iconic' seafront, claiming that it fails to adhere to 'standards'. Brighton and Hove City Council have declared that Alison Leasley, who has had her beloved beach hut for six years, is in breach of her beach hut licence as strictly vertical stripes or a solid colour are permitted. The retired psychotherapist, who described the decision as 'pathetic', was initially told she had just three days to remove the design, though this was later extended to a week. Were she not to remove the flag, which the council say has received numerous complaints, the public body insisted they would do it themselves and then charge her for the work. In an email addressed to Ms Lesley, a member of the council said that the body have a 'very strict policy on the presentation of beach huts'. Defending their decision, they added that the Palestinian flag 'is likely to interfere with community cohesion', with the likelihood of causing 'distress and upset'. Speaking to The Argus, Ms Leasley described the decision as 'one-sided' and 'unfair', arguing that another beach hut along the popular stretch of seafront has been painted with a French flag for the last two years. She said: 'I told the council for every one person who has made a complaint I can find ten that would approve.' The 77-year-old insisted that the beach hut was painted in a bid to show support for those in Palestine amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict. Local councillor Birgit Miller, cabinet member for culture, heritage and tourism, told the Argus that the public body had asked Ms Lesley to repaint the beach hut 'as the current design doesn't adhere to the licence agreement and painting standards'. Adding that the beach huts along the seafront are an 'iconic feature' and should therefore be protected as such, Cllr Miller said: 'It's important licence holders comply with their agreements'. Members of the Hove Beach Hut Association, a local forum for residents who own their own residence along the beachfront, shared mixed responses regarding the council's decision. While one declared they could 'only hope' that Ms Lesley removed her license as a result of the controversial painting, another insisted that the 'fun police' should 'get a life', arguing that the decision was unjustified. In October 2023, Brighton and Hove Council announced controversial plans for a 10 per cent effective sales tax for beach hut owners in a bid to plug a £70million black hole in its budget. The fee, based on the sale price from April 2023, was proposed by councillors in lieu of raising the annual £503.60 licence fee and ownership transfer fee of £82 if they sell up. However, owners of the iconic huts insisted that the terms of the licences amounted to 'extortion' and accused the council of 'bullying' and 'coercive behaviour'. With huts selling for up to £35,000, the decision could mean that owners have to pay the council a massive £3,500. 'This is outrageous. It is nothing other than a stealth tax,' said Paula Ford, who has owned a beach hut for 30 years, 'It's a shocking move by the council and they should be ashamed of themselves. 'The huts don't belong to the council. They are privately owned by us, but we just site them on land owned by the council.' There are 459 beach huts on Hove seafront that are privately owned by residents in the seaside resort, with the annual cost of licences generating around £192,000 for the council. According the council, the value of these huts has risen to a range of between £25,000 and £35,000, depending on their location and condition. David and Susie Howells, who have owned their beach hut for 20 years, said: 'The beach huts on the promenade are a much-photographed attraction and beach hut owners all play our part as a community that adds value to the seafront experience for both residents and visitors to Brighton and Hove.' Serena Mitchell, who bought her hut in 2017, also described the proposals as a 'stealth tax'. She said: 'They use the word 'fee' as councils are not legally allowed to charge a tax on property sales. The Government can and do.' Ms Ford (pictured) said: 'This is outrageous. It is nothing other than a stealth tax. 'The huts don't belong to the council. They are privately owned by us, but we just site them on land owned by the council' Councillor Alan Robins, chair of the council's culture, heritage, sport, tourism and economic development committee, said: 'Currently the council is not benefitting in any way from the profit made on the sale of a beach hut when most of the value is due to its prime position on the seafront. 'If the transfer fee is introduced, then the additional revenue can be reinvested back into seafront services such as our lifeguards. 'It's an extremely challenging time for local government finances, and the potential income will go towards providing essential life-saving services while offering council land for hut owners to enjoy the seafront.'
