China's leaders vow support for economy, crackdown on disorderly competition
The official news agency Xinhua said on Wednesday that leaders have signalled they will rein in price wars among producers, amid growing expectations that Beijing may be about to start a new round of factory capacity cuts in a long-awaited but challenging campaign against deflation.
Xinhua cited a summary of the proceedings of a meeting of China's Politburo, a top decision-making body of the ruling Communist Party whose July gathering sets the economic course for the rest of the year.
It said that in the second half China will keep policy steady with "flexibility and foresight", looking to stabilise employment, companies, the market, and expectations.
Analysts said policymakers may feel less urgency to introduce new stimulus measures, as stronger than expected economic data and a continued tariff truce with Washington allow greater focus on supply-side measures to combat overcapacity and deflation.
"There is a stronger emphasis on recognising potential risks from demand-supply imbalance," said Gary Ng, senior economist at Natixis.
"The government is also more willing to take measures to battle deflationary pressure and overcapacity in the manufacturing sector. However, the stress has not pushed policymakers to commit to more immediate stimulus, as they only keep the options open if needed."
Separately, state media quoted President Xi Jinping as saying at a symposium that China should effectively boost consumption and break the cycle of "involution," a term widely used in China to describe a situation where intense competition among companies leads to diminishing returns, and even losses.
China will continue to pursue a more proactive fiscal policy and an "appropriately loose" monetary policy, the summary showed, but unlike the April meeting made no mention of interest rates or reserve requirement ratio cuts.
Top leaders also called for the use of structural monetary policy tools to provide stronger support for technological innovation, boost consumption, aid small firms, and stabilise foreign trade.
The world's second-largest economy grew 5.2% in the second quarter, slightly ahead of expectations, but analysts say weak domestic demand and rising global trade risks may prompt policymakers to introduce further stimulus.
China is targeting economic growth of around 5% in 2025.
"Policymakers are taking a wait-and-see mode for now, but they will take action whenever the growth target is under threat," Larry Hu, chief China economist at Macquarie, said in a note.
The 15th five-year period (2026–2030) will be crucial for China to achieve economic modernisation, as the country's development environment faces profound and complex changes, Xinhua reported.
The leadership will hold a fourth plenum in October, according to Xinhua. Analysts expect the meeting will focus on discussions for the new five-year plan.
Meanwhile the economy faces persistent deflationary pressures, as producer prices dropped for the 33rd straight month in June. A prolonged property downturn is also weighing on the economy despite policy support, while analysts expect the impact of a consumer goods trade-in scheme to fade in the coming months.
"At present, China's economic performance still faces many risks and challenges," Xinhua quoted the Politburo as saying.
The economy has been helped by a rush among exporters to capitalise on a tariff truce between Beijing and Washington.
The two countries agreed to seek an extension of their 90-day tariff truce on Tuesday, following two days of what both sides described as constructive talks in Stockholm aimed at defusing an escalating trade war.
China will unleash the potential of domestic demand and take steps to boost consumption, Xinhua said, adding the issuance and use of government bonds would be accelerated, with more efficient usage.
It will also promote technological innovation and speed the growth of emerging pillar industries that are globally competitive, while curbing disorderly competition.
"Disorderly competition among enterprises must be governed according to laws and regulations," the summary read. "Capacity management in key industries should be advanced."
Some analysts believe that stimulating consumer demand remains key to effectively fighting deflation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Republicans slam Trump's firing of Bureau of Labor Statistics chief
Senior Republican lawmakers are condemning the decision of their party leader, Donald Trump, to fire the leading US labor market statistician after a report that showed the national economy added just 73,000 jobs – far fewer than expected – in July. The disappointing figures – coupled with a downward revision of the two previous months amounting to 258,000 fewer jobs and data showing that economic output and consumer spending slowed in the first half of the year – point to an overall economic deterioration in the US. Trump defended his decision to fire US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner Erika McEntarfer. Without evidence to back his claims, the president wrote on social media that were numbers were 'RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad' and the US economy was, in fact, 'BOOMING' on his watch. But the firing of McEntarfer, who had been confirmed to her role in January 2024 during Joe Biden's presidency, has alarmed members of Trump's own party. 'If the president is firing the statistician because he doesn't like the numbers but they are accurate, then that's a problem,' said Wyoming Republican senator Cynthia Lummis. 'It's not the statistician's fault if the numbers are accurate and that they're not what the president had hoped for.' Lummis added that if the numbers are unreliable, the public should be told – but firing McEntarfer was 'kind of impetuous'. North Carolina senator Thom Tillis, a Republican, said: 'If she was just fired because the president or whoever decided to fire the director just … because they didn't like the numbers, they ought to grow up.' Kentucky senator Rand Paul, another Republican, questioned whether McEntarfer's firing was an effective way of improving the numbers. 'We have to look somewhere for objective statistics,' he said. 'When the people providing the statistics are fired, it makes it much harder to make judgments that you know, the statistics won't be politicized.' According to NBC News, Paul said his 'first impression' was that 'you can't really make the numbers different or better by firing the people doing the counting'. Tillis and Paul were both opponents of Trump's recent economic legislative package, which the president dubbed the 'big, beautiful bill'. But Alaska senator Lisa Murkowski, a Republican who supported the legislation after winning substantial economic support for her state, remarked that the jobs numbers could not be trusted – and 'that's the problem'. 'And when you fire people, then it makes people trust them even less,' she said. William Beach, a former BLS commissioner appointed by Trump in his first presidency, posted on X that McEntarfer's firing was 'totally groundless'. He added that the dismissal set a dangerous precedent and undermined the BLS's statistical mission. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Beach also co-signed a letter by 'the Friends of the Bureau of Labor Statistics' that went further, accusing Trump of seeking to blame someone for bad news and calling the rationale for McEntarfer's firing 'without merit'. The letter asserted that the dismissal 'undermines the credibility of federal economic statistics that are a cornerstone of intelligent economic decision-making by businesses, families and policymakers'. The letter pointed out that the jobs tabulation process 'is decentralized by design to avoid opportunities for interference', adding that US official statistics 'are the gold standard globally'. 'When leaders of other nations have politicized economic data, it has destroyed public trust in all official statistics and in government science,' the letter said. Democrats have also hit out at Trump's decision. Vermont senator Bernie Sanders described it as 'the sign of an authoritarian type', and he said the decision would make it harder for the American people 'to believe the information that comes out of the government'. Paul Schroeder, executive director of the Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics, described the president's allegation against McEntarfer as 'very damaging and outrageous'. He said: 'Not only does it undermine the integrity of federal economic statistics, but it also politicizes data which need to remain independent and trustworthy. This action is a grave error by the administration and one that will have ramifications for years to come.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The British public deserves to know what Miliband discussed with Beijing
When the Government signed a deal on net-zero co-operation with Canada, the text of the memorandum was published. So too were the texts of deals with Ireland, Norway, South Korea and Chile. Five months after the Energy Secretary Ed Miliband signed a similar memorandum with the Chinese government, however, we are still in the dark as to precisely what was agreed. Chinese media have asserted that the Energy Secretary agreed to co-operation on power grids, battery storage, offshore wind power and carbon capture, among other areas; it is understood that Chinese investment in the UK was not discussed by Mr Miliband. The role of the Chinese state in Britain's net-zero ambitions may well be an uncomfortable issue for the Labour Government to discuss. While the Defence Secretary is insisting that Britain is 'ready to fight' over the future of Taiwan and the Foreign Secretary is explicitly referring to China as a 'sophisticated and persistent threat' that requires hundreds of millions of pounds in additional funding for the intelligence services, Chancellor Rachel Reeves has been courting Chinese investment, and Mr Miliband's drive to meet his net-zero targets is heavily dependent on Chinese industry. Both the switch to electric vehicles and the decarbonisation of the energy grid will make heavy use of Chinese products. One study commissioned by the German defence ministry recently warned that this position at the heart of Western energy systems could result in Beijing enjoying the power to trigger remote shut-downs as 'an instrument of economic warfare'. Such concerns are less hypothetical than we might wish. Earlier this year, undocumented communication devices were located in Chinese-made power inverters exported to the United States, triggering fears that Beijing could use compromised equipment to 'physically destroy the grid'. This would be fully in line with the current approach of the People's Liberation Army to warfare as a clash between systems, and the extensive Volt Typhoon operation carried out by Chinese state-sponsored actors. Even given the understandable desire to avoid a sudden break with China, the delicacy of the balance between trade and reliance is such that the British public deserves to know what Mr Miliband has discussed with Beijing.
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Dem senator agrees with GOP that Trump's making progress on trade war but others make grim tariffs forecast
A prominent Democratic senator is backing President Donald Trump 's trade war strategy, even as others in his party warn that looming economic fallout could soon hit American consumers and industries. Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman, told Fox News Digital this week that the Trump administration's aggressive use of tariffs has been effective so far. 'Absolutely,' Fetterman said when asked if he believed the U.S. is winning the trade war. 'I'm a huge fan of Bill Maher, and I mean, I think he's really one of the oracles for my party, and he acknowledged it, it's like, hey, he thought that the tariffs were going to tank the economy, and then he acknowledged that it didn't,' Fetterman added. 'So, for me, it seems like the E.U. thing has been going well, and I guess we'll see how it happens with China.' Fetterman's comments come as Trump intensifies his tariff push. On Thursday, the 47th President signed two new executive orders - one raising tariffs on Canadian imports from 25 percent to 35 percent beginning Friday, and another modifying reciprocal tariff rates for countries with significant U.S. trade deficits. The White House cited Canada's failure to help curb fentanyl and other illicit drug imports as the reason for the increased tariffs. 'The goal is to secure fair, balanced and reciprocal trade relationships,' the White House said in a statement. The moves build on Trump's earlier decision this year to impose a baseline 10 percent tariff on all countries, with steeper rates for those running large trade surpluses with the U.S. Trump's recently installed tariffs took effect on April 9, and since then, the his administration has inked several major trade deals. During his second term, Trump and his administration reached a trade agreement with the European Union (EU) under which the E.U. committed to purchasing $750 billion in American energy and investing an additional $600 billion in the U.S. economy by 2028. As part of the deal, the E.U. accepted a 15 percent percent tariff rate. A separate agreement was struck with Japan, which pledged $550 billion in investments aimed at rebuilding and expanding key American industries. Japan also agreed to open its markets further to U.S. exports and, like the E.U., accepted a baseline 15 percent tariff rate. However, many top Democrats remain skeptical. While speaking with Fox News Digital, Rhode Island Senator Jack Reed cautioned that any short-term gains could be undercut by rising prices. 'Within a few weeks or months, you'll start seeing significant increases in most things you buy,' Reed said. 'And also, you will see disruption in terms of a lot of our industries, because they're not able to access product or supply.' Senator Chris Van Hollen, of Maryland, echoed those concerns, saying Trump's tariff strategy contradicts his campaign promises. 'This is the president who said he was going to come in and reduce prices. Prices are going to rise, and they're going to rise more over time,' Van Hollen warned. However, Massachusetts Senator, Elizabeth Warren, took a broader view, arguing that Trump's confrontational trade policies are pushing U.S. allies to look elsewhere for business. 'Donald Trump may beat his chest and say, "Man, I made him take a 15 percent tariff or 25 percent tariff," but also understand that every one of those trading partners is now looking hard all around the rest of the world to find other customers,' Warren said. 'The United States under Donald Trump is not a reliable trading partner. And that's not good for any of us.' Warren also linked the trade war to interest rate policy, blaming Trump's tariff decisions for the Federal Reserve's refusal to lower rates. 'Jerome Powell said last month that he would have lowered interest rates back in February if it hadn't been for the chaos that Donald Trump was creating over trade,' Warren said. 'And the consequence has been that American families have, for six months now, been paying more on credit cards, more on car loans, more home mortgages.' Republicans, however, are rallying behind the president's hardline stance. Texas Senator Ted Cruz called the strategy a 'big win'. 'I think it's exactly the right approach,' Cruz said. 'It's what I have been urging the president to do, and I think the successes he's winning are big wins for America.' Seemingly mocking Democrats' warnings of economic turmoil, and quoting the film Casa Blanca, Cruz added, 'I'm shocked, shocked that Democrats are rooting for the economy to do badly under President Trump.' 'It'd be nice if some Democrats would put their partisan hatred for Trump aside and actually start working together for American workers and American jobs. Unfortunately, I don't see a whole lot of Democrats interested in doing that right now,' he said. Louisiana Senator John Kennedy praised the E.U. deal and said he hopes it leads to what he calls 'ideal reciprocity'. 'Clearly, the president got a good deal from one perspective. The Europeans just caved, they did. Fifteen percent tariffs on them, zero on us, commitment to invest in our country,' Kennedy said. 'But the part of the deal I like the most - the E.U. and the president agreed that a whole bunch of goods would be tariff-free. That is, no American tariffs and no E.U. tariffs.' 'Let the free enterprise system work. May the best product at the best price win,' Kennedy added. 'That, to me, would be the perfect situation.'
