
Bizarre Acknowledgement of Country ritual at a work meeting is slammed - as survey reveals what Aussies really think about the ceremonies
A senior businessman has blasted his boss for making every single one of their workers perform an Acknowledgement of Country at a meeting.
The worker, who wished to remain anonymous, told the Herald Sun it was 'comical' to watch and said he felt compelled to join his colleagues in the ritual.
The comment comes as the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) conducted a survey in May and found 56 per cent of Australians believe Welcome to Country ceremonies have become divisive.
That was compared with just 17 per cent who disagreed.
A childhood educator said pressure to perform the acknowledgements in the private sector had been led by other progressive staff members, the government and relevant peak bodies.
She said failure to give one would cause her to be 'crucified' by other staff.
'It's being pushed down our throats,' she said.
The state government's First Peoples' relations wing advised traditional owners should be acknowledged at the commencement of functions, board meetings, and school assemblies, among other events.
The IPA - a conservative, free market think tank - asked 1,005 Australians whether Welcome to Country ceremonies had 'become divisive'.
Fifty-six per cent of respondents said they agreed they had, while 17 per cent disagreed.
A larger proportion of Australians said the practice should continue before sporting events and ceremonies like ANZAC Dawn Services.
Just under half – 49 per cent – said the Welcome to County ceremonies should no longer take place before sports games, while 30 per cent said they should continue.
At Anzac Day, 34 per cent wanted to see the Welcomes continue, while 46 per cent said they should no longer occur.
A Welcome to Country is a formal ceremony conducted by an Elder or Traditional Owner of the land, granting permission for others to be on their Country.
An Acknowledgment of Country, however, can be delivered by anyone to show respect for the Traditional Owners.
Last week, a Darebin City Council worker objected to have land acknowledgements before work meetings.
The council dismissed Shaun Turner when he questioned the ceremony after it was held at the toolbox meeting for the first time.
He told the meeting: 'If you need to be thanking anyone, it's the people who have worn the uniform and fought for our country to keep us free.
'It's getting out of hand and people are losing it, it is now being done at the opening of a postage stamp.'
Council officers investigated Mr Turner's alleged 'serious misconduct', but he doubled down and won an unfair dismissal case.
The ceremonies took a central place in the lead-up to the May 3 Federal election.
Then-Coalition leader Peter Dutton said he wanted to unite the country under one flag and maintained the ceremonies were 'overdone', after Daily Mail Australia revealed both prime ministerial contenders would have to answer a question regarding the ceremonies following an incident at a dawn service.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said individual organisations should decide whether to open events with a Welcome, saying the ceremonies were a 'matter of respect'.
It came after a group of protesters booed the Welcome to Country ceremony during the Anzac Day dawn service in Melbourne on Friday.
Victorians gathered under pre-dawn darkness to commemorate those who paid the ultimate sacrifice, before Bunurong Elder Mark Brown began the Welcome to Country.
But boos and heckles emanating from the front of the crowd began shortly after Mr Brown commenced his speech.
'It's our country!' one heckler yelled.
'We don't have to be welcomed!' another screamed.
Jacob Hersant, a prominent neo-Nazi figure, was allegedly among those loudly booing.
'This is a day for the Anzacs, it's not for Aboriginals,' he told media after the service.
Public opinion was divided following the incident.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
American politician issues a wake-up call for Anthony Albanese - and what he needs to do for Trump
Two US congressmen have urged Anthony Albanese to visit the White House in order to meet Donald Trump and save the wavering AUKUS pact. Republican Michael McCaul and Democrat Joe Courtney are the co-chairs of the Friends of Australia Caucus, which is pushing for AUKUS to go ahead after Elbridge Colby, the US defence under-secretary for policy, announced a review of the nuclear submarine deal. McCaul said on Monday it was crucial for Albanese to develop a personal rapport with Trump. 'For (Albanese) to come to the White House would be a great gesture on the prime minister's part, that I think would go over very well,' he told the Australian Financial Review. 'That would be very sound advice for him to do that.' Meanwhile, Courtney said Albanese should highlight the significant investment Aussie companies were making in US shipyards, set to hit $4.6billion AUD. He also emphasised that Australia would pay a fair price for the several nuclear submarines set to be acquired from 2032. 'This really takes it out of the sort of America First criticism of security agreements... where President Trump felt that other countries weren't pulling their own weight,' Courtney said. 'It's a case that is very unique that the prime minister can articulate. '(Albanese) is a very personable and socially savvy person, kind of like (UK Prime Minister) Keir Starmer, who does seem to have succeeded with the personal interaction.' Albanese was stood up by the US President at the G7 Summit in Canada earlier this month, and instead met with members of Trump's senior economic team. Trump left the summit early due to the Israel-Iran conflict, scotching planned meeting with several world leaders including Albanese, who has only ever spoken to the US President on the phone. The prime minister also did not attend last week's NATO Summit, where political observers had hoped he would have a second chance to meet with Trump. In a win for the US President, members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation - which Australia is not a part of - agreed at the summit to lift their defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP over 10 years. The White House later indicated it expects its allies in the Asia-Pacific - including Australia - to also increase their defence funding. This means that Albanese may be pressured to increase defence spending if he wants to shore up the AUKUS deal, and to secure a reprieve from punishing tariffs imposed by the US on imports, including a 50 per cent levy on steel and aluminium. In this year's Budget, the Albanese government raised defence spending to 2.2 per cent of GDP, aiming for 2.3 per cent by 2034 - well short of the 3 per cent of GDP that the Trump administration has previously demanded of Australia.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
1 July changes: minimum wage, Centrelink payments, parental leave, road fines and everything else coming for the 2025-26 financial year
A wage increase for low-paid workers, changes to superannuation and significant reforms to the pension are part of sweeping changes being made on 1 July. The end of the financial year is typically when state and federal governments change a range of legislation, implementing new policies. This year there is a lot happening so let's take a look at the big-ticket items. Good news for those on the bottom income line, the minimum wage will increase by 3.5%, to $948 per week or $24.95 per hour, based on a 38-hour work week. The changes are expected to impact 2.6 million and will apply from the first full pay after July 1. The minimum amount of superannuation employers must contribute is also set to rise from 11.5% to 12%. This will be the final increase in a five-year series of rises to the amount employers have to pay and will mean a 30-year-old earning $100,000 will have an additional $125,000 when they retire. In addition to cutting 20% off student loan debts for 3 million Australians, the government will also increase the amount that people can earn before they are required to start paying back their loans to $67,000, subject to the passage of legislation. The national disability insurance scheme will introduce a number of changes from 1 July as part of its annual pricing review. The changes will mean that the maximum rates providers can charge some NDIS participants will be lowered after the review found some limits were 'inflated' or 'out of step with broader market rates'. For example, physiotherapy sessions have been reduced by $10 to $183.99 per hour. Maximum rates will also be made nationally consistent meaning some providers in jurisdictions will be increased – prices for psychology sessions have been standardised at $223.99 across all states and territories. Other changes will include removing an establishment fee providers once charged participants for setting up their services. Sector advocacy groups have criticised the changes, warning they will result in fewer services being available for participants in regional and rural areas. In brighter news, disability support workers will get a 3.95% pay boost from July. The pension rate is not going up but increased income and asset thresholds mean thousands more will be entitled to benefits and bigger payments. From 1 July the thresholds will be adjusted to better keep up with inflation, with every couple who are asset-tested getting a $34.50 fortnight increase, with singles getting $22.50. The asset cut-off point when the pension starts to be reduced has also been decreased from $481,500 for couples and $321,500 for singles to $470,000 per couple and $314,000 for singles. Around 2.4 million Centrelink recipients will also see a small increase to their payments, as the regular indexation is applied to their income. This means that payments and thresholds will increase by 2.4%. While any increase to the bottom line will be welcomed by those on the payments, advocates routinely say the high cost of living, including soaring rent, far outpaces the extra money. There is good news for parents and carers born in the new financial year with the number of paid parental leave (PPL) paydays lifting from 110 to 120, or 24 weeks. Parents will be able to claim the leave up to three months before their child 'enters their care'. This is a series of increases to the scheme which will see it progressively expand until it hits 26 weeks by 2026. AI-powered surveillance cameras, that will be able to detect when drivers are holding or using their mobile phones, will now be used across the country. There are also state-based changes. In NSW, for example, there will be harsher penalties if someone is found not wearing a seatbelt, as fines rise in line with the CPI increase of 3.2%. The state will start trialling average speed cameras for cars and motorcycles in two locations. In Queensland, speed limits will be reduced in selected areas and traffic fines will increase by 3.5%. Drivers in Victoria will now have to slow to 40kmh when passing roadside assistance vehicles, tow trucks or emergency response vehicles that are flashing their lights. In South Australia, this will be lowered to 25kmh on some roads. Drivers in Western Australia will now face fines up to $700 for mobile phone use and over $1,600 for excessive speeding. Households that are looking to install battery systems will be in a better position as the cheaper home batteries program offering a 30% discount on the purchase and installation kicks in. Paid practical placements will start for some tertiary students studying teaching, nursing, midwifery, and social work. Eligible students will be able to access $319.50 per week while they're undertaking a placement. Affordable access to life-changing treatment for cystic fibrosis will be expanded to more Australians with a change to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. People living with rarer types of cystic fibrosis will pay a fraction of the price to access life-changing treatment under an expansion of the scheme. People will now pay a maximum of $31.60 per script, or $7.70 if they hold a concession card.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Former Greens candidate Hannah Thomas speaks from hospital as NSW police charge her over protest
The former Greens candidate Hannah Thomas has been charged with resisting police after she was injured at a pro-Palestinian protest. Thomas, who ran against Anthony Albanese in the Sydney electorate of Grayndler at the federal election, sustained facial injuries while being arrested in Belmore on Friday morning and was taken to hospital. In a statement on Sunday evening, NSW police said a 35-year-old woman had been issued a future court attendance notice for hindering or resisting a police officer in the execution of duty and refusing/failing to comply with direction to disperse. She is scheduled to appear at Bankstown local court on 12 August. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Thomas shared a video on social media on Sunday evening, thanking her community for their support and saying there was a possibility she could lose her sight in one eye. 'I've been very lucky to have been looked after so well,' she said in an Instagram post recorded at Bankstown hospital. 'I don't want to get into too much detail about the traumatic events on Friday but I'm five-foot-one, I weight about 45kg, I was engaged in peaceful protest … My interactions with NSW police have left me potentially without vision in my right eye permanently.' The NSW Greens MP Sue Higginson has called for an investigation into the incident. 'The level of impunity the police displayed doesn't come from nowhere. It's written there in black and white – a direct reference to the anti-protest laws rushed through the NSW Parliament,' the Greens' spokesperson for justice said in a statement on Monday. She called for the 'agenda of intolerance and anti-protest measures' to be reversed. The protest was outside a business in Belmore accused of 'supplying electroplating and surface coating services for a variety of applications including aerospace and defence technology' to Israel. Earlier this year an international campaign urged nations that produce F-35 fighter jets to stop supplying Israel. SEC Plating told Guardian Australia on Friday that: 'We have no involvement in providing plating services for various parts used in the F-35 Jet program. 'We do not have any business servicing F-35 components. We do have business servicing some Australian defence manufactures however F-35 components are not part of this.'