Jane Street victims? F&O casino made retail option traders lose Rs 1 lakh crore in FY25
Jane Street's Alleged Manipulation Machine
Jane Street has, however, disputed the allegations.
Warren Buffett's 'Financial Weapons of Mass Destruction'
SEBI's Damage Control Measures
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
Indian retail traders suffered a crushing Rs 1.05 lakh crore loss in derivatives trading during FY25, fresh SEBI data reveals, as the market regulator simultaneously exposes how American quant trading firm Jane Street allegedly manipulated the very markets where individual investors are hemorrhaging money.The timing couldn't be more damning. Just as SEBI accused Jane Street of making Rs 36,500 crore profit through systematic market manipulation, the regulator's research report shows retail F&O traders' cumulative net losses ballooned from Rs 75,000 crore in FY24 to a staggering Rs 1.05 lakh crore in FY25.The carnage deepened as more Indians rushed into the derivatives casino. Individual derivative traders surged from 86.3 lakh in FY24 to 96 lakh in FY25, but their misery only multiplied. Average losses per person jumped from Rs 86,728 in FY24 to Rs 1,10,069 in FY25, a devastating 27% increase.The three-year destruction has been breathtaking. In FY22, only 42.7 lakh F&O traders populated Dalal Street, making cumulative losses of Rs 40,824 crore. Within three years, both the number of traders and losses have more than doubled."Further, the percentage of traders making losses in the equity derivative segment remained broadly unchanged at 91% from the earlier study done by SEBI," the regulator noted, underlining the brutal mathematics of derivatives trading, where nine out of ten participants lose money.The retail bloodbath gains sinister context against Jane Street's alleged market manipulation. Last week, SEBI released an interim order accusing the American firm of systematic market manipulation designed to profit from enormous index options positions.According to the regulator, Jane Street would deal simultaneously across multiple market segments - cash equities, stock futures, index futures, and index options - but in a manipulative manner.The firm allegedly engaged in aggressive buying of Nifty Bank component stocks and futures during morning hours, artificially inflating prices. They would then reverse these positions later in the day through aggressive selling, causing prices to fall. This coordinated buying and selling was designed to manipulate the index at strategic times to benefit their massive options positions.The explosive growth in retail derivatives trading has raised alarm bells about household savings being gambled in high-risk markets. Warren Buffett's famous warning about futures and options as "financial weapons of mass destruction" appears prophetic as Indian families pour money into a game where the house, and sophisticated players like Jane Street, appear to have overwhelming advantages.Amid reports of household savings being diverted to derivatives speculation, SEBI announced measures in November 2024 to cool the frenzy.The regulator implemented a range of measures targeted at reducing market volatility, especially from daily index expiries, including limiting weekly expiries to only Nifty and Sensex contracts, increasing the lot size from Rs 5-10 lakh to Rs 15-20 lakh, and increasing margins for expiry day trading.Early signs suggest the measures are having some impact. SEBI's report covering December 2024 to May 2025 shows that index options turnover is down 9% year-on-year in premium terms and 29% in notional terms. Individual turnover in premium terms is down 11% year-on-year, and the number of unique individual traders trading is down 20% compared to the previous year.However, the damage remains enormous. "India continues to see a relatively very high level of trading in EDS (equity derivatives segment), compared to other markets, particularly in index options," SEBI acknowledged.While derivatives markets "assist in better price discovery, improve market liquidity and allow investors to manage their risks better," SEBI noted that "with an explosion in index options trading on expiry day over time, concerns arose around investor protection & systemic stability."The Jane Street case raises uncomfortable questions about whether retail traders are unwitting victims in a game rigged by sophisticated algorithms and deep-pocketed players. As millions of Indians chase quick profits in F&O markets, the combination of massive retail losses and alleged institutional manipulation paints a troubling picture of India's derivatives boom.The Rs 1.05 lakh crore question remains: Are retail traders simply bad at trading, or are they systematically disadvantaged in markets where players like Jane Street allegedly manipulate prices with impunity?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Textiles exporters face fresh trade uncertainty amid Trump's latest announcements
NEW DELHI: US President 's latest tariff announcements have resulted in fresh uncertainty, with buyers expected to go slow on new orders. While textiles exporters seem to have got an advantage over Bangladesh, which has been slapped with 35% duty by Trump, industry is keeping close tabs on India's bilateral trade deal with the US as the American president has claimed the agreement with Vietnam allows him to impose a 20% tariff, although there may be product-specific concessions. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In any case, the final word is not out on where tariffs settle in the coming weeks, with countries, including Bangladesh, once again rushing to Washington to rebalance the equations. "We need to watch how tariffs move. Buyers are a little confused at the moment," said V Elangovan, managing director of Tirupur-based SNQS International. What is adding to the complications is China. "Retailers have to fill their shelves. Last week, our merchandisers were in Shanghai, we could not compete because the Chinese were quoting better prices this year than last year. It is not clear how they can do so when the tariff for them is higher. We need more hand-holding from govt," he added. Govt and industry has been pushing for zero duty for garments and home textiles, where Indian products are competitive, although it is unlikely even if a trade deal is worked out as the Trump administration has refused to remove the 10% baseline tariff applicable on all countries. At 10%, Indian exporters are seen to be better off than rivals, provided subsidies are not doled out to Chinese manufacturers. In natural garments, where India has traditional strength, the cost disadvantage is relatively small, 3-4%. However, in synthetic garments, the gap widens to 10-11% due to higher production costs, Apparel Export Promotion Council (AEPC) said. "India, even with the existing reciprocal tariff rate (26% announced in April), will gain in export competitiveness vis-a-vis major garment exporting competing countries. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Besides, we are quite hopeful of India striking a favourable trade deal which will further improve the competitiveness of India's apparel exports in all important US market... even a moderate reduction in the reciprocal tariff to around 15% could significantly improve our competitiveness across both natural and synthetic garment categories, thereby opening infinite export possibilities for India amid shifting global sourcing trends," said AEPC CEO Mithileshwar Thakur. With current tariff levels - India at 26%, Vietnam at 20%, and Bangladesh at 35% - India is seen to be competitive against Bangladesh in natural garments but faces pressure in the synthetics segment. "It is looking good for us and a trade deal will help," said K M Subramani, president of Tirupur Exporters' Association. The big question is the ability of Indian garment makers to manufacture on a scale, especially given their reluctance to invest in capacity addition.
&w=3840&q=100)
India.com
34 minutes ago
- India.com
Dollar Dominance, Trade Risks & Delhi's Balancing Act – Why Trump's BRICS Threats Matter For India
New Delhi: At a time when India inches closer to finalising a trade deal with the United States, a thunderclap from Washington has cast shadows over the celebration. US President Donald Trump's blunt message, posted publicly this week, warned that any country aligning with what he described as BRICS' 'anti-American policies' would face an additional 10% tariff without exceptions. As one of the founding members of BRICS, India finds itself at the centre of this growing storm. The recently concluded Rio de Janeiro summit of the bloc had laid out an ambitious declaration. There was no mention of the United States, but it still sent ripples through Washington. The BRICS statement challenged unilateral economic measures, defended multilateralism, voiced concern over tariffs that disrupt global trade and pushed for changes to global governance. These words appear to have stung. What followed was Trump's retaliation. On his Truth Social platform, he wrote that siding with BRICS' economic vision would come at a cost. The timing could not have been more crucial. He is expected to begin announcing trade deals from Monday, and India is among the countries on the list. In Delhi, this new tension is being watched with a mix of caution and calculation. Trade experts in the capital believe the core of Trump's anger lies deeper within the BRICS push for currency alternatives. For years, Russia and China have spoken of a new financial system to bypass the dollar. In 2022, Russia even floated a proposal for a BRICS reserve currency. Many Indian analysts suspect this is what triggered Trump's fury. The dollar remains Washington's most powerful economic weapon. The United States used it in 2012 to isolate Iran and again in 2022 against Russia. Any attempt to weaken its grip invites blowback. Despite its lack of political cohesion, BRICS still threatens that power by raising the idea of currency diversification. Indian economists see the bigger picture. The call for a common BRICS currency faces hurdles. Political will is scattered. China's dominance in the bloc sparks unease among other members. But the conversations alone unsettle Washington. That is why even vague references to multilateral financial systems draw fire. Meanwhile, India, experts are of the view, must walk a fine line. It is preparing for what is being described as a 'mini trade deal' with the United States. Reports suggest Delhi has already agreed to a baseline 10% tariff, but higher rates – up to 26% – remain on the table. Agriculture and dairy continue to be sticking points. At the same time, India cannot ignore its standing in BRICS. It shares that space with strategic rivals like China but also long-standing defence and energy partners like Russia. The bloc includes emerging economies looking for new trade paths. Turning away completely would be costly. Domestic industry lobbies in India are growing nervous. Sectors like textiles, pharma and information technology could suffer if Trump hikes tariffs further. Executives fear the fallout of a new wave of American protectionism. What adds to the anxiety is the unpredictability. Trump has changed course before. His sudden termination of a long-standing free trade pact with Vietnam has become a cautionary tale. Despite the tensions, some foreign policy voices in Delhi urge calm. They argue that BRICS has always been an idea more than an institution. Its members rarely share political agendas or geographical interests. But that has not stopped it from becoming a target. Others believe Trump's aggressive approach may backfire. His posture could push India to double down on groups such as BRICS and the Global South. But that path brings its own dilemmas, especially with China pulling the strings in many of these platforms. At the heart of it all, the challenge remains the same – can India navigate between its old allies and emerging coalitions without inviting punishment from either? With Trump's new tariffs looming, the question is no longer hypothetical. The countdown has begun.
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
UP STF's big catch: Con with Rs 50,000 bounty held in Amritsar
1 2 L ucknow: The UP Special Task Force (STF) apprehended Harveer Singh, alias Kake Sardar, a notorious fraudster with a Rs 50,000 bounty on his head, in Amritsar, Punjab, on Tuesday. Harveer was wanted in connection with a cheating case registered at Paras Pur police station in Gonda under BNS Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, and 406. Harveer, originally from Basarke village in Tarn Taran district of Punjab, had been absconding after duping Gonda resident Sunil Kumar Dwivedi of Rs 50 lakh in 2021. Dwivedi's troubles began when he met Chandan Dixit, a co-accused from Chitrakoot, who introduced him to Harveer and Madan Gupta. They convinced Dwivedi to invest in a mining contract in Fatehpur, showcasing forged documents of a mining lease and promising a 10% partnership and substantial profits. Trusting them, Dwivedi handed over Rs 50 lakh, but the trio vanished without fulfilling their promises. The STF successfully apprehended Harveer near Parvati Hospital in Ranjit Avenue, Amritsar, based on intelligence inputs. The operation was led by STF inspector Jay Prakash Rai under the supervision of deputy SP Shailesh Pratap Singh. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Calcula cuánto podrías ganar invirtiendo en Cervecería Nacional CFD Empieza a invertir hoy Leer más Undo The team, comprising SI Gulzar Singh and constables Rohit Singh, Pankaj Tiwari, and Ajay Yadav, played a crucial role in arresting Harveer. STF recovered a mobile phone, an Aadhaar card, and Rs 2,000 in cash from Harveer's possession. According to the STF, Harveer is part of a well-organised inter-state gang involved in preparing fake documents and luring gullible victims with fake investment promises. The gang reportedly was active in Gonda, Lucknow and Barabanki. During interrogation, he admitted to duping people using similar tactics involving fake contracts, money doubling schemes, and shell companies. His gang also claimed connections with scrap contracts and even operated a steel plant in Bhopal as part of the ruse, the STF Singh alias Kake Sardar has multiple fraud-related cases registered against him across Uttar Pradesh. These include cases under BNS sections related to cheating, forgery, and criminal intimidation in Gonda (Itiyathok and Paras Pur), Barabanki (Cyber Crime Station), and Lucknow (Indira Nagar and Gomti Nagar). The charges range from BNS 406, 419, 420 (cheating and criminal breach of trust) to 467, 468, 471 (forgery) and sections 504, 506, and 34 (criminal intimidation and common intent). Following his arrest, Harveer was produced before the Judicial Magistrate First Class in Amritsar, where the STF obtained transit remand. He will now be brought to UP for further legal proceedings.
