
Over before a single vote cast? Redistribution, turnout, and political shifts played role in Niagara South flip
Davies, a Niagara Region councillor for Port Colborne, won 47.8 per cent of the vote, compared to Badawey's 43.9 per cent, according to
Elections Canada validated results
.
The result marks a significant political shift in a riding that had leaned Liberal for nearly a decade. But analysts say the change may have occurred before a single vote was cast.
The new Niagara South riding was created during the 2022 federal redistribution. It absorbed Fort Erie from the Niagara Falls riding, and ceded parts of St. Catharines, replacing more progressive areas with Conservative-leaning territory.
'In the 2021 election, Conservatives actually would have won Niagara South on its current boundaries by around 300 votes,' said EKOS political analyst Earl Washburn.
'Adding (Fort Erie) to the riding made it significantly more Conservative. It basically flipped the riding without an election even happening.'
Fort Erie leaned strongly Conservative in 2021, while parts of St. Catharines, now removed, had supported the Liberals and NDP. That left Badawey, who held the former Niagara Centre since 2015, starting the race behind.
Washburn said Davies also benefited from a dramatic collapse in support for both the NDP and the People's Party of Canada.
In 2021, the NDP received about 25 per cent of the vote in Niagara Centre. In 2025, that number fell to just over five per cent, with NDP candidate Chantal McCollum raking in 5.61 per cent of the vote in the riding.
'That NDP vote, most of it looked like it went Liberal, but a little bit probably went Conservative,' Washburn said. 'And the People's Party vote? That probably just all went Conservative.'
He noted many PPC voters had been new to federal politics in 2019, galvanized by pandemic-era rhetoric, and remained engaged under Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre.
'In 2021, it was the pandemic,' he said. 'Those (voters), for lack of a better term, were in echo chambers and they're bubbles right? That kept their momentum.'
This consolidation on the right helped Davies edge ahead in a newly redrawn, politically volatile riding.
'When the People's Party shed out, and when Poilievre became Conservative leader, those people flocked to him, because he's the kind of (candidate) that would appeal to them.'
According to Elections Canada, the election saw a voter turn out rate of 68.65 per cent. This translates to the highest voter turnout rate in 30 years.
Washburn believes the higher participation likely helped the Conservatives in ridings like Niagara South.
'You kind of saw that in 2021,' he said. 'I think you're getting a lot of new voters that were vying for the People's Party in 2021. So those people definitely came out and voted again but they didn't vote PPC, they went Conservative.'
Elections Canada won't be releasing poll-by-poll results for several months but Washburn noted that early trends suggest Fort Erie voted heavily Conservative, while Welland and parts of St. Catharines leaned NDP or Liberal. Port Colborne, hometown to both Davies and Badawey, appeared to split its support.
'Then you have Port Colborne, that's a bit of a mix,' he said. 'Of course both candidates are from (Port Colborne) so who knows how that broke out, just based on their own personal popularity.'
Davies will now represent a diverse district that includes Fort Erie, Welland, Thorold, and Port Colborne. His long-standing regional profile and focus on local issues may have helped him appeal to voters looking for a change with a familiar face.
The newly drawn Niagara South riding stands as a case study in how redistribution, voter turnout, and partisan realignment can reshape electoral outcomes.
Elections Canada will release poll-by-poll results and data in the coming weeks.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Mehdi Hasan's Viral Jubilee Debate With Far-Right Conservatives, Explained
Topline Left-wing journalist Mehdi Hasan debated 20 far-right conservatives in a video that has gone viral on social media, largely due to shocking statements made by some of his opponents, including one who admitted he identifies as a fascist and doesn't care about being called a Nazi—and who has since lost his job, which Forbes confirmed through an employer. Mehdi Hasan's debate video for Jubilee has gone viral. (Photo byfor ... More Crooked Media) Getty Images for Crooked Media Key Facts The video, part of a controversial video series produced by media company Jubilee, has garnered 4 million views since its publication Tuesday and has racked up millions more views across X and TikTok. The nearly two-hour debate covered hot topics ripped from the headlines: Whether President Trump was defying the constitution, the value of immigrants to the U.S. and U.S. involvement in Gaza. Some inflammatory claims made by the participants have gone viral, including one from a man who identified himself as Connor, who responded, 'Yeah, I am,' after Hasan suggested he may be a fascist, to applause from the other participants, and also said he didn't care about being called a Nazi, voiced opposition to democracy and free speech, and advocated for autocracy by rulers who uphold Catholic teachings. One day after the Jubilee debate, Connor (who has not returned interview requests from Forbes) claimed in an interview on RiftTV he was fired from his job as a result of the debate, which he blamed on the 'manner in which you're canceled' for voicing 'heterosexual, Christian, moral beliefs.' VeUP, a cloud engineering firm, confirmed to Forbes the man had been a subcontractor, stating his employment was 'not terminated by VeUP, but by the core contractor.' Connor has since posted a fundraiser on a Christian fundraising platform seeking $15,000 in emergency funds while he seeks a new job, and as of Tuesday morning, he has raised more than $29,000, with some comments from donors including, 'It's ok to be white,' and 'We need a white nation! It's our only future! Vive le Fascisme!' What Moments From The Debate Have Gone Viral? One clip from the debate, in which a participant tells Hasan he's 'going to have to go'—meaning he wants Hasan, who is an immigrant, to leave the United States—garnered 10 million views in a post on X. In another clip that garnered 4 million views on X, a participant told Hasan he feels his 'entire race,' referring to white people, is facing a 'genocide' in the United States. In a moment from the debate that garnered 4 million views on TikTok, Hasan pressed a participant over her views on immigration, prompting her to admit her parents are immigrants to the United States, but 'at this moment' she does not 'accept that immigrants are Americans.' What Has Hasan Said After The Debate? Hasan has said in posts on X after the debate was uploaded to YouTube that he did not know some of the participants would be 'actual outright open fascists,' adding in another post, 'Jubilee cast these folks, not me!' At the end of the Jubilee video, Hasan said he enjoys debating people but tries to 'avoid bad faith folks,' adding he believes some of the participants in the video were debating in bad faith. 'Free speech doesn't mean you need to give credibility or oxygen or a platform to people who don't agree in human equality,' he said. Chief Critics Some viewers have criticized Jubilee, accusing the media company of platforming people who lack basic decency. In one post that garnered 44,000 likes on X, a user accused Jubilee of 'lying to its guests,' referencing a post by Hasan saying he was unaware of how far-right the guests would be. In another post that garnered 30,000 likes, a user said Jubilee should be 'demonetized' on YouTube, accusing it of 'knowingly spreading Nazi propaganda.' Last year, when a different Jubilee debate video went viral, a Vox journalist said the questions appear 'primed to become 'rage bait' clips meant to get viewers excited or angry, to the tune of millions of clicks.' Matt Bernstein, a left-wing activist and podcaster with millions of social media followers, said he previously turned down an invitation to appear on Jubilee and said he does not believe a "channel that gives a platform of millions to people who self identify as 'fascist' should be allowed to monetize its videos' on YouTube. Who Is Mehdi Hasan? A former MSNBC host, Hasan left the network last year and launched his media company Zeteo, which he previously told Forbes is an independent organization through which he will speak 'bluntly about racism, fascism, genocide and more.' Hasan hosts multiple podcasts for Zeteo as well as the 'Head to Head' podcast for Al Jazeera, and works as a columnist for The Guardian. He is the author of a 2023 book, 'Win Every Argument,' about how to succeed in debates. What Is Jubilee? Jubilee is a media company mostly known for its YouTube channel, where it has 10 million subscribers and primarily posts videos that attempt to challenge social taboos and norms. One of its most popular video series is the format Hasan participated in, in which one person of a certain political belief is made to debate more than a dozen people with opposing beliefs. Last year, a video of right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk debating 25 college students described as liberal racked up 30 million views, making it one of Jubilee's most popular uploads. Other popular video series include 'Odd One Out,' in which a group of people are challenged to find which one does not share a common characteristic—like six vegans trying to find the one meat eater—and 'Middle Ground,' where people of opposing political views try to find beliefs in common. Further Reading '1 woke teen vs. 20 Trump supporters': The new age of viral political videos (Vox) 'Memeification of Politics': What to Know About Jubilee Media's Viral Debate Show Surrounded (Time)


Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Carney says getting best possible deal with U.S. more important than Aug. 1 deadline
HUNTSVILLE, ONTARIO, CANADA - Prime Minister Mark Carney downplayed the importance of a looming Aug. 1 deadline in trade talks with the U.S. on Tuesday, saying the objective is to get the best possible deal for Canadians. 'They're complex negotiations and we'll use all the time that's necessary,' he told reporters after meeting with premiers at the Council of the Federation gathering in Huntsville, Ont. Carney said the government will agree to a deal 'if there's one on the table that is in the best interests of Canadians.' He described such a deal as one 'that preserves, reinforces and stabilizes' the trade relationship between Canada and the U.S., and 'also one that doesn't tie our hands in terms of other things that we can do.' Carney was invited to join the premiers in Ontario's cottage country this week as they gathered to discuss eliminating internal trade barriers and U.S. President Donald Trump's threat to impose 35 per cent tariffs on a wide variety of Canadian goods on Aug. 1. Carney told premiers that Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc will be in Washington, D.C., this week and said the federal government is 'only going to accept the best deal for Canada.' He also said the government is working to bring long-standing trade issues involving softwood lumber into the broader negotiations, if possible. At a press conference after the meeting on Tuesday afternoon, Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston said that while he'd like to see a deal that eliminates tariffs altogether, 'we're not in that world right now' with Trump imposing levies on trade partners around the globe. 'We just have to be open-minded about what that might look like,' he said. Carney said Tuesday's gathering offered a chance for the premiers to focus on ways to build a stronger economy. The Liberal government has passed legislation granting cabinet the power to fast-track major projects it deems to be in the national interest, and is set to open its major projects office by Labour Day. Premiers have submitted their pitches for projects they'd like to see fast-tracked, but Carney has said the government has not yet started assembling a list of projects. Houston said he hopes the projects office will be able to provide some clarity on that by the fall. 'We need you to work together to propose ideas and have consensus on the projects that you want to move forward,' Carney told the premiers at the start of the meeting, adding that continuous engagement with Indigenous Peoples is a key part of that effort. The premiers met with First Nations, Métis and Inuit leaders on Monday. Ontario Premier Doug Ford said he believes Carney is close to signing off on a few major projects. He has put forward a list of five major projects he'd like to see built; his top priority is mining in the Ring of Fire region in northwestern Ontario, which is said to be replete with critical minerals. Ford came out of the meeting saying he believes Canada will strike a good deal with the U.S. 'We're standing behind the prime minister to make sure that he has a fair and free trade deal for Canada and every single province and territory, and I'm very confident that's going to happen,' he said. At the start of the meeting with Carney, Ford said he personally still wants Canada to match Trump's tariffs 'dollar for dollar, and hit him back as hard as we possibly can,' adding strength is the only thing this president understands. He also said the federal government needs to be ready to support industries hit hard by the trade war, and Canada needs to onshore production of things like aluminum cans and steel beams to avoid tariffs. 'We need to send them a strong message. We don't have to take a back seat to anyone in the world, and we sure the heck don't have to take a back seat to President Trump,' he said. Ford, who chairs the Council of the Federation, praised Carney for being a 'brilliant businessman' and said it's refreshing for premiers to work with a prime minister who 'has our backs.' Carney commended the premiers on the series of trade agreements they've signed to open up access to internal Canadian markets. On Tuesday morning, Ford joined the premiers of Alberta and Saskatchewan in announcing a new memorandum of understanding calling for the construction of new pipelines using Ontario steel. The agreement also calls for new rail lines to be built to help ship critical minerals from yet-to-be approved mines in the Ring of Fire to Western Canada. Ford called the agreement a 'game changer' that focuses on shipping Western oil to refineries in southern Ontario and a new deep sea port in James Bay. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said she's heard from Carney that he wants to make Canada an energy superpower, and she wants him to drop 'nine bad laws' she said are hurting the country's business investment climate. B.C. Premier David Eby was not invited to sign the agreement and said he didn't know the details of the deal. He was asked Tuesday whether his government is open to supporting the construction of an oil pipeline from Alberta to B.C.'s northern coast — something which it has vocally opposed in the past. 'There's no project, there's no proponent, there's no private sector money involved that I'm aware of,' he said. 'When Premier Smith crosses those obvious hurdles to get a project done, then let's have those conversations.' — Written by Liam Casey in Huntsville, Ont., and Sarah Ritchie in Ottawa This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 22, 2025.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Right-Wing Leader Says Conservatives Need ‘Scalps' of Woke Wall Street CEOs
In late January, the CEO of the pro-business American Legislative Exchange Council told right-wing operatives and officials that they need a 'scalp' from one of two supposedly woke CEOs of major Wall Street firms. Lisa Nelson, who leads ALEC, was discussing Larry Fink of BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, and Brian Moynihan of Bank of America, the second largest bank in the country. She appeared to be speaking metaphorically, as she struggled to refer to an unknown movie. Nelson made the comments at the Consumers' Research Summit in Sea Island, Georgia. Rolling Stone has obtained exclusive audio and documents from the event. Nelson noted she had spoken about this at breakfast. 'Whether it's Larry Fink or Brian Moynihan, we have got to take one of these guys out,' she said, presumably another metaphor. She added, 'Brian Moynihan is the guy, or Larry Fink is the guy that we should have their scalp.' ALEC is a powerful 'bill mill' that brings corporations, conservative advocates, and state legislators together to hash out right-wing, pro-business legislation that is then introduced nationwide, with a focus on red states. A spokesperson for ALEC declined to comment for this story. 'Over the past three years, the assets BlackRock manages on behalf of our clients have grown by $4 trillion to $12.5 trillion,' says a BlackRock spokesperson. 'We are focused on delivering for each and every client in every market we operate in around the world, including helping millions of Americans in states across the country retire with dignity.' Bank of America declined to comment, though a person familiar with the matter says that the bank's representatives attended ALEC's annual meeting last week. Fink and his firm BlackRock have become primary targets in conservatives' crusade against environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing and initiatives promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). The firm has trillions in assets under management, and manages billions of dollars for public pension funds. Because of its extensive holdings, BlackRock exerts enormous influence across the stock market through shareholder votes. In his widely-read annual letters to CEOs, Fink has written that 'climate risk is investment risk.' Moynihan, for his part, has defended the idea of inclusion in the workplace, characterizing it as a positive business opportunity. Consumers' Research targeted Bank of America in 2023 for engaging in 'anti-consumer' behaviors: namely, having internal DEI training and offering tips for how clients can calculate their greenhouse gas emissions. Amid Republican attacks on ESG and DEI, including from President Donald Trump, BlackRock and Bank of America both dropped out of Net Zero alliances, which require a commitment to achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. Additionally, both companies have eliminated their DEI goals, while maintaining a general commitment to inclusion. Consumers' Research, which hosted the event, is at the center of a network of nonprofits tied to the right-wing power broker Leonard Leo that is waging a 'War on Woke' against corporations and financiers who embrace ESG investment criteria — or the idea that asset managers should consider the threat of planetary devastation when deploying money. Leo's network helps fund ALEC, which has pushed model legislation in the states to ban asset managers for state retirement funds from promoting ESG. The anti-ESG coalition has notched some wins in terms of BlackRock and Bank of America's public posturing, but these conservatives argue the fight is far from over. 'We have our good examples. We're sharing them every day when they get out of something,' Nelson noted, but 'it's words right now.' That's why conservatives need their scalps, Nelson explained. 'And, you know, and that's — it's like the scalps. I don't know what the movie is,' she said, adding it was about 'taking the scalps.' 'Brian Moynihan would be the perfect person,' Nelson continued. 'We were talking about it at lunch, or breakfast. I think he is ideologically all-in on everything he's doing.' Comparing him to JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, the ALEC chief said she doesn't believe that Dimon is 'all-in' ideologically. 'I think he is just seeing where the winds are blowing and trying to have his cake and eat it, too — and 'I'm gonna play footsie with everybody,' and all is going to be OK for JPMorgan in his mind,' Nelson asserted. Nelson spoke with a JPMorgan executive on a panel at ALEC's annual meeting last week. A JPMorgan representative declined to comment but confirmed the firm is an ALEC member. ALEC does not disclose its donors or a full list of its members. The organization receives some corporate funding, including from Chevron, and donations from lobbying groups for Big Pharma, fossil fuel interests, the telecom industry, and electric utilities. ALEC's Private Enterprise Advisory Council includes Mike Thompson, a top lieutenant at Leo's consulting firm CRC Advisors, which helped manage the summit; as well as execs at Consumers' Research; the American Bankers Association (ABA); oil billionaire Charles Koch's business empire; and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Washington's top business lobby. Bank of America previously cut ties with ALEC in 2012. Nelson, who previously ran global government relations at credit card giant Visa, made her comments about the CEOs during a larger conversation about the necessity of political neutrality in public investments. Fiduciaries, like BlackRock, are legally bound to act in the best financial interests of their clients. Conservative politicians and groups, ALEC included, have demanded that companies eschew ESG and DEI as part of their investment criteria, arguing the only thing that should matter is maximizing shareholder profit. During Nelson's panel, an operative asked the panelists if they had any examples where Republican-led states had 'in their efforts to kind of correct, [and] go from liberal ESG investing, instead of going back to neutral, they over-corrected,' to a place where they're putting public money into conservative investments. 'If we want neutral, we should want neutral,' the operative said. Debate ensued, with most participants concluding that long-suffering conservatives needed to beat back Big Banks, who are in cahoots with the Left — neutrality be damned. 'That's a very good kind of point to bring up,' Nelson said. 'But I think you know, we should plant our flag as far as we possibly can.' Thompson, the CRC exec who moderated the panel, agreed, but was more explicit, comparing the Left and Big Banks to Hitler: 'If the Allies said, 'Hey, Hitler, will you go neutral? You've taken over France. You've got Northern Africa. You've got all this stuff. We'll stop if you stop.' OK, he'll stop for a little while and then he'll keep coming.' He complained about an initiative attempting to get companies to reduce their climate impact, because it was rating corporations and docking them for giving money to nonprofits that do not align with their climate goals. 'Which means ALEC,' Thompson said, adding it 'means Consumers' Research should get no money from the other side.' 'We need to stop their momentum and then push back,' Thompson continued. 'We don't need them to go, 'Oh, we're neutral now. We've run over 90 percent of your world. We've burned down 90 percent of your house, and now we'll stop' … Sometimes that means not neutral. It means get us back to where we can be neutral. It's not enough to say, 'We're no longer gonna push the DEI agenda, but we're still going to have trans bathrooms, you can go to any bathroom you want, do whatever you want. No, no, no. You have to rip out all those policies.'' Tom Jones — the right-wing opposition researcher notorious for publishing a DEI Watch List of mostly Black federal officials he decided should be fired by Trump — argued that conservatives should not 'get wedded' to neutrality. 'Publicly held funds should reflect the values of Americans, and if that means we're not going to invest in companies that support boycott, divestment, and sanctions, [against Israel] or we're not going to invest in companies that use slave labor in China, or we're not going to invest in companies that invest in Iran because it's a threat to American national security, we should 100 percent have those policies,' said Jones. 'I don't know what neutral means — but legal and principled,' said perennial anti-tax crusader Grover Norquist, who seemed irritated with his compatriots' hypocrisy. 'I think you can't go to a court and say, 'We want to make decisions that aren't fiduciary, but we shouldn't be ruled to be stealing people's money, but they do.' I have no idea how you don't get laughed out of court with any argument…. This is a real slippery slope, and I don't know how you make that argument without laughing at yourself.' Described by NPR in 2001 as a 'conservative revolutionary,' Norquist famously told the outlet: 'I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.' A spokesperson for Consumers' Research tells Rolling Stone, 'For years, megalomaniacs at the helm of powerful corporations like BlackRock and Bank of America exploited their positions to impose a political agenda and bully others into compliance. The American people have had enough and they are demanding a return to business, not activism. Neutrality means moving away from the far left and back to focusing on consumers. There is still a long way to go and damage to make amends for before these companies and others like them can earn the public's trust again.' GOP attorneys general — long financed by Leo through their Republican Attorneys General Association — are currently suing BlackRock on alleged antitrust violations regarding its coal investments. The effort is being led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, whose top deputy bragged during a different panel that he threatened another big bank, Wells Fargo, into leaving the Net Zero Banking Alliance. (Texas had similarly threatened Bank of America's bond business, until it dropped out of the climate coalition.) Even former Congressman Ken Buck, who was the ranking Republican on the Antitrust Subcommittee, thinks Paxton's case against BlackRock is politically motivated 'lawfare.'In May, Democrats in the Senate and House announced probes into the exodus of banks from major climate change initiatives. Sheldon Whitehouse, the top Democrat on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, tells Rolling Stone: 'We have apparent open admissions — straight from the mouths of fossil-fuel-funded Republican operatives and lawmakers — of their phony anti-ESG scheme and their calls for the 'scalps' of the banking executives who've warned about the systemic risks from climate change.'Facing increasingly costly legal backlash from Republican state officials in the Leo network, BlackRock has tried to mend fences with conservatives. In January 2024, Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick detailed Fink's moves to get back into his good graces, by lining up investors for new natural gas plants in the state's power grid. That didn't dissuade Paxton from launching the antitrust lawsuit against BlackRock last November. Fink's firm withdrew from the Net Zero Asset Managers alliance in January, but the attacks from conservatives have not abated. They've continued even after the financier made a huge overture to Trump, in helping to achieve one of his key priorities: wresting control of the Panama Canal from China. Multiple agencies in the Trump administration have since written letters in support of Paxton's antitrust lawsuit. From the sounds of it, no amount of concessions will satisfy these conservatives, only scalps. More from Rolling Stone Jimmy Fallon Responds to Colbert Cancelation: 'I Don't Like What's Going On' Stephen Colbert Addresses Cancelation by Telling Trump to 'Go F-ck Yourself' Jon Stewart to CBS After Colbert's 'Late Show' Cancellation: 'Go F-ck Yourself' Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence