logo
EXCLUSIVE: 'World Will Be Watching' Carney's Fast-Tracked Megaprojects as Carbon Budget Shrinks

EXCLUSIVE: 'World Will Be Watching' Carney's Fast-Tracked Megaprojects as Carbon Budget Shrinks

Canada News.Net5 days ago

With a wave of new "nationally significant" projects on the way after the Carney government's Building Canada Act (Bill C-5) becomes law, the world will be watching how Canada meets its climate responsibilities, said the UK's former chief scientific advisor Sir David King.
"Every country in the world is now wondering how to handle the new president in the United States. Every country feels under threat," King told The Energy Mix in an exclusive interview Friday.
But "climate change is the biggest challenge humanity has ever had to face up to, and because it's a global problem, every country needs to handle the problem," he said. "It's not something we can just put aside for a period. This is an issue that is right up front, something we cannot abandon, and I do think Mark Carney is somebody who understand that."
So "we over in the rest of the world are going to be watching how Canada handles that problem," added King, who said he knew Carney well during the prime minister's term as governor of the Bank of England.
King was commenting after more than 60 of the world's top climate scientists warned that humanity is on track to exceed the available carbon budget to limit average global warming to 1.5C, in a paper published in the journal Earth System Science Data. By the beginning of this year, that budget "had shrunk to 130 billion tonnes," the British Broadcasting Corporation reports, "largely due to continued record emissions of carbon dioxide and other planet-warming greenhouse gases like methane, but also improvements in the scientific estimates."
If countries keep up their current pace of about 40 billion tonnes of emissions per year, "130 billion tonnes gives the world roughly three years until that carbon budget is exhausted," BBC adds.
The remaining carbon budget for a 1.6 or 1.7 threshold could be exceeded within nine years, Phys.org says.
"Things are all moving in the wrong direction," warned lead author Piers Forster, director of the Priestley Centre for Climate Futures at the University of Leeds. "We're seeing some unprecedented changes and we're also seeing the heating of the Earth and sea-level rise accelerating as well."
Those shifts "have been predicted for some time," he added, "and we can directly place them back to the very high level of emissions."
"Under any course of action, there is a very high chance we will reach and even exceed 1.5C and even higher," added study co-author Joeri Rogelj, a professor of climate science and policy at Imperial College London. "We are currently already in crunch time for higher levels of warming."
The news prompted an urgent call to action from King, now chair of the 18-member Climate Crisis Advisory Group.
The findings "make one thing clear-there is effectively no carbon budget remaining for either CO2 or methane emissions if humanity is to achieve a safe and manageable future," he said in an email release. "Policy-makers must adopt a comprehensive strategy focused on deep and rapid emissions reduction and removal, whilst also developing resilience against increasing extreme weather events."
With this year's UN climate summit, COP30, just a few months away in Belem, Brazil, "governments, financiers, and businesses must put this in focus," King added. "We do not have time to delay any further."
Carney must approach the dual challenges of climate change and Trump's aggression "with clarity, to demonstrate that Canada means business," King told The Mix.
"There is a real culture in Canada that is distinct from the culture of the United States," he said. So "protect your culture. Do what you can. But don't do it at any cost."
Climate change has been accelerating over the last five years, along with the loss and damage from an uptick in extreme weather events, and "the result of the election in the United States producing Trump as the president means the onus is now on all other countries to make much better commitments." The United Kingdom has already reduced its emissions by 54% from 1990 levels, and has set a target of 81% by 2035.
King said the Canadian prime minister "understands very clearly that in the UK, we have reduced our carbon dioxide footprint from 12 tonnes per person in 1995 to something like six tonnes, whereas you guys in Canada are well over 20 tonnes per person." So "Canada has an enormous amount of work to do to demonstrate that it understands why we're all suffering from these extreme weather events, and why the future of humanity is now severely at stake."
The European Union has set its sights on a 90% emissions reduction by 2040. And King rejected concerns that that target will be undercut by reliance on questionable carbon credits, or by member states that don't deliver on their promises-largely because renewable energy is now the cheapest form of electricity in any part of the world.
"That's the big driver for change," he said. But "we're seeing a terrible future unless we get action now from all progressive countries," and while "I have always admired Canada as a major progressive country, I can't say that on climate change," with its reliance on oil sands production that he cited as "probably the worst way of getting oil out of the ground."
But judging by Carney's record with the Bank of England, where he took "a very strong line" against banks investing in fossil fuel projects destined to become stranded assets, "he understands the risks of climate change. He doesn't need a lecture on this issue. So you are very fortunate to have Mark Carney in place....For any economy that is now based on oil, gas, or coal, there has to be a shift away from that, and Carney is frankly the right person to lead it."
King said he saw no need to connect trade and climate policy. But Carney has been musing about replacing carbon pricing with a carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) with other "like-minded" countries, and the Liberal Party platform in the recent federal election said a Carney government would "promote fair competition with our trading partners" through a CBAM.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'What if we just forced people to buy stuff?': The imagined thoughts of the Canadian EV mandate
'What if we just forced people to buy stuff?': The imagined thoughts of the Canadian EV mandate

Edmonton Journal

time6 hours ago

  • Edmonton Journal

'What if we just forced people to buy stuff?': The imagined thoughts of the Canadian EV mandate

Article content The Carney government is under growing pressure to drop what is known as the 'EV mandate.' This is a policy first introduced in 2022 wherein Canadian auto manufacturers will be mandated to sell a minimum quantity of EVs each year until 2035, when the sale of new gas-powered cars will be banned entirely. The singular problem with the mandate is that nobody wants to buy EVs. Even with Canada having the highest fuel prices in the hemisphere, sales of EVs have only ever peaked at about 20 per cent of new vehicle sales. And even that has been in freefall in recent months.

EDITORIAL: The financial risks of ‘nation-building'
EDITORIAL: The financial risks of ‘nation-building'

Toronto Sun

timea day ago

  • Toronto Sun

EDITORIAL: The financial risks of ‘nation-building'

Prime Minister Mark Carney attends the NATO Summit in The Hague, Netherlands, on June 25, 2025. Photo by Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS Now that Prime Minister Mark Carney's legislation to fast-track 'nation-building' projects has been approved, the concern is whether taxpayer money spent building them will be respected. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Nation-building projects are what governments used to call capital spending and we already know that Carney is planning to finance federal projects with more public debt. In his election platform alone, Carney identified $130 billion in new spending over four years with total deficit spending of $224.8 billion, 71% higher than what the Trudeau government said it would spend. The Carney government will also be green-lighting selected capital projects submitted by the provinces involving both public and private sector spending. The problem is we all know what happens when governments fast track public spending while ignoring the rules aimed at giving taxpayers good value for money. It ends in financial disasters such as the ArriveCAN app, developed during the pandemic, that was supposed to cost $80,000 and ended up at almost $60 million, according to Auditor General Karen Hogan. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. She warned that the failure of public servants to follow contracting rules that led to the ArriveCAN mess is widespread across the government, based on her investigations of other contracts. The history of military purchases by the defence department alone is replete with financial fiascoes. In her recent report, Hogan estimated the cost of replacing Canada's aging fleet of CF-18 fighter jets with 88 new F-35s, increased by almost 50% between 2022 and 2024 from $19 billion to $27.7 billion. She said it happened because the government relied on outdated data and failed to develop contingency plans for managing financial risks associated with the project. Going forward, spending on the military is poised to skyrocket given Carney's commitment to meet Canada's NATO target of spending 2% of annual GDP on defence by March 31, 2026, rising to 5% by 2035 at an added estimated cost of $150 billion annually. Meanwhile, parliamentary budget officer Yves Giroux said he can't assess whether Carney's claim he will balance the operating budget in three years is credible because the government hasn't provided definitions of what it means by operational versus capital spending. Unless the government cleans up its act, we're facing years of billion-dollar boondoggles that we'll only learn about years after the fact. NHL Columnists Columnists Toronto Raptors Toronto Maple Leafs

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store