Hospitals and unis MUST follow new rules on trans toilets and changing rooms, demands Starmer after landmark court case
SIR Keir Starmer has ordered hospitals, universities and public bodies to follow new rules on trans toilets and changing rooms.
The PM said they must observe the Supreme Court's landmark ruling on single-sex spaces after complaints some were reluctant to act.
It comes after critics warned some NHS trusts, universities and government departments are dragging their feet on implementing the decision.
Asked if they need to get on with it, Sir Keir told reporters: 'We've accepted the ruling, welcomed the ruling, and everything else flows from that as far as I'm concerned.
'And therefore, all guidance of whatever kind needs to be consistent with the ruling and we need to get to that position as soon as possible.'
In April, Britain's top judges ruled the legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex, not self-declared gender identity - even for those with a Gender Recognition Certificate.
The landmark judgment confirmed single-sex spaces like toilets, changing rooms and hospital wards can legally be reserved for biological women only.
The ruling dealt a major blow to campaigners who had pushed for trans women to access female-only spaces, even after legally changing their gender on paper.
Keir says 'woman is an adult female' & insists he's 'pleased' by court trans ruling after years of woke dithering
1
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Kendall to set out welfare changes as modelling suggests 150,000 may be pushed into poverty
Update: Date: 15:09 BST Title: Who has said what? Content: While we're taking a look over that written statement, and waiting for things to get moving in the Commons, here's what some of the key players have said about the proposed welfare changes : After the concessions were announced, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said the government was aiming to deliver a "fairer, more compassionate" benefits system. Labour rebels argued the original plans were rushed and would push vulnerable disabled people into poverty. Despite the government's partial U-turn, dozens are believed to still have misgivings about the changes and could defy the government in tomorrow's vote. The Liberal Democrats are planning to vote against the bill and have called for the government to bring forward its programme to help people into work more quickly. The Conservatives said ministers had wasted an opportunity to reform welfare and have called for cuts to mental health benefits for all but the worst cases. Update: Date: 15:02 BST Title: Government shares statement ahead of Commons address Content: A written ministerial statement, external from Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has just been published, ahead of her address in the Commons later this afternoon. We're reading through it now and will bring you the key lines imminently. Update: Date: 14:54 BST Title: What concessions has the government made? Content: The original bill set out changes to who could qualify for certain disability and sickness benefits. This includes restricting eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), and freezing the health-related element of universal credit (UC). Now Pip claimants will continue to receive what they currently get, as will recipients of the health-related element of UC. Instead, planned cuts will only hit new claimants. The government also reversed its plans to freeze the health-related component of UC. The payment will now rise in line with inflation for existing recipients. Update: Date: 14:37 BST Title: A simple guide to the planned changes to Pip and universal credit Content: Personal independence payment (Pip) is paid to 3.7 million people who have a long-term physical or mental health condition in England and Wales - up from 2.1m in 2019. There are two elements - a daily living component and a mobility component. Claimants may be eligible for one or both. The government now plans to tighten daily living assessments for future claimants - this will not affect those already receiving Pip, and the mobility element is not affected. It also announced changes to universal credit (UC), a payment made to people to help with their living costs. More than three million recipients of UC have no requirement to find work due to their health, a number that has risen sharply. If you have limited capacity to work because of a disability or long term condition, the UC payment you receive more than doubles, because of an extra top-up. Under the government's proposals, claimants will not be eligible to get this incapacity top-up until they are aged 22 or over. And new claimants will also see the value of this top-up fall. Update: Date: 14:32 BST Title: How we got here, in 99 words Content: Back in March, the government announced significant benefits changes, aimed at cutting welfare spending. But they proved unpopular with a large group within Labour, and faced criticism from opposition parties. As the first parliamentary hurdle drew nearer, so grew MPs' disquiet. Then last Thursday, after 126 Labour MPs threatened to vote down the proposals, the government confirmed major concessions, including: Today, the work and pensions secretary will share more details in the Commons, ahead of a vote on Tuesday. Update: Date: 14:29 BST Title: Government to outline welfare concessions ahead of key vote Content: Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall will later this afternoon set out to Parliament the details of concessions the government has made to proposed welfare changes. Last week, Prime Minister Keir Starmer was forced into a U-turn over his planned benefits changes, after more than 120 Labour MPs threatened to vote down his plans. The deal with rebel MPs suggests the welfare reforms will only save £2bn a year, rather than the £5bn they were expected to save by 2030. Ministers are hoping the concessions will help limit the rebellion ahead of a key vote on the bill tomorrow - but dozens of Labour MPs are believed to still have misgivings, and could defy the government in Tuesday's vote. Stick with us as we follow Kendall's statement live - due at around 15:30 BST.
The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
Protesters urge Wimbledon to cut ties with Barclays over Israel business deals
Pro-Palestinian protesters urged Wimbledon to drop Barclays as a sponsor Monday because of the British bank's business dealings with Israel. About two dozen protesters from Palestine Solidarity Campaign demonstrated by the main entrance of the All England Club as thousands of fans arrived for Day 1 of the tournament. 'They're the bank for the arms companies that are obviously supplying weapons to Israel,' protester Khalid Zalmay told The Associated Press. 'We should not be arming Israel, we should not be allowing anybody to facilitate arming them, and I think ties should be cut with Israel, the same way that ties were cut with Russia.' One protester held a sign that said Barclays is a 'sponsor of Wimbledon and genocide.' Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducted 251 people in the Oct. 7, 2023 attack that sparked the Israel-Hamas war. Israel's military response has led to the death of 56,000 Palestinians, according to the Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and combatants. It says more than half of the dead were women and children. Wimbledon did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Barclays said it is 'proud of our partnership with Wimbledon' and defended its business practices. 'We provide a range of financial services and products to companies supplying defense products to the UK, NATO and its allies,' the company statement said. 'As NATO, the EU and UK seek to increase their defense capabilities in response to increasing geopolitical threats, the provision of financial products and services to the defense sector is becoming increasingly important.'
The National
42 minutes ago
- The National
War crimes, not festival acts, should be dominating the headlines
Predictably, Kneecap's performance enjoyed huge crowds with justifiable denunciation of the rabid right-wing Israeli government and Keir Starmer's continued immoral justification for his government's non-interventionist stance – apart, that is, from the maintenance of supplying arms to Netanyahu to enable the genocide of the Palestinian people. READ MORE: Met police drop second terror charge against Kneecap Daily reports of the IDF firing on desperate crowds trying to obtain food and water for themselves and their families are consistently ignored or obfuscated by the majority of the media and politicians in the UK. The systematic murder of civilians does not even warrant token coverage by the 'just and equitable' BBC as soldiers from the IDF use them for target practice. It is accurate to state that Bob Vylan crossed the line of common decency in their rhetoric to the Glastonbury crowd but it is nonetheless frustrating to realise that this then becomes the story for television and newspapers, and not the acts of barbarity committed by the Netanyahu administration, a gang of heinous war criminals. There are governments in Europe that are prepared to make a righteous and humanitarian stance with regards the international crimes being carried out in Palestine. Spain and Ireland spring readily to mind. READ MORE: Keir Starmer responds Bob Vylan's Glastonbury Festival chants Would it be too much to ask that our own First Minister nail his colours to the mast by castigating the UK Government for its ongoing tangible support for the abhorrent Israeli government and the disproportionate overreaction of Starmer's government to the actions of the Palestine Action group and Kneecap? Scotland should be on the right side of history with compassion and humanitarianism at the fore. And for those who believe young bands like Kneecap have an invidious political influence over their young (and not so young!) followers, please note that one of the headliners at Glastonbury, none other than Rod Stewart, was doing his best to sway his fans as well. The octogenarian, who plainly has a head emptier than the Albion Rovers trophy cabinet, seems to have channelled his inner John Lennon by entreating us all to 'give Farage a chance'. Really Rod, I don't want to talk about it. Owen Kelly Stirling WAR and violence is the failure of leadership. The ultimate display of weakness and hypocrisy. Maybe the intellectually challenged occupant of Downing Street should read the above and inwardly digest it. That way, the rest of us might have a future. Margaret Forbes Blanefield IT is difficult to suppress a very tiny smile when reading the story of convicted fraudster Thomas Robinson, also known as Tam O'Braan (was this alias not a wee hint?), who between 2014 and 2019 tricked high-end retailers and very well-known hotels into buying fake 'Scottish-grown' tea. He has just been jailed for three-and-a-half years. His 'Scottish' tea was in fact purchased from a wholesaler in Oxford and resold with an inflated price tag. Apparently his scheme received support from the Scottish Government, and I seem to remember him appearing on at least one national TV news programme. Given his deception was to the value of more than £500,000 and ran for five years, a curious person might wonder why it has taken another five years to bring him to justice. READ MORE: Fraudster jailed for 3 years over Scottish tea scam Clearly he is a man of some considerable talent, however misguided, who one could imagine selling sand to Arabs and ice to Eskimos. Perhaps when he is released from prison he could find a senior position in the likes of Scottish Enterprise or in the public relations department of CalMac. On the final day of the Scottish Parliament before its summer holiday break, legislation was passed to allow prisoners to be released having serving only 15% of their sentence. If this were to be applied to Mr O'Braan's 42-month sentence, he could be released some time in January 2026 – only six months from now. He would miss Christmas and New Year at home but I wonder if he would be eligible to stand in the May 2026 Scottish Parliament elections? Brian Lawson Paisley THE description of a Hearts investor as a 'professional gambler, poker player and entrepreneur' in Saturday's edition neatly sums up the state of professional football in this country. Add in the 'apology' to Rangers fans from an erstwhile big wheel at Ibrox and it's plain that the game, once almost the sole preserve and passion of working people, has been infiltrated by money men operating near the edge of legality. Contempt for the rules has percolated down to player level, with blatant cheating now endemic and seemingly accepted as part of the game. Not the sport it used to be. Jim Butchart via email
