logo
Dr Reddy's gets 7 USFDA observations after Srikakulam plant inspection

Dr Reddy's gets 7 USFDA observations after Srikakulam plant inspection

A Form 483 is issued by the US health regulator when inspectors identify conditions that may violate the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act or relevant guidelines
New Delhi
Hyderabad-based pharmaceutical major Dr Reddy's Laboratories (DRL) has received a Form 483 with seven observations from the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) in a recent inspection at its formulations manufacturing plant in Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, according to the exchange filing.
The USFDA concluded the inspection of its FTO 11 facilities, the company stated in the filing.
A Form 483 is issued by the US health regulator when inspectors identify conditions that may violate the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act or relevant guidelines.
'We have been issued a Form 483 with seven observations, which we will address within the stipulated timeline,' it added.
Dr Reddy's Laboratories reported a 22 per cent year-on-year rise in consolidated net profit for the fourth quarter of financial year 2025, reaching ₹1,593.9 crore. The company has also announced a final dividend of ₹8 per equity share for FY 2024-25.
The company's first-quarter results for FY26 are scheduled to be released on July 23.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Big ‘Mc' Feud: Here's why a Gujarat snack maker is suing McDonald's
The Big ‘Mc' Feud: Here's why a Gujarat snack maker is suing McDonald's

Mint

time17 minutes ago

  • Mint

The Big ‘Mc' Feud: Here's why a Gujarat snack maker is suing McDonald's

McPatel Foods Private Limited has filed a civil suit against McDonald's Corporation before an Ahmedabad rural court. The Gujarat-based snack maker alleged that it has been receiving 'groundless threats' from the American fast-food chain due to its use of the mark 'McPatel.' The Indian snack maker filed the suit under Section 142 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, aiming for an injunction to prevent McDonald's from initiating or threatening legal action over its use of the 'Mc' prefix in its corporate and product branding. The case is listed for hearing on July 28, 2025, Bar and Bench reported. The conflict began when McPatel Foods applied to register the mark 'McPatel' under Class 30 (covering bakery goods, snacks, noodles, confectionery, sauces and frozen foods) in March 2024. However, on August 27, 2024, McDonald's filed an objection before the Indian Trade Marks Registry against this application. In its notice of opposition, McDonald's alleged the following: Deceptive similarity: McDonald's claims that the 'McPatel' mark is deceptively similar to its 'Mc' and 'Mac' family of trademarks, including McDonald's, McFries, McChicken and others. Acquired distinctiveness: The 'Mc' prefix, according to McDonald's has gained distinctiveness globally since the 1970s, and since 1996 in India due to its widespread use. Global enforcement: McDonald's argues that its trademarks are registered in more than 100 countries, solely with an aim to protect against third-party use of 'Mc'-formative marks. Dominant element: The fast-food chain also argues that 'Patel' and 'Foods' are quite common, making 'Mc' the dominant and source-identifying element in 'McPatel'. Bad intention: McDonald's also alleged that McPatel adopted the mark in bad faith to benefit from McDonald's goodwill, leading to confusion and deception and of the brand's reputation. In its counter statement filed on October 29, 2024, McPatel Foods denied all allegations, asserting the following: Legitimate adoption: The Indian snack maker claimed that the mark was adopted from its registered corporate name and trading style, with no intent to misrepresent or unfairly benefit from McDonald's reputation. Distinct identity: The company said that it is a legally incorporated Indian MSME specialising in processed food, particularly in frozen French fries and their mark is also visually, phonetically and conceptually different from McDonald's trademarks. No prior conflict: The Trademark Registrar is said to have found no conflicting marks at the examination stage, leading to the application's acceptance and advertisement. Lack of evidence: McPatel also pointed to the absence of actual confusion or consumer deception. Jealousy: McPatel contends that the opposition is driven by 'business jealousy' and is filed in bad faith to harass a domestic company. McPatel stood by its rationale that 'Mc' is a common prefix and McDonald's cannot claim monopoly over it across all combinations or industries. As of now, the trademark registry has not made a final decision on the dispute. The ongoing litigation is expected to cause further delays, as reported by Bar and Bench.

Transteel Tech expects data-driven design solutions to drive revenue growth
Transteel Tech expects data-driven design solutions to drive revenue growth

The Print

timean hour ago

  • The Print

Transteel Tech expects data-driven design solutions to drive revenue growth

Mumbai, Jul 24 (PTI) Bengaluru-based workspace solutions provider Transteel Technologies expects its data-driven design solutions to drive revenue growth, accounting for around 60 per cent of total turnover over the next few years, a top company official said. The company aims to ramp up its design capabilities and expects this segment to contribute revenues upwards of Rs 600 crore by 2029 or over 60 per cent of the total revenue, Transteel Managing Director Shiraz Ibrahim said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store