15 taken to hospital after double decker bus crashes into bridge and rips roof off as passengers ‘scream in horror'
Emergency services scrambled to the scene at the junction of barton Lane and Trafford Road, Eccles, following the horror incident.
4
4
4
4
One horrified witness told Manchester Evening News that they heard screams moments after the bus hit the bridge.
They said: "It [was] probably two minutes before I got there.
"I could just hear screaming coming from the top of the bus."
The 100 bus departed from Shudehill and was travelling to Salford, Trafford Centre and Warrington.
Shocking images show firefighters at the scene, and, according to witnesses, an air ambulance also attended the incident.
A Greater Manchester Police spokesperson said: "We are currently responding to a collision between a bus and a bridge at the junction of Barton Road and Trafford Road in Eccles.
"Emergency services are currently on scene as part of the ongoing work. Please avoid the area as road closures are currently in place."
More to follow... For the latest news on this story keep checking back at The Sun Online
Thesun.co.uk is your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see video.
Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/thesun and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSun.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Australian actor Rebel Wilson sued by production company behind her own film
The legal drama surrounding The Deb, Rebel Wilson's directorial debut, has made landfall in Australia, with one of the production companies behind the venture filing a lawsuit against Wilson in the New South Wales supreme court this week. UK-based AI Film, represented by Australian legal firm Giles George and high-profile barrister Sue Chrysanthou SC, accused the Pitch Perfect Australian actor of deliberately sabotaging the film's release, alleging threats and defamatory claims had caused the production company financial and reputational damage. The suit also claims the motive behind Wilson's actions was to devalue the production's worth and pressure AI Film and Australian company Dunburn Debutantes Commissioning Company (DDCC – the entity managing the film's rights and named as the second plaintiff in the lawsuit) into selling their stake to Wilson's company Camp Sugar. Originally conceived as a quirky musical comedy celebrating Australian culture, The Deb was co-produced by AI Film and Camp Sugar, with Wilson directing and starring. But the partnership fractured in mid-2024 when Wilson took to Instagram to accuse fellow producers Amanda Ghost, Gregor Cameron and Vince Holden of alleged embezzlement, sexual misconduct and obstructing the film's release. The allegations, broadcast to Wilson's 11 million followers, were swiftly denied by the producers who began defamation proceedings against Wilson in the Los Angeles superior court last July. In November, the film's lead actor, Charlotte MacInnes, who Wilson claimed was the victim of the alleged sexual misconduct, filed a declaration in the US court stating that Wilson fabricated the claims, describing them as 'completely false and absurd'. The court subsequently threw out Wilson's bid to strike out the defamation suit, not accepting her lawyer's argument that under California's anti-Slapp laws, the accusations she had made against the producers of her The Deb constituted 'protected activity' and were a matter of public interest. That defamation case remains ongoing. After filing its lawsuit in the supreme court's equities division on Thursday, AI Film issued the following statement: 'These proceedings are regrettable but essential to ensure The Deb's timely release. It's a joyous, fun film, and we are sure that audiences are going to love it.' And MacInnes issued a second statement, saying: 'I love this film and I can't wait for it to be released … it would be wonderful if these proceedings can help make that happen.' Wilson's Californian legal team, Freedman Taitelman + Cooley, which is handling the defamation case, did not respond to the Guardian's request for comment. In its lawsuit filed this week, Giles George claims that on 5 January, Wilson's lawyer Bryan Freedman responded to correspondence by AI Film's legal team, saying that 'Wilson is currently in active discussions to outright purchase The Deb (the 'Film') and all associated rights and title'. The Freedman letter also threatened to 'pursue all claims and damages should Al Film or any agents acting on its behalf interfere with that business opportunity'. AI Film is alleging that Wilson's motivation behind her alleged undermining of distribution efforts, including making threats to seek an injunction against the film's release, was personal financial gain. AI Film's lawyers claim that on 6 June 2025, Wilson had a discussion with film distributor Kismet, who was bidding to secure the rights for the theatrical release of The Deb in Australia, during which she said words to the effect that she was supportive of Kismet as the Australian distributor of the film but while there was a legal case involving the film in the US she could not support the film's distribution and would seek an injunction if any attempts to distribute the film were made. Giles George alleges Wilson knew the legal proceedings in the US were not impeding the film's release, and knew the threat of injunction was against her and her company, Camp Sugar's, contractual obligations. But as evidence in Byran Freedman's correspondent to them in January, Wilson was delaying the film's release so that she could pursue the 'business opportunity' of buying all rights to the film outright. AI Film is seeking damages, a formal apology, corrective advertising and a permanent restraint on Wilson and her company making any further disparaging and incorrect claims relating to other companies and individuals involved in the making of The Deb, which have come to been know in legal circles as 'The Wilson Statements'.
The Sun
11 hours ago
- The Sun
Shocking moment ex-footballer, 22, ploughs into elderly gran and flees before being hunted down by horrified bystanders
THIS is the shocking moment an ex-footballer riding an e-bike ploughed into a grandmother crossing the road. Footage shows Margaret Scaldwell, 70, walking across Orell Road, in Wigan, in August 2023. 7 7 Kian Monks, then aged 19, barrels towards her at around 40mph on a Talaria Sting e-bike. The grandmother was thrown several metres through the air and smashed her head on the pavement. A distressed 999 caller could be heard telling a dispatch officer: "She's in the middle of the road, she's just been knocked over. "Her head's open, there's blood everywhere, she is breathing, the lad's trying to run away, the one who knocked her over. It's not good." Cowardly Monks was filmed by members of the public as he fled from the scene down an alleyway. When officers caught up to the thug his face was covered in blood. He tried to plead innocence and told police: "I wasn't driving, it wasn't me. I've hit my head. I've hurt my head and my jaw." The teen had been riding the Talaria Sting, which had its speed limiter disconnected, alongside Joel Pilling, 22. Pilling handed himself in to police later the same day. Margaret was rushed to hospital with a broken spine, pelvis, arms and 19 broken ribs. She was placed in a coma with life-changing injuries. The 70-year-old who was once "independent" and "always had a smile" is now unable to feed herself. Both Monks and Pilling appeared at Bolton Crown Court yesterday. Monks, now 22, was sentenced to 22 months in prison, after pleading guilty to causing serious injury by dangerous driving, dangerous driving and driving with no licence or insurance. 7 7 7 The £3,795 Talaria Sting e-bike is considered a motor vehicle under the law and requires insurance. He was also found guilty of failing to stop at the scene of a collision, failing to report a collision and failing to provide a specimen for analysis following a serious collision. Pilling, who owned the motorbike but held no licence, was given a 22-month sentence, suspended for two years. He must also carry out 250 hours of unpaid work. In an emotional statement after the sentencing, Margaret said: "These men's selfishness have ruined my life. "Before the collision I was an independent lady and always had a smile on my face. "Now my life is dehumanising, reduced to a long list of hospital appointments with no end in sight and I can no longer walk wash or feed myself. "No sentence will bring back my health. But I will not let them beat me as I am determined to recover the best I can." Det Const Steve Pennington, of Greater Manchester Police, said: "This was a shocking incident where two individuals recklessly rode an e-bike through one of Wigan's busiest areas with complete disregard for public safety. "Their dangerous driving resulted in a horrific collision with a grandmother who was simply crossing the road. "She suffered life-changing injuries and spent weeks in a coma - it's nothing short of miraculous that she survived. "This incident highlights the severe consequences of operating e-bikes illegally on our roads. "These aren't toys - they're powerful vehicles that require proper licensing, safety equipment, and responsible handling. "Riding without these essentials isn't just breaking the law - it's putting lives at risk. "At GMP we're committed to reducing serious and fatal collisions across our region. "We actively support national road safety initiatives like the Fatal 4 campaign, targeting the four main causes of serious road incidents: speeding, using mobile phones, not wearing seatbelts, and driving under the influence. "Road safety is everyone's responsibility, and the consequences of ignoring this can be truly catastrophic." E-bike crack down By Jack Elsom YOBS who terrorise towns with off-road bikes, e-scooters and cars will have them crushed within 48 hours under new police powers. Ministers plan to reduce the time cops can destroy thugs' vehicles from two weeks to two days so they have less chance to retrieve them. Officers have complained that the current 14-day window creates a 'revolving door' where louts have time to reclaim their bikes and cars to keep wreaking havoc. The Home Office has launched a consultation on their proposals to tackle the scourge of anti-social behaviour blighting communities. Policing Minister Dame Diana Johnson said: 'Anti-social and reckless driving brings misery to communities across the country, from dangerous street racing to off-road bikes tearing through local parks. "By enabling police to seize and dispose of these vehicles within just 48 hours, we're giving our officers the tools they need to deliver immediate results and providing communities the swift justice they deserve.' Labour are also looking to hike the fines for the cost of seizing, towing and crushing vehicles. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has already announced powers for police to seize bikes, e-scooters and cars without warning. The problem of nuisance driving has become so bad that some forces have launched dedicated operations to combat it. Operation Vulcan in Oldham has been targeting e-bikes, four of which were seized after their drivers were arrested for drug supply. National Police Chiefs' Council Lead for Roads Policing, Chief Constable Jo Shiner, said: 'Anti-social use of a vehicle, such as street racing, street cruising or off-road use is more than a matter of noise pollution. 'It can have long-term effects on a neighbourhood, with the criminal damage of roads, other vehicles and surrounding property.'
Glasgow Times
15 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Manchester Airport case jurors urged to ‘not be distracted' by officer's actions
Mobile phone footage of the incident on July 23 last year was shared on social media and went viral. Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, 20, is on trial at Liverpool Crown Court accused of assaulting three police officers and a member of public before he was felled by a Taser strike. Greater Manchester Police officers Pc Zachary Marsden, Pc Lydia Ward and Pc Ellie Cook entered the Terminal 2 car park paystation after reports that a male fitting Amaaz's description had headbutted a member of the public inside the airport minutes earlier. The Crown says Amaaz resisted and his brother, Muhammad Amaad, 26, intervened as a 'high level of violence' was inflicted on the officers. In his closing speech to the jury on Thursday, prosecutor Paul Greaney KC said it was 'simple logic and common sense' that what happened subsequently was 'irrelevant as to why the defendants used the force they did'. He said: 'We don't shy away from that kick and stamp by Pc Marsden. However, what does that kick, what does that stamp have to do with your task? 'The defence suggest, at least as we understood it, that the kick and stamp and other aspects of the aftermath reveal that the officers were out of control from start to finish. 'We suggest from all of what you have seen and all of what you have heard from these three professional officers when they gave evidence is that you can be sure that the suggestion that they were out of control is false and wrong. 'We invite you to focus on the violence used by the defendants and not be distracted by what happened afterwards. That's what it is, a distraction and an example of an effort to try to complicate what is a simple case.' He said the claims by Amaaz that he did not realise that Pc Ward and Pc Cook were women when he struck them was a 'barefaced lie'. Pc Ward suffered a broken nose as she was floored by a punch to the face and Pc Cook was also knocked to the ground by a number of elbows and punches, the court has heard. Mr Greaney told jurors: 'Of course we know you will make fair allowance for the fast-moving and dynamic events but the suggestion he didn't know they were women cannot exist in the world we inhabit.' Mr Greaney said Amaad had 'no legitimate reason to seek to prevent the officers from carrying out their duty particularly in the circumstances where it must have been obvious his brother was resisting arrest'. His claims that he thought his brother was being choked by Pc Marsden was 'demonstrably untrue', said the prosecutor. Mr Greaney said the officers were doing what the law entitled them to do in their plan to seek to move Amaaz from the paystation area and then tell him outside he was under arrest. He said: 'What was going through their minds is we have a duty to perform and we are going to perform it. 'Conversely, what was going through the mind of the first defendant, Amaaz, was that he plainly knew that the people taking hold of him were police officers. He had just attacked a man in public in an international airport. What he did think they were there for?' Both defendants, from Rochdale, Greater Manchester, deny the allegations and say they were lawfully acting in self defence or in defence of each other. Amaaz is alleged to have assaulted Pc Marsden and Pc Ward, causing them actual bodily harm. He is also accused of the assault of emergency worker Pc Cook, and the earlier assault by beating of a member of the public, Abdulkareem Ismaeil, at a Starbucks cafe in T2 arrivals. Amaad is alleged to have assaulted Pc Marsden, causing actual bodily harm. In his closing submission, Imran Khan KC, defending Amaaz, said the incident may not have happened and 'gone viral' but for Pc Marsden. He said: 'Pc Marsden's decision-making has put his colleagues in danger. It has caused all this to happen. It could have been avoided. 'One might think that the easiest thing to have done would have been to say 'excuse me sir, would you mind stepping outside so I can have a word with you'. 'What would be wrong with that? This was not the crime of the century. 'They all three of them grab hold of parts of his body without announcing themselves, that's crazy, 'This deliberate intentional plan led to unlawful force being applied. This is a group of officers led by Pc Marsden that flouts every procedure, every rule, every law. 'Fahir was terrified for his life. That's how this started.' Mr Khan said Pc Marsden's conduct after Amaaz was felled by a Taser strike was relevant. He said: 'When it comes to the kick and stamp we say that is typical of his behaviour from the beginning. 'When Fahir is on the floor almost motionless having been tasered, he is not a threat. 'Pc Marsden sought to justify the unjustifiable. 'He kicked Fahir in the head with what you may feel was a rugby-style kick. He said it was a light kick. In what world can this be said to be a light kick?' Mr Khan told jurors it was 'plain as the nose on my face' that Pc Marsden also pushed his Taser into the face of the defendants' mother, rather than the officer's belief that Amaad accidentally struck her. He said: 'To suggest her own son did it is plumbing the depths. 'It is very clear. This is Pc Marsden out of control. That's how she got her injury. She was not a threat.' The trial continues on Friday.
