logo
Hasten slowly: Voters wary of reform surprise from Albanese

Hasten slowly: Voters wary of reform surprise from Albanese

Just 20 per cent backed a change to the rate of the 10 per cent GST, with opposition at 47 per cent. Across every group, from Labor to low- and high-income earners, opposition to a different GST rate was high. At least half of retirees, people in marginal seats and Coalition voters oppose a new rate.
There was little support for a change to the base of the GST, with some proponents arguing it should be extended to areas such as financial services and fresh food. Just 23 per cent of those surveyed back such a move, with opposition at 40 per cent.
On Monday, the Labor-aligned McKell Institute released research into changing the capital gains tax concession in a bid to meet the government's 1.2 million target of new homes by the end of the decade.
It found that lifting the current 50 per cent concession to 70 per cent for investors who build new apartments or units while cutting it to 35 per cent for those who bought existing detached homes would create an additional 130,000 properties by 2030.
The RPM poll showed support to axe or reduce capital gains tax concessions was the highest of any reform put to those surveyed. Thirty-six per cent backed a change to the concession, with 37 per cent unsure.
Opposition was at 27 per cent, although this was driven by Coalition voters, of whom 35 per cent did not support the move. Even among higher-income respondents, more people supported a change (38 per cent) than opposed it outright (31 per cent).
Labor went to the 2019 election, which it lost against expectations, promising an overhaul of both CGT and negative gearing.
The RPM poll shows less than a third of those surveyed agreed with either reducing negative gearing or axing it completely.
Just 31 per cent backed a change compared to 43 per cent who said they were unsure, while 26 per cent opposed.
Support was highest among Labor voters and high-income people (at 35 per cent), while support was lowest among Coalition supporters at just 26 per cent.
While the poll results are a warning to the government, they also contain a key message for the Coalition.
Just 18 per cent of respondents agreed the Coalition should oppose major reforms, with 57 per cent saying the Liberal and Nationals parties should negotiate changes and reach a consensus with the government.
Even among Coalition voters, 58 per cent believe in negotiation with the government, with the highest support level among retirees at 69 per cent.
A quarter of those polled said the focus of reform should be on health, just ahead of housing, which was identified by 24 per cent as the government's priority. Economic and financial reform was ranked the most important by 21 per cent.
Pushed on the state of the budget, 37 per cent said Chalmers should reduce spending to remain in surplus, while just 14 per cent backed current spending levels being paid for by higher taxes. Twenty-eight per cent said the government should maintain spending levels and keep the budget in deficit.
Some voters seem prepared to bear the brunt of any cuts. Forty-one per cent of respondents said they were willing to make a personal sacrifice for reform, with just 19 per cent saying they were not. Another 41 per cent said they were unsure.
The most prepared to give up something were Labor voters (45 per cent) and those on higher incomes (47 per cent), while the least prepared were Coalition voters (37 per cent) and the unemployed (30 per cent).
This week, independent MP Allegra Spender – who is due to attend the government's economic roundtable – will hold her own tax discussion with experts including former Treasury secretary Ken Henry, current head of the Grattan Institute Aruna Sathanapally and Westpac chief economist and former Reserve Bank economist Luci Ellis.
She said reform of the tax system had to be on the government's agenda given its importance to the nation's future.
'Tax reform can help young people get ahead, help our businesses thrive and help us transition our energy as cheaply as possible,' she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why I changed my mind about cutting the voting age to 16
Why I changed my mind about cutting the voting age to 16

AU Financial Review

timean hour ago

  • AU Financial Review

Why I changed my mind about cutting the voting age to 16

In Australia, lowering the voting age has long been the aspiration of those who would benefit from it. For years, the Greens have supported extending the franchise, and during the Bill Shorten years, Labor did too. Following British prime minister Keir Starmer's commitment to give 16 and 17-year-olds the vote, Australian independent MP Monique Ryan has pledged to introduce a private member's bill on the topic, to let young people 'have a say on those things that really matter to them'.

How Australia became home to a million refugees
How Australia became home to a million refugees

Sydney Morning Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

How Australia became home to a million refugees

Tran, who was eight at the time, counts herself as lucky that they did not encounter pirates roaming the oceans they had heard stories about. Her father had worked in a warehouse affiliated with the American army during the war, and feared he had a target on his back. On their 14th attempt, the family made it to a Malaysian refugee camp. Following months of processing, Tran remembers landing in Sydney on a rainy afternoon the following year. 'It was just joyous,' she said. 'To this day, I still love the rain, and when I'm in long car rides and it's raining, yeah, those moments come back.' Tran is a board director for six organisations ranging from liquor regulation to family violence and financial counselling for women, and said she was motivated to create opportunities for those who otherwise wouldn't have them. 'That's what I've been gifted by just being in Australia,' Tran, who sits on the Victorian Liquor Commission, said. 'We get to live without fear, and we get to live being able to make the most of what the community provides us.' John Howard's Coalition government began processing refugees offshore in 2001 after the Tampa, a ship carrying 433 mostly Hazara asylum-seekers, grabbed national attention as it tried to enter Australian waters. The Rudd Labor government dismantled the policy in 2008, with then-minister for immigration and citizenship Chris Evans labelling it a 'cynical, costly and ultimately unsuccessful exercise'. Four years later, then-prime minister Julia Gillard, under political pressure from opposition leader Tony Abbott, reintroduced offshore processing. The policy was strengthened under the Abbott government's 'Operation Sovereign Borders' program, which continues to this day with bipartisan support. There were 93 people on Nauru at the end of last year, according to the Refugee Council of Australia. Faqihi, an ambassador for the council, said her family had been threatened with violence and barred from sending their children to school in Afghanistan as members of the Hazara ethnic minority. She believed Indonesia, where the family moved in 2012, would provide safety and educational opportunities for six months before a country took them in permanently. But Faqihi and her family were stuck for a decade in processing limbo, unable to get an education or work or access public services because of her refugee status. 'Those 10 years were the darkest moments of my life,' she said. 'We lived through a decade of uncertainty … without any say in the most important decisions being made about our lives.' Eventually arriving in Australia in 2022 was like being reborn, she said. The Department of Home Affairs said the refugee program for the 2024-25 financial year had 20,000 places. Loading The UK, which has a much larger population than Australia and is also going through a major immigration debate, accepted 93,342 refugees and asylum seekers in the 2023-24 financial year. The US resettled 100,034 refugees in the same year, according to the Migration Policy Institute. The United Nations has found Australia has violated the human rights of refugees detained in offshore processing, and the policy has been widely criticised by advocates as inhumane. Faqihi continues to advocate for the almost 12,000 displaced people in limbo in Indonesia. 'There is a lot Australia can do as a leader in the region,' she said. 'Australia can respond by expanding resettlement visas, especially for those who are stuck in the region and our neighbourhood regions.' Tran said: 'I just hope that Australians continue to take refugees, not because we might add value or anything, but ... because it's the right thing to do, and the best thing you can offer someone is a chance to be Australian.'

How Australia became home to a million refugees
How Australia became home to a million refugees

The Age

time2 hours ago

  • The Age

How Australia became home to a million refugees

Tran, who was eight at the time, counts herself as lucky that they did not encounter pirates roaming the oceans they had heard stories about. Her father had worked in a warehouse affiliated with the American army during the war, and feared he had a target on his back. On their 14th attempt, the family made it to a Malaysian refugee camp. Following months of processing, Tran remembers landing in Sydney on a rainy afternoon the following year. 'It was just joyous,' she said. 'To this day, I still love the rain, and when I'm in long car rides and it's raining, yeah, those moments come back.' Tran is a board director for six organisations ranging from liquor regulation to family violence and financial counselling for women, and said she was motivated to create opportunities for those who otherwise wouldn't have them. 'That's what I've been gifted by just being in Australia,' Tran, who sits on the Victorian Liquor Commission, said. 'We get to live without fear, and we get to live being able to make the most of what the community provides us.' John Howard's Coalition government began processing refugees offshore in 2001 after the Tampa, a ship carrying 433 mostly Hazara asylum-seekers, grabbed national attention as it tried to enter Australian waters. The Rudd Labor government dismantled the policy in 2008, with then-minister for immigration and citizenship Chris Evans labelling it a 'cynical, costly and ultimately unsuccessful exercise'. Four years later, then-prime minister Julia Gillard, under political pressure from opposition leader Tony Abbott, reintroduced offshore processing. The policy was strengthened under the Abbott government's 'Operation Sovereign Borders' program, which continues to this day with bipartisan support. There were 93 people on Nauru at the end of last year, according to the Refugee Council of Australia. Faqihi, an ambassador for the council, said her family had been threatened with violence and barred from sending their children to school in Afghanistan as members of the Hazara ethnic minority. She believed Indonesia, where the family moved in 2012, would provide safety and educational opportunities for six months before a country took them in permanently. But Faqihi and her family were stuck for a decade in processing limbo, unable to get an education or work or access public services because of her refugee status. 'Those 10 years were the darkest moments of my life,' she said. 'We lived through a decade of uncertainty … without any say in the most important decisions being made about our lives.' Eventually arriving in Australia in 2022 was like being reborn, she said. The Department of Home Affairs said the refugee program for the 2024-25 financial year had 20,000 places. Loading The UK, which has a much larger population than Australia and is also going through a major immigration debate, accepted 93,342 refugees and asylum seekers in the 2023-24 financial year. The US resettled 100,034 refugees in the same year, according to the Migration Policy Institute. The United Nations has found Australia has violated the human rights of refugees detained in offshore processing, and the policy has been widely criticised by advocates as inhumane. Faqihi continues to advocate for the almost 12,000 displaced people in limbo in Indonesia. 'There is a lot Australia can do as a leader in the region,' she said. 'Australia can respond by expanding resettlement visas, especially for those who are stuck in the region and our neighbourhood regions.' Tran said: 'I just hope that Australians continue to take refugees, not because we might add value or anything, but ... because it's the right thing to do, and the best thing you can offer someone is a chance to be Australian.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store