logo
Sudan war shatters infrastructure, costly rebuild needed

Sudan war shatters infrastructure, costly rebuild needed

TimesLIVE29-05-2025
One consequence of the infrastructure breakdown can be seen in a rapid cholera outbreak that has claimed 172 deaths out of 2,729 cases over the past week alone mainly in Khartoum.
Other parts of central and western Sudan, including the Darfur region, are similarly ravaged by fighting, while the extensive damage in Khartoum, once the centre of service provision, reverberates across the country.
Sudanese authorities estimate reconstruction needs at $300bn for Khartoum and $700bn for the rest of Sudan.
The UN is doing its own estimates.
Sudan's oil production has more than halved to 24,000 barrels-per-day and its refining capabilities ceased as the main al-Jaili oil refinery sustained $3bn in damages during battles, oil and energy minister Mohieddine Naeem told Reuters.
Without refining capacity, Sudan now exports all its crude and relies on imports, he said. It also struggles to maintain pipelines needed by South Sudan for its own exports.
Earlier this month, drones targeted fuel depots and the airport at the country's main port city in an attack Sudan blamed on the UAE. The Gulf country denied the accusations.
All of Khartoum's power stations have been destroyed, Naeem said. The national electrical company recently announced a plan to increase supply from Egypt to northern Sudan and said earlier in the year that repeated drone attacks to stations outside Khartoum were stretching its ability to keep the grid going.
LOOTED COPPER
Government forces re-took Khartoum earlier this year and as people return to houses turned upside down by looters, one distinctive feature has been deep holes drilled into walls and roads to uncover valuable copper wire.
On Sudan's Nile Street, once its busiest throughway, there is a ditch about one metre deep and 4km long, stripped of wiring and with traces of burning.
Khartoum's two main water stations went out of commission early in the war as RSF soldiers looted machinery and used fuel oil to power vehicles, according to Khartoum state spokesperson Altayeb Saadeddine.
Those who have remained in Khartoum resort to drinking water from the Nile or long-forgotten wells, exposing them to waterborne illnesses. But there are few hospitals equipped to treat them.
'There has been systematic sabotage by militias against hospitals, and most medical equipment has been looted and what remains has been deliberately destroyed,' said health minister Haitham Mohamed Ibrahim, putting losses to the health system at $11bn.
With two or three million people looking at returning to Khartoum, interventions were needed to avoid further humanitarian emergencies like the cholera outbreak, said UN Development Programme resident representative Luca Renda.
But continued war and limited budget means a full-scale reconstruction plan is not in the works.
'What we can do ... with the capacity we have on the ground, is to look at smaller-scale infrastructure rehabilitation,' he said, like solar-power water pumps, hospitals, and schools.
In that way, he said, the war may provide an opportunity for decentralising services away from Khartoum, and pursuing greener energy sources.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US redraws Africa policy map, what's in it for African leaders?
US redraws Africa policy map, what's in it for African leaders?

The South African

time2 hours ago

  • The South African

US redraws Africa policy map, what's in it for African leaders?

Early in July 2025, the White House announced that it would hold a US-Africa conference with five African states. According to Semafor and Reuters , the conference will take place in Washington, D.C., from 9 to 11 July 2025. Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mauritania, and Senegal are among the invited leaders. The news of the summit comes after a series of US diplomatic engagements with African leaders, including Trump's meeting with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in May 2025. According to officials, the summit would prioritise business over aid, which is consistent with Trump's bid for a second term. Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared that the United States will no longer fund charity-based aid programs. According to Rubio, when the United States distributes aid in the future, it will give preference to nations that exhibit self-sufficiency and a dedication to reform. The senior bureau official for African Affairs at the US State Department, Troy Fitrell, announced the evaluation of ambassadors based on commercial partnership. At the AmCham meeting in Côte d'Ivoire, Fitrell gave a presentation on a six-point trade strategy. Furthermore, to improve trade between the US and Africa, the strategy includes tariff reform and infrastructure investment. Following the US-mediated DRC-Rwanda peace deal on 27 June 2025, the meeting, which focuses on trade and investment, highlights the Trump administration's strategy of linking peace and stability in Africa to economic opportunities and access to vital resources. The conference marks a continuation of increased US-African engagement. Unlike his predecessors, Trump did not hold an African summit in his first term in office. Trump is scheduled to meet with African leaders in a multilateral setting for the first time after his reelection. The goal of the Trump administration is to replace humanitarian initiatives with business partnerships. The summit will amplify cooperation on regional security and resource access in West Africa. U.S. leaders emphasise private sector-led development as a means of fostering collaborative prosperity. Furthermore, African leaders will be proposing investment reforms. The outcomes will impact future US-African relations, according to the White House. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

Russian Navy deputy head Gudkov killed by Ukraine, says Moscow
Russian Navy deputy head Gudkov killed by Ukraine, says Moscow

TimesLIVE

time3 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

Russian Navy deputy head Gudkov killed by Ukraine, says Moscow

Maj-Gen Mikhail Gudkov, deputy head of the Russian Navy and a former commander of a marine brigade fighting against Ukraine, has been killed in action, depriving Moscow of one of its most senior officers, the Russian military said on Thursday. Gudkov, who was handed a top military honour in the Kremlin by Russian President Vladimir Putin in February, was killed on Wednesday "during combat work in one of the border districts of Kursk region", the defence ministry said in a statement. Unofficial Russian and Ukrainian military Telegram channels had earlier reported that Gudkov had been killed, along with other servicemen and officers, in a Ukrainian missile attack on a command post in Russia's Kursk region, which borders Ukraine, with a US-made HIMARS missile. Reuters could not independently verify how Gudkov, 42, whose call sign was "Viking", died or what he was doing in Kursk. Some Russian war bloggers said he had been in overall command of marines advancing in Ukraine's neighbouring Sumy region. In charge of the navy's coastal and land forces, including marine units, he is one of the most senior Russian military officers to have been killed since Moscow launched its full-scale war against Ukraine in 2022. At least 10 other senior Russian commanders have been killed in action or assassinated by Kyiv since the start of the war. There was no immediate comment from Ukraine, which accused Gudkov and his subordinates of committing various war crimes, something Moscow denied. In the far eastern port city of Vladivostok, the home base of Russia's Pacific Fleet, mourners left flowers near an outdoor portrait of Gudkov, part of a photo exhibition celebrating officers Russia regards as military heroes. Oleg Kozhemyako, governor of the Primorsky region which includes the port, said in a statement that Gudkov, whom Putin appointed deputy commander-in-chief of the navy in March, had been killed "carrying out his duty as an officer" along with others, and expressed his condolences to the dead men's relatives. Attached to his statement was a video showing him awarding Gudkov a military honour and images of Gudkov — set to a patriotic Russian song — on the battlefield. "When he became deputy chief of the navy, he did not stop personally visiting the positions of our marines," Kozhemyako said on Telegram. Russian war blogger "Romanov Light" said Gudkov was regarded by troops as one of the most effective commanders and as one of the few to tell superiors the real situation on the ground rather than what they wanted to hear. Before his promotion to the navy's top brass, Gudkov had led a marine brigade of Russia's Pacific Fleet, which had fought in Ukraine and had fought in Kursk too. Parts of Kursk were seized by Ukrainian forces in a surprise offensive in August 2024 before Russia said earlier this year it had driven them out.

Critical need for gender-responsive climate policies at COP30 to bridge gender gaps
Critical need for gender-responsive climate policies at COP30 to bridge gender gaps

Daily Maverick

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Critical need for gender-responsive climate policies at COP30 to bridge gender gaps

Gender-responsive policy is vital for climate resilience, but that requires actionable and better resourced plans. Women and girls make up 80% of people displaced by climate change, leaving them at risk of increased poverty, violence and exploitation. They are also much more likely than men to be injured or killed in natural disasters because gender inequalities have created discrepancies in healthcare, access to information, resources and decision making. Climate change also amplifies existing gender inequalities, intensifying the vulnerabilities of those who are already disadvantaged. Gender-responsive climate policies are therefore vital for building resilience and ensuring transformative and effective climate action. Integrated responses are required to address these deeply linked issues. However, no country in the world is on course to achieve the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals' gender equality targets. These goals are critical for climate resilience and could enable women to help their communities withstand the impacts of climate change. At the 2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP29), states agreed that a comprehensive Gender Action Plan would be developed at this year's COP30 in Belém, Brazil. They also agreed to extend the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change's Lima Work Programme, set up in 2014 to address climate and gender at the intergovernmental level. The programme recognises that climate justice requires addressing environmental and social inequities, positioning women as vital agents of change. Although valuable, the Lima Work Programme has struggled to deliver due to insufficient resources and limited integration of gender across the convention. Persistent issues include inconsistent representation of women in Framework Convention on Climate Change processes and COP delegations, and limited implementation support for developing countries. Gender Climate Tracker shows that since 2008, no COP has achieved equal gender representation and participation in delegations. At COP29, only 35% of all country delegates were women, suggesting systemic barriers in achieving gender equality in climate negotiations. Another setback at COP29 was the pushback against language on human rights, intersectionality, and recognising the diversity of women's experiences. Egypt, Iran, Russia and Saudi Arabia opposed the use of gender-inclusive language and sought to ensure binary distinctions, limiting any wording that could reference lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and other (LGBTQ+) people. These disagreements reflect a complex global rollback on human rights and gender, including at UN events. COP must also grapple with the tension between what some countries consider progressive and others see as controversial or unacceptable. In addition, some Nationally Determined Contributions outlined specific gender-related commitments, while others made general references or excluded them entirely. These differences undermine consensus, making it difficult for states to align their ambition, language and scope of action at COP. Africa faces severe climate risks, which hit women and girls hardest, especially in rural and conflict-affected areas. This underscores the importance of Africa's involvement at COP, particularly regarding gender. Despite the continent's growing participation in talks, the African Group of Negotiators lacks a strong position on gender. African delegations face significant financial gaps, limiting their attendance, preparation and meaningful engagement. All states at COP29 urged the Framework Convention on Climate Change secretariat to help ensure that national gender focal points could attend meetings. This kind of support is critical to strengthening Africa's voice at the negotiating table. Before COP30, the African Group of Negotiators is calling for the new Gender Action Plan to respond to Africa's realities on the ground and the needs of vulnerable women and girls. Their recommendations include asking developed states to provide technical and financial means to implement the plan. Technical requests Technical requests include training national gender focal points, enhancing gender data and monitoring systems, supporting the mainstreaming of gender in climate policies, and building capacity for gender impact assessments. Financial requests are for implementing national gender action plans, supporting women's participation in climate negotiations, providing access to climate technologies, and improving women and girls' resilience. The COP29 decision on the Gender Action Plan emphasises the urgency of greater support for developing countries, but lacks financial and enforcement mechanisms to deliver it. Without dedicated funding for implementation, the plan will remain aspirational, especially for developing countries. For a COP aiming to negotiate ambitious finance goals, Baku missed the opportunity to ensure arrangements to fund the plan, with clear, measurable targets. The New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) is a climate finance agreement that aims to raise at least$300-billion a year by 2035 to support developing countries' climate action. While it says climate finance must benefit women and other marginalised groups, the agreement is not legally binding. That, together with the lack of accountability measures, makes the New Collective Quantified Goal's call for 'scaled-up support' a mere ambition for developing countries. Billed as the 'People's COP', Belém is expected to centre the voices and needs of local and indigenous communities. But to make a difference, the Gender Action Plan needs measurable targets with a dedicated funding mechanism. Gender must be elevated from a peripheral issue to a cross-cutting issue incorporated across key COP30 outcomes, particularly the Nationally Determined Contributions, just transition and adaptation. In the lead-up to COP30, stronger internal coordination in the African Group of Negotiators is needed to present a clear position with a coherent message that centres Africa's priorities. The group must push for gender to be integrated across COP agenda items, asking the Framework Convention on Climate Change secretariat to support this. This will require African negotiators to be supported with the technical expertise and staffing to meaningfully engage in Framework Convention on Climate Change processes, especially as negotiations become more technical and focused on outcomes. DM

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store