logo
Dentists are struggling to counter RFK Jr. on fluoride

Dentists are struggling to counter RFK Jr. on fluoride

Politico11-07-2025
'Fluoride's predominant benefit to teeth comes from topical contact with the outside of the teeth, not from ingestion,' an HHS spokesperson told POLITICO. 'There is no need, therefore, to ingest fluoride.'
The impact the retreat from fluoridation has on oral health will show whether dentists are right, that a cavity crisis will follow, or whether Kennedy's view, that Americans can get the fluoride they need in toothpaste and mouthwash, will bear out.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, an agency within HHS, has held out fluoridation as one of the 10 greatest public health achievements of the 20th century, citing data that it reduces tooth decay by as much as 70 percent in children and tooth loss by as much as 60 percent in adults.
But Kennedy nonetheless believes the case to remove fluoride is urgent because of evidence that it can curtail children's brain development. It's a position bolstered by a report from the National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences during the Biden administration and an Obama-appointed federal judge last year — though the levels of fluoride they examined were higher than what Americans consume.
Dentists see it otherwise.
'This is revving up an anti-science narrative,' said Brett Kessler, the president of the American Dental Association, the country's leading dentists' group. 'There are ways to get fluoride in toothpaste, some of the foods we eat, some of the drinks we drink, topical fluoride mouthwashes. … But without fluoridated water you're already behind the eight ball because you've got vulnerable teeth.'
Dentists' case
Opposition to adding the cavity-fighting mineral to water — based on a mishmash of reasoning around the purity of the drinking supply, concerns about side effects and conspiracy theories — has long been a cause of some on the left.
Before Utah and Florida's moves, residents of Hawaii, New Jersey and Oregon were the least likely to have fluoride in their water, according to a review of 2022 data by the United Health Foundation, a philanthropy started by the insurer UnitedHealth Group to promote better public health.
(The same study found 79 percent of Floridians and 43 percent of Utahns drank fluoridated water.)
Health researchers have mostly found that low levels of fluoride, including the amounts found in drinking water systems across the U.S., are safe and can help fortify teeth against decay and other ailments.
Many communities began to fluoridate their water in the mid-1900s at the behest of voters and their local and state governments. In 1962, HHS started providing guidance on fluoride in drinking water, and the Environmental Protection Agency invoked the Safe Drinking Water Act years later to enforce these standards, though fluoridation is still done at states' discretion.
But research, much of it in China, has since prompted the Trump administration to question those standards. The findings suggest higher levels of fluoride in groundwater are linked to neurobehavioral issues and reduced IQ in children, but those results are not definitive due to study designs and methodology.
Opponents of fluoridation in blue jurisdictions like Portland, Oregon, and Hawaii, historically have made the case that the best water is the least touched by human hands.
'The attitude was, 'don't ruin our pure water,'' said Barry Taylor, the executive director of the Oregon Dental Association. He says the Chinese studies have only made convincing Oregonians otherwise harder because they've added 'a new element of doubt.'
Kessler contends the studies are not applicable to the U.S. because of the difference in fluoride levels and confounding variables. 'It could be lower IQ parents. It could be a lack of special foods that could help brain development. And it could just be DNA or genetics,' Kessler said.
Dental health advocates also see a flaw in Kennedy's case that mouthwash and toothpaste are all people need. They argue that some Americans don't use the products, either because they can't get to a store, can't afford them or because they choose not to, putting them at risk.
'This is a lot of forces coming together to undermine oral health for particularly people that are lower income or in areas that may not have as many resources to get the oral health care they need,' said Melissa Burroughs, senior director of public policy at CareQuest, an oral health advocacy group aligned with the dentists.
The American Dental Association's Kessler says the battle is far from over, pointing to the ADA's success this year in persuading state lawmakers to reject bills that would have banned fluoridation or otherwise impeded fluoridation efforts in 16 states across the political spectrum, including Hawaii.
Kennedy's campaign
Kennedy traveled to Salt Lake City in April to praise Utah for becoming the first state to ban fluoride in a state's water. The rule took effect in May.
'It makes no sense to have it in our water supply,' Kennedy said at a news conference with state lawmakers. 'I'm very, very proud of this state for being the first state to ban it, and I hope many more will come.'
Kennedy hasn't withdrawn Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance encouraging fluoridation but he's threatening to do so.
Earlier this year, he directed the CDC to reconvene the Community Preventive Services Task Force, an independent panel of experts, to study the issue.
And his concerns about fluoride are filtering into other agencies' agendas. The Food and Drug Administration has announced it plans to ban ingestible fluoride pills and drops marketed to children. It's convening a public meeting on the issue on July 23.
The response has not always followed partisan lines.
When Kennedy appeared before a House Appropriations subcommittee in May, Rep. Mike Simpson of Idaho, a Republican and a dentist, said he'd seen the benefits of fluoride during his 22 years taking care of patients' teeth.
'If you are successful in banning fluoride, we better put a lot more money into dental education because we're going to need a whole lot more dentists,' Simpson said.
Kennedy didn't back down. 'We now know that virtually all the benefit is topical, and we can get that through mouthwashes,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Advocates worry new White House order on homelessness could hurt vets
Advocates worry new White House order on homelessness could hurt vets

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Advocates worry new White House order on homelessness could hurt vets

Advocates and critics are warning that a recent White House order aimed at getting homeless individuals off city streets and public parks could cause significant problems for efforts to help veterans without stable housing. They argue that the executive order, signed July 24, would force veterans into institutions without considering their available options and discourage individuals from seeking help for multiple, interrelated issues. 'Veterans fought for this country,' officials from the National Coalition for Homeless Veterans said in a statement on Friday. 'They have earned the dignity of a hand up in the way of investments in housing, mental health, and substance abuse treatment, and additional supportive services — not surveillance and detention.' President Donald Trump's executive order — 'Ending crime and disorder on America's streets' — would allow local officials to remove homeless individuals from public areas and permit those authorities to commit those Americans to drug treatment centers or other public health institutions. Advocates for homeless vets wary over proposed changes to VA programs 'Shifting homeless individuals into long-term institutional settings for humane treatment through the appropriate use of civil commitment will restore public order,' the president's order states. 'Surrendering our cities and citizens to disorder and fear is neither compassionate to the homeless nor other citizens.' The document also outlines ending support for 'housing first' policies, which administration officials argue 'deprioritize accountability and fail to promote treatment, recovery, and self-sufficiency.' Homeless advocates have said that research shows the opposite. They insist that providing stable housing to individuals facing a host of mental health and financial problems gives them more security to clean up other aspects of their lives without worrying about where they will sleep at night. 'This deprives people of their basic rights and makes it harder to solve homelessness,' officials from the National Homelessness Law Center said in a statement shortly after the White House release. 'This executive order is rooted in outdated, racist myths about homelessness and will undoubtedly make homelessness worse.' The Department of Housing and Urban Development's annual point-in-time count conducted in early 2024 found roughly 33,000 veterans living on the street without stable housing, a reduction of about 2,700 individuals from the 2023 count. That number is less than half the estimated 74,000 homeless veterans nationwide in 2010, when then-President Barack Obama announced a federal government goal of ending veteran homelessness. But some areas — in particular, Los Angeles — have struggled to reduce those totals further in recent years. Advocates have pushed for more resources and fewer restrictions for community groups, but conservatives have questioned whether more funding will produce continued results. Officials from NCHV warned that involuntary hospitalization and institutionalization of homeless individuals instead of relying on community coordination of care may actually worsen the problem. 'For veterans — many of whom live with service-connected trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder or other mental health conditions — forced treatment can retraumatize rather than heal,' they said in their statement. 'Moreover, institutionalization is often more expensive than providing housing and outpatient care and can be traumatic for individuals who are mandated into treatment settings without their consent. Veterans deserve access to voluntary, trauma-informed care in community settings, not confinement.' Trump's executive order drew immediate condemnation from Democratic critics, who said it was motivated by cost-cutting illusions rather than sound problem-solving policies. 'Hundreds of thousands of veterans rely on the incredibly successful HUD and VA housing assistance programs,' House Veterans' Affairs Committee ranking member Mark Takano, D-Calif., said. 'This directive misdiagnoses the root causes of homelessness – particularly among veterans – and proposes punitive measures that will punish and endanger the very people it claims to help. 'Instead of getting veterans off the street, this misguided approach delays that process and puts handcuffs on those vulnerable veterans. It will exacerbate the homelessness crisis.' White House and Department of Justice officials have not yet outlined exactly how the new order will be enforced, and when local officials might be able to change their approach to homeless response without legal concerns. Veterans Affairs officials have not announced any changes in their grant programs or assistance efforts as a result of the new order. In May, VA Secretary Doug Collins said that officials had begun work on Trump's ideas for a new 'National Center for Warrior Independence' in Los Angeles to provide more housing and employment support for the estimated 3,000 homeless veterans living there. He also promised continued focus on the issue in coming months. Solve the daily Crossword

Top medical group presses RFK Jr. to keep health screening panel
Top medical group presses RFK Jr. to keep health screening panel

The Hill

time40 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Top medical group presses RFK Jr. to keep health screening panel

A top U.S. health lobbying group is calling on Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to not dismiss a preventive task force following a report he's planning to remove all of its members in the same way he ousted an entire vaccine advisory board earlier this year. The American Medical Association (AMA) wrote to Kennedy on Sunday to express its 'deep concern' over reporting that Kennedy is planning to dismiss all members of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). 'USPSTF members have been selected through an open, public nomination process and are nationally recognized experts in primary care, prevention and evidence-based medicine. They serve on a volunteer basis, dedicating their time to help reduce disease and improve the health of all Americans—a mission well-aligned with the Make America Healthy Again initiative,' the AMA wrote in a letter to Kennedy. The Wall Street Journal reported late last week that Kennedy was planning to dismiss the entire 16-member panel for being too 'woke' in his eyes, citing people familiar with the decision. The report comes after Kennedy in June dismissed the entire Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, replacing the members with some known spreaders of vaccine information. When reached for comment by The Hill, a spokesperson the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said, 'No final decision has been made on how the USPSTF can better support HHS' mandate to Make America Healthy Again.' Just last month, the USPSTF's powers to make recommendations survived legal scrutiny when the Supreme Court upheld their constitutionality. Plaintiffs in the case argued the panel was unconstitutional. The case began when a Texas business did not wish to cover HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, which is recommended by the USPSTF. 'Given the essential role USPSTF members play in weighing the benefits and harms of preventive services such as screenings, behavioral counseling, and preventive medications, and making evidence-based recommendations for implementation in primary care settings, we urge you to keep the previously appointed USPSTF members and continue the task force's regular meeting schedule to ensure recommendations are put forth, updated, and disseminated without delay,' the AMA told Kennedy.

RFK Jr. reportedly eyeing overhaul of cancer screening task force
RFK Jr. reportedly eyeing overhaul of cancer screening task force

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

RFK Jr. reportedly eyeing overhaul of cancer screening task force

(NewsNation) — Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is facing criticism over a reported plan to fire all 16 members of a federal advisory panel that helps determine which cancer screenings and preventive services insurers must cover at no cost to patients. The group in question, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, provides evidence-based recommendations on screenings such as breast and colon cancer and plays a role in shaping coverage for millions of Americans. The plan was first reported by the Wall Street Journal, which cited sources claiming Kennedy believes the plane is 'too woke.' NewsNation has not independently confirmed the potential firings but has requested a comment from the Department of Health and Human Services. FDA eyes warning about antidepressants during pregnancy AMA: Panel plays a 'critical, nonpartisan' role in patient health The American Medical Association wrote a letter to Kennedy expressing 'deep concern' over the potential dismissals. The AMA said the panel plays a 'critical, nonpartisan role in guiding physicians' efforts to prevent disease and improve the health of patients.' The organization is urging Kennedy to retain the previously appointed members and 'ensure their important work can continue without interruption.' AMA President Dr. Bobby Mukkamala has pushed back on criticism of the panel as well as claims that it's driven by partisan ideology. 'So the question is, why was this taken apart?' Mukkamala said. 'What was the motivation to do that? What did we think that these folks were doing wrong, that then somebody else may be perceived as doing it better, for reasons that we have no idea what makes this person wrong and what makes this person right. And that's where we're concerned.' Not allergic to poison ivy? Don't be so sure Task force accused of being 'too woke' Kennedy's reported plan comes in the wake of an article in the American Conservative Magazine, which accused the task force of harboring left-wing ideology. Kennedy has since postponed the panel's meeting scheduled this month. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store