
Dentists are struggling to counter RFK Jr. on fluoride
The impact the retreat from fluoridation has on oral health will show whether dentists are right, that a cavity crisis will follow, or whether Kennedy's view, that Americans can get the fluoride they need in toothpaste and mouthwash, will bear out.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, an agency within HHS, has held out fluoridation as one of the 10 greatest public health achievements of the 20th century, citing data that it reduces tooth decay by as much as 70 percent in children and tooth loss by as much as 60 percent in adults.
But Kennedy nonetheless believes the case to remove fluoride is urgent because of evidence that it can curtail children's brain development. It's a position bolstered by a report from the National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences during the Biden administration and an Obama-appointed federal judge last year — though the levels of fluoride they examined were higher than what Americans consume.
Dentists see it otherwise.
'This is revving up an anti-science narrative,' said Brett Kessler, the president of the American Dental Association, the country's leading dentists' group. 'There are ways to get fluoride in toothpaste, some of the foods we eat, some of the drinks we drink, topical fluoride mouthwashes. … But without fluoridated water you're already behind the eight ball because you've got vulnerable teeth.'
Dentists' case
Opposition to adding the cavity-fighting mineral to water — based on a mishmash of reasoning around the purity of the drinking supply, concerns about side effects and conspiracy theories — has long been a cause of some on the left.
Before Utah and Florida's moves, residents of Hawaii, New Jersey and Oregon were the least likely to have fluoride in their water, according to a review of 2022 data by the United Health Foundation, a philanthropy started by the insurer UnitedHealth Group to promote better public health.
(The same study found 79 percent of Floridians and 43 percent of Utahns drank fluoridated water.)
Health researchers have mostly found that low levels of fluoride, including the amounts found in drinking water systems across the U.S., are safe and can help fortify teeth against decay and other ailments.
Many communities began to fluoridate their water in the mid-1900s at the behest of voters and their local and state governments. In 1962, HHS started providing guidance on fluoride in drinking water, and the Environmental Protection Agency invoked the Safe Drinking Water Act years later to enforce these standards, though fluoridation is still done at states' discretion.
But research, much of it in China, has since prompted the Trump administration to question those standards. The findings suggest higher levels of fluoride in groundwater are linked to neurobehavioral issues and reduced IQ in children, but those results are not definitive due to study designs and methodology.
Opponents of fluoridation in blue jurisdictions like Portland, Oregon, and Hawaii, historically have made the case that the best water is the least touched by human hands.
'The attitude was, 'don't ruin our pure water,'' said Barry Taylor, the executive director of the Oregon Dental Association. He says the Chinese studies have only made convincing Oregonians otherwise harder because they've added 'a new element of doubt.'
Kessler contends the studies are not applicable to the U.S. because of the difference in fluoride levels and confounding variables. 'It could be lower IQ parents. It could be a lack of special foods that could help brain development. And it could just be DNA or genetics,' Kessler said.
Dental health advocates also see a flaw in Kennedy's case that mouthwash and toothpaste are all people need. They argue that some Americans don't use the products, either because they can't get to a store, can't afford them or because they choose not to, putting them at risk.
'This is a lot of forces coming together to undermine oral health for particularly people that are lower income or in areas that may not have as many resources to get the oral health care they need,' said Melissa Burroughs, senior director of public policy at CareQuest, an oral health advocacy group aligned with the dentists.
The American Dental Association's Kessler says the battle is far from over, pointing to the ADA's success this year in persuading state lawmakers to reject bills that would have banned fluoridation or otherwise impeded fluoridation efforts in 16 states across the political spectrum, including Hawaii.
Kennedy's campaign
Kennedy traveled to Salt Lake City in April to praise Utah for becoming the first state to ban fluoride in a state's water. The rule took effect in May.
'It makes no sense to have it in our water supply,' Kennedy said at a news conference with state lawmakers. 'I'm very, very proud of this state for being the first state to ban it, and I hope many more will come.'
Kennedy hasn't withdrawn Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance encouraging fluoridation but he's threatening to do so.
Earlier this year, he directed the CDC to reconvene the Community Preventive Services Task Force, an independent panel of experts, to study the issue.
And his concerns about fluoride are filtering into other agencies' agendas. The Food and Drug Administration has announced it plans to ban ingestible fluoride pills and drops marketed to children. It's convening a public meeting on the issue on July 23.
The response has not always followed partisan lines.
When Kennedy appeared before a House Appropriations subcommittee in May, Rep. Mike Simpson of Idaho, a Republican and a dentist, said he'd seen the benefits of fluoride during his 22 years taking care of patients' teeth.
'If you are successful in banning fluoride, we better put a lot more money into dental education because we're going to need a whole lot more dentists,' Simpson said.
Kennedy didn't back down. 'We now know that virtually all the benefit is topical, and we can get that through mouthwashes,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
19 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Millions Warned To Stay Out of Sun In 25 States: 'Lethal Temperatures'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The National Weather Service (NWS) has issued heat-related alerts for at least 25 states, with the agency warning millions of Americans to stay out of the sun and not to leave children or pets unattended in cars because of "lethal temperatures." Why It Matters The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) warns that extreme heat can trigger heat-related illnesses, particularly among seniors, young children, and people with chronic health conditions. Symptoms can range from intense sweating and muscle cramps to dizziness and nausea. According to the CDC, extreme heat causes more than 700 deaths annually in the U.S. Additionally, increasing temperatures can intensify ground-level ozone pollution, potentially creating further health concerns. What To Know Extreme heat warnings, which the NWS announces when "extremely dangerous heat conditions are expected or occurring," were issued for parts of eastern and southeastern Missouri, southern Illinois, western Tennessee and Kentucky, central and eastern Arkansas, northeastern and southeastern Louisiana, and the majority of Mississippi early on Wednesday. "Dangerously hot conditions," with heat index values—which measure how hot it feels when humidity and temperature are factored in—of 110F and above were expected across these areas, according to the agency. "Drink plenty of fluids, stay in an air-conditioned room, stay out of the sun, and check up on relatives and neighbors," the warnings said. "Do not leave young children and pets in unattended vehicles. Car interiors will reach lethal temperatures in a matter of minutes." At the same time, heat advisories, issued for "dangerous heat conditions that are not expected to reach warning criteria," spanned broad swathes of the South, Midwest, and Northeast on Wednesday morning, including parts of: Alabama Connecticut Florida Iowa Indiana Kansas Michigan Minnesota Massachusetts Nebraska New York Ohio Oklahoma Rhode Island South Dakota Texas West Virginia Wisconsin Heat index values were forecast to reach the upper 90s and in many cases cross the 100-degree threshold across these areas, according to the service. What People Are Saying National Weather Service said on X, Tuesday: "Dangerous, prolonged heat is expected across portions of the Central and Southeast U.S. through the end of July. Widespread Major to locally Extreme HeatRisk is expected, especially over the Mid-Mississippi, Lower Ohio Valleys, and the Mid South. "During hot and humid weather, your body's ability to cool itself is challenged in ways you may not expect. Stay #WeatherReady by learning the symptoms of Extreme Heat exposure and the appropriate responses." The National Weather Service forecast office, Memphis, Tennessee said on X, Tuesday: "An areawide Extreme Heat Warning is in effect tomorrow as heat index values exceed 110F. Yes, it gets hot every summer. However, that does not mean that these temperatures don't result in fatalities. Please, take breaks and hydrate if you must be outside this week." What Happens Next At the time of writing, the latest extreme heat warning was in effect until 9 p.m. CDT on Thursday. The NWS publishes forecast updates on its website regularly.


Axios
20 minutes ago
- Axios
MAHA-inspired Coke shift isn't a health win, nutritionists say
Nutrition leaders have this to say about Coca-Cola's decision to launch a U.S. product made with cane sugar: It won't make America healthier. Why it matters: President Trump's announcement last week that the company would pivot from corn syrup was as much about power and asserting leverage as it was about advancing the "Make America Healthy Again" agenda. It also reflected the movement's preoccupation with rooting out ingredients it deems harmful like corn syrup, seed oils or food colorants that — a strategy nutritionists say ignores the bigger point. The big picture: Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. may be correct that high-fructose corn syrup is a driver of obesity and other chronic disease, but physicians and food experts say alternatives like sugar cane and beet sugar also lead to weight gain and bad outcomes. "These one ingredient changes don't make these foods healthy," said Marion Nestle, professor emeritus of nutrition and public health at New York University. "They're not going to make any difference unless they change the dietary intake of what people are eating." Substituting cane sugar for high fructose corn syrup is more like a cosmetic change, said Priya Fielding-Singh, director of policy and programs at George Washington University's Global Food Institute. It "feels like a bit of a misplaced effort," she said. State of play: Coca-Cola said Tuesday that a new Coke offering made with cane sugar will appear on shelves this fall alongside traditional, high-fructose corn syrup Coke. Only it's not exactly "new." U.S. consumers have already been able to get cane-sugar Coke imported from Mexico. It's even made limited runs of "Passover Coke," made with sugar instead of corn syrup. Kennedy nonetheless welcomed the announcement, telling Axios in a statement that "Americans deserve access to the same natural foods that other countries enjoy and we are delivering that." The food industry has made other moves to align itself with MAHA's agenda. The Consumer Brands Association on Tuesday said it would encourage members to stop making products with artificial dyes by the end of 2027. The dairy industry this month committed to eliminating artificial dyes from ice creams. Fast-food chain Steak 'n Shake also announced earlier this year that it was "RFK"ing it's french fries by cooking them in beef tallow instead of seed oils. Zoom out: Scientific reviews show that ultra-processed foods can contribute to the development of chronic conditions like obesity, heart disease and diabetes. But replacing one ingredient — even if it's a highly processed ingredient — isn't going to change the fact that the food product is still ultra-processed. "It doesn't matter whether it has cane sugar or high fructose corn syrup —it's still sugar," Nestle said. "They're fine as occasional treats, but nobody should be drinking liters of soda and nobody should be eating quarts of ice cream" even after MAHA-influenced ingredient changes. Cutting back the sodium content in foods, reducing intake of ultra-processed foods and making fresh produce more affordable are some interventions that could actually improve population health, Nestle added. Reality check: Kennedy speaks frequently about reducing Americans' intake of ultra-processed foods, and has championed state efforts to restrict SNAP benefits from being used to purchase soda. Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey told investors in April that the company is making progress on reducing sugar in its beverages by changing recipes and using global marketing and distribution resources to increase "interest in our ever-expanding portfolio."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A judge blocked a rule to drop medical debt from credit reports. What now?
A recent federal court ruling overturned a Biden-era ban on medical debt in credit reports just as access to healthcare and health insurance is becoming more fragile. The decision could thwart the hopes of an estimated 15 million Americans who might have seen some relief ahead of expected hikes to healthcare premiums, the end of enhanced marketplace subsidies, and an anticipated increase in the number of Americans without insurance. 'We're really concerned that with the loss of insurance altogether, or healthcare becoming more expensive, we're just going to see more medical debt,' said Mona Shah, the senior director of policy and strategy at Community Catalyst, a national nonprofit healthcare advocacy organization. 'With this protection removed around credit reporting, it's going to impact people's overall economic well-being and ability to thrive.' A $49 billion reversal Earlier this month, a federal judge blocked a rule from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which had never taken effect, that would have stopped medical bills from appearing on credit reports and barred lenders from using such data to make lending decisions. The CFPB estimated the change could raise impacted consumers' credit scores by an average of 20 points. Healthcare providers typically don't report missed medical bills directly to credit bureaus, according to Equifax, so medical debt often doesn't wind up on a credit report until it's been reported to a collections agency. However, two trade associations successfully argued that the CFPB had overstepped its authority. Under the Trump administration, the CFPB also asked for the rule to be thrown out. In a July 11 ruling, Judge Sean Jordan of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas agreed with the trade groups. The ruling comes at an especially precarious time in healthcare. The tax bill signed into law by President Trump this month is expected to leave 10 million Americans without health insurance by 2034, largely due to changes in Medicaid. Meanwhile, enhanced premium tax credits that helped make Affordable Care Act marketplace coverage more affordable will expire at the end of this year after they were not extended in the tax bill, a change that will help contribute to the largest premium increases seen in years in 2026. The end of the subsidies is expected to leave an estimated 4.2 million people uninsured. 'Having more people lose Medicaid and become uninsured, and also lower-income adults losing subsidized marketplace coverage and becoming uninsured, is going to significantly increase medical debt,' said Fredric Blavin, a senior fellow and researcher at the Urban Institute, a Washington-based think tank. Under the Biden administration, the CFPB estimated that removing medical bill information could have wiped $49 billion off the credit reports of about 15 million Americans, noting that medical billing information often contained errors and was a poor predictor of a consumer's creditworthiness. Lower credit scores can damage a person's ability to rent a home, obtain a credit card with a favorable rate, and even impact their job search. In public comments supporting the rule, many Americans shared stories of how medical bills had weighed on their credit, including cancer patients, people who had been in car wrecks, and more. Read more: How are credit scores calculated? Sign up for the Mind Your Money weekly newsletter By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy What should consumers do now? Credit reporting agencies had already voluntarily decided in April 2023 to wipe medical collection debt from consumer credit reports if the balance was below $500. A year earlier, paid medical collection debt was also dropped from credit reports, and consumers were given one year to pay down medical collection debt before it started appearing on their credit reports, rather than six months. Additionally, the CFPB noted that FICO and VantageScore had previously both 'decreased the degree to which medical bills impact a consumer's score.' These combined changes dropped medical debt in collections from most consumers' credit reports, the Urban Institute found, leaving about 4.1% of adults with such data on their records in August 2024, down from 12.6% in February 2022. Additionally, 14 states have provisions in place to remove medical collection debt from credit reports. 'We expect more states to take the same initiative moving forward,' said Breno Braga, a senior fellow and researcher at the Urban Institute. Still, consumers are left with the onerous job of keeping up with these changes and staying on top of their credit as they face mounting bills — along with the resumption of delinquent student loans hitting credit scores. Consumers should regularly check their mail and email for information concerning their credit, while also carefully examining the bills to determine what they owe and what they might be able to contest. When it comes to unaffordable medical care, consumers can ask healthcare providers about financial assistance options. Read more: How to check your credit score for free 'It's really just vigilance and trying to understand what's available in terms of assistance,' said Sarah Chenven, the CEO of Working Credit, a nonprofit organization that helps people build good credit. Consumers should also be cautious about signing up for medical credit cards with a 'deferred interest', said Shah with Community Catalyst, which may subject them to high, retroactive interest charges if they don't pay their bill in a certain promotional period. 'When patients are now faced with these difficult decisions of not being able to pay off these bills right away — worried about how it's going to impact their credit scores, losing their insurance, still needing healthcare — they may be lured into signing up for one of these payment products,' said Shah. Emma Ockerman is a reporter covering the economy and labor for Yahoo Finance. You can reach her at Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data