Trump wants us to spend a bomb on defence. We should think twice
Has some new existential threat to each of the countries emerged? Or is the fear that a few countries may come under foreign invasion but, since we don't know which few it will be, all of us are arming ourselves to the teeth just in case?
Let's assume we spend these many trillions on armaments rather than lesser worries such as health, education and climate change, and nothing untoward occurs. Will this prove the money was well spent, or that it was a complete waste? We stocked up for a party, but no one came. We'll never know.
Unsurprisingly, this strange behaviour was in response to a pronouncement of Donald Trump, who told us and his other presumed allies we should no longer rely on America's defence shield, but spend more on our own security.
Initially, his demand was for us to increase our spending from 2 per cent of national income to 3 per cent, a rise of about $28 billion a year. This would swell defence spending by more than half, with the increase almost as much as federal spending on public hospitals.
But then Trump's Defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, said the countries of South-East Asia should boost their spending to 5 per cent of national income.
The European members of NATO have been told the US will be shifting forces away from Europe, so they should greatly increase their own spending. They've agreed to increase it to 3.5 per cent. In Britain's case, that would be up from a bit more than 2 per cent.
It's remarkable how few people have remarked on what a strange way this is to decide how much more needs to be spent. You'd think the defence people would decide it based on the cost of the extra weapons and programs they judged to be needed to complete our security.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
9 News
25 minutes ago
- 9 News
Trump lashes out over Epstein files
Trump hints at timeline for tariffs on $1.6 billion of Aussie exports US President Donald Trump has said he will "probably" impose tariffs on pharmaceutical drug imports from the end of July.
ABC News
25 minutes ago
- ABC News
How experts say Donald Trump set his own trap on the Jeffrey Epstein files
Donald Trump's derision of some supporters as "weaklings" is the latest spray in an ongoing attempt to shift the public conversation past calls for the full release of files linked to the Jeffrey Epstein case. His suggestion that calls for further releases are "stupid" resembles past crisis management tactics the president has employed, but experts say this approach could fall flat with some of his most fervent supporters. Here's what's going on. A large number of Mr Trump's own MAGA base are angry over an announcement by the Department of Justice that no more files on the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and his death in prison will be released. The department said Epstein did not maintain a "client list" of associates to whom underage girls were trafficked. The list has been central to several conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein, and, by extension, beliefs in the existence of a shadowy "deep state" Mr Trump and allies have promised to expose. Many stalwart supporters of the president, including conservative commentators Alex Jones and Laura Loomer, have expressed distrust over the administration's announcement that the list does not exist. They point to previous comments by Attorney-General Pam Bondi, which appeared to suggest she had the client list on her desk, and the release of a "first phase" of declassified Epstein files, which implied there would be more to come. It's unclear. While he campaigned on a promise to publish all documents compiled during the investigation into Epstein, he appears now to be supportive of his administration withholding them. In the last fortnight, he has oscillated between lashing out at his supporters for their interest in the issue, claiming the case files are a hoax, and suggesting Ms Bondi should publish what she believes to be "credible". But none of the strategies have successfully called the MAGA base off the trail. A Truth Social post on Saturday, which claimed the Democratic Party had concocted the files to use against him, did little to mollify his furious supporters. For the first time in the platform's history, the president was ratioed. That is, comments on the post outweighed likes by roughly 4,700 — a sign of widespread disapproval among his most loyal supporters. "I don't understand what the interest or what the fascination is," he told reporters on Tuesday when the furore had not died down. Asked whether Ms Bondi has told him if his name was in the Epstein files, Mr Trump said no. He went on to repeat his claim that there were credibility issues with the documents, suggesting without citing evidence, they were "made up" by former FBI director James Comey and former presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. "But she's handled it very well, and it's going to be up to her, whatever she thinks is credible, she should release, yeah," he said. When it had become clear the hoax claim had not stuck, Mr Trump resorted to hurling insults at his MAGA base. "… All these people want to talk about … is the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax," he wrote in a screed on Truth Social on Wednesday. He later told reporters those calling for the release of files were "some stupid Republicans" who were "wasting their time". The political crisis has proven to be especially challenging for Trump to hose down, because of its connection to conspiracy theories. The value of conspiratorial fabrications is they help people get political power — something Mr Trump has been skilled in exploiting, said Russell Muirhead, who teaches political science at Dartmouth College. Mr Trump needs to come forward with truth and transparency on the topic, or risk losing the faith of large segments of his most enthusiastic and devoted supporters, Dr Muirhead said. Harry Melkonian, an honorary associate at the United States Studies Centre, told ABC News the president was now "reaping what he's sown". "He certainly fed all of this about Epstein, and that he was going to be transparent about it, release everything about it," Dr Melkonian said. "And now that he's in a position of authority, he says, 'Well, there's nothing to release', and his attorney-general says there's nothing to release, there is no such list." At a conservative student action summit on Friday, right-wing podcaster Steve Bannon estimated Mr Trump was at risk of losing 10 per cent of the MAGA movement if he did not release the promised client list. Recent polling suggests the blow to his popularity could be greater. A Quinnipiac University poll of 1,290 registered voters published on Wednesday found 35 per cent of self-identified Republicans disapproved of Mr Trump's handling of the issue. Similarly, A YouGov-Economist poll of 1,680 citizens released on Tuesday found 79 per cent of Americans believe all case documents should be released. "It could be extremely damaging because he has these hardcore MAGA supporters who have been with him through thick and thin," Dr Melkonian said. "It's very dangerous for a politician to alienate that hardcore [base]." But experts have warned providing more daylight could be a poisoned chalice for the president. "For some portion of this set of conspiracy theory believers, no amount of contradictory evidence will ever be enough," said Josephine Lukito, who studies conspiracy theorists at the University of Texas at Austin. Dr Melkonian agreed that the Trump administration has found itself in a "very difficult catch 22". "[They've] convinced people that they're in a cover-up," he said. "No matter what they do, it's going to inflame this group of people. Matt Dallek, a political scientist at George Washington University, said it would be difficult for the Trump administration to wind back previous commentary on the conspiracy theory. "The faulty assumption Trump and others make is they can peddle conspiracy theories without any blowback," said Dr Dallek. "The Epstein case is a neat encapsulation that it is hard to put the genie back in the bottle." ABC/AP
News.com.au
25 minutes ago
- News.com.au
US senators approve $9 billion of Elon Musk's federal cuts
The US Senate approved early Thursday a package of spending cuts proposed by President Donald Trump that would cancel more than $9 billion in funding for foreign aid programs and public broadcasting. The upper chamber of Congress green-lit the measure in what was seen as the first test of how easily lawmakers could usher into law savings sought by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) -- in the aftermath of the tech mogul's acrimonious exit from the government. Despite the cutbacks' unpopularity in some sections of both parties, the Republican-led Senate passed the measure with 51 votes for and 48 against in a session that went more than two hours past midnight. The version of the text passed in June by the House of Representatives sought to eliminate $400 million in funding allocated to health programs, including the PEPFAR global AIDS relief fund created by then-president George W. Bush. But defunding PEPFAR -- which has saved an estimated 26 million lives -- was seen as a nonstarter among a handful of moderate Republican senators, and the proposal was dropped. South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham told AFP the bill was consistent with Trump's promises to cut spending. "I've been a big fan of the foreign aid accounts... I'm a big hawkish guy, but you need foreign aid. You need soft power," he said. "But when you start spending money on a bunch of junk, and liberal programs disconnected from the purpose of the aid package, it makes it difficult on a guy like me." The bill now goes back to the House for final approval, with lawmakers up against the clock. Congress, which had already allocated the money, has to approve the cuts by Friday or the White House must spend the cash as originally intended. Legislation to claw back money already approved by Congress -- known as a "rescissions package" -- is extremely rare, and no such measure has passed in decades. - 'Surrendering powers' - Around a dozen Republicans had voiced concerns about allowing the White House to dictate spending cuts, placing them in the crosshairs of Trump, who last week threatened to withhold his endorsements from any rebels. The vote was the first in what Republicans have touted as a potential series of packages codifying the spending cuts made by DOGE. Musk was tapped by Trump to lead the task force after the tech billionaire spent $290 million helping him get elected. The SpaceX and Tesla boss boasted that he would be able to save $2 trillion in federal spending -- but left the White House under a cloud in late May as he feuded with Trump over deficits and spending. DOGE acknowledges that it has saved taxpayers just $190 billion -- and fact checkers even see that claim as dubious, given previous inaccuracies in its accounting. The rescissions package slashes around $8 billion in foreign aid, with much of that approved for humanitarian organization USAID, one of DOGE's first targets. Around $1 billion is to be taken back from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which helps fund National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), as well as more than 1,500 local radio and television stations. Conservatives often accuse PBS and NPR of bias, and Trump signed an executive order in May to cease federal funding for both networks. Democrats say cutting the funding will not meaningfully reduce the deficit, but instead dismantle a trusted source of information for millions of Americans. "It is yet another example of the spirit and ideals of our Constitution being undermined in a terrible way. We are a nation that believes that (Congress) has a real role," New Jersey Senator Cory Booker told AFP. "And this is a bunch of my colleagues in thrall of the president, surrendering the powers of us, and the urgency for us to work together and do it in a bipartisan way to improve budgets."
