A peaceful protest on Ashley Terrace – but with a serious message
On Wednesday evening locals took to the streets in a peaceful protest drawing attention to the amount of traffic, the speed of the traffic and the lack of pedestrian crossings.
An 80-year-old woman was seriously injured at the junction of Ashley Terrace on 28 April.
Cllr Christopher Cowdy said to The Edinburgh Reporter: 'The biggest problem is lack of resources in the council. So when I came here in 2022 there was already a pedestrian crossing programme. There were hundreds of crossings being promised. But within a year, when I was on the Transport Committee that had already run over two years late, because they had bitten off more than they could chew, they said, and they were lacking in resources.
'So I know that the city council is short of money, and it's running on a budget deficit about £50 million a year, and trying and trying to make that up, and trying to get the resources to provide all of the crossings for all of the schools across the entire city is very difficult.'
David Hunter of Living Streets said: 'I think it's fantastic to see. I think pedestrians often don't kick up as much of a fuss as maybe other groups do, so it's great to see it mobilised.
'There must be quite a strength of feeling to have this amount of support.
'But of course there has been a really serious injury to an old lady here. You can see the speed, some of this traffic's going at. I think we really need a strategy for the whole city. I would like to see more money going into these kind of routine improvements, particularly around schools, and I think it would get a lot of public support.'
Despite the council promising crossings three years ago nothing has happened, although Cllr Stephen Jenkinson the Transport Convener has said that 'Councillor Stephen Jenkinson, Transport and Environment 'pedestrian safety across the city is a priority'
He said: 'I fully understand the safety concerns raised by the community in relation to the junction at Ashley Terrace and Harrison Gardens, particularly given the recent road traffic accident which took place there.
'As outlined in the Road Safety Delivery Plan, there are plans in place for two footpath build-outs on Ashley Terrace. Unfortunately, we have experienced some delays due to necessary design revisions and coordination with other services.
'In relation to Ashley Terrace, the installation of a build-out directly in front of the school entrance requires the relocation of a nearby bin hub. This is being progressed through a Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) by the Waste team, and we are awaiting further updates from them.'
Like this:
Like
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
4 days ago
- Scotsman
Bid to halt Edinburgh George Street revamp defeated
A bid to scrap the £35 million plans to revamp Edinburgh's George Street has been rejected by councillors. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The city's transport and environment committee voted down a Tory proposal that because of the lack of any confirmed funding for the project, the council should opt for a maintenance-only approach instead. The George Street plans are to remove parking and reroute buses, turning it into a pedestrian and cycle zone with vehicles excluded for most of the day. Pavements are to be widened and trees planted at each end of the street, along with planters and benches. The full revamp of George Street would see the current parking down the centre of the street removed, buses rerouted, the pavement widened and vehicles excluded for most of the day. | supplied Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad City Centre Tory councillor Joanna Mowat said: 'The elephant in the room is we still don't have any money and are reliant on applying to third parties and having this money granted to us before we can put a single shovel in the ground.' She said a report to the committee made clear it would cost £10.5m to carry out maintenance to bring George Street up to standard. And she argued that could be paid for with the parking revenue from the street of £3.2m a year. 'We should just be realistic - that's what we've got, that's what we can afford, let's do the maintenance schedule from the parking income rather than having a £35m fantasy budget. 'I don't see, given the financial climate we're in and the pressures on government funding, that we're suddenly going to get this money.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But officers said a 'do minimum' scheme would not meet the criteria for external funding. And committee convener Stephen Jenkinson said: 'It's perfectly normal not to have all the funds sitting in a bank account ready to be spent. As you move through developing a project, at various different stages you will draw down funding both internal and external.' Some of the money for the George Street revamp is likely to come from the city's planned Visitor Levy; there could also be contributions from developers; and the main source is expected to be various Scottish Government and Transport Scotland funding channels. The committee agreed to proceed with the full scheme to the next stage, advertising the road traffic orders, while keeping options open for future cost savings, for example by changing some of the materials. But it was agreed to rule out two 'do minimum' options - the maintenance-only proposal advocated by the Tories and another which would include the removal of parking. However, SNP transport spokesman Neil Gardiner said: 'This project needs a lot of scrutiny. Until we understand the money side of it we should not be taking any of the options off at this stage.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He said it was possible the money could be better used elsewhere. "We will make our decision on whether to proceed or not on the basis of future reports." Lib Dem councillor Hal Osler said she was ' deeply concerned' about the level of funding. She said: 'Of course, as a council, we should have aspiration and we should bring forward something that isn't just a 'do minimum' approach. But we have to be realistic about the situation we're in and this is public funding. We do have to make a decision whether it is actually going to be worth spending £35m on something.' Green councillor Chas Booth said: 'We share a lot of people's concerns about the cost of this project but the question is: What do we do about that? 'The Conservative position is to say 'Scrap the whole scheme' - but we've heard from officers that might actually increase the financial exposure of the council. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We've heard there is the potential for external funding if we proceed with this scheme and I think that's the right thing to do. And we've heard from officers that, if that financing is not available they will come back to us for a further decision.' The George Street Association, which represents the street's businesses and other organisations, gave its backing to the full revamp. In a written submission, association chair Dr William Duncan said the other options simply deferred essential infrastructure work that will need to be done He said: 'George Street should look and operate very much better than it currently does. Planning its transformation has been under discussion for far too many years and it needs to move forward at pace to deliver the high-quality changes needed for the future success of this iconic 'go to place,' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We do not agree with those who might want to put this project on hold or not to proceed, because the physical condition of the public realm in George Street has deteriorated due to lack of investment for decades, meaning that status quo is not an acceptable or credible alternative. 'The need has gone beyond a facelift – the street needs major work done and the longer this is delayed the more extensive and expensive it will be.' Afterwards, Cllr Jenkinson said he was pleased the committee had agreed to move forward with the project. "This is a unique opportunity to bring one of Edinburgh's most important streets into the modern world whilst still maintaining its unique history and features. "The wider potential improvements are vast, from benefits to local residents and businesses to enhancing Edinburgh as a visitor destination, and beyond – we're on our way to delivering a bold new vision for George Street and our city centre.'
Scotsman
5 days ago
- Scotsman
Labour prospects of 10th councillor at by-election look slim
At the moment Labour heads a coalition administration in the City Chambers despite only having nine councillors in its group The electorate of Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart will have the opportunity tomorrow to elect a councillor to fill the vacancy brought about by the untimely death of the sitting Labour Councillor, Val Walker. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... However, Labour's prospects of filling the vacant position are in some doubt to say the least. Last time around in May 2022, the Conservative candidate Christopher Cowdy came first in the Single Transferable Vote election and the Tories are confident that their candidate in the current contest will do likewise. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad At the moment Labour forms the administration up in the High Street despite only having nine councillors in its group. Edinburgh City Council is comprised of 63 councillors and after tomorrow's election that number will be restored, but Labour, unfortunately for them, are unlikely to increase their number to ten. Of course, it is remarkable that they form the administration in the first place and only do so with the support of the Liberal Democrat and Conservative groups who banded together to thwart the aspirations of the SNP/Greens who had the combined total of 29 councillors, just three short of an outright majority. The SNP and Greens assumed that they, and not Labour, would form the administration – with some justification I might add. So why did the Liberal Democrats and the Tories decide to use their combined forces to catapult Labour into power and block the SNP's bid for the spoils? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It has been said that both those parties are 'Unionist' and so would naturally want to limit to the role of a party of 'Independence' to that of a by-stander but there would seem to be more to it than that. After all, when I was fortunate to lead the SNP group in the City Chambers, I successfully negotiated coalition deals with first the Liberal Democrats in 2007 and then Labour in 2012, with both coalitions lasting their full term of five years. So it would appear that the reluctance to allow the SNP to run the council along with the Greens was borne out of resentment at the way they were treated by the SNP when it formed the previous administration with the Labour Group. Accusations of arrogance and failure to consider proposals from others were cited as examples of how some SNP members in that particular administration dealt with members from other groups and the Liberal Democrats and Tories did not fancy more of the same, thank you very much. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad So, the outcome of tomorrow's by-election will have no bearing on who runs the council because that ship has already sailed and the only way that it can be sunk is if the Labour Group scuttle it by so incensing their two political allies, the Lib Dems and the Tories, to the extent that they jump ship. Even the current Labour group, inexperienced as it is, surely cannot be so foolish as to jeopardise its position – after all the opportunity to run a council with nine members out of a total of 63 doesn't land in your lap every day!
Scotsman
5 days ago
- Scotsman
Edinburgh's George Street revamp includes £4.8 million for anti-terrorism measures
The revamp of Edinburgh's George Street as a largely pedestrianised area will include £4.8 million worth of reinforced bollards and super-strong planters to stop terrorist attacks by vehicles being driven into crowds. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The "Hostile Vehicle Measures" (HVM) will be installed at all junctions along the street. And the bollards on the carriageway will also double as a method of controlling access, being raised or lowered to allow vehicles into the area at the permitted times. The move follows government anti-terrorist advice and is designed to prevent incidents like the attacks on Christmas markets in Europe, when people were killed by vehicles driven into crowds. The bollards and planters at the junctions are reinforced in case of a terrorist attack | City of Edinburgh Council Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The bollards and planters will look like normal street furniture but they will have reinforced foundations so they can block even heavy vehicles. Transport convener Stephen Jenkinson said: "If someone decides to drive a car into one of these planters, it's going to wreck the car." Councillors will this week be urged to back the £35 million George Street scheme - which would see parking removed, vehicles excluded from the street between 10.30am and 7pm Monday-Saturday and 12.30-7pm on Sundays and trees planted at each end of the street. But they will also be asked to keep options open for potential future savings. However, there appears to be consensus that the anti-terrorist measures must be kept as a crucial part of the plans. Cllr Jenkinson said: "We're all aware of the terrorist incidents there have been, and it's the one aspect of the project that unites all the parties - that we need to ensure, whatever we do with George Street, that it is safe. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Unfortunately we live in a world these days where we have to consider hostile vehicles and ensure we have mitigation in place. 'The pavements are going to be significantly widened on both sides and the concept design is that it will be a much more outdoor cafe type culture in George Street, so the street will be used in a different way and there will be people not just walking, but also sitting enjoying George Street. 'An assessment of the plans has been done by officials in the Scottish and UK governments and the Home and this is the recommendation that's come from above - that when we design streets we have to ensure we are protecting pedestrians and taking these issues into consideration." In London in 2017, eight people were killed and 48 injured when attackers ploughed into pedestrians on London Bridge in a hired van before launching a deadly knife attack in nearby Borough Market. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad On 20 December 2024, an SUV was driven into a crowd at the Christmas market in Magdeburg, Germany, killing five people and injuring around 300 others. And there had been previous Christmas market attacks in other European cities, including Berlin in 2016, when a truck was deliberately driven into the crowd, leaving 12 dead and 56 others injured. Lib Dem transport spokesman Kevin Lang agreed the HVM measures were essential for George Street. He said: 'One area we definitely o not want to be scrimping and saving on is the security measures planned at the junctions, which would effectively prevent vehicles from driving through what is going to become a pedestrianised area. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Given the events we have seen, not just in the UK but in other parts of the world, I think we need to recognise that this is a high profile street in Edinburgh and as part of the improvements there is significant investment planned in these measures to stop heavy vehicles from getting access. 'When we are looking at how to save money, which is a legitmate thing to focus on - we're very keen we get absolute value for money, one area we definitely don't want to see being removed are these safety measures. 'Whatever way you look at it, the number one most important thing is protecting the safety of the people who are using George Street. 'I think we need to recognise that if we're investing in George Street there is always the potential it becomes a high profile target and if we are moving forward with pedestrianisation that every measure is taken to ensure pubic safety comes first.'
