Conservatives will look to amend Government welfare Bill
Ministers have warned there will be costs to their backtracking on the plans, as Downing Street and the Treasury will be looking to cover the spending shortfall left by the decision.
The Tories will look to lay amendments to the legislation – set to be renamed the Universal Credit Bill – and party leader Mrs Badenoch is due to deliver a speech on welfare on Thursday.
Among the amendments the Conservatives will propose is a requirement for eligibility for Pip to be determined by a face-to-face meeting, rather than virtually.
As part of the Government's reforms, the Department for Work and Pensions has proposed a new 'severe conditions criteria' for universal credit.
Claimants in this category will be entitled to a higher rate of the benefit, and will not be routinely reassessed to receive money.
Another of the Conservatives' amendments would prevent somebody from being classed as having a severe condition for the purpose of universal credit only by having anxiety, mild depression, or ADHD.
The third amendment would block the increase in universal credit and restrict Pip for some people who are not British citizens.
In her welfare speech, Mrs Badenoch is expected to say that the Conservatives are 'the only party that is prepared to take the tough decisions to get spending under control'.
'I have no doubt that, emboldened by their success in forcing Starmer to U-turn last week, Labour's backbench MPs will now be eyeing up more concessions,' she will say.
The original welfare proposals had been part of a package that ministers expected would save up to £5 billion a year, and economists are now warning that tax rises are likely to plug the gap left by the concessions to rebels.
On Friday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves admitted that the fallout over the Government's welfare Bill had been 'damaging' and did not rule out tax rises in the autumn budget.
It came after images of the Chancellor crying during Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday spooked the financial markets and led to questions about her future, although a spokesman said she was upset by a personal matter.
In an interview with The Guardian, Ms Reeves said it would be 'irresponsible' to rule out the idea of tax rises and warned 'there are costs to what happened' with the welfare Bill.
The Sunday Times reported that the two-child benefit cap could be unlikely to be scrapped – as many Labour backbenchers want – as ministers look to balance the finances.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
37 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Pubs in Scotland continue to struggle despite heatwave boost for businesses
EXCLUSIVE: Hospitality chiefs have called on the SNP Government to reform the business rates system which puts bars north of the Border at a "competitive disadvantage" to those in England. Pubs across Scotland are continuing to struggle due to rising costs despite enjoying a bumper weekend as a heatwave grips the country. Hospitality chiefs have today called on the SNP Government to reform the business rates system which puts bars north of the Border at a "competitive disadvantage" compared to those in England. UKHospitality Scotland, which represents members of the licensed trade, said the industry was being squeezed by sky-high energy bills and the impact of employer National Insurance contributions (NICs) being hiked by the UK Government. The trade body warned pubs and bars were now shedding jobs as a result of the NIC hike and is demanding a rethink ahead of the autumn Budget. Pubs are currently closing across Britain at a rate of one a day. The Record previously revealed how 56 bars closed for good in Scotland last year, compared to 42 that shut down in 2023. Around 1,000 pubs have closed north of the border over the last 20 years, with the total dropping from the more than 5,000 operating in 2004. In a letter to Keir Starmer, the trade body warned the 2024 Budget had directly contributed to a reversal in hospitality's ability to create jobs. Between October 2024 and May 2025, the sector lost 69,000 jobs across the UK. In the same period the previous year, hospitality created an additional 18,000 jobs. Leon Thompson, Executive Director of UKHospitality Scotland, said: "The damaging impact of increasing employer National Insurance contributions (NICs) is being felt by businesses and teams across Scotland, with thousands of Scottish hospitality jobs undoubtedly lost since the Budget. "While the damage caused by employer NICs was a decision made in Westminster, we still need Holyrood to step up and back our businesses with vital support. "The Scottish Government needs to speed up in delivering its promise to reform the broken business rates system, before it's too late and Scottish businesses are put at a further competitive disadvantage to those in England. "It's also critical that the Scottish Government maintains and extends business rates relief for the sector at the Scottish Budget later this year - this is the lifeline our venues need." Kate Nicholls, chair of UKHospitality, said: "In the years following the financial crisis we created one in five net new jobs and today employ 3.5 million people. The Government needs sectors like hospitality to create jobs and meet their ambition to get more people back into work. "We have a proven track record of being able to deliver those jobs in every part of the country and for people from all backgrounds. "The NICs change was socially regressive and had a disproportionate effect on entry level jobs." Shona Robison, the Finance Secretary, said: "Businesses are being hit by the impact of the UK Government's decision to raise employers' National Insurance contributions and rising energy costs continue to bite hard. "While many levers to grow Scotland's economy lie with the UK Government, we are providing a package of non-domestic rates reliefs worth an estimated £733 million in 2025-26, including 40% relief – capped at £110,000 per business – for hospitality premises liable for the Basic Property Rate. "Around half of properties in the retail, hospitality and leisure sectors also continue to be eligible for 100% Small Business Bonus Scheme relief – the most generous small business rates relief in the UK.'
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
378 pub closures expected across UK as industry body issues alert
Thousands of jobs could be lost in the fray as pubs are finding it 'impossible' to turn a profit The UK faces the prospect of losing more than one boozer daily, as the British Beer and Pub Association (BBPA) pleads with ministers to slash the tax and regulatory burden weighing down the hospitality sector. The organisation predicts 378 pubs will be forced to call last orders permanently across England, Wales and Scotland. Currently, the scorching weather has provided a welcome lift for pub trade as Brits rush to beer gardens to soak up the sun with a refreshing drink. However, most of the of cash flowing into pubs is making its way straight to the Treasury, industry experts explained. The association revealed that for every £3 spent at a pub, £1 heads directly "to the tax man". The BBPA also highlighted the knock-on impact these shutdowns will have on hospitality employment, breweries and even agricultural workers. The BBPA's statistics represent a troubling jump from last year's data, which recorded 350 pub closures. The organisation attributes this surge to hefty business rates imposed on establishments alongside other pub-specific expenses such as beer duty and VAT. Compounding matters is the employer's national insurance contributions hike introduced in April and fresh waste disposal regulations that have ramped up expenses for glass bottle recycling. BBPA members produce 90% of British beer and operate over 20,000 pubs, according to Sky News. The association cautioned that these closures could result in more than 5,600 job losses. Emma McClarkin, the chief executive of the BBPA, said: 'Pubs are trading well but most of the money that goes into the till goes straight back out in bills and taxes. "For many it's impossible to make a profit which all too often leads to pubs turning off the lights for the last time. When a pub closes it puts people out of a job, deprives communities of their heart and soul, and hurts the local economy. "However, it's not too late to change this sad state of affairs. We know Government recognises the economic and social value of pubs and we're not asking for special treatment, we just want the sector's rich potential unleashed. "We're calling on Government to proceed with meaningful business rates reform, mitigate these eye-watering new employment and EPR costs, and cut beer duty." By reducing cumulative tax and regulatory burdens on the industry, the government could drive more investment and jobs. While also safeguarding venues beloved by the public and in some cases are the last remaining establishments for communities to get together, according to the trade body. The association noted that pubs are often disproportionately affected by business tax rates in particular. These are based on a property's value, estimated by the Valuation Office Agency in terms of how much it would cost to rent the premises. Pubs, typically housed in high-value buildings, often operate on slim profit margins. With the added burden of extended producer responsibility costs, the pub sector has shelled out an extra £60million a year, as reported by The Guardian. The Labour government has confirmed plans to overhaul the existing business rates system. However, the industry is still eagerly awaiting an interim report that was due over the summer.
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
New proposals to cut PIP and disability benefits ahead of full review
The Centre for Social Justice has called for emergency measures to be brought in to reduce the number of people currently on the benefit New plans to slash Personal Independence Payment (PIP) have been put forward, aligning with a forthcoming Government review of the benefit. Currently, Labour has paused any steps regarding PIP within its welfare overhaul due to a backlash from MPs and activists for disability rights. Originally, there was a move to impose a four-point rule to tighten PIP accessibility. This would've meant claimants needing at least one tally of four points in assessed daily living activities to qualify. However, modifications to PIP are now set to follow only after Sir Stephen Timms, Minister for Social Security and Disability, conducts a thorough examination. READ MORE: 'I'm a beauty writer - the new ghd curling wand gave me perfect waves in 15 mins' Slated for completion by Autumn 2026, the 'Timms Review' vows to be "co-produced with disabled people, along with the organisations that represent them, experts, MPs and other stakeholders, so a wide range of views and voices are heard." The Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), a centre-right think tank, is urging for an expedited review and argues for a significant reform of PIP to "redirect funding from long-term cash payments." In the updated 'Change the Prescription' report, the CSJ outlines several proposals concerning eligibility for PIP and the health component of Universal Credit, reports Birmingham Live. Amongst their suggestions is the ceasing of PIP and Universal Credit health benefits for individuals experiencing slighter forms of anxiety, depression, and ADHD - a change that could impact over a million beneficiaries, including those currently receiving standard-rate PIP for such conditions. For those who continue to be eligible due to receiving the enhanced rate of PIP, their payments would be cut by roughly £80 a week to match the standard rate. The report estimates this would save £7.4 billion annually by 2029/2030 and suggests that £1 billion of this could be reinvested in frontline mental health services such as NHS Talking Therapies, local support groups, work coaches and community interventions. The think tank suggests that limiting eligibility for PIP and the UC health element to the most severe cases of anxiety, depression and ADHD would save approximately £8.8 billion. Joe Shalam, policy director at the CSJ, said: "Liz Kendall deserves credit for tackling the perverse incentives that have crept into the welfare system since Covid. "People who cannot work due to sickness or disability must always be protected, but as our research shows, too many people are trapped in a cycle of dependency and wasted potential. "By tightening eligibility for mental health benefits and investing in therapy and employment support, ministers can save public money and transform lives. The Timms Review must be brought forward to Autumn, there is no time to lose." Labour's welfare reforms bill was supported by MPs only after a £5 billion reduction to PIP was dropped. However, the CSJ argues that the rising number of PIP claims are contributing to a significant gap between welfare and work that needs immediate attention. The report suggests that a person who is economically inactive and on Universal Credit, including the average housing element to cover their rent, and also receiving PIP, would have a taxpayer-funded Government income of around £25,000 - this increases to £27,500 for those awarded the highest rate of PIP. However, this amount drops to £22,550 once the welfare bill's cut to the Universal Credit health element for new claimants is considered. In contrast, a full-time worker earning the National Living Wage (NLW) is projected to make £22,500 after paying income tax and National Insurance, creating a £2,500 disparity between work and welfare for existing claimants. The CSJ argues that the gap widens even further when additional benefits are factored in. For instance, an unemployed single parent, claiming PIP for anxiety and disability allowance for a child with additional needs such as ADHD, would receive £36,900, which is over £14,000 more than the net wages of a full-time worker on the National Living Wage.
