Kenyan, Ugandan activists allege sexual torture in Tanzania
Mwangi and Atuhaire made the allegations at a joint press conference in Kenya's capital, Nairobi, on Monday. Both had separately spoken of their brutal treatment in the days after their release.
The two had travelled to Tanzania attend the first court appearance on 19 May 2025, of Tanzanian opposition leader Tundu Lissu, who faces treason charges.
They were abducted from their hotel room and allege they were interrogated and tortured by security officers before being dumped several days later near the borders of their countries.
Speaking at the press conference, they said they had both filed a complaint against the Tanzanian authorities.
'What they did to us, it breaks me'
Mwangi, a photojournalist and prominent campaigner against corruption and police brutality in Kenya, broke down in tears as he recounted the brutal beatings and the sexual assault.
READ | Magudumana lawfully deported from Tanzania, says SCA - but one judge disagrees
He was stripped naked, he said, hung upside down and beaten on his feet.
'They would put objects in my anus and then say: 'Say you're feeling nice, say you're feeling good,'' Mwangi said, addressing a press conference alongside Atuhaire.
Tony Karumba/AFP
Officers told him that they filmed everything and to never speak of what happened, otherwise they would release the footage, he said.
'And what they did to us is, it breaks me. ... We're here to share our story, and to say that our bodies may be broken, but our spirit is strong,' Mwangi added.
No shame, rather 'desire for justice'
Atuhaire said she too had been blindfolded, tied up and similarly assaulted.
'The only thing I desire is justice,' the award-winning journalist said.
'It is what has enabled me to hold on in this situation.'
Although she came from Uganda, a country she described as 'very dictatorial', she never imagined that she 'would find a worse foreign country, a worse government'.
You cannot be the head of state, the president, yet publicly and shamelessly condone torture, sexual violence.
Agather Atuhaire
On the day of the abductions, President Samia Suluhu Hassan urged security services 'not to allow ill-mannered individuals from other countries to cross the line here'.
Atuhaire, who won the EU Human Rights Defenders' Award in 2023 and an International Women of Courage Award from the US in 2024, has previously said that she refused to be silenced by the shame of being a victim of sexual assault.
'You are the one who is committing a heinous crime, so you are the one who should be ashamed,' Atuhaire told the AFP news agency in May.
No comment from Tanzania's government
Spokespeople for Tanzania's government, Foreign Affairs Ministry and police did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment on the allegations, the news agency said on Monday evening.
AFP also said it attempted to reach the Tanzanian government for comment, but there was no immediate response.
The case has highlighted a growing repression of political dissent in Tanzania, criticised by a wide range of bodies and organisations, including Amnesty International and the European Parliament.
Opposition leader Lissu, Hassan's main political rival, was arrested in April and charged with treason.
His Chadema party has been disqualified from running in October's presidential and legislative elections.
Hassan's ruling party has nominated her as their candidate in October's election.
Tanzania has been ruled by the Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) party since independence in 1961.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
It's minimal force if no one dies, says Taiping Prison's assistant superintendent
Mohd Hairie Jumri, an assistant prison superintendent, claimed him hitting inmates in Taiping Prison in January this year was not serious as he had not killed anyone. Mohd Hairie, 39, who was transferred to Taiping Prison in November 2022, denied being aggressive and said he used minimal force when hitting the inmates. He was testifying before the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia's (Suhakam) public inquiry into alleged human rights violations at Taiping Prison on Jan 17. On Jan 25, Twentytwo13 reported that inmate Gan Chin Eng, 62, had died from abdominal injuries caused by blunt trauma in the Jan 17 incident. He was among 104 detainees transferred from the Batu Gajah Correctional Facility to Taiping Prison on Jan 16. Earlier, another witness, prison sergeant Dzulizwar Mohd Bakir, 44, admitted there was no justification for his aggressive actions towards inmates on Jan 17. When asked by Suhakam's assisting inquiry officer, Simon Karunagaram, to define what 'minimal force' meant to him, Mohd Hairie replied: 'If the inmate didn't die, it means it is minimal force'. Simon: So, if I punch you, you have bruises and your eyesight is blurry, is that minimal force? Mohd Hairie: Yes. Simon: Look at this image. Prisoners are bleeding. Is this minimal force? Mohd Hairie: Maybe they hit the fire hydrant on the way out of Hall B. He also demanded that Simon prove that he had used excessive force. But when questioned by Suhakam chairman, Datuk Seri Mohd Hishamudin Md Yunus, who is on the panel of inquiry with Dr Farah Nini Dusuki, Mohd Hairie replied that he was not in the right frame of mind when the beatings took place. Like the other witnesses this week, he claimed the inmates used harsh and abusive words against the guards and threatened to rape members of their families, causing him to act irrationally. When asked by lawyer T. Shashi Devan, who is representing some 99 Taiping Prison inmates, if he agreed that maximum force was used as it resulted in the death of Gan Chin Eng, Mohd Hairie replied: 'I disagree.' Earlier, Mohd Hairie, who is attached to the maintenance department, admitted that Taiping needs a new prison as the current one is too old. Taiping Prison is Malaysia's oldest prison, built in 1879, and is a heritage building. During questioning by Suhakam's assisting inquiry officer, Aida Suraya Haron, Mohd Hairie stated that Block B of the prison had been declared unsafe by the Public Works Department, as were the upper floors of Block E, and there were additional concerns regarding Block C. Mohd Hairie also admitted that: He did not record every activity in his pocket diary. He only recorded the incidents of Jan 17 a few days after giving his initial statement to Suhakam investigators on March 10. His superiors did not check his pocket diary once a month. The dereliction of duty by his superiors could be the reason many officers don't record their pocket diaries faithfully, even though it could be produced in court as evidence. He did not discuss with other witnesses who testified this week – Dzulizwar Mohd Bakir, prison inspector Ahmad Rizal Razali, sergeant Saiful Azman Mohamad Ibrahim, and prison inspector Muhamad Mustakhim Abdul Rahim – how to testify, even though the words used were almost the same. The inquiry will continue next month.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
This Is The Most Corrupt Place In America
Young woman holding a poster against corruption. Human rights and democracy concept. When people think about government corruption they often think of authoritarian countries like Russia, Venezuela, or North Korea. While these and other countries run by autocrats have high levels of corruption, democracies like the United States are not completely pure. In a recent analysis, Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute examines corruption in the United States by federal judicial district. He finds that Washington D.C. is the most corrupt place in the country, followed by the Eastern District of Louisiana, where New Orleans is located. Government corruption of any magnitude is a problem. It erodes citizens' trust in government and fosters animosity between voters and public officials. To measure the level of government corruption in America, Edwards' examines Department of Justice data on public corruption convictions across the country's 94 federal judicial districts. The top ten districts ranked by the average annual number of convictions from 2004 to 2023 are in the table below. As mentioned previously, the nation's capital tops the list, and three U.S. territories are in the top five. In the contiguous United States, districts in Montana, Oklahoma, Kentucky, South Dakota, and Tennessee share Eastern Louisiana's proclivity for corruption. The least corrupt areas, which are not shown in the table, are the state of New Hampshire and the Middle District of North Carolina, where Greensboro is located. Both have annual conviction rates of only 0.05. Top 10 federal judicial districts ranked by conviction rate. In addition to eroding trust in government, corruption has adverse effects on economic activity. One study that looks at country-level corruption finds that a 1% increase in the level of corruption reduces the rate of economic growth by 0.72%. The authors attribute most of the negative impact corruption has on growth to the political instability corruption causes, which generates uncertainty for businesses. Another study finds that countries with more corruption receive less foreign direct investment and experience higher inflation, both of which reduce growth. There is evidence that corruption reduces economic growth in America, too. One study finds that more state-level corruption reduces investment and the growth of output per worker. Another study finds that states with more corruption convictions from 1976 to 1980 experienced slower income growth over the next 20 years. This study also finds that states with more educated populations are less corrupt on average. To explain this finding, the authors suggest that educated voters are more inclined and better able to monitor public officials which reduces opportunities for corruption. Closer inspection of the economic data in places with the most corruption reveals these adverse economic effects. Take Louisiana and Illinois: Both states have reputations for being corrupt that are supported by the convictions data and recent stories. In Louisiana, federal officials recently arrested and indicted several former Louisiana law enforcement officials and businessmen allegedly involved in a U-visa scam. In Illinois, the corruption case around former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan is still playing out. A former CEO of Illinois utility company ComEd was sentenced just this week. In addition to high levels of corruption, both Illinois and Louisiana had personal income growth below the national average over the last year according to the most recent data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). Income growth was 5.4% in Illinois, 5.9% in Louisiana, and 6.7% for the entire country. In the two states with the least corruption, New Hampshire and Utah, income growth was 6.6% and 7.2%, respectively. These are just a few observations, of course, but they are consistent with the studies discussed earlier. While government corruption in the United States is far below the levels of autocratic countries, it is still a problem that needs to be addressed. There are plenty of ideas, including strengthening the Inspectors General who oversee audits and investigations in government agencies; better enforcement of anti-corruption laws already on the books; more investigative journalism to uncover corruption; and greater protection and rewards for whistleblowers that reveal corruption. None of these are a silver bullet, but in combination they would help reduce corruption. Voters should also emphasize character when evaluating political candidates to reduce the number of dishonest people elected to office. Monitoring public corruption is important since we cannot address a problem we do not know about. The Cato Institute analysis is a reminder that public corruption is alive and well in America. Reducing it will improve local economies and cultivate more trust between voters and elected officials.
WIRED
21 hours ago
- WIRED
The ICJ Rules That Failing to Combat Climate Change Could Violate International Law
Jul 24, 2025 12:31 PM In a landmark ruling, the International Court of Justice declared that failure to act on climate change can be an 'internationally wrongful act'—meaning countries could face legal consequences for harming the planet. Vanuatu's minister of climate change, Ralph Regenvanu, delivers a speech during a rally ahead of the International Court of Justice's session. Photograph:If a country fails to take decisive action to protect the planet from climate change, it could be breaking international law and be held liable for damages caused to humanity. This is one of the conclusions of an unprecedented advisory opinion issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the legal obligations of states in the face of this environmental crisis. The 15 judges that make up the ICJ, the highest judicial body of the United Nations, described the need to address the threat of climate change as 'urgent and existential.' Unanimously, they determined that signatories to various international agreements could be violating international law if they do not adopt measures to limit greenhouse gas emissions. The ruling states that a 'clean, healthy, and sustainable environment' constitutes a human right. This interpretation elevates the climate debate beyond the environmental or economic realm, positioning it as an issue of justice and fundamental rights. The shift in focus could significantly influence future international legislation and litigation, making it easier to hold polluting countries accountable for the environmental damage they cause. As of June of this year, according to the most recent report from the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment in London, there were approximately 2,967 active climate change lawsuits in nearly 60 countries, with more than 226 new cases initiated in 2024 alone. Yuji Iwasawa, president of the ICJ, clarified that this is an advisory opinion, not a binding ruling. However, he expressed that the court hopes that this pronouncement will 'inform and guide social and political action to address the ongoing climate crisis.' The case leading to this opinion originated in 2019, when a group of students from Vanuatu, a Pacific island nation particularly vulnerable to the effects of climate change, began pushing for government inaction on the climate crisis to be legally recognized as an 'existential risk.' Subsequently, Ralph Regenvanu, the country's minister of climate change, filed a formal complaint with the ICJ. In 2023, the UN General Assembly formalized the request for an advisory opinion from the court. The judges answered two key questions: What are the obligations of states under international law to protect the climate system and environment from greenhouse gas emissions? And what are the legal consequences for countries that, by action or inaction, cause significant damage to the climate, especially in relation to vulnerable island states and present and future generations? The court's analysis considered the provisions of international treaties such as the United Nations Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Paris Agreement, the Kyoto Protocol, and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, among others. The ICJ's assessment concluded that states have a duty, 'by acting with due diligence and using all means at their disposal,' to prevent activities under their jurisdiction or control from adversely affecting the environment. ICJ president Yuji Iwasawa (center) issues the advisory opinion at The Hague on July 23, 2025. Photograph:The opinion stresses that the need 'to prevent significant transboundary harm under customary international law, are obligations erga omnes '—that is, they are obligations to the entire international community. In this sense, Iwasawa emphasized, the protection of the environment is a precondition for guaranteeing human rights. The negative effects of climate change, he added, can hinder rights to water, health, housing, and family life. The court also clarified that what constitutes an internationally wrongful act is not the emission of greenhouse gases per se, but the failure to comply with obligations, both conventional and customary, to protect the climate system. The opinion text stresses that countries in breach of such obligations must assume their responsibility and face the legal consequences of their acts or omissions. If found to be in breach of their obligations, they should stop their unlawful conduct, guarantee they won't repeat their actions if the circumstances so require, and give full reparation to those affected, including through restitution and compensation. 'Where several states are responsible for the same internationally wrongful act, the responsibility of each state may be invoked in relation to that act,' the advisory opinion states. 'What makes this case so important is that it addresses the past, present, and future of climate action,' Joie Chowdhury, senior counsel at the Center for International Environmental Law, told AP. 'It's not just about future targets—it also tackles historical responsibility, because we cannot solve the climate crisis without confronting its roots.' The opinion issued represents a significant victory for island nations and international movements that, for decades, have sought to establish legal mechanisms to hold major greenhouse gas emitters accountable for the consequences of climate change on their livelihoods, well-being, and the survival of their ecosystems. This story originally appeared on WIRED en Español and has been translated from Spanish.
