Trump just made a problematic Ghislaine Maxwell situation look even worse
Aaron Blake
, CNN
Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Photo:
AFP / US District Court for the southern district of New York
Analysis
: Interviewing Ghislaine Maxwell is the Trump administration's first big move to allay concerns about its hugely unpopular handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Friday (US time)
wrapped up two days of interviews with Epstein's convicted associate
.
But there were already all kinds of reasons to be sceptical of this move and what it could produce, given the motivations of the two sides involved.
And President Donald Trump epitomised all of them in a major way on Friday.
While taking questions on his way to Scotland, Trump repeatedly held open the possibility of pardoning Maxwell for her crimes.
"Well, I don't want to talk about that," Trump said initially.
When pressed, he said, "It's something I haven't thought about," while conspicuously adding, "I'm allowed to do it."
US President Donald Trump disembarks from Air Force One upon his arrival at Prestwick Airport, south of Glasgow on July 25, 2025, on the first day of his UK visit.
Photo:
AFP / Brendan Smialowski
This wouldn't be the first time Trump has appeared to dangle a pardon over someone providing evidence that could impact him personally and politically. (In this case, he has demonstrated past personal ties to Epstein, and his administration is scrambling to clean up its botched handling of the Epstein files after previously promising to release them.)
A similar situation played out during the Russia investigation, when Trump repeatedly left open the possibility of
pardoning key witnesses like Paul Manafort
, Michael Flynn and Michael Cohen. Critics alleged this amounted to obstruction of justice.
Special counsel Robert Mueller's report didn't draw conclusions on possible obstruction, but it did cite Trump's pardon comments as "evidence" that Trump's actions "had the potential to influence Manafort's decision whether to cooperate with the government".
Manafort indeed wound up being a decidedly uncooperative witness, with a bipartisan Senate report saying his repeated lies hamstrung its own investigation. And Trump later pardoned him in a move that could certainly be understood as a reward for his lack of cooperation.
That bit of history looms large here, given the parallels.
But Trump is really just exacerbating an already dubious situation. There were already plenty of reasons to be sceptical of this move to interview Maxwell, and nobody involved seems particularly bothered to address those problems or even combat the perception of them.
Ghislaine Maxwell pictured in September 2013 in New York City.
Photo:
AFP / Getty Images
The first reason is the state of play in Maxwell's criminal case.
It might seem far-fetched that Trump would ever pardon a convicted child sex-trafficker like Maxwell (even though he did "wish her well" after she was charged). But there are other things his administration could do to help her. Among them would be taking actions in her ongoing appeal of her 2021 conviction.
The Trump Justice Department has already taken highly suspect actions in another criminal case involving someone Trump wanted something politically from: New York mayor Eric Adams. The administration earlier this year moved to dismiss the charges against Adams while suggestively citing its desire for the New York Democrat to assist in its crackdown on illegal immigration.
Multiple prosecutors resigned in protest, with one claiming it was a "quid pro quo" in her resignation letter. And the judge in the case appeared to sympathise.
"Everything here smacks of a bargain: Dismissal of the indictment in exchange for immigration policy concessions," the judge said.
Maxwell's lawyer, David Oscar Markus, has also been remarkably solicitous of Trump and the administration.
Last week he called Trump the "ultimate dealmaker" while claiming that the Justice Department had violated a deal with Maxwell. This week, he praised the Trump administration's "commitment to uncovering the truth in this case" and said he and Maxwell were "grateful that the government is trying to uncover the truth".
Markus on Friday also suggested an openness to a pardon.
"The president this morning said he had the power to do so," Markus said, "and we hope he exercises that power in a right and just way."
Indeed, also relevant here are the lawyers involved.
Critics have cried foul that the DOJ official interviewing Maxwell was Blanche, rather than a non-political prosecutor who has been involved in the case who would have much more expertise. Not only is Blanche a top political appointee of Trump's; he's also his formal personal lawyer.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer
Photo:
AFP/ Getty - Kevin Dietsch
"The conflict of interest is glaring," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said on Thursday on X. "It stinks of high corruption."
What's more, Blanche appeared on a podcast last year with Markus and labelled him a "friend."
"You are by far the best out there," Blanche said.
But one of the biggest reasons to be sceptical is that Maxwell is someone the Trump Justice Department - the first one, at least - labelled a brazen liar.
Back in 2020, the DOJ charged Maxwell with two counts of perjury - on top of the more serious charges she faced - while citing a 2016 civil deposition she gave.
In the deposition, Maxwell claimed no knowledge of Epstein's "scheme to recruit underage girls for sexual massages", despite later being convicted of helping in the effort. She also claimed she didn't know about Epstein possessing sex toys, which was contradicted by witnesses at her trial.
Maxwell's lawyers at the time said "the questions asked were confusing, ambiguous, and improperly formed".
She was never actually tried for perjury. After her conviction on the more serious charges, prosecutors agreed to dismiss the perjury charges if her conviction stood, citing a desire to avoid further emotional trauma for the victims.
But the Trump Justice Department in 2020 still called her credibility into question.
In a 2020 filing, it said Maxwell's lies "should give the Court serious pause" about trusting her. It also said Maxwell's "willingness to brazenly lie under oath about her conduct … strongly suggests her true motive has been and remains to avoid being held accountable for her crimes".
All of that would seem relevant to today, especially given Trump's demonstrated willingness to wield his power to help people who help him - whether using pardons or anything else. Maxwell, who has years left in her 20-year prison sentence, clearly has motivation to say things Trump wants.
That doesn't mean the interviews of Maxwell couldn't glean something important. Even witnesses with credibility problems can provide important information, if it's corroborated with other evidence.
But right now, Trump and Co aren't trying very hard to make this situation look kosher. And Trump's pardon comments take that to another level.
-CNN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
37 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Round three - United States and China hold economic talks as trade truce nears end
The Trump Administration has been trying to win concessions from many countries before an August 1 deadline for reimposing tariffs announced in April. Those levies were suspended in order to reach trade deals. Over the last week, the Trump Administration has announced deals with some of America's biggest trading partners in quick succession. Last week the US and Japan finally agreed to a deal that included a 15% tariff on Japanese imports and a pledge from Japan to invest US$550 billion in the US. Today, Trump announced that he had also reached a deal with the European Union, whose economies rely on exports to the US. The deal would put a 15% tariff on many European exports, including cars. One of the biggest unknowns is what will happen with China, which remains one of America's largest source of imports. After a tit-for-tat period of tariffs and retaliation, the two nations have come to something of an uneasy truce after talks in Geneva in May, and in London in June. Today, before he met with European officials, Trump implied that some kind of trade arrangement with China might be close at hand. 'We just struck a deal with Japan as you know, and we're very close to a deal with China,' he said. This will be the first meeting between the countries without an imminent crisis, like the tariff standoff or China's economically crippling ban on rare earth exports this year. Trade experts said the list of potential topics for discussion was long, ranging from Trump's push to get China to stop the flow of fentanyl to the US, to America's concerns about its purchases of Russian and Iranian oil, and recent exit bans that have prevented US citizens from leaving China. US officials appear to be looking forward to more ambitious trade talks in the months to come. Those could include Chinese purchases of American products, steps to open the Chinese market and, potentially, Chinese investment in the US. They are also likely seeking to lay the groundwork for a potential meeting between Trump and Xi Jinping, the Chinese leader, this year. Administration officials are considering a trip to Beijing before a meeting of Asian and Pacific countries in South Korea in October or potentially connecting Trump and Xi on the sidelines of an international meeting. Michael Pillsbury, a former government official who has advised the Trump Administration on China, said this would be Trump's sixth summit meeting with Xi. Each of those summits had a minimum of two hours of dialogue, and Trump went prepared with specific dealmaking requests, he said. 'The President feels it's better to deal face to face,' he said. Trade experts are also wondering whether US technology controls or an agreement to transfer ownership of TikTok may be on the negotiating table. On CNBC last week, Howard Lutnick, the Secretary of Commerce, said that the US had submitted a proposal to China for transferring ownership of TikTok to American companies, and that the Administration was waiting for the Chinese response. The topic was 'not officially' part of the trade talks, he said, 'but unofficially, of course'. Tensions between the US and China started to spiral after Trump announced his 'Liberation Day' tariffs in early April. China was the only country to immediately retaliate, matching Trump's tariffs of 34% with 34% tariffs on American products. Beijing also set up a licensing system to restrict exports of seven rare earth elements that are processed almost exclusively in China and used in electric cars, smart bombs and other high-tech devices. Trump then responded by ratcheting up tariffs on Chinese products to a minimum of 145%, which brought much of the trade between the countries to a halt. The previous rounds of negotiations secured a temporary truce that included China's relaxing its restrictions on shipments of valuable rare earth minerals and magnets needed by US manufacturers. In return, US officials agreed to roll back limits on exports of US products and technology, including ethane and airplane parts, as well as the proposed visa restrictions. US tariffs on Chinese imports were scaled back to 30%, while China has 10% tariffs on American products. The truce is scheduled to expire on August 12, after which tariffs would rise by 10%. However, Bessent has been optimistic that the truce could be extended. In an interview on the Fox Business Network last week, Bessent said that 'trade is in a good place' with China. He added that he hoped to begin having broader discussions with his counterparts about rebalancing the Chinese economy and encouraging China to curb purchases of Russian and Iranian oil. Bessent said China was in a manufacturing slump and faced a residential real estate market crisis. He argued Beijing must focus on building a consumer economy. 'They can't export their economic problems to the rest of the world; they need to solve them,' Bessent said. US companies continue to have a rash of criticisms about doing business in China, including the country's newly established rare earth licensing system. The processing time for licences is long, American firms say, and China requests proprietary and sensitive business information as part of the applications. In a survey released this month, members of the US-China Business Council said strained relations and tariffs between the two countries remained their biggest concerns. But they also said Chinese policies favouring domestic companies were eroding confidence in doing business in the country. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Alan Rappeport and Ana Swanson ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
US, EU avert trade war with 15% tariff deal
The US has struck a framework trade agreement with the European Union, imposing a 15% import tariff on most EU goods - half the threatened rate - and averting a bigger trade war between the two allies that account for almost a third of global trade. US President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced the deal at Trump's luxury golf course in western Scotland after an hour-long meeting that pushed the hard-fought deal over the line, following months of negotiations. "I think this is the biggest deal ever made," Trump told reporters, lauding EU plans to invest some $US600 billion ($NZ997bn) in the United States and dramatically increase its purchases of US energy and military equipment. Trump said the deal, which tops a $US550 billion deal signed with Japan last week, would expand ties between the trans-Atlantic powers after years of what he called unfair treatment of US exporters. Von der Leyen, describing Trump as a tough negotiator, said the 15% tariff applied "across the board", later telling reporters it was "the best we could get." "We have a trade deal between the two largest economies in the world, and it's a big deal. It's a huge deal. It will bring stability. It will bring predictability," she said. The agreement mirrors key parts of the framework accord reached by the US with Japan, but like that deal, it leaves many questions open, including tariff rates on spirits, a highly charged topic for many on both sides of the Atlantic. The deal, which Trump said calls for $US750 billion of EU purchases of US energy in coming years and "hundreds of billions of dollars" of arms purchases, likely spells good news for a host of EU companies, including Airbus, Mercedes-Benz and Novo Nordisk, if all the details hold. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal, saying it averted a trade conflict that would have hit Germany's export-driven economy and its large auto sector hard. German carmakers, VW, Mercedes and BMW were some of the hardest hit by the 27.5% US tariff on car and parts imports now in place. The baseline 15% tariff will still be seen by many in Europe as too high, compared with Europe's initial hopes to secure a zero-for-zero tariff deal. Bernd Lange, the German Social Democrat who heads the European Parliament's trade committee, said the tariffs were imbalanced and the hefty EU investment earmarked for the US would likely come at the bloc's own expense. Trump retains the ability to increase the tariffs in the future if European countries do not live up to their investment commitments, a senior US administration official told reporters on Sunday evening. The euro rose around 0.2% against the dollar, sterling and yen within an hour of the deal's being announced. MIRROR OF JAPAN DEAL Carsten Nickel, deputy director of research at Teneo, said Sunday's accord was "merely a high-level, political agreement" that could not replace a carefully hammered out trade deal: "This, in turn, creates the risk of different interpretations along the way, as seen immediately after the conclusion of the US-Japan deal." While the tariff applies to most goods, including semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, there are exceptions. The US will keep in place a 50% tariff on steel and aluminum. Von der Leyen suggested the tariff could be replaced with a quota system; a senior administration official said EU leaders had asked that the two sides continue to talk about the issue. Von der Leyen said there would be no tariffs from either side on aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, certain generic drugs, semiconductor equipment, some agricultural products, natural resources and critical raw materials. "We will keep working to add more products to this list," von der Leyen said, adding that spirits were still under discussion. A US official said the tariff rate on commercial aircraft would remain at zero for now, and the parties would decide together what to do after a US review is completed, adding there is a "reasonably good chance" they could agree to a lower tariff than 15%. No timing was given for when that probe would be completed. The deal will be sold as a triumph for Trump, who is seeking to reorder the global economy and reduce decades-old US trade deficits, and has already reached similar framework accords with Britain, Japan, Indonesia and Vietnam, although his administration has not hit its goal of "90 deals in 90 days." US officials said the EU had agreed to lower non-tariff barriers for automobiles and some agricultural products, though EU officials suggested the details of those standards were still under discussion. "Remember, their economy is $US20 trillion ... they are five times bigger than Japan," a senior US official told reporters during a briefing. "So the opportunity of opening their market is enormous for our farmers, our fishermen, our ranchers, all our industrial products, all our businesses." Trump has periodically railed against the EU, saying it was "formed to screw the United States" on trade. He has fumed for years about the US merchandise trade deficit with the EU, which in 2024 reached $US235 billion, according to US Census Bureau data. The EU points to the US surplus in services, which it says partially redresses the balance. Trump has argued that his tariffs are bringing in "hundreds of billions of dollars" in revenues for the US while dismissing warnings from economists about the risk of inflation. On July 12, Trump threatened to apply a 30% tariff on imports from the EU starting on August 1, after weeks of negotiations failed to reach a comprehensive trade deal. The EU had prepared countertariffs on 93 billion euros ($US109 billion) of US goods in the event a deal to avoid the tariffs could not be struck.
NZ Herald
11 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Role the former adviser took in stoking the controversy shows he's still a political risk for Trump
And even if Musk's goal was merely to stoke the controversy without necessarily settling it, his mission has been accomplished - and then some. Right-wing influencers and conspiracy theorists have alleged without evidence for years that the federal government suppressed information to protect famous associates of Epstein, who they assert may have participated in his sex crimes. The controversy boiled over earlier this month, when Trump's Justice Department announced it would disclose no more documents related to the case. Perhaps most damning of all was a Wall Street Journal report last week that Attorney-General Pam Bondi informed Trump in May that his name appeared in the files multiple times. 'Elon was right,' tweeted financier Anthony Scaramucci, who briefly served as communications director during the first Trump White House. 'He knew it!' Late Show host Stephen Colbert joked. 'I always said. I always said that he's a good guy who's right about everything.' The uncontained controversy threatens to further fray Musk and Trump's torn relationship. And it reveals how Musk remains a potent political risk for Trump months after he publicly left the White House, where he enjoyed unprecedented access and insight into the President's life as the so-called 'first buddy', rarely leaving his side during the transition and early months of his second term. Neither the White House nor Musk immediately responded to a request for comment. White House communications director Steven Cheung called the Wall Street Journal report on the Bondi meeting 'another fake news story'. The Trump Administration also sued the Journal after the outlet reported that Trump submitted a sketch of a naked woman bearing his name as part of a bawdy birthday gift for Epstein. Epstein was found dead in his jail cell before he faced trial on sex-trafficking charges. Officials ruled his death a suicide. Musk has not commented on the Wall Street Journal report, and he deleted the original tweet that claimed Trump appeared in the Epstein files. But he has fanned outrage over Trump's decision to not release the files in posts on X, using his megaphone on a platform he owns to keep the issue in the social media feeds of his 223 million followers, even as Trump unsuccessfully tried to convince his supporters to move on from the case. This month, Musk accused the Trump Administration of engaging in 'a cover up (obviously)'. 'So many powerful people want that list suppressed,' he wrote in a separate post. Musk has also asked Grok, the artificial intelligence chatbot built by his start-up xAI, to weigh in on the matter several times. 'Please make a thorough list of all those who should be investigated for possible rape of underage girls provided by Epstein,' Musk wrote. 'Think hard and research thoroughly. Order by probable severity and frequency of their crimes.' X has become more popular among conservative users after Musk purchased it in 2022 and unravelled many of the company's defences against disinformation. Some of the most high-profile skirmishes over the Epstein files got their start on the social media platform, originating from Maga influencers such as Laura Loomer, who had been banned from the site but was later restored by Musk. Trending topics on X have included the hashtag '#TrumpIsAPedoRapist'. At some moments, Musk has paused his taunts to defend the President. Following the Journal report on the naked sketch, Musk said: 'It really doesn't sound like something Trump would say tbh'. Yet Musk stoked tensions with the White House as Trump rolled out a raft of AI executive orders and appeared at a conference on Thursday hosted by some of Musk's longtime friends and business partners who co-host the 'All-In' podcast, including AI and crypto tsar David Sacks. Musk had previously acted as a bridge between Trump and the tech world, and his absence was palpable at the event. Allies of Musk serving in the Trump Administration have had to tread carefully, largely declining to comment on the feud between the President and one of the world's most powerful business leaders. In a sign of the awkwardness, the 'All-In' show opted not to discuss the public feud between Musk and Trump in June. The Trump-Musk relationship has long been marked by contradictions and inconsistencies, and that has not changed. Trump signed an executive order that bars federal agencies from using 'woke AI', which appeared to be a boon to Grok, as xAI instructs the agent to prioritise 'truth-seeking' over political correctness. But when asked whether Trump wanted xAI to receive contracts, Leavitt responded, 'I don't think so, no'. Trump on Truth Social appeared to walk back previous threats against Musk's companies and wrote that he would not take away large subsidies from the billionaire's businesses, which include SpaceX and Tesla. 'I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE, in fact, THRIVE like never before!,' Trump wrote. 'The better they do, the better the USA does, and that's good for all of us.' Musk did not accept the olive branch, responding that the 'subsidies' Trump was referring to do not exist. He criticised Trump for slashing tax credits for electric vehicle companies in the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' while retaining subsidies for the oil and gas industries. He also warned that it would be impossible for the federal Government to cut its ties with SpaceX. 'SpaceX won the Nasa contracts by doing a better job for less money,' Musk wrote. 'Moving those contracts to other aerospace companies would leave astronauts stranded and taxpayers on the hook for twice as much!'
