
See The Sun Shrink As Planets Dazzle: The Sky This Week
Augusta , GEORGIA - APRIL 08: Fans use solar eclipse glasses to look at the sun prior to Masters ... More Tournament at Augusta National Golf Club on April 8, 2024 in Augusta , Georgia. (Photo by Ben Jared/PGA TOUR via Getty Images)
Each Monday, I pick out North America's celestial highlights for the week ahead (which also apply to mid-northern latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere). Check my main feed for more in-depth articles on stargazing, astronomy, eclipses and more.
The Night Sky This Week: June 30-July 6, 2025
If I told you that on two specific dates each year, Earth is closest to, and farthest from, the sun, when would you guess those dates were? Conventional wisdom would have it that Earth is closer during summer and farthest during winter — but the opposite is true. On Thursday this week, Earth reaches aphelion, at its farthest from the sun in 2025. So why is it so hot? Seasons come from the tilt of Earth's axis, not its distance to the sun.
During Earth's annual journey around the sun, our view of the other planets — each on their journey — changes, and this week we get to see unique views of Mars, Venus and Mercury. Here's everything you need to know about stargazing and astronomy this week:
Monday, June 30: Moon, Mars And Regulus
Monday, June 30: Moon, Mars And Regulus
Look west just after dark and see the 33%-lit waxing crescent moon, with Mars below-right and bright star Regulus beyond, closer to the horizon. Regulus, the brightest star in the constellation Leo, 'The Lion,' is 70 light-years distant.
Wednesday, July 2: First Quarter Moon And Spica
Wednesday, July 2: First Quarter Moon And Spica
At 2:31 p.m. EDT today, the moon reaches its first quarter phase, appearing half-lit in the southwestern sky during dusk. Look to the moon's left to find Spica (pronounced 'speaker'), the brightest star in the constellation Virgo, 'The Maiden,' is 261 light-years distant. Mars and Regulus will be lower in the west.
Thursday, July 3: Explaining Earth's Aphelion and Perihelion.
Thursday, July 3: Earth At Aphelion
Today, Earth reaches aphelion, the point in its orbit when it's farthest from the sun at about 94.5 million miles (as opposed to 91.5 million miles on January 3). If you have solar eclipse glasses —perhaps leftover from the total solar eclipse on April 8, 2024, across North America — today's a good day to use to view the year's smallest sun. You may also spot sunspots, active regions of magnetic tumult on the surface of the sun.
Friday, July 4: Mars And Mercury
Friday, July 4: Mars And Mercury
Look west 54 minutes after sunset at Mars and Regulus above west. Mentally draw a line between them and carry on to the horizon, and you may see tiny Mercury making a rare appearance.
Saturday, July 5: Venus And The Pleiades
Saturday, July 5: Venus And The Pleiades
If you can rise before the sun, look to the northeast for the sumptuous sight of bright Venus beneath the Pleiades, an open star cluster that looks beautiful to the naked eye and through binoculars. The Pleiades is about 440 light-years distant.
Sunday, July 6: Moon And Scorpius
Sunday, July 6: Moon And Scorpius
Now 86%-lit, the waxing gibbous moon tonight reaches the constellation Scorpius, 'The Scorpion,' making a pitstop in the insect's claws. See below for the lowdown on another of summer's most iconic constellations.
Constellation Of The Week: Sagittarius
Constellation Of The Week: Sagittarius
Look south late at night this week for Sagittarius, 'The Archer,' which lies across the middle of the Milky Way — Galactic Central Point. If you have binoculars, sweep them across its center, known as the 'Teapot' because of the shape its bright stars make, for seemingly endless nebulae, star clusters and dark dust lanes.
The times and dates given apply to mid-northern latitudes. For the most accurate location-specific information, consult online planetariums like Stellarium.
Wishing you clear skies and wide eyes.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
38 minutes ago
- Forbes
Science Savants Mourn DOE Funding Cuts As Google's Fusion News Provides A Quiet Rebuke
Inside Commonwealth Fusion Systems' Devens, Massachusetts facility. Two of America's most senior scientists are enraged at the Trunp administration's slashing of research funding for energy, as well as draconian cuts at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF). The protesting scientific savants are John P. Holdren, President Barack Obama's science adviser and director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and Neal Lane, a former NSF director and President Bill Clinton's science adviser and OSTP director. In an impassioned essay, published in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, they say, 'What is happening now far exceeds our worst fears.' They state: 'Brutal cuts in staff and budgets have devastated not only science and science-centered work conducted inside the government, but also science at colleges, universities and nongovernmental research centers across the country that depend on federal funding. Profusion Of Companies Benefit 'The businesses that support the decimated offices and programs are likewise being impacted. The immense profusion of U.S. companies that work to convert the advances flowing from government-supported sciences into societal benefit, will suffer, too.' The co-authors see organic damage at the Department of Energy (DOE). They say that of its $50 billion budget in fiscal year 2024, about $15 billion went to non-defense research and development, and $7 billion of that went to energy supply options – nuclear, fossil and renewables — and to energy efficiency. Some $8 billion, according to Holdren and Lane, went to basic research, supported by the DOE's Office of Science. 'That office, the nation's largest funder of basic research in the physical sciences, supported 25,000 researchers (including students) at 300 institutions around the country, including 17 Department of Energy national laboratories; that work included advanced scientific computing, basic energy sciences, biological and environmental research, fusion energy sciences, high energy physics, and nuclear physics.' When I asked John Savage, the retired co-founder of the computer science department at Brown University, what the key ingredient is in research, he responded, 'Passion.' He explained that scientists need constant passion to barrel through the disappointments and constant roadblocks that stand between concept and realization, the time spent working at the bench on a microscope or a computer. An example of the rewards of that tireless seeking of a way forward in science came with the announcement that Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), headquartered in Devens, Massachusetts, has signed a deal with Google to provide 200 megawatts of power from a site in Chesterfield County, in southwestern Virginia. This could be the beginning of the greatest revolution yet in energy and electricity production. Breakthrough Lit Industrial Revolution It could be as big a breakthrough in science and engineering as when James Watt added a condenser to an embryonic steam engine — and lit the fuse to the Industrial Revolution. It will have come after decades of frustration and passion — and untold billions of dollars of funding from world governments and private companies and research universities, often deploying government funding This money has been spread across two principal competing fusion technologies: magnetic confinement fusion (tokamak) and inertial confinement fusion, in which a target is compressed with a beams of energy or light. Both have been stubbornly difficult, head-breakingly hard. Lately there have been major advances in inertial fusion at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, but magnetic confinement promises, through CFS leadership, to be the first commercial plant. Tellingly, during the past 70 or so years, there have been many efforts to cut funding for fusion. Success isn't guaranteed, but CFS has reached the threshold and is confident that it will succeed. The lessons learned in many experiments have paved the way for a moment of high excitement: the opening of what might be the beginning of a new chapter in the energy and the human prospect.


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Advances New Microreactor Policies
Engineer in a nuclear fusion reactor research factory. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced it is moving forward to advance new uses of factory-built microreactors by accepting three policies recommended by staff. Microreactors are small modular reactors that would generate nuclear energy for particular uses such as to create a power supply for a company or generate energy an isolated community. This use of nuclear energy could also be provide emergency power reserves. This unique application of nuclear energy would serve non-conventional nuclear markets and differ from an electric utility providing nuclear power among its energy mix for its customer base. The NRC revealed this key development in a short June 18 public notice called 'NRC Advances Factory-Built Microreactor Policy.' The agency briefly described its three new federal policies. 'These very small reactors could be built, loaded with fuel, and tested at factories before being shipped to operating sites, and would generate about 1% or less of the power of a current large reactor,' NRC stated. Microreactor characteristics. The new NRC policies are: Furthermore, the NRC also directed its staff 'to continue other microreactor-related activities, such as engaging with' the U.S. Department of Energy as well as the U.S. Department Defense 'to build and operate microreactors on DOE/DOD sites or as part of critical national security infrastructure.' The NRC announcement referred to a June 17 memo from Dr. Mirela Gavrilas, NRC executive director for operations, to Tomas Herrera, acting NRC secretary. The memo stated NRC staff should explore additional recommendations by stakeholders, such as using existing National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and National Weather Service meteorology and weather information to support analyses and design bases. 'The staff should ensure that it is clear that when features to preclude criticality are inserted to support transportation after completion of operational testing or at the end of the operating cycle, the license for the reactor does not authorize operation at power,' the memo recommended. In addition, NRC staff should plan proactively develop a comprehensive regulatory framework and microreactor manufacturers licensing options that combine the activities of a microreactor applicant (for factory fabrication, operational testing, fuel loading and microreactor transportation) in a single federal license. 'Such a framework could clarify the appropriate use of using license conditions or technical specifications to address unique technical considerations such as the need for features to preclude criticality while the microreactor is in transit,' the memo added. Key features of microreactors. The DOE has a Microreactor Program to examine new technologies to create, test and deploy very small, transportable reactors to provide decentralized energy and heat for civilian, industrial and defense uses. DOE is looking into different type of microreactor reactor designs—such as gas, heat-pipe-cooled, liquid-metal and molten-salt. Microreactor would be able to operate for up to a decade or even longer. Another feature they would offer is the ability to be used and sent quickly as emergency power supplies. The MARVEL microreactor. The DOE's Microreactor Program is being spearheaded by its Idaho Falls-based Idaho National Laboratory. In February, INL hailed reaching a milestone with the Battelle Energy Alliance to start developing a primary coolant system for a MARVEL (Microreactor Applications Research Validation and Evaluation Project) microreactor. The MARVEL is a sodium-potassium-cooled reactor designed to produce 85 kilowatts of thermal energy. 'It will be one of the lab's first new reactors in nearly 50 years,' INL says. 'MARVEL will help developers demonstrate microreactor applications and evaluate systems for new microreactor technologies. The primary coolant system manages the heat produced in the reactor core and will be the most complex fabrication of the MARVEL project.'


Health Line
2 hours ago
- Health Line
I Tried Exercise Snacks for 2 Weeks
Exercise snacks can help people move more during the day. Some research suggests these small, consistent exercise breaks may have a positive impact on health and well-being. Health and wellness touch everyone's life differently. This is one person's story. The views and opinions expressed are those of the speaker and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of Healthline Media. I spend the bulk of my workday jumping from virtual meeting to virtual meeting. Despite my best efforts, I often find it hard to move around much during the day. When I learned about exercise snacks, I was intrigued. Exercise snacks are short bursts of exercise throughout the day. They can be completed in 1 minute or less, and should be done every 45 minutes to an hour, over several hours. There's a growing trend to incorporate these into the workday, encouraging movement for people who work sedentary desk jobs. Exercise snacks can be done using a range of exercises, including burpees, jumping jacks, or other exercises that can be easily done anywhere and using body weight. There's also some evidence to suggest that even just doing 10 squats during these quick breaks, 10 times per day can have a positive impact on your health. Reading about many of the potential benefits, I decided to give it a try for two weeks. What the science says Prolonged periods of inactivity can negatively impact health and well-being. Not only can sitting for long periods lead to musculoskeletal problems, but there is also some evidence to suggest it may be tied to increased risk for hypertension. In one study, people who sat for longer periods of time had increased blood pressure compared to people who were more active during the day. Reduced mobility after meals can also impact blood glucose levels, whereas movement, even in the form of leg fidgeting, may have positive impacts on blood glucose control. There is also evidence that exercise snacks can positively impact cardiovascular fitness, blood glucose control, and muscular function and balance. The setup I used a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) for several days before getting started to gauge my baseline levels and blood glucose control. A CGM is not required. I also took my weight using a body fat scale and monitored my blood pressure. I continued to monitor glucose levels, weight, and blood pressure during my 2-week experiment. I also shared my plan with colleagues, both to hold myself accountable and so that they wouldn't be confused if they saw me doing squats around the office or during meetings. How it went I work a hybrid schedule. I go into the office 2 days a week and work from home the other 3 days. I decided to start my experiment on an in-office day and planned to mostly focus on squats. On my first day, I did some of my squats in the bathroom to give me privacy and other sets in conference rooms between meetings. I didn't notice many changes in the first day, though my thighs were very sore by the end of the work day. I found it easier to consistently do my exercises on my work-from-home days. There were some days when I missed a set, but I focused on giving myself grace and embracing the idea that any movement was better than no movement. As I moved through the two weeks, I experimented with timing, eventually adjusting the times to ensure that I always took an exercise snack break shortly after eating. My results I found that the foods I ate, more than anything, had the biggest impact on my blood glucose levels during my 2-week study. I did not see any shifts in blood pressure or sleep quality (I use a sleep tracker), or in my baseline blood glucose levels. When my exercise breaks occurred within 30 to 45 minutes following a meal, I did see that my blood glucose stabilized back to my baseline more rapidly than when I did not plan exercise breaks around meals. Exercise did not seem to have any impact on immediate glucose spikes following a meal, however. I also lost 2 pounds during that time and saw a slight improvement in muscle tone in my lower body, and found I had more energy during the work day. If you decide to give exercise snacks a try, it's important to note that everyone's results will vary. How to get started You don't need any equipment to get started. All you need to do is to set you intentions, pick a day, and then dive in. You also don't have to do squats. I ended up doing a mix of body weight exercises. The important thing is to pick an exercise you can safely do and that helps elevate your heart rate and gets your muscles moving. The takeaway Carving out space in your day for more movement can have positive impacts on your health and well-being. If you can't commit to breaks every 45 minutes or even every hour, that's ok. The main thing is to find more time to move.