logo
‘Slippery slope': How will Pakistan strike India as tensions soar?

‘Slippery slope': How will Pakistan strike India as tensions soar?

Yahoo09-05-2025
Islamabad, Pakistan – On Wednesday evening, as Pakistan grappled with the aftermath of a wave of missile strikes from India that hit at least six cities, killing 31 people, the country's military spokesperson took to a microphone with a chilling warning.
'When Pakistan strikes India, it will come at a time and place of its own choosing,' Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry said in a media briefing. 'The whole world will come to know, and its reverberation will be heard everywhere.'
Two days later, India and Pakistan have moved even closer to the brink of war.
On Thursday, May 8, Pakistan accused India of flooding its airspace with kamikaze drones that were brought down over major cities, including Lahore and Karachi. India confirmed the drone assault, but said it was responding to a provocation from Pakistan — missiles and drones launched towards cities and air defence systems in India and Indian-administered Kashmir. Pakistan denied that charge, and subsequent accusations of missile and drone attacks on parts of Indian-administered Kashmir on Thursday night.
With Pakistan denying any missile or drone strikes against India, Chaudhry's warning of upcoming retribution remains alive, hovering over the 1.6 billion people of South Asia, 17 days after armed gunmen killed 26 male civilians in Pahalgam, Indian-administered Kashmir, triggering the current escalation.
Experts say how Pakistan responds will likely be shaped by its desire to demonstrate that it can hurt India, without pushing the crisis over the edge into a full-blown conflict.
'We are still far away from a war, but we are much closer than we were 24 hours ago,' said Christopher Clary, assistant professor of political science at the University at Albany.
Clary said that the next 'logical escalatory' step for both countries might be to target each other's military bases.
'We have already seen this with air defence-focused strikes,' Clary told Al Jazeera, referring to the Indian drone attacks that tried to target Pakistani radar systems overnight on May 7-8, and New Delhi's claims that Pakistan launched missiles and drones towards its military facilities.
'But I fear other strikes are likely in the next 24 hours. I think we are still several days from de-escalation,' Clary said, adding that more deaths are likely.
India and Pakistan have been at loggerheads since gaining independence from British colonial rule in August 1947, especially over the scenic Kashmir Valley in the northwestern subcontinent. Both control parts of it, with China in control of two thin slices. India claims all of Kashmir, while Pakistan claims all of Kashmir except the parts held by China, its ally.
They have fought multiple wars over Kashmir. The last major escalation occurred in February 2019, when India accused Pakistan of supporting armed groups responsible for a suicide bombing that killed 40 Indian soldiers in Pulwama, in Indian-administered Kashmir.
In response, India crossed the border for the first time since the 1971 war, launching air strikes in Balakot, Pakistan's northwest, claiming to have hit 'terrorist infrastructure' and having killed 'hundreds of fighters'.
Pakistan countered that the area was a forest and reported no casualties. It responded the next day with its own fighter jets, leading to a dogfight and the downing of an Indian jet. The captured pilot, Abhinandan Varthaman, was later returned to India, easing tensions.
Kamran Bokhari, senior director at the New Lines Institute for Strategy and Policy in Washington, DC, called the current situation 'much more dangerous' than in 2019.
India, he said, appeared to be locked into an 'escalatory spiral'.
'In case Pakistan makes a move, India will respond and up the ante,' he said.
'This is a new situation for Pakistan. For the military to say that it will respond in a time of its own choosing suggests they want to think it through, to strike in a manner that does not lead to escalation. But how that materialises is a function of capability and constraint.'
It took India 12 days to respond to the Pulwama killings with the Balakot strike in 2019. In the current conflict, the Indian response took even longer, 15 days, via 'Operation Sindoor,' which struck multiple Pakistani cities, including ones in Punjab, close to the Indian border.
Some analysts argue that while Pakistan has so far calibrated its response diplomatically and militarily, the drone strikes on Thursday morning marked a 'serious escalation'.
'The military is expected to respond in a manner that is firm and resolute, drawing on both public and political support. The scale of Pakistan's response will be quite telling,' said Arsla Jawaid, associate director at global consulting firm Control Risks, while speaking to Al Jazeera.
She said Pakistan is likely to opt for precision strikes targeting Indian military assets while avoiding civilian casualties.
'This could issue a decisive response while minimising further escalation. The latter will be a critical calculation in any Pakistani response,' she added.
Sahar Khan, a Washington, DC-based security analyst focused on South Asia, agreed that Pakistan will 'definitely' respond.
Khan said India had crossed several 'red lines,' including suspending the Indus Waters Treaty after the Pahalgam attack, and launching missile and drone attacks. The Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), mediated by the World Bank and signed in 1960, governs the distribution of Indus River waters, critical for millions across the subcontinent, particularly in Pakistan.
'The question is, what will they [the Pakistani military] target? That will determine the escalation dynamics and the eventual off-ramps,' she told Al Jazeera.
'I think Pakistan will retaliate, showcasing its military capabilities. Its defence systems remain intact, and that is an added incentive to respond,' Khan added.
With brinkmanship at its peak and both sides locked in aggressive posturing, the greatest fear remains that even a small miscalculation could lead to a fully fledged war between two nations with more than 150 nuclear weapons each.
Bokhari warned that India's strikes in Punjab, Pakistan's most populous and prosperous province, marked a dangerous precedent.
'By attacking Punjab, which was almost unthinkable, India has now made this the new normal. This is a real slippery slope,' he said.
Jawaid concurred, noting that drone strikes on Pakistani urban centres also suggest a shift in red lines.
'That opens the door to a sustained and heightened risk of escalation, which is deeply problematic due to the risk of miscalculation on both sides. We are in a case of who blinks first,' she said.
But Khan believes that there are a few potential off-ramps.
'The first is the international community, such as the US, China, and Russia, urging restraint. The second is for India and Pakistan to show willingness to redefine red lines, like India agreeing to the IWT again and Pakistan agreeing not to strike Indian military targets,' she said.
Jawaid, however, warned that even if India and Pakistan avoid a war, their already deeply strained equation has changed – there's a new normal that will define it.
'The longer this is sustained, the more challenging it becomes,' she said. 'The bilateral relationship is already fraught with heightened tensions, which will continue even if the current conflict settles down, especially due to unresolved issues around natural resources and Kashmir, which remains a flashpoint.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Multiple families were sent the wrong bodies after Air India disaster: report
Multiple families were sent the wrong bodies after Air India disaster: report

New York Post

time16 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Multiple families were sent the wrong bodies after Air India disaster: report

Families of UK residents killed in last month's Air India disaster have been sent the wrong bodies in repatriation blunders. The Daily Mail reports that at least two cases of mistaken identity had come to light, with one family having to abandon a funeral after being informed their coffin contained an unknown body. In another case, a coffin contained 'co-mingled' remains of more than one person killed in the flight 171 crash at Ahmedabad in western India on June 12. The scandal has sparked top-level inquiries in both the UK and India, the Mail reports, and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected to raise concerns with counterpart Narendra Modi this week. 5 Basit Zargar/ZUMA Press Wire / There were 52 British citizens killed among the 261 people who died after the plane lost power and crashed into a residential area soon after it lifted off to fly to London. All but one of the 242 people on board died as well as 19 people on the ground. Aviation lawyer James Healy-Pratt has been engaged to represent UK-based people impacted by the tragedy, with the remains of 12 people repatriated so far. 'I've been sitting down in the homes of these lovely British families over the last month, and the first thing they want is their loved ones back,' he told the Mail. 'But some of them have got the wrong remains and they are clearly distraught over this. 5 Getty Images 'It has been going on for a couple of weeks (and) I think these families deserve an explanation.' Healy-Pratt said the family which had received the wrong body had been left 'in limbo' since the devastating discovery was made. '(They) have no one to bury because it was the wrong person in their casket. 'And if isn't their relative, the question is, who is it in that coffin? Presumably it's another passenger and their relatives have been given the wrong remains. 'The coroner also has a problem because she has an unidentified person in her jurisdiction.' Investigations continue into how the disaster unfolded, with mounting attention on the actions of lead pilot Captain Sumeet Sabharwal. 5 AFP via Getty Images Some experts who have reviewed the initial report from India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) believe a pilot on turned off two switches controlling fuel flow to the plane's engines. The first was moved three seconds after lift off and the other one second later, the AAIB report found, before being turned back on a further 10 seconds later. Fingers have been pointed at Captain Sabharwal because his younger co-pilot, Clive Kunder, would have had his 'hands full' while flying the plane. Air India's inspection of the locking feature on the fuel control switches of its existing Boeing 787 aircraft found no issues, an internal communication circulated within the airline said on July 17. 5 AFP via Getty Images India's aviation regulator ordered the country's airlines this week to investigate the locking feature on the switches of several Boeing models. The order came after Boeing notified operators that the fuel switch locks on its jets were safe. However, it was in line with a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB) issued by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in 2018, which recommended inspection of the locks to ensure they could not be moved accidentally. Air India's probe found no problems with the locking mechanism. 5 Saurabh Sirohiya/NurPhoto/Shutterstock 'Over the weekend, our Engineering team initiated precautionary inspections on the locking mechanism of Fuel Control Switch (FCS) on all our Boeing 787 aircraft,' the airline's flight operations department said in a communication to its pilots. 'The inspections have been completed and no issues were found.' A spokesperson for the UK government told the Mail formal identification of the bodies was a 'matter for the Indian authorities'. 'We understand that this is an extremely distressing time for the families, and our thoughts remain with them,' they said.

Keir Starmer and Narendra Modi set to sign off on Britain-India trade deal
Keir Starmer and Narendra Modi set to sign off on Britain-India trade deal

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Keir Starmer and Narendra Modi set to sign off on Britain-India trade deal

Sir Keir Starmer and India's Narendra Modi are set to sign off on a trade deal worth £6 billion in investment for the British economy. The Prime Minister and his Indian counterpart also agreed ahead of their meeting on Thursday to ramp up joint efforts to tackle illegal migration and organised crime. The UK-India trade deal is understood to be the largest of its kind for its economic impact on Britain. It will see tariffs on an array of British goods reduced from an average of 15% to 3%, with the aim of boosting the £11 billion of imports into the south Asian nation. Whisky tariffs will be slashed in half, according to the Government, and will fall further over successive years, while other industries including soft drinks, cars and cosmetics are also expected to see cheaper duties. Before his meeting with Mr Modi to confirm the deal, Sir Keir said: 'Our landmark trade deal with India is a major win for Britain. It will create thousands of British jobs across the UK, unlock new opportunities for businesses and drive growth in every corner of the country, delivering on our Plan for Change. 'We're putting more money in the pockets of hardworking Brits and helping families with the cost of living, and we're determined to go further and faster to grow the economy and raise living standards across the UK.' The deal is expected to result in 2,200 jobs across the country and £6 billion investment by British and Indian businesses. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the investment will 'reach all regions and nations of the UK so working people in every community can feel the benefits'. He added: 'The almost £6 billion in new investment and export wins announced today will deliver thousands of jobs and shows the strength of our partnership with India as we ensure the UK is the best place in the world to invest and do business.' The UK and India are also bolstering co-operation on tackling corruption, fraud, organised crime and illegal migration, by sharing criminal records and other intelligence. The deal has not given the UK as much access as it would have liked to India's financial and legal services industries. The agreement promises some benefits for the UK's financial services, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves understood to have pushed on behalf of the sector in discussions with her Indian counterpart. But more wide-ranging access was not agreed, and talks continue on a bilateral investment treaty aimed at protecting British investments in India and vice versa. The two nations also continue to discuss UK plans for a tax on high-carbon industries, which India believes could hit its imports unfairly. Negotiations on the deal began when Boris Johnson was prime minister in 2022, and were concluded in May this year. Labour sought to portray closing the deal, as well as trade agreements with the US and the EU, as evidence of the Government's pragmatism and global outlook. But shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith said it had only been made possible 'because of Brexit delivered by the Conservatives'. He added: 'Any trade deal that can successfully cut regulation which stops Britain's makers from creating new jobs and wealth will be a step in the right direction. 'But the irony should not be lost on anyone that any gains from this trade deal will be blown out of the water by (Deputy Prime Minister) Angela Rayner's union charter, stifling business with red tape, the jobs tax and, come autumn, Rachel Reeves' inevitable tax hikes that will punish Britain's makers just to reward those who do not contribute.' The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has said that the signing 'sends a powerful signal that the UK is open for business and remains resolute in its commitment to free and fair trade'. Chief executive Rain Newton-Smith added: 'A trade agreement with India – one of the world's fastest-growing economies – is a springboard for long-term partnership and prosperity. UK firms can take advantage of this new platform to scale, diversify and compete on the global stage.' Elsewhere, Sir Keir is facing calls to raise the case of Jagtar Singh Johal, a British citizen who has been detained in India since 2017, when the Prime Minister meets Mr Modi. The Scottish Sikh is accused of being a member of the Khalistan Liberation Force, which is banned as a terror group in India. His family say he is being arbitrarily detained, with his brother Gurpreet Singh Johal insisting the matter should be 'high on the agenda when the prime ministers meet'.

House food service workers, Democrats stage boycott in fight to keep union jobs
House food service workers, Democrats stage boycott in fight to keep union jobs

Politico

time2 hours ago

  • Politico

House food service workers, Democrats stage boycott in fight to keep union jobs

House food service workers, with support from Democratic lawmakers, called for a boycott of some Capitol complex restaurants Thursday — demanding that incoming dining subcontractors maintain the previous union-negotiated base pay and benefits. Congressional Labor Caucus co-chairs Reps. Steven Hordford (D-Nev.), Donald Norcross (D-N.J.) and Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) joined food service employees in front of the Capitol building after final votes Thursday to protest the new vendors' delay in recognizing the Unite Here Local 23 bargaining unit's existing agreement. Union members are asking lawmakers, staff and Capitol visitors to boycott six of the new venues: Starbucks, Pakistani food restaurant CHA Street Food, Jimmy John's, Panera, Java House and PX Tacos. 'We have 124 members in our labor caucus. That means, along with the rest of the Democrats, half the people will not be buying Starbucks coffee,' Dingell told reporters at the boycott announcement. The House of Representatives is ending its contract with food service company Sodexo, which employed close to 200 workers, in favor of new vendors to take over in the coming months. More than 100 Democratic lawmakers signed a letter last week calling for the subcontractors to rehire employees at the in-Capitol outlets where they previously worked and keep the previous union contract's minimum $22.15 hourly wage, health care and retirement benefits. 'Many of us know these workers directly and have cherished our interactions with them over the years,' the letter reads. 'It is critical that you retain these workers to avoid any disruption to their livelihoods and to preserve their institutional knowledge and established relationships with Members of Congress and their staff.' Employees have only received return offers from one of the seven contractors so far — Metz, which is running the cafeterias, according to a statement from Unite Here. 'My coworkers and I have struggled over the years to make this the kind of job we can raise our families on,' union steward and long-time Capitol dining employee Rickie Toon said at Thursday's event. 'We call on everyone who cares about the dignity of labor to honor this boycott.' The union-organized boycott begins immediately, though the House is out of session for August recess starting this afternoon.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store