logo
‘Slippery slope': How will Pakistan strike India as tensions soar?

‘Slippery slope': How will Pakistan strike India as tensions soar?

Yahoo09-05-2025
Islamabad, Pakistan – On Wednesday evening, as Pakistan grappled with the aftermath of a wave of missile strikes from India that hit at least six cities, killing 31 people, the country's military spokesperson took to a microphone with a chilling warning.
'When Pakistan strikes India, it will come at a time and place of its own choosing,' Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry said in a media briefing. 'The whole world will come to know, and its reverberation will be heard everywhere.'
Two days later, India and Pakistan have moved even closer to the brink of war.
On Thursday, May 8, Pakistan accused India of flooding its airspace with kamikaze drones that were brought down over major cities, including Lahore and Karachi. India confirmed the drone assault, but said it was responding to a provocation from Pakistan — missiles and drones launched towards cities and air defence systems in India and Indian-administered Kashmir. Pakistan denied that charge, and subsequent accusations of missile and drone attacks on parts of Indian-administered Kashmir on Thursday night.
With Pakistan denying any missile or drone strikes against India, Chaudhry's warning of upcoming retribution remains alive, hovering over the 1.6 billion people of South Asia, 17 days after armed gunmen killed 26 male civilians in Pahalgam, Indian-administered Kashmir, triggering the current escalation.
Experts say how Pakistan responds will likely be shaped by its desire to demonstrate that it can hurt India, without pushing the crisis over the edge into a full-blown conflict.
'We are still far away from a war, but we are much closer than we were 24 hours ago,' said Christopher Clary, assistant professor of political science at the University at Albany.
Clary said that the next 'logical escalatory' step for both countries might be to target each other's military bases.
'We have already seen this with air defence-focused strikes,' Clary told Al Jazeera, referring to the Indian drone attacks that tried to target Pakistani radar systems overnight on May 7-8, and New Delhi's claims that Pakistan launched missiles and drones towards its military facilities.
'But I fear other strikes are likely in the next 24 hours. I think we are still several days from de-escalation,' Clary said, adding that more deaths are likely.
India and Pakistan have been at loggerheads since gaining independence from British colonial rule in August 1947, especially over the scenic Kashmir Valley in the northwestern subcontinent. Both control parts of it, with China in control of two thin slices. India claims all of Kashmir, while Pakistan claims all of Kashmir except the parts held by China, its ally.
They have fought multiple wars over Kashmir. The last major escalation occurred in February 2019, when India accused Pakistan of supporting armed groups responsible for a suicide bombing that killed 40 Indian soldiers in Pulwama, in Indian-administered Kashmir.
In response, India crossed the border for the first time since the 1971 war, launching air strikes in Balakot, Pakistan's northwest, claiming to have hit 'terrorist infrastructure' and having killed 'hundreds of fighters'.
Pakistan countered that the area was a forest and reported no casualties. It responded the next day with its own fighter jets, leading to a dogfight and the downing of an Indian jet. The captured pilot, Abhinandan Varthaman, was later returned to India, easing tensions.
Kamran Bokhari, senior director at the New Lines Institute for Strategy and Policy in Washington, DC, called the current situation 'much more dangerous' than in 2019.
India, he said, appeared to be locked into an 'escalatory spiral'.
'In case Pakistan makes a move, India will respond and up the ante,' he said.
'This is a new situation for Pakistan. For the military to say that it will respond in a time of its own choosing suggests they want to think it through, to strike in a manner that does not lead to escalation. But how that materialises is a function of capability and constraint.'
It took India 12 days to respond to the Pulwama killings with the Balakot strike in 2019. In the current conflict, the Indian response took even longer, 15 days, via 'Operation Sindoor,' which struck multiple Pakistani cities, including ones in Punjab, close to the Indian border.
Some analysts argue that while Pakistan has so far calibrated its response diplomatically and militarily, the drone strikes on Thursday morning marked a 'serious escalation'.
'The military is expected to respond in a manner that is firm and resolute, drawing on both public and political support. The scale of Pakistan's response will be quite telling,' said Arsla Jawaid, associate director at global consulting firm Control Risks, while speaking to Al Jazeera.
She said Pakistan is likely to opt for precision strikes targeting Indian military assets while avoiding civilian casualties.
'This could issue a decisive response while minimising further escalation. The latter will be a critical calculation in any Pakistani response,' she added.
Sahar Khan, a Washington, DC-based security analyst focused on South Asia, agreed that Pakistan will 'definitely' respond.
Khan said India had crossed several 'red lines,' including suspending the Indus Waters Treaty after the Pahalgam attack, and launching missile and drone attacks. The Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), mediated by the World Bank and signed in 1960, governs the distribution of Indus River waters, critical for millions across the subcontinent, particularly in Pakistan.
'The question is, what will they [the Pakistani military] target? That will determine the escalation dynamics and the eventual off-ramps,' she told Al Jazeera.
'I think Pakistan will retaliate, showcasing its military capabilities. Its defence systems remain intact, and that is an added incentive to respond,' Khan added.
With brinkmanship at its peak and both sides locked in aggressive posturing, the greatest fear remains that even a small miscalculation could lead to a fully fledged war between two nations with more than 150 nuclear weapons each.
Bokhari warned that India's strikes in Punjab, Pakistan's most populous and prosperous province, marked a dangerous precedent.
'By attacking Punjab, which was almost unthinkable, India has now made this the new normal. This is a real slippery slope,' he said.
Jawaid concurred, noting that drone strikes on Pakistani urban centres also suggest a shift in red lines.
'That opens the door to a sustained and heightened risk of escalation, which is deeply problematic due to the risk of miscalculation on both sides. We are in a case of who blinks first,' she said.
But Khan believes that there are a few potential off-ramps.
'The first is the international community, such as the US, China, and Russia, urging restraint. The second is for India and Pakistan to show willingness to redefine red lines, like India agreeing to the IWT again and Pakistan agreeing not to strike Indian military targets,' she said.
Jawaid, however, warned that even if India and Pakistan avoid a war, their already deeply strained equation has changed – there's a new normal that will define it.
'The longer this is sustained, the more challenging it becomes,' she said. 'The bilateral relationship is already fraught with heightened tensions, which will continue even if the current conflict settles down, especially due to unresolved issues around natural resources and Kashmir, which remains a flashpoint.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We're creating AI that could surveil US citizens. And the government is in on it.
We're creating AI that could surveil US citizens. And the government is in on it.

USA Today

time22 minutes ago

  • USA Today

We're creating AI that could surveil US citizens. And the government is in on it.

Tech companies' lack of transparency and accountability in developing surveillance tools that governments can use is unacceptable. President Donald Trump recently gathered CEOs for a summit about renewing the United States 'spiritually and financially.' At the top of the agenda was a closer look at 'American values' such as faith and freedom. There is cause for alarm, however. Centuries after Americans declared independence from the British monarchy, our freedom and liberty are under threat − not only from foreign governments like China, but potentially our own. America's surveillance state is spreading as the federal government collects personal data of hundreds of millions of Americans. In the age of artificial intelligence, with data collection accelerating at an unprecedented rate, our privacy has never been more vulnerable. Who is the culprit? The data collectors range from the National Security Agency to Silicon Valley's cadre of data-hungry technology companies. Add to that list a new organization: Palantir. While it is not a household name like Google or Netflix, it is soon to be a common domestic concern. The technology company's surveillance operation has exploded in recent months, raising the possibility of creating a full-fledged surveillance state. Opinion: AI knows we shouldn't trust it for everything. I know because I asked it. Since January, Palantir has received more than $113 million in federal funds, according to The New York Times, not including a $795 million Defense Department contract awarded in May. While the federal government increased data sharing across agencies (with Palantir's help), the company continues to shop its technology to the Social Security Administration and the Internal Revenue Service. AI technology could be repurposed for sinister uses We are talking about technology that can be weaponized. While Palantir's current focus is to identify people in the United States illegally, tracking movements in real time, the company is also building the infrastructure that could be used for a massive surveillance state. Former Palantir employees have warned about the potential for the company's AI tools to surveil American citizens with a disregard for personal privacy. It is not so far-fetched. Palantir's AI software is used by the Israeli Defense Forces to strike targets in Gaza. It is used to assist the U.S. Defense Department in analyzing drone footage. And it has been used by the Los Angeles Police Department to forecast crime patterns. This is called 'predictive policing.' If "Minority Report"was not a horror movie before, it is now. Given the government's penchant for abusing power (see: COVID-19 censorship or the NSA spying scandal), does this not seem like an obvious move against our civil liberties? For years, the NSA engaged in the mass surveillance of Americans' telephone records, as was exposed in 2013. Between 2001 and 2007, government wiretapping − executed without warrants − affected millions of U.S. citizens. Now, the same agencies are tapping into the power of AI to expand government surveillance in once unimaginable ways. Opinion: AI is changing our world. At what point will it change our reality? Of course, the federal government can already access a wide range of our personal data, but it is often separated by agency. Washington, DC, can create exponentially more detailed profiles on all of us by sharing data with the help of Palantir's AI tools. Even when surveilling noncitizens, the government's data collection inevitably tracks individual Americans based on their own interactions with these noncitizens. The government's data collection is based on information from police departments, financial institutions and other entities, like Palantir. Big government and big tech partnership raises concerns Even if the alliance between the government and Palantir works as intended, it is a potential threat to our civil liberties. Political dissidents could become targets. Not even those with limited public personas are safe from the state's detailed profiling machine. These systems are not perfect, and neither are our leaders. What happens when AI systems fail? What happens when data collection goes haywire? Palantir is hardly alone. OpenAI recently launched OpenAI for Government, which aims to equip federal, state and local leaders with advanced AI tools. OpenAI claims to serve the 'public good' and 'bolster national security readiness,' but why would private citizens take that at face value? What does 'readiness' actually mean, in practice? At the moment, many of our elected officials do not have answers to these questions, or they are just ignoring them. The same goes for OpenAI and Palantir, which are all too comfortable amassing ever-larger federal contracts and greater market share. This lack of transparency or accountability is unacceptable. The only thing worse than the overreach of Big Government is Big Tech in bed with Big Government. For those who care about freedom and liberty, now is the time to speak up, before it is too late. Peyton Hornberger serves as communications director at The Alliance for Secure AI, a nonprofit organization that educates the public about the implications of advanced artificial intelligence.

Reeves warned pensions tax raid could cost UK in the long run
Reeves warned pensions tax raid could cost UK in the long run

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Reeves warned pensions tax raid could cost UK in the long run

City platform Hargreaves Lansdown has warned Rachel Reeves that 'tinkering' with the pension tax relief could cost the UK in the long run and undermine the government's fresh attempts to get workers to save more into retirement. The return of the Pensions Commission, which will report its findings on the adequacy of retirement savings in 2027, will likely see several policies recommended to the government to boost workers' savings as they approach retirement. But Hargreaves Lansdown has warned that expected tax rises in this year's Autumn Budget could thwart plans to boost pension contributions if the lump sum threshold is reduced or rates are changed. Its head of retirement Helen Morrissey said the commission will have a 'tricky' job in trying to get people to boost pension contributions but warned that hiking taxes could dissuade people from putting enough cash in pension pots. 'As we run into the Budget any discussion around reform of pension tax relief needs to be treated with care,' Morrissey said. 'Tinkering with these incentives could lead to people putting less away for their future which could cost the state more in the long run. 'Stability in pensions tax is essential if people are going to be confident that the money they put away today will be there for them decades into the future.' The Fabian Society, a left-wing think tank, said last year the government should create a flat rate of tax relief for individual and employer pension contributions for all tax bands or reduce the tax-free lump sum, which can currently be in excess of £250,000. Labour ministers ruled out scrapping the higher 40 per cent rate tax relief on pension contributions before the last Budget but it has so far refused to comment on suggestions pensions could be targeted. Pensions commission introduced to help boost savings The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) said some 45 per cent of workers were not putting any cash into their pensions, with an estimated 15m people not saving enough for retirement. The new commission is expected to look more closely at small savings trends across low-income workers in the private sector, the self-employed and people from Pakistani and Bangladeshi backgrounds. Its last version in 2006, which recommended auto-enrolment in workplace pensions, led to a rise in the number of eligible employee savings from 55 per cent in 2012 to 88 per cent now. Morrissey said members of the commission will have to consider how far earnings should be used for the 'here and now' versus for the future to prevent retirees from receiving a 'nasty shock' that hits their lifestyles. 'State pension and minimum auto-enrolment contributions should be set at a level that helps lower earners hit their target replacement rate and higher earners would be encouraged to contribute over and above these minimums to hit theirs.' Several City firms, including Fidelity International, have urged the commission to provide certainty on taxation as part of its efforts to encourage sensible saving. 'We encourage the government to take a holistic view, including pensions taxation in its considerations, to help shape a sustainable and effective policy framework for the future and avoid the constant speculation about pension taxation changes which risk causing real harm to consumers,' said James Carter, head of platform policy at Fidelity. Sign in to access your portfolio

UK, Australia back embattled submarine deal with US
UK, Australia back embattled submarine deal with US

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

UK, Australia back embattled submarine deal with US

Britain and Australia said Friday they will sign a 50-year commitment to their nuclear-powered submarine pact with the United States, seeking to bolster a deal that Washington has thrown into doubt. The two countries cast their pledge as a historic treaty but gave few details beyond saying it would help economic cooperation and "underpin" the existing, three-nation AUKUS pact. "It is a profoundly important treaty that we will sign tomorrow," Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles told reporters after talks in Sydney between the two countries' defence and foreign ministers. A US defence official last month revealed that a review of AUKUS was underway to ensure it "aligned with the President's America First agenda" and that the US defence industrial base was "meeting our needs". Under the 2021 AUKUS deal, Australia would acquire at least three Virginia-class submarines from the United States within 15 years, eventually manufacturing its own subs. The US Navy has 24 Virginia-class vessels but American shipyards are struggling to meet production targets set at two new boats each year. In the United States, critics question why Washington would sell nuclear-powered submarines to Australia without stocking its own military first. "A new government undertaking a review is the most natural thing in the world," Marles said of the decision by US President Donald Trump's administration. - 'Symbolism is important' - Australia had already contributed US$1 billion this year to help boost production and maintenance of submarines in the United States, he said. "We are really confident that the production rates will be raised in America." Under AUKUS, Britain will eventually develop a new class of nuclear-powered attack submarines, the SSN-AUKUS, to enter service from the late 2030s. Australia would also build the SSN-AUKUS, with delivery expected to its navy in the early 2040s. British Defence Secretary John Healey said London welcomed the US review. "It's an opportunity for the new administration to renew America's commitment to the deep AUKUS partnership that our three nations have," he said. In a government statement, Britain repeated previously released figures saying that the AUKUS submarine programme would lead to the creation of 21,000 UK jobs. It said the submarine programme was expected to be worth "up to" 20 billion pounds (US$27 billion) in British exports over the next 25 years. Analyst Tom Corben from the United States Studies Centre in Australia said the new treaty between Canberra and London was an important show of solidarity. "The symbolism is important given everything else that is happening," he said. Britain's defence and foreign ministers were visiting Australia as their country's Carrier Strike Group and 3,000 personnel took part in annual Talisman Sabre military exercises across Australia and Papua New Guinea. djw/sft/amj Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store