Dixon auto repair business says goodbye after over 55 years of keeping community rolling
At the time, he had no idea that it would mark the beginning of a decades-long legacy. Now, more than 55 years later, his time working on vehicles at that spot — now known as Russ' Automotive Service — has come to a close.
Friday was Shuck's last day in business. He sold the building to Nate Rockwood of Amboy, who plans to bring his automotive window tinting service, TintWood, to Dixon.
ExpandAutoplay
Image 1 of 6
Russ Shuck, who's run Russ' Automotive Service for over 55 years, hung up his wrench Friday, May 9, 2025. (Alex T. Paschal)
Shuck recalls getting his start in the business by working for the former owner, Bud Carr, for 20 years and managing the business for the last five of those years.
"One day, Bud went fishing and came back and said, 'You guys are doing fine running it. You should just take over,'" Shuck recalled.
Shuck purchased the business from Carr in the summer of 1988. He operated it as a full-service gas station until 2006, when he closed the pumps and opened Russ' Automotive Service & Towing.
"He always told me, 'You'll never get rich in the gas business but you'll never starve,'" Shuck said. "And I never did. But I made a good business out of it and I've got nothing to complain about."
As the years rolled on, advancements in automotive technology kept Shuck on his toes as he learned to keep up to date through personal research and fellow mechanics. He attributes the businesses' success to transparency with his customers.
"I never flinched when telling a customer what was needed and always tried to do my best," Shuck said. "They always liked me for that."
Many times, Shuck went above and beyond for his customers, often creating tabs to make things easier for busy customers. He shared one example involving the rural fire department.
"One night, after they got rid of their tankers, they needed fuel for their trucks and vehicles," Shuck recalled. "So, I gave them a key and told them if something happened and I wasn't here, to help themselves and make out a ticket. They were great guys and I was happy to help."
Shuck is 73 years old now and moving around the shop has gotten harder. Although he will continue his towing service, he decided it was finally time to take the break he had never allowed himself over the years.
"Tires and stuff on cars are getting bigger and heavier, and I'm struggling to get them up," Shuck said. "I got a bad knee. I'll continue to do the wrecker service, but working on cars is getting a little bit too much for me to handle, and I think it's a good time to get out."
He plans to spend his extra free time restoring classic cars, including his 1967 Dodge Dart.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Classic Chrysler Proves It's Tougher Than Modern Cars
Read the full story on Backfire News A classic Chrysler New Yorker that was rear-ended by a modern car demonstrated they don't make them like they used to. The owner took to social media to share the aftermath of the crash, which shows the front end of the newer vehicle demolished and the classic taking seemingly no the old Chrysler lost its rear license plate and the plastic holder. But the bumper and everything else on it looks just fine. But the other car, which is something like a Dodge Dart or Toyota Corolla – it's really hard to tell at this point – had its front end crumpled like an accordion. We know newer vehicles are designed with crumple zones, so the modern sedan did what it was supposed to. That keeps the energy from the impact reaching the people inside the vehicle, at least to a point, reducing the likelihood of injuries. But the owner of the Chrysler doesn't mention even a sore neck or back from the collision. Instead, the Facebook post about the crash reads as follows: 'So, how's your day going ? I was just driving home from company picnic… Cop said 'they don't make them like they used to..' when he saw the 'damage' on my 1973 Chrysler New Yorker : the license plate fell off.' People had plenty of jokey replies to the post about the Chrysler 'eating' the other vehicle or the modern car being the New Yorker's crumple zone. However, some believe the photos are some sort of 'setup' to make it look like the classic car wasn't damaged in the crash that creamed the other ride. We suppose they believe this is some conspiracy of the classic automobile industry or some such nonsense. But we know from experience the right modern trucks and SUVs would've held up similarly to the classic Chrysler. Part of it has to do with how the vehicle is constructed. If you know, you know. Images via Detroit's Forgotten Wheels/Facebook
Motor Trend
7 days ago
- Motor Trend
How Do a Camper, Bikes, and a Cargo Box Affect EV Range?
Mount a rooftop cargo carrier or hitch a trailer to a large gas SUV, and most drivers will take the inevitable efficiency and range hit without complaint. Do the same thing with an EV, though, and range and charging anxieties bubble back to the surface. We tested the Kia EV9's range with added accessories including a roof box, bikes, and towing a camper. Towing especially reduces range, highlighting the need for a larger battery or gas engine when it comes to long-distance towing. This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article Read Next Can you practically haul skis or bikes or a camper with an EV? To answer that question, I saddled MotorTrend 's yearlong review 2024 Kia EV9 Land with three big-kid toys and measured their impact on range. The toys we gathered up would make for a great summer vacation. General RV loaned us a Modern Buggy Little Buggy 12LRK, a 1,685-pound teardrop camper with a sleeping space for two, an exterior kitchen, and a rooftop tent. A Kuat Piston Pro bike rack provided a platform for two full-suspension mountain bikes, while a Yakima SkyBox 16 Carbonite cargo carrier clamped to Kia's $360 accessory roof-rack crossbars added 16 cubic feet of lockable, weather-resistant cargo space to the 20 cubes behind the EV9's third row. Suppressing a strong urge to drive off into the woods, I steered the EV9 to our Michigan proving ground where I tested each accessory individually and the full rig with all three toys attached. How We Tested EV Range It would have taken days to run MotorTrend 's standard EV range test on public roads for all four configurations. That's not just a pain in the butt; the changing traffic and weather (which directly affects air density and drag) would compromise the results. To eliminate those variables, we performed coast-down testing on the proving ground's 1.6-mile straight. Coast-down testing measures a vehicle's road-load force, or the amount of shove it takes to overcome air resistance, drivetrain friction, and tire losses to maintain a given speed. Automakers regularly use it as part of EPA range and fuel-economy testing, following the procedures and calculations outlined in SAE International's J2263 standard. We used a simplified version of the SAE J2263 test for this story, but the basics are the same: Accelerate to 80 mph, shift into neutral, and let the Racelogic Vbox Touch data loggers record the speed trace as the vehicle slowly decelerates. The test is a rolling demonstration of just how aerodynamic and efficient modern cars are. With all the accessories removed, the EV9 sailed for more than a mile and was still traveling 40 mph at the end of the straight. The power curves above are calculated from the road load force. It takes 35 hp to maintain 70 mph in the bare, stock EV9. Pushing the roof box through the air raises that to 38 hp, while pulling the trailer at 70 mph requires more than double that. The Range Results An EV's MotorTrend Road-Trip Range represents how far it can travel at 70 mph using 95 percent of a full charge. Early in its stay, we established that our long-term EV9 Land can cover 270 miles in that test—a fantastic showing for a vehicle with an EPA range of 280 miles. The table below shows how range drops with the Yakima roof box, mountain bikes, and Modern Buggy camper hooked up. See any surprises? We were expecting a bigger hit from the Yakima roof box, both on its own and when it was mounted along with the camper and bikes. We were also surprised to see that the bikes mounted on the back of the Kia had a larger impact on range than the cargo carrier (though the difference is small enough to be insignificant). We're not surprised to see the Modern Buggy camper takes a huge bite out of the Kia EV9's range. While the teardrop camper is fully shielded by the EV9's frontal area, the rooftop tent sticks above the SUV's roofline and likely creates significant turbulence. Kia engineers clearly knew that towing long distances would be a fool's errand. The moment you plug a trailer's electrical connector into the EV9, the range estimation plummets to just over 100 miles on a full charge, slightly under-promising so that the EV9 has a chance to overdeliver. As long as you aren't traveling far, the EV9 is a fantastic tow vehicle. The factory-installed hitch is easy to access and features huge ears that make hooking up safety chains easy. The blind-spot cameras give you a great view when changing lanes, and with its upgraded 516 lb-ft of torque, our EV9 Land effortlessly tugs light loads. Our big-kid toy test proves that it's possible to still cover long distances in an EV with a roof-mounted cargo carrier or rear-mounted bike rack installed. Towing, though, remains the one hurdle that can only be solved with a massive battery—or a gas engine. For More on Our Long-Term 2024 Kia EV9 Land: Can the 2024 Kia EV9 Electric SUV Replace a Gas-Powered Family Hauler? We Downloaded More Torque and New Features for Our Kia EV9. Was It Worth the Cost? Our Kia EV9 Charges Like a Champ—So Long as You Avoid Tesla Superchargers Why Did Our Kia EV9's First Service Cost $322? Aren't EVs Supposed to Be Cheaper to Maintain? Did Our Yearlong Kia EV9 Do a Crime? 1,100-Mile Road-Trip Roulette: Kia EV9 vs. Two Toddlers, One Dog, Single-Digit Temps, and Holiday Travelers What the Kia EV9 Gets Right and Wrong About the Future of Cars
The Drive
09-07-2025
- The Drive
Dear Dodge Dart Owners: My Bad
The latest car news, reviews, and features. Last week, I wrote what seemed like a mundane news story about the Dodge Dart. For those who missed it, the feds are opening an investigation into whether a previous transmission shifter bushing recall actually fixed the problem it was designed to address. Dry stuff, really, but it passed for news in a traditionally not-so-newsy week, and to liven things up a bit, I may have taken a shot or two at the now-discontinued FCA compact, and then signed off by dressing up our normal tip solicitation just a tad: 'Of the 299,000 supposedly still out there, there might be six or seven that aren't rotting away in somebody's alleyway. ' ' Got a Dodge Dart that actually runs? Let us know at tips@ ' Welp, contrary to my flippant remarks, there really are more than just a few running Darts left in the wild, and as it turns out, quite a few of their owners read The Drive . And in defiance of all conventional Internet wisdom—not only did many of you actually read all the way to the end, but you took that bit of rhetorical flourish to heart. Over the course of the holiday weekend, Dart owner after Dart owner deposited a fresh email in our inbox, and most (though not all) of them heaped praise on their cars. Seriously, where are you all hiding? And you're all just so darned nice —too nice to treat my playful sniping as an act of hostility. Here's a sampling of the notes we received: Here's Noah to kick things off: Hello! I just finished reading Byron Hurd's piece on the Dodge Dart's faulty shifter cable. Funny enough, I don't remember ever receiving a previous recall notice and I haven't had any issues. I do perform all the maintenance myself and my Dart runs like a champ! I will keep this in mind and keep a lookout for any recalls! Have a Happy Independence Day!!! Niclas, a fellow orange-car connoisseur writes: Boy do I have a Dodge Dart. One from 2016 and two from way back in the day(older than me). It a 2016 with about 130,000 miles on it. And thank goodness it's not a lame automatic. It's seen better days. But she gets me from point A to point B and sometimes to C. I actually drove 1000 miles to get it. It was the closest one. Had to be a Dodge. Had to be a manual and most of all it had to be ORANGE. Thanks Lawrence writes: I bought a 2013 Dodge Dart new, still driving it. It's been in the shop 3 times. 2 for recalls (TCM and shifter bushing) 3rd time for a wheel alignment(maintenance). The car currently has 109768 Kilometers. It has the 1.4 turbo motor with the DDCT transmission. I had to adjust the wastegate, which I believe there is a bulletin for it. The vehicle is amazing on fuel on the highway, almost 1000 k to a tank. I replaced the rear brake pads this spring as the backing plates was rusty due to our winters. So far it's been a great reliable vehicle. It also has the rare Laguna blue paint (see photo) Robert seems to know the secret to keeping his son's Dart on the road: I wanted to email in about my 2013 Dodge Dart. It still runs fine and I have 170,000 miles on it now. I've even passed it down to my son who's started driving this summer. Let me know if you have any questions. I did experience the shifter cable failure but fixed it on my own. Roy's experience has been flawless: Best car I've ever owned. In the last almost eight years I've owned it I have only had 1 engine code for a sensor and of course the recalls. Which never gave me any issues. I only got them done for the sake of it being a recall. Better than average gas mileage at 26 City and 30 plus highway mpg. I haven't even had to replace the brakes yet. Michael's hasn't, but he's getting by: I have a 2013 Dodge dart that is experiencing those problems but it hasn't gotten to the point where it has been rendered useless I actually like the car for the most part I got a 6-speed 2013 Dodge dart SE manual. But Stephanie loves her 2016, and also included a pic. Blue Dart owners roll deep! Hello, I hope you're doing well. I've had my dart for 6 years now and I still love it. I have put it in the shop a couple of times but not until the last 6 months, the fuel pump went out and my motor mounts had to be replaced. Granted I hit a curb going pretty fast and knocked out the shifting linkage on my own and had that repaired in 2021. When i put it in the shop though, they did say I must be one of the lucky ones since mines done good overall. 2016 Dodge Dart GT. And we have another orange Dart owner here, Howie, who took a chance on one and had it pay off: I have a 2014 dart gt, 2.4l with a 6 speed manual. Crazy fun to drive and its General Lee orange. My wife wants to put the 01 on the doors and a flag on the roof. Only put a clutch and starter in it. Third owner, bought it with 121000 and currently at 172000. I bought as a commuter car to keep miles off of my Silverado. The first Dodge I've ever owned and I'm 51. It's all quiet on the Mopar front at Celia's: I own a 2015 Dodge Dart & it's still running. Read the article about the recall. Chris echoes that sentiment: I have a Dodge dart. 2014. It has over 100,000 miles on it. I have had very few problems with it. And then there's Mike, who couldn't be happier: hello, I have owned a dart since 2014 bought new. I have 135000 miles on it and had 0 issues. it is the Gt and it's peppy, 30 mpg and still in great shape, only 1 small rust bubble on the door. I love driving it and wish they still made them. I commute to work 60 miles a day 1 way and still enjoy this car. just wanted to share. A reader going only by auto_erotica might be the single most dedicated Dart owner on the planet: purchased a 2013 Dodge Dart Limited with the 1.4L and six-speed manual in December 2013 – the first year of the reissue. Still have it, still runs, is my daily driver, and I still love it. Yeah, it's a Dodge – has Dodge problems all day long. The 1.4L is from the Fiat 500 and is seriously overclocked in the Dart. I got a fight with the dealer (John Elway in Greeley, CO) when it was around 30K miles because the engine felt 'off'. It ran, but I just felt like it was having an issue. Finally got the dealer to take it in and keep it for a few days….they kept it for about a month and replaced the engine. They were kind enough to give me a nice loaner car in the meantime. It's had several recalls for stupid stuff, including needing the clutch cylinder replaced; and I really hate those heckin' low-sidewall-profile tires. Those damned tires – get a leak, flat in a minute. Always the sidewall, always requires a replacement. I will NEVER have a car with those *tty low-profile sides again. Brake Calipers are tempermental. Electronics flake out – Cruise Control will randomly crash, requires an engine-off restart Boost gate error trips, especially in hot weather – I watched a Youtube video and opened the waste gate a bit – about half of what the video suggested. Indeed it did help. But I need to go ahead and open it like the video suggested to see if that fixes it 100%. Paid a garage to replace the timing belt because you have to disassemble the whole front-right-end of the car to get at it. That's pure bullshit. But I purchased a (used) 2010 Mazda CX-9 for my wife, and that maintenance nightmare is far worse. Learned my lesson there…. But it's fun to drive with the manual and the turbo. Their official MPG is a wet dream. I drove it like a dead grandma when it was new and it never got the 40+ highway they claim. In 2013, it had the best set of safety and convenience features of any car in its price range. Seat heaters, a heated steering wheel, giant-ass display for the backup camera, this was heckin' sweet! I will drive it 'til it drops dead. Then I will revive it and drive it some more. MOPAR = My Old Pig Ain't Runnin' is still true. By far, the most surprising note came from The Drive 's very own Adam Ismail. He no longer has a Dart (running or otherwise), but I asked him to share his story anyway. He writes: So, I was still in college and I was coming out of a two year Focus lease…this was 2014 I wanna say. My family was a Chrysler family, unfortunately, and my dad wanted me in something new. My parents never wasted money except on bad new cars. He was interested in the Dart because they were practically giving them away back then, which should have been a red flag. Ultimately I had a 2.4 auto—basically the GT in every way except no leather or sunroof. It honestly was a decent car for the money but it was so thirsty, and so heavy. And the suspension was easily the worst of any small car I've ever experienced. That guy who said he blew so many tires on his Dart, I fully believe him because the same thing happened to me. Astonishingly hard ride, and those heavy 18-inch stock wheels with zero sidewall didn't help things at all. After three years I sold it and got a Fiesta ST which was a great decision. Of course I'm grateful to my parents because they paid for the Dart and I was able to put that toward the first car I bought with my own money, but yeah, not the choice I would've made. Given that Dodge sold 300,000-some-odd Darts, it really shouldn't surprise me that so many of them are still on the road, nor that one of our very own staffers had a Dart story to share. Still, to say that we've been impressed by this response would be an understatement. Kudos to all of you, and thank you for your feedback! It was, top-to-bottom, absolutely delightful to read. Got a controversial compact and a strong opinion about it? Let us know at tips@ or contact the author directly at byron@
