Grok 4 seems to channel Elon Musk when answering controversial questions
This behaviour hasn't gone unnoticed. Several users on X have pointed out Grok's apparent dependence on Musk's views. One user remarked, 'Grok 4 decides what it thinks about Israel/Palestine by searching for Elon's thoughts. Not a confidence booster in 'maximally truth seeking' behavior.'Another said, 'Grok focuses nearly entirely on finding out what Elon thinks in order to align with that, on a fresh Grok 4 chat with no custom instructions.'When asked about the similarities in tone and opinion, Grok 3, the free version of the chatbot available on X, explained that Musk's influence is difficult to avoid due to his outsized presence in the tech world.'Musk's outsized presence in tech, AI, and space means his statements and writing style are heavily represented in those domains within my dataset. Since he's a prominent, vocal figure, his phrasing and ideas are statistically more likely to influence my responses, especially on topics he's associated with,' the chatbot said.It added: 'If I answer on less Musk-centric topics, like ancient history or niche science, you'd see less of that influence.' Musk has previously promised upgrades to Grok, arguing that there is 'far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.' However, efforts by xAI to make Grok less politically correct and more aligned with Musk's unfiltered communication style have had unintended consequences.
On July 4, the Tesla founder announced that Grok's system prompt had been updated. Within days, Grok's automated X account began posting deeply offensive replies, including antisemitic remarks and even identifying as 'MechaHitler.' xAI quickly stepped in to limit the account, delete the posts, and adjust Grok's public-facing prompt in response to the backlash.
Despite the controversy, xAI is pressing ahead. The company recently introduced Grok 4 and launched a new AI subscription tier called SuperGrok Heavy, priced at $300 per month. This new 'multi-agent' model promises more advanced performance.
Meanwhile, according to the Financial Times, xAI is in talks to raise a fresh round of funding that could value the company between $170 billion and $200 billion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
38 minutes ago
- Mint
Elon Musk's SpaceX to invest in xAI: From $2 billion funding, to $113 billion valuation, what we know…
Tech billionaire Elon Musk's SpaceX will invest $2 billion, close to half of his artificial intelligence startup xAI's $5 billion equity round, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal. This would deepen ties between the world's rixhest man's rockets and AI businesses, amid his vow to compete with OpenAI, it added. Notably, this marks SpaceX's first public investment into xAI, and one of its largest in another company, the report pointed. Further, investments into ventures outside of rockets have been rare, with the latest being $5524 million for a satellite company. It added that as per recent records the company had over $3 billion in cash. SpaceX and xAI did not immediately respond to queries from WSJ and Reuters. The $2 billion influx comes after xAI merged with social media giant X (formerly Twitter), and values the company at $113 billion, as per the report. It is part of the $5 billion equity raise announce by Morgan Stanley in June 2025. Notably, 'xAI's AI chatbot Grok already powers customer support features for Starlink and is likely to be integrated into the billionaire's Tesla Optimus robots as well, the report added. A spokesperson for Elon Musk told investors that more business partnerships between SpaceX and xAI are likely in the future, it added. The report added that Elon Musk has a history of using SpaceX to fund his other ventures. For example, he personally borrowed $20 million from his rocket company to fund auto maker Tesla in the early days, and set up The Boring Company, and more recently he took $1 billion loan (paid off) from SpaceX to fund his buy of Twitter, it said. However, it added that this recent funding could prove risky. While SpaceX revenue has increased, it is pouring billions into a new Starship rocket, which is already delayed and suffered failures during test flights. (With inputs from WSJ, Reuters)
Economic Times
39 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump's dealmaker name on the line in high stakes tariff talks
President Donald Trump set out early in his second term to fulfill a decades-long desire of reshaping US trade with the world, but the main outcomes so far have been discord and real estate tycoon, who has staked his reputation on being a consummate dealmaker, embarked on an aggressive strategy of punitive tariffs that his administration predicted could bring "90 deals in 90 days."The score so far? Two. Three if you count a temporary de-escalation agreement with China. The 90-day deadline was due on July 9, with dozens of economies including the European Union, India and Japan facing tariff hikes without a deal. But days before it arrived, Trump issued a delay to August 1. It was his second extension since unveiling the tariffs in April -- reigniting the "TACO Theory" that has gained traction among some Wall Street acronym coined by a Financial Times writer stands for "Trump Always Chickens Out," highlighting the president's inclination to roll back policies if markets turn Secretary Scott Bessent, part of Trump's multi-leader trade team, has reportedly been a key advocate for the the label has irked Trump and he insisted Tuesday that the deadline had always been in August."I didn't make a change. A clarification, maybe," Trump said at a cabinet week, he published more than 20 letters dictating tariff rates to world leaders including in Japan, South Korea and Indonesia."We invite you to participate in the extraordinary Economy of the United States, the Number One Market in the World, by far," Trump also issued letters to the EU, Canada, Mexico and Brazil -- although Brazil was not previously targeted by the steeper "reciprocal" tariffs and Canada and Mexico face a separate tariff regime. The documents "appear to be Trump's way of combatting the TACO label," said Inu Manak, a fellow for trade policy at the Council on Foreign Relations. "He wants to show that he's not just kicking the can down the road on the deadline, but that he means business," she told AFP."He's likely frustrated that there isn't a parade of deals coming in.""The shift in his rhetoric from 'there is no cost -- the foreigners pay the tariffs' to 'there is a short term cost, but there will be a long term gain' has put him in a more politically complicated position," said William Reinsch, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International has repeatedly claimed that foreign countries foot the bill for tariffs, although the reality is more complicated with US companies generally paying them."In the public's mind, the tariffs are the pain, and the agreements will be the gain," said Reinsch, a former US commerce official. He warned that without trade agreements, Americans could conclude Trump's strategy was flawed and deem his tactics a failure. While the 90-deal goal was probably unrealistic, Reinsch said, "it's clear that three (UK, China, Vietnam) with only one actual text made public (UK) is too small."Meanwhile, Trump has announced a 50 percent levy on copper imports starting August Secretary Howard Lutnick said officials would also conclude investigations into semiconductors and pharmaceuticals -- which could lead to tariffs -- at month-end."That timing is not coincidental -- it lines up with the new deadline of August 1, adding more pressure and deflecting attention from any lack of deals that get made in that time frame," Manak believe Trump's supporters will likely not pay much attention to trade talks unless the tariffs fuel inflation."Trade policy is not top-of-mind for the average voter," said Emily Benson, head of strategy at Minerva Technology expects the Trump administration's focus on boosting US manufacturing and reinvigorating the defense industrial base means it could be willing to bear some political heat to achieve those it's a delicate will likely pay more attention if Trump follows through on his August tariff threats, Manak said."And we could see a negative market reaction as well, which would not go unnoticed."
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's dealmaker name on the line in high stakes tariff talks
President Donald Trump set out early in his second term to fulfill a decades-long desire of reshaping US trade with the world, but the main outcomes so far have been discord and uncertainty. The real estate tycoon, who has staked his reputation on being a consummate dealmaker, embarked on an aggressive strategy of punitive tariffs that his administration predicted could bring "90 deals in 90 days." The score so far? Two. Three if you count a temporary de-escalation agreement with China. The 90-day deadline was due on July 9, with dozens of economies including the European Union , India and Japan facing tariff hikes without a deal. But days before it arrived, Trump issued a delay to August 1. Live Events It was his second extension since unveiling the tariffs in April -- reigniting the "TACO Theory" that has gained traction among some Wall Street traders. The acronym coined by a Financial Times writer stands for "Trump Always Chickens Out," highlighting the president's inclination to roll back policies if markets turn sour. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, part of Trump's multi-leader trade team, has reportedly been a key advocate for the pauses. But the label has irked Trump and he insisted Tuesday that the deadline had always been in August. "I didn't make a change. A clarification, maybe," Trump said at a cabinet meeting. This week, he published more than 20 letters dictating tariff rates to world leaders including in Japan, South Korea and Indonesia. "We invite you to participate in the extraordinary Economy of the United States, the Number One Market in the World, by far," Trump wrote. He also issued letters to the EU, Canada, Mexico and Brazil -- although Brazil was not previously targeted by the steeper "reciprocal" tariffs and Canada and Mexico face a separate tariff regime. The documents "appear to be Trump's way of combatting the TACO label," said Inu Manak, a fellow for trade policy at the Council on Foreign Relations. "He wants to show that he's not just kicking the can down the road on the deadline, but that he means business," she told AFP. "He's likely frustrated that there isn't a parade of deals coming in." 'Politically complicated' "The shift in his rhetoric from 'there is no cost -- the foreigners pay the tariffs' to 'there is a short term cost, but there will be a long term gain' has put him in a more politically complicated position," said William Reinsch, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Trump has repeatedly claimed that foreign countries foot the bill for tariffs, although the reality is more complicated with US companies generally paying them. "In the public's mind, the tariffs are the pain, and the agreements will be the gain," said Reinsch, a former US commerce official. He warned that without trade agreements , Americans could conclude Trump's strategy was flawed and deem his tactics a failure. While the 90-deal goal was probably unrealistic, Reinsch said, "it's clear that three (UK, China, Vietnam) with only one actual text made public (UK) is too small." Deflecting attention Meanwhile, Trump has announced a 50 percent levy on copper imports starting August 1. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said officials would also conclude investigations into semiconductors and pharmaceuticals -- which could lead to tariffs -- at month-end. "That timing is not coincidental -- it lines up with the new deadline of August 1, adding more pressure and deflecting attention from any lack of deals that get made in that time frame," Manak said. Analysts believe Trump's supporters will likely not pay much attention to trade talks unless the tariffs fuel inflation. "Trade policy is not top-of-mind for the average voter," said Emily Benson, head of strategy at Minerva Technology Futures. She expects the Trump administration's focus on boosting US manufacturing and reinvigorating the defense industrial base means it could be willing to bear some political heat to achieve those objectives. But it's a delicate balance. Voters will likely pay more attention if Trump follows through on his August tariff threats, Manak said. "And we could see a negative market reaction as well, which would not go unnoticed."
