Italy needs to upgrade ageing stadiums for club revenue boost, Euro 2032
Italy is trying to raise its game when it comes to stadiums, pressed by foreign investors who have acquired a number of clubs including the two Milan giants, and also needing arenas that are fit for purpose when it co-hosts the 2032 Euros, with Turkey.
But teams like AC Milan and Inter, as well as Lazio and Roma further south, are struggling to rebuild or renovate, wrangling with public bodies who often own stadiums, and getting caught up in red tape.
The result is that only six Italian stadiums were built or redeveloped in the 2007-2024 period, compared with 19 in Germany, 13 in England and 12 in France, according to consultancy firm PwC.
"At the San Siro stadium, we can't cook anything. The little food that we sell is all microwaved three minutes beforehand," AC Milan Chairman Paolo Scaroni told a PwC Italy event in March.
He contrasted it to the situation in Britain, where Tottenham Hotspur's new stadium even features an in-built microbrewery "because the English like to drink beer, and we can't even cook a plate of spaghetti."
The Tottenham stadium, designed by specialist company Populous, opened in 2019 at a cost of around 1 billion pounds ($1.4 billion) and features a retractable pitch. It also hosts other events such as NFL games.
GOVERNMENT HELP
The Italian government is trying to help, with a plan in the works to appoint a special commissioner with power to fast-track projects worth 5 billion euros ($5.8 billion) across different agencies, and speed up preparations for Euro 2032, the first major tournament in Italy since the 1990 World Cup.
The Italia 90 tournament, when matches were played at 12 venues across the country, marked the last time Italy embarked on a serious round of stadium upgrades.
"For Italian teams, sports facilities are the real gap with European peers," said Luigi De Siervo, Chief Executive Officer of Italy's top flight soccer league Serie A.
Although crowds have risen to levels not seen since the early 2000s, Serie A clubs generated just 440 million euros in matchday revenue in 2023-24 - according to a report from Deloitte - less than half of what England's Premier League earned.
"More modern arenas structurally generate higher match day revenues, they usually have a higher occupancy rate, more food outlets, with different price ranges, and pricier tickets," said Cristian Celoria, partner at consultancy firm PwC.
EURO 2032 CONCERNS
Besides frustrating club owners, Italy's lack of progress in redeveloping its sporting infrastructure could harm its role as a co-host of the Euros.
Italy must give European soccer's ruling body UEFA a list of five stadiums to host Euro 2032 games by October next year.
At present, among the 10 arenas Italy named in its initial bid document, only the Juventus one in Turin - one of the few club-owned grounds in Italy - is fit for the tournament, according to a UEFA official.
The 41,000-seater venue was completed only in 2011, replacing the Stadio delle Alpi which was built for the 1990 World Cup.
Venues needing redevelopment or new builds can be included in the final Euro 2032 shortlist, but the projects need to be fully financed and approved by next year's deadline, said the UEFA official, who asked not to be named.
"The need for a special commissioner is becoming even more urgent, as next year we will undergo a series of checks that may even result in some matches being reallocated to Turkey," said De Siervo, the Serie A chief.
However, the Italian Football Association remains confident it can meet the deadline, with work underway in Bologna and Florence and scope to bring Rome's Olympic Stadium and the current San Siro venue in line with specifications.
FATE OF SAN SIRO
The San Siro, with its striking spiral staircases wrapped around the outside of the stadium, was one of the symbols of Serie A's golden age in the 1990s, but much like Italian soccer in general, it has seen better days.
AC Milan and Inter - owned by U.S. investment firms RedBird and Oaktree respectively - have billed as unfeasible a full revamp of the arena, officially known as the Giuseppe Meazza after a forward who played for both clubs in the 1920s-1940s.
AC Milan and Inter are in talks to jointly buy the stadium, built in 1926, and the surrounding area from the Milan municipality as part of a 1.2 billion euro redevelopment including a real estate project.
The plan, first presented in 2019, envisages the clubs continuing to use the 76,000-seater stadium until a new one is built nearby. Once that is ready, the old ground would be demolished except for a heritage section comprising part of its second tier.
The clubs, however, face opposition from those who would like to preserve one of the temples of Italian soccer.
"It is still a functional stadium. It can be modernised, and we have fought for that, but the problem is that no one is listening to our calls," said Luigi Corbani, president of a citizens' committee opposing clubs' demolition plans.
Even rock stars who love playing concerts in the huge San Siro have chimed in.
"It is the greatest stadium in the world, it has personality, heart and soul," Bruce Springsteen's guitarist Steven Van Zandt, aka Little Steven, told Italy's Corriere della Sera daily, calling plans to knock it down "criminal".
($1 = 0.7378 pounds)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
38 minutes ago
- CNA
England's French pressing problem leads to Women's Euro defeat
ZURICH :England came into the Women's Euros as reigning champions and promptly fell into a trap set for them by a cunning French side who ruthlessly exploited their errors en route to a 2-1 Group D win on Saturday that puts the Lionesses in a precarious position after their opening game. A bright start for England resulted in a disallowed goal before giving way to a flat, listless performance that saw them concede two goals in the first half and, despite a late onslaught following a Keira Walsh goal, there were few positives England could take from the game. Faced with the lightning counter-attacking of France, England could not afford to give away the ball but they did so repeatedly and cheaply, especially in the middle of the field. "The positive is that I've not seen us like that, in terms of turning the ball over so much, for a while," England captain Leah Williamson said. "When you lose the ball cheaply, you're defending in an emergency. When you concede four or five counter-attacks in a row against quality like France have, it is tough." As England coach Sarina Wiegman pointed out after the game, the French were selective in how they pressed, waiting until England tried to pass their way out of small spaces and pouncing on any poor touch that was made. The French attack, which often looked static on the night, took winning possession as a cue to surge towards the English goal and by the time the Lionesses showed any sign of solving the puzzle posed by the French press, it was too late. England now face Netherlands on Wednesday knowing another defeat will see them out of the competition. "It was a big game as it was but now it's an even bigger game for us as a must-win," winger Beth Mead said. "We'll analyse this game that we've just played, we'll put ourselves in good stead, and we'll prepare the best we can for the Netherlands game."
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Commentary: Whose job is safe from AI?
LONDON: As artificial intelligence becomes ever more capable, is any job secure? 'I've sort of convinced myself that the safest job in the world is probably gardener,' the FT's chief economics commentator Martin Wolf recently confessed. That seemed right. There are some things the computers just can't do. The next morning the FT published The Gardens That AI Grew, describing intelligently automated drip irrigation, pest detectors, laser scarecrow systems and a solar-powered weeding robot. Oof. It's not entirely clear how much the laser scarecrow and the robot weeder really will threaten the jobs of human gardeners, but the prospect reminds us that there is a distinction between a job and a task. Most jobs are bundles of interconnected tasks. A gardener needs to do everything from mowing and weeding to diagnosing a pest infestation, designing an outdoor space, or – hardest of all – communicating with a difficult client. Different AI systems could well help with most of these tasks, although the likely outcome is not that the job of gardener disappears, but that it changes shape. The question is, how will each new AI application change the shape of what we do? And will we like the reworked jobs available to us on the other side of this transformation? TECHNOLOGY, BOTH OLD AND NEW Generative AI may be new but these questions are not. They run all the way back to the Luddite protests of the early 1800s, when highly skilled textile workers saw machines doing the hardest parts of their job, allowing them to be replaced by low-paid labourers with far less expertise. And the answers to those long-standing questions? They depend both on the technology and on the job. There's a lesson to be drawn from two contrasting precedents: the digital spreadsheet, and warehouse guidance earpieces such as the 'Jennifer unit'. The digital spreadsheet, which hit the market in 1979, instantly and flawlessly performed work previously done by accounting clerks, but the accounting profession simply moved on to more strategic and creative problems, modelling different scenarios and risks. Who doesn't want a creative accountant? The Jennifer unit is a headset to guide warehouse pickers as they scurry around grabbing merchandise off shelves, whispering in their ears as it tracks their last move and guides their next one. The unit removes the last vestige of cognitive load from a physically demanding job that was already mind-numbing. It is a stark contrast to the digital spreadsheet, which excised the most tedious part of a varied and highly skilled job. The lesson: AI can make a boring job even more boring and an interesting job even more interesting. New data and a new perspective on these questions come from MIT researchers David Autor and Neil Thompson. Autor and Thompson begin a new research paper titled 'Expertise' by posing a question: would we expect accounting clerks and inventory clerks to be similarly affected by automation? There are several well-established approaches to analysing this question, and all of them suggest that the answer is 'yes'. Back in the day, both types of clerk spent a lot of time performing routine intellectual tasks such as spotting discrepancies, compiling inventories or tables of data, and doing simple arithmetic on a large scale. All of these tasks were the kind of things that computers could do, and as computers became cheap enough they took over. Given the same tasks faced the same sort of automation, it seems logical that both jobs would change in similar ways. THE JOBS AI CAN DO, AND CAN'T But that is not what happened. In particular, say Autor and Thompson, wages for accounting clerks rose, while wages for inventory clerks fell. This is because most jobs are not random collections of unrelated tasks. They are bundles of tasks that are most efficiently done by the same person for a variety of unmysterious reasons. Remove some tasks from the bundle and the rest of the job changes. Inventory clerks lost the bit of the job requiring most education and training (the arithmetic) and became more like shelf-stackers. Accounting clerks also lost the arithmetic, but what remained required judgment, analysis and sophisticated problem solving. Although the same kind of tasks had been automated away, the effect was to make inventory clerking a job requiring less training and less expertise, while accounting clerks needed to be more expert than before. The natural worry for anyone hoping to have a job in five years' time is what AI might do to that job. And while there are few certainties, Autor and Thompson's framework does suggest a clarifying question: does AI look like it is going to do the most highly skilled part of your job or the low-skill rump that you've not been able to get rid of? The answer to that question may help to predict whether your job is about to get more fun or more annoying – and whether your salary is likely to rise, or fall as your expert work is devalued like the expert work of the Luddites. For example, generative AI systems are great brainstormers. They make unexpected connections and produce lots of varied ideas. When I'm running a role-playing game, that's great. They accelerate the preparation and let me get straight to the good stuff, which is sitting around the table with my friends pretending to be wizards. For someone whose job offers occasional oases of creative brainstorming in a desert of menial administration, the emergence of industrial brainstorming engines might be rather less liberating. Or consider that gardener. Perhaps the worst part of their job is trying to compose emails to desk-based clients who seem far more fluent in the medium than someone who spends most of their time outside. Laser scarecrows and robot weeders be damned. What the gardener needs is an AI secretary, scribe and editor. And the technology for that is already here.
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Reigning champions England beaten 2-1 by France in Women's Euro opener
France forwards Marie-Antoinette Katoto and Sandy Baltimore scored first-half goals as they beat reigning champions England 2-1 in their Women's Euro Group D opener on Saturday, handing Lionesses manager Sarina Wiegman her first defeat at the finals of the competition. After championship-winning runs with Netherlands in 2017 and England in 2022, Wiegman came into the game unbeaten in 12 games at the Euro finals, but the beginning of the end of that run came when Katoto scored from close range in the 36th minute. Her goal was the result of a brilliantly simple counter-attack, with Elisa De Almeida winning the ball and sending it down the line for Delphine Cascarino to chase and she squared it perfectly for Katoto to score with a simple finish. The second goal three minutes later was a virtuoso solo performance from Sandy Baltimore, who dribbled and jinked and almost lost the ball before firing it high over Hampton into the net from a tight angle. An uncharacteristically rudderless England did not register a shot on target until Keira Walsh reduced the deficit with a strike from distance in the 87th minute, prompting a late charge from the Lionesses. Alessia Russo and Grace Clinton both went close and 19-year-old substitute Michelle Agyemang had a goal-bound effort blocked by Selma Bacha, who threw herself at everything to protect the French goal in the closing minutes as her side hung on to win. Netherlands, who beat debutantes Wales 3-0 earlier on Saturday, top the group after the first round of games ahead of their clash with England on Wednesday in Zurich, while France can book their spot in the knockout stage with a win over Wales in St. Gallen the same evening.
