The charming corner of Norfolk rejecting the second homes tax
Much of this ire is focused in a quiet corner of North Norfolk, in the village of Burnham Market, in an area widely known as Chelsea-on-Sea. Here, almost 10pc of properties are second homes.
In 2023, villagers voted to stop properties from being turned into holiday homes through the planning system, and then the council hit owners with a 100pc tax surcharge.
Almost all of Norfolk penalises second home owners with higher council tax – except for one area which, by contrast, greets them with open arms.
Welcome to Wymondham, in the heart of South Norfolk. It is far less flashy than its northerly counterparts. Its medieval streets are littered with thatched cottages, timber-framed properties and a historic abbey. The high street is packed with independent shops, and the cobbled market cross hosts a farmer's market every Friday.
There is the annual Wymondham duck race, when hundreds of rubber ducks are launched down the river on May Day. Wymondham in Bloom transforms the high street during the summer months.
It is the kind of place where everyone knows everyone – the locals can point out the Airbnb and second home hotspots. Yet they are welcoming of these visitors, as the high street cries out for more business.
'We need second home owners,' says Nicky O'Grady, a Wymondham local and owner of the Enchanted Willow flower shop.
'We need the footfall, and want the town to become more discovered. Second home owners can often afford to spend money and buy local produce. You can't just rely on locals for business.'
'Taxation for taxation's sake'
While its neighbours have doubled tax on second homes, South Norfolk Council chose not to, deciding that it would have been 'taxation for taxation's sake'.
The 100pc council tax premium on second homes was introduced by 230 councils across the country on April 1. It means a second home owner in Wymondham will pay £2,258 for a Band D property in council tax. Across the border in Great Yarmouth or North Norfolk, the same second home would attract a bill of more than £4,000.
There are 667 second homes in the district, which is dwarfed in comparison to the 5,973 in North Norfolk. Yet local authorities with as few as six second homes – including Sandwell Borough Council in the West Midlands – have introduced the levy.
The town hall resisted this attack on second home owners, saying it didn't believe in 'taxation for taxation's sake'. So the area remains an attractive second home destination, with the Norfolk Broads National Park nearby.
Kyrena O'Brien, of local estate agency, TW Gaze, said the market in Wymondham is 'really active at the moment', with lots of interest from buyers.
'Wymondham is the most sought-after area in South Norfolk, it's getting more and more popular. The town is very welcoming of Airbnbs and short-term lets. It's getting busier, and that's a good thing.'
She adds: 'This is the perfect place if you can't afford to be right on the sea, but you can get there quickly. It's also really easy to get to London via the A11 and has good train lines from Norwich, so it's a good place for a second home.'
It's still an affordable place to buy, with median house prices just above the national average, at £300,000.
'We need the footfall'
As is the case in so many small towns, its high street has struggled. Wymondham residents, Karen and Michael Graham, both 64, have seen an increasing number of businesses shut up shop over the years.
'The high street used to have wonderful butchers and fishmongers, etc,' says Karen. 'Second homes mean tourists are coming in, which helps the economy. We need the footfall.'
Michael says that instead of buying in Chelsea-on-Sea, second home owners should set their sights further south. 'There are lots of places here that are extremely nice.'
Their sentiment is echoed by local businesses. O'Grady, who runs the flower shop, says the town is 'lovely, but undiscovered', and adds that she can't 'just rely on locals for business'.
'We love tourism here. We need the second home owners. We want the town to become more discovered. I worry about the high street,' she added.
Her shop, which is one of its oldest buildings, recently received royal approval when Princess Ann took a bunch of the Enchanted Willow's flowers on a visit to the local hospital.
A change is coming
The South Norfolk council area stretches from Diss in the south to the outskirts of Norwich, and creeps east towards the coast, bordering Great Yarmouth. As local government funding wanes, this second home tax haven may cease to exist next year.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves' Budget hiked employer National Insurance contributions, indirectly costing councils an extra £1.13bn this year. And the spending review fell 'well short of filling the projected £2.2bn funding gap faced by county and unitary councils next year', the County Councils Network said.
South Norfolk District Council has suggested that it may have to bring in the levy because of a lack of government support.
Daniel Elmer, the council leader, said: 'South Norfolk Council took the decision not to increase council tax on second homes this year as we do not believe in taxation simply for taxation's sake.
'Unfortunately, due to the reduced support from central government and the current financial situation, we have had to agree to introduce the increase from next year so that we can use the added revenue to help reduce the overall tax burden for our residents.'
This move may not be wholly supported by Wymondham's locals, however.
Buster Smith, South Norfolk born-and-bred, says: 'There is nothing in Wymondham now. It's just charity shops. We need people here!'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
21 minutes ago
- Times
British Business Bank back in black with £144 million profit
Britain's state economic development agency has returned to profit, and its investment portfolio grew by almost a fifth, as it prepares for a beefed-up role after recent government changes. The British Business Bank, established in 2014 to improve the flow of finance to private companies, generated a pre-tax profit of £144 million in its last financial year — after two consecutive years of losses, including a £131 million loss in the 12 months to March 2024 — boosted by the performance of its investments. The bank provides wholesale finance to equity and debt providers but can also invest up to £60 million directly in individual companies. • British Business Bank marks tenth anniversary of doing deals After the government's recent five-year spending review and industrial strategy, the agency's role has been significantly increased. The government committed £6.6 billion of new capital to the British Business Bank in June, taking its financial capacity to £25.6 billion. Ministers are seeking to stimulate investment in promising UK companies to help drive economic growth and productivity and enable companies to scale up at home rather than overseas, particularly in the US. The annual report for the bank, which has its headquarters in Sheffield, shows that its investment portfolio has increased in value by 19 per cent to £4.7 billion. It supported a total of £6.8 billion of finance for smaller businesses, made up of £1.2 billion deployed by the agency, £2.6 billion of lending guaranteed and £3 billion of private sector capital that it 'crowded in'. As a result, it said, 24,000 businesses that haven't previously been supported by the bank received funding, plus 4,000 that have previously benefited. Louis Taylor, chief executive of the British Business Bank and a former boss of UK Export Finance, the government's export credit agency, said its activities from the last year were forecast to create 38,000 extra jobs and £8 billion of gross value added 'over the life of the finance'. Taylor, 58, whose total pay was £460,800, added: 'We have undertaken a significant reshaping of our organisation to prepare for an expanded mandate and long-term ambitions. Having an economic development bank with permanent capital and a consistent risk appetite, underpinning the UK venture and growth market through its cycles, is a powerful and very positive development.' Despite the market volatility generated by President Trump's tariffs war, the agency said it did not expect 'any direct impact' on its investment portfolio given its UK focus and it not being concentrated in sectors most exposed to US tariffs. • Keir Starmer unveils 'targeted, long-term' industrial strategy The bank's expanded role includes the British Growth Partnership, an investment vehicle seeking to raise hundreds of millions of pounds from UK pension funds and other institutions to back British venture capital. For the first time, it will be managing capital on behalf of pension funds together with other institutional investors. Aegon UK, NatWest Cushon and London CIV, a grouping of local government pension schemes, have expressed interest in working with it.
Times
29 minutes ago
- Times
Angela Rayner blocked from allowing councils to tax tourists
Angela Rayner pushed for councils to be given powers to tax tourists as part of the government's devolution agenda but was rebuffed by the Treasury. The deputy prime minister wanted to give directly elected mayors the ability to charge their own taxes on hotel stays as part of the government's Devolution Bill, published earlier this month. However, the move, first reported by The Daily Telegraph, was rebuffed by Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, amid fears that it could reduce revenues for businesses already struggling with higher national insurance taxes and rises in the minimum wage. A spokesman for Rayner's department did not deny the rift, saying only that there were 'currently no plans to introduce a tourism tax in England'. Many European cities, including Barcelona, Lisbon, Venice and Amsterdam, charge tourists a tax on the cost of hotel rooms and private rentals, either as a flat rate or percentage of the room charge. Cities in Scotland have their own tax-raising powers. Visitors to Edinburgh and Glasgow will pay 5 per cent on hotel stays from July next year and January 2027 respectively. Andy Burnham, the Labour mayor of Greater Manchester, is among the local leaders pushing to be allowed to charge more in England, while Sir Sadiq Khan, the London mayor, has suggested he would be open to a tourist tax in the capital that would provide more revenue for local projects. Last month, both mayors signed a joint letter with their counterparts in Liverpool, the North East, West Yorkshire and the West Midlands, calling for 'Barcelona-style' tourist tax. • The Sunday Times view: Business is an easy target for tax. Ministers should resist News of the disagreement over a tourism levy came as polling suggested the public would support a new tax regime to attract wealthy foreigners to the UK, provided they use private schools and private healthcare. In total, 67 per cent of people — and 69 per cent of Labour voters — supported special tax treatment for high net-worth investors, according to a report published on Tuesday. A majority of the population said they believed Britain should allow more of the world's wealthiest investors into the country, but only if they make a contribution to the economy and its public finances. Some 66 per cent thought part of that contract should be that foreign investors are banned from using the NHS or the state education system. The survey results were contained in a report jointly published by Onward, a think tank set up by the former Conservative MP Sir Simon Clarke, and the Adam Smith Institute, the free-market campaign group. Called The Prosperity Package, the report calls for a new tax regime for global investors to help stop the exodus of wealth from the UK. Britain is estimated to have lost a quarter of its billionaires over the past two years and is expected to lose a record 16,500 millionaires this year, according to research published over the past month. The acceleration in wealth migration since Labour came to power follows Reeves's decision to abolish the non-domiciled tax regime and apply inheritance tax to family businesses and farms. The old non-dom regime allowed wealthy foreigners who had lived in Britain for more than seven years to avoid paying UK taxes on their worldwide earnings in exchange for a fee starting at £30,000 a year. In its place, Labour introduced a new residence-based system that makes wealthy foreigners pay UK tax on their global earnings after living in the UK for four years, while their worldwide assets become subject to UK inheritance tax after ten years. • Surge in wealthy using insurance to beat inheritance tax hit The authors of The Prosperity Package report suggest an alternative that they believe would boost growth and increase tax revenue by attracting global investors to the UK. Under their scheme, wealthy foreigners would be allowed to move to the UK and keep their global assets, income and gains away from the taxman for 15 years in exchange for an annual fee of £300,000. In addition, applicants would be required to invest a minimum of £3 million into one of eight government-designated 'Industrial Strategy Sectors', delivering cash into areas such as clean energy, the life sciences, and digital technologies. Those who apply to the scheme would also have 'no recourse to public funds' and be required to take out private health insurance and educate their children in the private school system. When the proposed scheme was put to a representative sample of 2,000 Britons, it was supported by 53 per cent of respondents and opposed by only 15 per cent. • Non-dom crackdown 'could leave £4bn hole in public finances' The report says that modelling of the regime suggests that if implemented and taken up by 1,000 people, it would give a £30 billion boost to the economy after ten years and raise a cumulative £13 billion in extra tax revenues. The proposal has similarities to the previous Conservative government's Tier 1 investor visa scheme, which required applicants to invest a minimum of £2 million in either UK government bonds, British shares or loans to UK-registered companies. That scheme was abolished in 2022 after being criticised for being open to abuse by allowing foreigners with questionable sources of wealth to gain residency. The authors of The Prosperity Package report say their proposal would raise more tax revenue and they propose stricter checks on applicants. • Why the super-rich are leaving Britain Maxwell Marlow, of the Adam Smith Institute and author of the report, said: 'The public are clear — they want fairness, not a fortress. If the wealthy contribute significantly and don't draw on the state, most voters are open to their investment. Our proposal meets this test and puts Britain back in the race to attract global capital.' The plan has already attracted some cross-party support. Lord Mendelsohn, the Labour peer and the party's former business and trade spokesman in the House of Lords, said: 'I do not agree with some colleagues that we should wave goodbye to the wealthy; we should be doing whatever we can to welcome them back, and new investors, entrepreneurs, and high spenders to our shores. 'Crucially though, they must contribute to Britain, rather than just using it.'
Sky News
39 minutes ago
- Sky News
Could your summer holiday be greener? Government invests £63m into more sustainable types of jet fuel
The government is investing £63m in new types of jet fuel that it hopes will make your summer holiday a little more eco-friendly - though not everyone is convinced. The cash will be shared by 17 British companies developing different types of "sustainable aviation fuel" (SAF), made from materials including forest cuttings, household rubbish, sugar beet or hydrogen gas. Ministers said the funds could support 1,400 jobs, add £5bn to the economy and help the British industry get ahead as global demand for SAF soars in order to meet stricter climate targets. But campaigners question how sustainable these fuels really are, saying the real answer is to deter "frequent flying". They warn the materials needed for sustainable fuels are hard to come by and too expensive to ever scale up. Industry says it needs this cash injection precisely in order to lower costs and grow, and global demand is booming. 1:55 As of January, flights taking off from the UK must use 2% SAF in their fuel, under new government rules. This will gradually rise to 10% in 2030 and 22% in 2040. But there have been alarm bells warning not enough SAF will be available to meet those targets. The government says sustainable fuels cut emissions of greenhouse gases by 70% on average compared with kerosene over the course of its life, which includes producing it and burning it. Aviation minister Mike Kane said: "We're not just backing brilliant British innovation, we're creating thousands of high-skilled jobs and positioning the UK at the forefront of the global sustainable aviation market." He said the move would "kickstart economic growth, secure energy independence, and make Britain a clean energy superpower". But campaigners say at best the fuels will reduce aviation emissions "by a tiny fraction of the amount needed", and are being used to justify "irresponsible levels" of airport expansion. James Sutton, co-director of climate charity Possible, told Sky News they were not anti-investment, but that the SAF plans would not bring down emissions at the pace and scale necessary. He said: "We need to cut those emissions immediately if we have any hope of hitting our climate goals, not just sit and hope for the best in a few decades time. "The technology and investment required for SAF to displace kerosene entirely is simply not there yet, but policies aimed at reducing demand for flights and taxing frequent flyers, which will therefore cut emissions, are possible now. "So that is what we need to focus on first and foremost." The biggest winner in this round of funding was Stockton-on-Tees based Alfanar Energy, which will get £8m for converting waste wood from sawmills and forestry into SAF.
